PURPOSE: Polytrauma is still a challenge for health care organizations. Today, the search for factors to reduce lethality continues. This study aims to describe the causes of death associated with polytrauma in 1 year. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed autopsy data of trauma deaths in Moscow for the whole of 2017. We identified victims with polytrauma, taking into account the Berlin definition as the main inclusion criteria with penetrating and blunt trauma. Each forensic report had information about the pre-hospital and hospital stages of treatment and autopsy data. The exclusion criteria for this study were: isolated injury, forensic reports not related to the examination of entire corpses, and autopsy studies of children (<18 years old). Statistical analysis was performed according to basic principles, including a comparison of groups using the Chi-squared test with Bonferroni comparison test and Fisher's exact test. The critical level of significance (p value) in testing statistical hypotheses in this study was taken as 0.05. RESULTS: We analyzed 2337 forensic medical examinations of victims who died of trauma in Moscow in 2017, of which 41.5% (n = 969) were polytrauma deaths. Most of the victims (65.4%, n = 634) died on the scene, and only 30.0% were admitted to the hospital. The most frequent cause of death was bleeding (72.0%, n = 698), followed by traumatic brain injury (43.8%, n = 424). They accounted for the first peak (78.4%, p = 0.005) of deaths, occurring in the first hours. Then these causes of death in the first peak go down in a few hours, and the second peak of mortality appears in 3 - 7 days (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This is the largest full-year autopsy study of polytrauma victims. Our data show that the main cause of polytrauma death is massive bleeding, with a lethality peak in the first hours after injury. The time distribution of polytrauma deaths has a bimodal pattern - the second period of polytrauma deaths occurs in 3 - 7 days.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Female ; Moscow/epidemiology* ; Autopsy ; Multiple Trauma/mortality* ; Adult ; Adolescent ; Middle Aged ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cause of Death ; Young Adult ; Infant ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over

PURPOSE: The mortality rate for severely injured patients with the injury severity score (ISS) ≥16 has decreased in Germany. There is robust evidence that mortality is influenced not only by the acute trauma itself but also by physical health, age and sex. The aim of this study was to identify other possible influences on the mortality of severely injured patients. METHODS: In a matched-pair analysis of data from Trauma Register DGU®, non-surviving patients from Germany between 2009 and 2014 with an ISS≥16 were compared with surviving matching partners. Matching was performed on the basis of age, sex, physical health, injury pattern, trauma mechanism, conscious state at the scene of the accident based on the Glasgow coma scale, and the presence of shock on arrival at the emergency room. RESULTS: We matched two homogeneous groups, each of which consisted of 657 patients (535 male, average age 37 years). There was no significant difference in the vital parameters at the scene of the accident, the length of the pre-hospital phase, the type of transport (ground or air), pre-hospital fluid management and amounts, ISS, initial care level, the length of the emergency room stay, the care received at night or from on-call personnel during the weekend, the use of abdominal sonographic imaging, the type of X-ray imaging used, and the percentage of patients who developed sepsis. We found a significant difference in the new injury severity score, the frequency of multi-organ failure, hemoglobine at admission, base excess and international normalized ratio in the emergency room, the type of accident (fall or road traffic accident), the pre-hospital intubation rate, reanimation, in-hospital fluid management, the frequency of transfusion, tomography (whole-body computed tomography), and the necessity of emergency intervention. CONCLUSION Previously postulated factors such as the level of care and the length of the emergency room stay did not appear to have a significant influence in this study. Further studies should be conducted to analyse the identified factors with a view to optimising the treatment of severely injured patients. Our study shows that there are significant factors that can predict or influence the mortality of severely injured patients.
Accidents ; classification ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Blood Transfusion ; Data Analysis ; Emergency Medical Services ; Female ; Fluid Therapy ; Germany ; epidemiology ; Hemoglobins ; Humans ; International Normalized Ratio ; Intubation ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Matched-Pair Analysis ; Multiple Organ Failure ; Registries ; Sex Factors ; Survival Rate ; Trauma Severity Indices ; Wounds and Injuries ; mortality

PURPOSE"Polytrauma" patients are of a higher risk of complications and death than the summation of expected mortality and morbidity of their individual injuries. The ideal goal in trauma resuscitation care is to identify and treat all injuries. With clinical and technological advanced imaging available for diagnosis and treatment of traumatic patients, point of care-rapid ultrasound in shock and hypotension (RUSH) significantly affects modern trauma services and patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of RUSH and patient outcomes by early detection of the causes of unstable polytrauma.

