1.Patient-reported outcomes after hemorrhoid surgery: early results from a prospective, nationwide, real-world, cohort study on diverse approaches
Metin KEMENT ; Atıf TEKIN ; Hakan BAYSAL ; Salih TOSUN ; Orhan ALIMOĞLU ; İlker SÜCÜLLÜ ; Osman CIVIL ; Nevin SAKOĞLU ; Naciye Çiğdem ARSLAN ; Cihad TATAR ; Ali Emre NAYCI ; Aziz ARI ; Ensar ÇAKIR ; Rozan KAYA ; İlknur TURAN ; Taygun GÜLŞEN ; Serhat MERIÇ ; Erkan YAVUZ ; Nihat BUĞDAYCI ; Farid Mohamad HAMAD ; Sezai LEVENTOĞLU ; Ramazan KOZAN ; Özkan AKPINAR ; Hakan YANAR ; Fatih YANAR ; Hasan Fehmi KÜÇÜK ; Mehmet KARAHAN ; Selçuk KAYA ; Nail Can ADIGÜZEL ; Tolga ÖNDER ; İlker ABCI ; Ahmet Zeki AYDIN ; Ömer Faruk ÖZKAN ; Nurhilal KIZILTOPRAK ; Berkay ÖZCAN ; Anıl ORHAN ; Alp Ömer CANTÜRK ; Murat TAN ; Yusuf BILGIN ; Harun ÇOK ; Azamet CEZIT ; Mehmet Mahir FERSAHOĞLU ; Mustafa ÖNCEL
Annals of Coloproctology 2025;41(6):573-585
Purpose:
Real-world evidence comparing surgical techniques for symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease (HD) remains limited, despite the availability of multiple approaches. This study aimed to evaluate short-term, interim outcomes from a prospective, nationwide cohort study that compared the effectiveness of different operative techniques based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with symptomatic HD.
Methods:
A prospective, nationwide cohort study was conducted at 20 tertiary care centers across Turkiye between July 2022 and July 2024. Adult patients aged 18 years or older with symptomatic HD (grades I–IV) who underwent surgery during this period were included. The choice of procedure was determined by the operating surgeon, and patients were categorized into excisional, fixative, and ablative groups according to the surgical approach used. The primary outcomes were changes in the Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score, Short Health ScaleHD, visual analog scale for pain, and patient satisfaction, assessed from the preoperative period to postoperative day 7 and postoperative week 6.
Results:
The study included a total of 315 patients after excluding those who did not fulfil the inclusion criteria. Among them, 239 (78.9%) were male, with a mean age of 43.7±11.7 years. The distribution of patients across surgical groups was 207 (65.7%) in the excisional group, 30 (9.5%) in the fixative group, and 78 (24.8%) in the ablative group. All groups demonstrated significant improvements in PROM scores from preoperative to postoperative assessments. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups at any time point for PROM scores or for changes in PROM scores across consecutive evaluations (P≥0.05 for all comparisons). Urinary retention occurred more frequently, and hospital stays were longer in the fixative group (P=0.006 and P<0.001, respectively). The excisional group had a greater need for narcotic use and longer duration of use (P=0.003 and P<0.001, respectively).
Conclusion
This real-world cohort study shows that all 3 surgical approaches are effective for HD, providing comparable short-term symptomatic relief and patient satisfaction. These techniques appear equally valid treatment options, and the choice of procedure may best be individualized based on patient-specific characteristics and surgeon preference.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05429060
2.Scapular spine base fracture with long outside-in superior or posterior screws with reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Osman Nuri EROĞLU ; Buğra HÜSEMOĞLU ; Onur BAŞÇI ; Mustafa ÖZKAN ; Hasan HAVITÇIOĞLU ; Onur HAPA
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2021;24(3):141-146
Background:
The purpose of the present study was to determine how long superior screws alone or in combination with posterior placement of metaglene screws protruding and penetrating into the scapular spine in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty affect the strength of thescapular spine in a fresh cadaveric scapular model.
Methods:
Seven fresh cadaver scapulas were allocated to the control group (short posterior and superior screws) and seven scapulars to thestudy group (spine base fixation with a four long screws, three with both long superior and long posterior screws).
Results:
The failure load was lower in the spine fixation group (long screw, 869 N vs. short screw, 1,123 N); however, this difference did notreach statistical significance (p>0.05). All outside-in long superior or superior plus posterior screws failed due to scapular spine base fracture; failures in the short screw group were due to acromion fracture. An additional posterior outside-in screw failed to significantly decrease the failure load of the acromion spine.
Conclusions
The present study highlights the significance of preventing a cortical breach or an outside-in configuration when a superioror posterior screw is inserted into the scapular spine base.
3.Scapular spine base fracture with long outside-in superior or posterior screws with reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Osman Nuri EROĞLU ; Buğra HÜSEMOĞLU ; Onur BAŞÇI ; Mustafa ÖZKAN ; Hasan HAVITÇIOĞLU ; Onur HAPA
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2021;24(3):141-146
Background:
The purpose of the present study was to determine how long superior screws alone or in combination with posterior placement of metaglene screws protruding and penetrating into the scapular spine in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty affect the strength of thescapular spine in a fresh cadaveric scapular model.
Methods:
Seven fresh cadaver scapulas were allocated to the control group (short posterior and superior screws) and seven scapulars to thestudy group (spine base fixation with a four long screws, three with both long superior and long posterior screws).
Results:
The failure load was lower in the spine fixation group (long screw, 869 N vs. short screw, 1,123 N); however, this difference did notreach statistical significance (p>0.05). All outside-in long superior or superior plus posterior screws failed due to scapular spine base fracture; failures in the short screw group were due to acromion fracture. An additional posterior outside-in screw failed to significantly decrease the failure load of the acromion spine.
Conclusions
The present study highlights the significance of preventing a cortical breach or an outside-in configuration when a superioror posterior screw is inserted into the scapular spine base.
4. Antimicrobial resistance and underlying mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus isolates
Ebru Şebnem YILMAZ ; Özkan ASLANTAŞ
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 2017;10(11):1059-1064
Objective To investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility of 97 clinical Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) strains against 14 antimicrobials and corresponding resistance mechanisms. Methods The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates was determined using a disk diffusion method and antimicrobial resistance genes were screened by polymerase chain reaction. Mutations responsible for ciprofloxacin and rifampicin resistance were investigated by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. Results All isolates were found to be susceptible to vancomycin. Various rates of resistance to penicillin (83.5%), ampicillin (77.3%), erythromycin (63.9%), tetracycline (16.5%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (16.5%), ciprofloxacin (15.5%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (15.5%), oxacillin (13.4%), fusidic acid (12.4%), rifampin (6.2%), clindamycin (6.2%), gentamicin (6.2%) and mupirocin (5.2%) were determined. In addition, different combinations of resistance genes were identified among resistant isolates. Ciprofloxacin resistant isolates had mutations in codon 84 (Ser84Leu) and 106 (Gly106Asp) in the gyrA gene. Mutations in grlA were mostly related to Ser80Phe substitution. Leu466Ser mutation in the rpoB gene was detected in all rifampin resistant isolates. All methicillin resistant S. aureus isolates were SCCmec type V. Conclusions In conclusion, it was determined that the isolates were resistant to different classes of antimicrobials at varying rates and resistance was mediated by different genetic mechanisms. Therefore, continuous monitoring of resistance in S. aureus strains is necessary to control their resistance for clinically important antimicrobials.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail