Objective: Disasters such as pandemics and natural catastrophes cause significant psychological distress, increasing the risk of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of remote mental health interventions, such as telepsychiatry, online cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), mobile applications, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools, during disasters. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using international databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL) and Korean domestic databases (KISS, RISS, DBpia, KMbase, KoreaMed). Studies published between January 2010 and February 2025 were screened following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Two board-certified psychiatrists independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full texts. Peer-reviewed articles and relevant grey literature, including government manuals and expert guidelines, were included. Results: A total of 147 studies were synthesized, including randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, observational studies, and policy documents. Evidence showed that remote interventions effectively reduced symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Online CBT was beneficial for mild to moderate distress; mobile apps facilitated psychoeducation and symptom tracking; and telepsychiatry ensured care continuity, especially in underserved areas. AI tools showed promise in screening and triage but require better clinical integration. Effectiveness was highest when interventions were implemented early, integrated within stepped-care models, and guided by trained professionals. Conclusion Remote mental health interventions are practical and effective tools for bridging mental health care gaps during disasters. To ensure sustainability, these interventions should be integrated into national disaster mental health frameworks, accompanied by adequate funding, clinician training, legal safeguards, and cultural adaptation.

Objectives: This study examined the experiences and perceptions of healthcare safety management specialists regarding suicide and self-harm incidents in hospitals. The aim was to assess the current state of in-hospital suicide prevention systems, identify vulnerabilities according to the institution type, and suggest directions for improving the related policies and safety guidelines. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted among 152 healthcare safety management specialists. Data were collected via an online questionnaire between May and June 2022. The survey items included experiences with suicide and self-harm incidents, types of incidents, components of prevention systems, staff training, and follow-up measures. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for analysis, including chi-square tests for comparisons across hospital types. Results: The most frequently reported suicide methods were hanging (40.1%) and jumping (28.3%), while self-harm incidents often involved self-injury (45.4%). Only 55.3% of respondents indicated that institutional guidelines on suicide/self-harm were present and implemented. Multidisciplinary treatment planning and suicide prevention education for all staff were lacking, showing 32.2% and 27.6%, respectively. Significant differences were observed across hospital types regarding the existence and implementation of prevention guidelines (p<0.01). Conclusion Despite the increasing awareness, substantial variability remains in suicide prevention preparedness across hospital types. Strengthening institutional guidelines, environmental modifications, and multidisciplinary approaches, particularly in nursing hospitals, is critical. Policy support for standardizing mental health consultations and mandatory staff training is essential for enhancing suicide prevention in hospitals.

Objective: The increasing concern over adolescent suicide necessitates suicide prevention training for school teachers, as students spend a significant portion of their time at school. This study’s objective is to develop a suicide prevention program tailored for teachers. Methods: The program was developed by a multidisciplinary research team, drawing on a review of both domestic and international suicide prevention programs, related scholarly articles, and Korean psychological autopsy interviews of adolescents. This was complemented by a survey of teachers to assess the program’s practicality and usability. Results: The developed program comprises three parts, consistent with other versions: Careful Observation, Active Listening, and Risk Evaluation and Expert Referral. Careful Observation focuses on training teachers to recognize verbal, behavioral, and situational warning signs of suicidal ideation in students; Active Listening involves strategies for encouraging students to express their suicidal thoughts and techniques for being an empathetic and attentive listener; Risk Evaluation and Expert Referral provides instruction on how to assess suicide risk and assist students safely. Conclusion It is anticipated that this program will equip teachers with valuable knowledge and skills, contributing to a reduction in adolescents suicide rates.

Objective: North Korean defectors (NKDs) have experienced substantial difficulties during the migration and settlement in South Korea. They have a high prevalence of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicidal behaviors. The high prevalence of mental disorders among NKDs can lead to a high suicide rate. However, there are no suicide prevention programs for NKDs. This study aims to customize a suicide prevention program with content suitable for NKDs’ particular circumstances. Methods: A multidisciplinary research team developed this program based on domestic and international gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention and articles related to suicide prevention. Results: We developed a multi-part gatekeeper training program, “Suicide CARE for NKDs.” In the “Introduction,” trainees learn about the need for the program and its importance. In “Careful observation,” trainees learn to recognize linguistic, behavioral, and situational signals of suicide risk. In “Active listening,” trainees learn how to ask about suicidal thoughts and to listen empathetically. In “Risk evaluation and expert referral,” trainees learn to evaluate suicide risk and to connect NKDs with institutes or services. Conclusion We expect this program to become useful for training gatekeepers to prevent suicide among NKD. A future follow-up study is needed to confirm the efficacy of the program.

Objectives: ：Cancer diagnosis causes significant distress while it may also bring positive change: post-traumatic growth. This study was conducted to analyze factors that affect post-traumatic growth. Methods: ：Medical records of 52 cancer patients who received psychiatric treatment at a university hospital in Seoul were reviewed and the correlation between post-traumatic growth and following factors were analyzed: Resilience, Anxious thoughts and tendencies, Mindful attention awareness, Acceptance attitude Results: ：Using Multiple Generalized Linear model, a positive correlation was found between post-traumatic growth and resilience (B=1.45, p<0.0001), mindful attention awareness (B=0.58, p=0.0030) and acceptance attitude (B=1.29, p=0.0003), while anxious thoughts and tendencies (B=-0.84, p<0.0001) had negative association. Conclusions ：Factors that have a positive impact on post-traumatic growth were resilience, mindful attention awareness, acceptance attitude and a factor with a negative impact was anxious thoughts and tendencies; Factors that impact post-traumatic growth need to be taken into account, when approaching the treatment of cancer patients.