METHODSThis cross-sectional, prospective study included 100 unstable polytrauma patients admitted in Suez Canal University Hospital. Clinical exam, RUSH and pan-computed tomography (pan-CT) were conducted. The result of CT was taken as the standard. Patients were managed according to the advanced trauma life support (ATLS) guidelines and treated of life threatening conditions if present. Patients were followed up for 28 days for a short outcome.

RESULTSThe most diagnostic causes of unstability in polytrauma patients by RUSH are hypovolemic shock (64%), followed by obstructive shock (14%), distributive shock (12%) and cardiogenic shock (10%) respectively. RUSH had 94.2% sensitivity in the diagnosis of unstable polytrauma patients; the accuracy of RUSH in shock patients was 95.2%.

CONCLUSIONRUSH is accurate in the diagnosis of unstable polytrauma patients; and 4% of patients were diagnosed during follow-up after admission by RUSH and pan-CT.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Child ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotension ; diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Trauma ; complications ; diagnostic imaging ; mortality ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Prospective Studies ; Shock ; diagnostic imaging ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: A massive transfusion (MT) of 10 or more units of packed red blood cells (PRCs) focuses on the summation volumes over 24 hours. This traditional concept promotes survivor bias and fails to identify the “massively” transfused patient. The critical administration threshold (≥3 units of PRCs per hour, CAT+) has been proposed as a new definition of MT that includes the volume and rate of blood transfusion. This study examined the CAT in predicting mortality in adult patients with severe trauma, compared to MT. METHODS: Retrospective data of adult major trauma patients (age≥15 years, Injury Severity Score [ISS]≥16) from a regional trauma center collected between May 2016 and June 2017 were used to identify the factors associated with trauma-related death. Univariate associations were calculated, and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the parameters associated with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 540 patients were analyzed. The median ISS was 22, and the hospital mortality rate was 30.9% (n=92). Forty-two (7.8%) and 23 (4.3%) patients were CAT+ and traditional MT+, respectively. Severe brain injury, CAT+, acidosis, and elderly age were significant variables in multivariate analysis. CAT+ was associated with a fourfold increased risk of death (odds ratio, 4.427; 95% confidence interval, 1.040–18.849), but MT+ was not associated (odds, 1.837; 95% confidence interval, 0.376–8.979). CONCLUSION: The new concept of CAT for transfusion was a more useful validation concept of mortality in adult severe trauma patients on admission than traditional MT. Encompassing both the rate and volume of transfusion, CAT is a more sensitive tool than common MT definitions.
Acidosis ; Adult* ; Aged ; Animals ; Bias (Epidemiology) ; Blood Transfusion ; Brain Injuries ; Cats ; Erythrocytes ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Logistic Models ; Mortality* ; Multiple Trauma ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survivors ; Trauma Centers

PURPOSETo accurately assess the mechanism, type and severity of injury in Iranian multiple trauma patients of a trauma center.

METHODSPatients with multiple traumas referring to the emergency department of Hasheminejad University Hospital in Mashhad, Iran, entered this cross sectional study from March 2013 to December 2013. All the patients with injury severity score (ISS) > 9 were included in this study. Data analysis was performed by SPSS software (Version 11.5) and P values less than 0.05 were considered as significant differences.

RESULTSAmong the 6306 hospitalized trauma patients during this period, 148 had ISS>9. The male female ratio was 80%. The mean age of the patients was (33.5 ± 19.3) years. And 71% of the patients were younger than 44 years old. There were 19 (13%) deaths from which 68.5% were older than 44 years old. The mean transfer time from the injury scene to hospital was (55 ± 26) minutes. The most frequent mechanisms of injury were motorcycle crashes and falling from height, which together included 66.2% of all the injuries. A total of 84% of hospital deaths occurred after the first 24 h of hospitalization. Head and neck were the most common body injured areas with a prevalence of 111 cases (75%).

CONCLUSIONMotorcycle crashes have high frequency in Iran. Since most victims are young males, injury prevention strategies should be considered to reduce the burden of injuries.

Accidents, Traffic ; statistics & numerical data ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Infant ; Injury Severity Score ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Trauma ; epidemiology ; mortality ; Trauma Centers ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system are widely used for critically ill patients. We evaluated whether APACHE II score and SOFA score predict the outcome for trauma patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed trauma patients admitted to the ICU in a single trauma center between January 2014 and December 2015. The APACHE II score was figured out based on the data acquired from the first 24 hours of admission; the SOFA score was evaluated based on the first 3 days in the ICU. A total of 241 patients were available for analysis. Injury Severity score, APACHE II score, and SOFA score were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall survival rate was 83.4%. The non-survival group had a significantly high APACHE II score (24.1 ± 8.1 vs. 12.3 ± 7.2, P < 0.001) and SOFA score (7.7 ± 1.7 vs. 4.3 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) at admission. SOFA score had the highest areas under the curve (0.904). During the first 3 days, SOFA score remained high in the non-survival group. In the non-survival group, cardiovascular system, neurological system, renal system, and coagulation system scores were significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: In ICU trauma patients, both SOFA and APACHE II scores were good predictors of outcome, with the SOFA score being the most effective. In trauma ICU patients, the trauma scoring system should be complemented, recognizing that multi-organ failure is an important factor for mortality.
APACHE* ; Cardiovascular System ; Complement System Proteins ; Critical Care* ; Critical Illness ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Intensive Care Units* ; Mortality ; Multiple Trauma ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Trauma Centers

BACKGROUND: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system are widely used for critically ill patients. We evaluated whether APACHE II score and SOFA score predict the outcome for trauma patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed trauma patients admitted to the ICU in a single trauma center between January 2014 and December 2015. The APACHE II score was figured out based on the data acquired from the first 24 hours of admission; the SOFA score was evaluated based on the first 3 days in the ICU. A total of 241 patients were available for analysis. Injury Severity score, APACHE II score, and SOFA score were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall survival rate was 83.4%. The non-survival group had a significantly high APACHE II score (24.1 ± 8.1 vs. 12.3 ± 7.2, P < 0.001) and SOFA score (7.7 ± 1.7 vs. 4.3 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) at admission. SOFA score had the highest areas under the curve (0.904). During the first 3 days, SOFA score remained high in the non-survival group. In the non-survival group, cardiovascular system, neurological system, renal system, and coagulation system scores were significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: In ICU trauma patients, both SOFA and APACHE II scores were good predictors of outcome, with the SOFA score being the most effective. In trauma ICU patients, the trauma scoring system should be complemented, recognizing that multi-organ failure is an important factor for mortality.
APACHE ; Cardiovascular System ; Complement System Proteins ; Critical Care ; Critical Illness ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Intensive Care Units ; Mortality ; Multiple Trauma ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Trauma Centers

PURPOSE: The terminology that represented major trauma was vague, inconsistent, and lacked validation. The objective of this study is to investigate the new definition of polytrauma in adult patients of major trauma. METHODS: A retrospective data of adult major trauma patients [Age≥15, 16≤Injury Severity Score (ISS)<75] from a regional trauma center were collected in period between July 2011 and December 2013 and divided into two groups: polytrauma and non-polytrauma. We compared the demographic, laboratory characteristics, and outcomes in patients with major trauma, polytrauma and non-polytrauma. Univariate associations were calculated, and a multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the parameters associated with in-hospital mortality and early death. RESULTS: A total of 662 patients met the inclusion criteria for major trauma. Of these, 150 (22.7%) met the new polytrauma definition. In the major trauma group, the mean ISS was 22, in-hospital mortality rate was 23.4%, and early death rate was 20.7%. In the polytrauma group, ISS was 27, in-hospital mortality rate was 44.7%, and early death rate was 38.7%. In the non-polytrauma group, ISS was 20, in-hospital mortality rate was 17.2%, and early death rate was 15.4%. Of the five physiologic parameters (systolic blood pressure≤90 mmHg, Glasgow Coma Scale≤8, base deficit≥6, international normalized ratio≥1.4/activated partial thromboplastin time≥40 seconds, age≥70 years), the lowest in-hospital mortality was found when one parameter was involved (2.5%), and the highest mortality was found when all parameters were involved (100%). CONCLUSION: Based on “The new Berlin definition”, polytrauma was associated more with in-hospital mortality and early death than non-polytrauma in adults. The five physiologic parameters were correlated with in-hospital mortality.
Adult* ; Berlin* ; Coma ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Logistic Models ; Mortality* ; Multiple Trauma* ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Retrospective Studies ; Thromboplastin ; Trauma Centers

PURPOSE: Early assessment of injury severity is important in management of major trauma patients. In general, hypotensive major trauma patients show more severe outcomes from injuries compared with normotensive major trauma patients. In this study, we analyzed the clinical features of severe trauma patients with initial hypotension and attempted to determine the prognostic factors of mortality in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted within our hospital. Review of trauma registry data identified 679 major trauma patients (Injury severity score, ISS>15). From January 2011 to December 2013, all major trauma patients with initial systolic blood pressure lower than 90 mmHg were included (N=77). The patients were divided into two groups - those who survived and those who expired - and the differences in initial and final values were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Out of a total of 77 patients, 55 patients survived and 22 patients died. The data showed almost no difference in heart rate between the two groups. The expired group showed low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, systolic blood pressure, revised trauma score, initial pH, and follow-up pH, as well as higher age, ISS, initial lactate, prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ration (INR), and follow-up lactate, compared with the survived group. In multivariate logistic analysis, age (p=0.034, OR 1.071), GCS (p=0.006, OR 0.61), initial base excess (p=0.042, OR 0.57), and follow-up base excess (p=0.041, OR 0.799) were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: The patient's age, initial GCS, initial base excess and follow-up values of base excess were good prognostic factors for mortality in the expired major trauma patients with initial hypotension.
Blood Pressure ; Emergency Service, Hospital* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glasgow Coma Scale ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Hypotension* ; Lactic Acid ; Mortality* ; Multiple Trauma ; Prothrombin Time ; Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUND: Numerous statistical models have been developed to accurately predict outcomes in multiple trauma patients. However, such trauma scoring systems reflect the patient's physiological condition, which can only be determined to a limited extent, and are difficult to use when performing a rapid initial assessment. We studied the predictive ability of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score compared to other scoring systems. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 229 patients with multiple trauma combined with chest injury from January 2006 to June 2011. A SIRS score was calculated for patients based on their presentation to the emergency room. The patients were divided into two groups: those with an SIRS score of two points or above and those with an SIRS score of one or zero. Then, the outcomes between the two groups were compared. Furthermore, the ability of the SIRS score and other injury severity scoring systems to predict mortality was compared. RESULTS: Hospital death occurred in 12 patients (5.2%). There were no significant differences in the general characteristics of patients, but the trauma severity scores were significantly different between the two groups. The SIRS scores, number of complications, and mortality rate were significantly higher in those with a SIRS score of two or above (p<0.001). In the multivariant analysis, the SIRS score was the only independent factor related to mortality. CONCLUSION: The SIRS score is easily calculated on admission and may accurately predict mortality in patients with multiple traumas.
Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Inflammation* ; Models, Statistical ; Mortality* ; Multiple Trauma* ; Retrospective Studies ; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome ; Thoracic Injuries