PURPOSE: Surgical management of the lateral end of clavicle fractures has been a challenge for orthopedic surgeons considering the high rate of non-union. There has been no right and wrong answer to these types of fractures and many methods discussed in the literature, but the 2 most used bony procedures are hook plate and locking plate with or without the use of supplementary soft tissue procedures. The available evidence, in this case, is scarce with questionable reliability. The idea of this systemic review is to promote evidence-based practice when choosing between the 2 implants for this fracture. This study aims to review the results by performing a systemic review of the literature comparing the results of locking plate vs. hook plate for the lateral end of clavicle fracture fixation with an emphasis on outcome and associated complications. METHODS: A search of the literature was made with the keyword "clavicle" in PubMed/Ovid Medline/Embase and University of Edinburgh online library "discover Ed". A total of 4063 articles were identified including case series (with at least 3 cases) and review articles focusing on locking plate alone, comparisons of locking plate and hook plate, or hook plate alone. Articles were excluded if they were not published in English, focused on pediatric studies, or consisted only of book chapters. Studies examining tension band wiring, soft tissue procedures for fracture fixation, arthroscopic-assisted procedures, additional soft tissue procedures along with plate fixation, and fracture dislocation of the lateral end of the clavicle were also excluded. The search was then narrowed down to 21 articles after consideration of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A detailed review of the surgical methodology further excluded additional soft tissue procedures, resulting in a final selection of 15 studies. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Modified Coleman Score by the authors. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies related to Neer type II fracture met the inclusion criteria. However, 2 other studies also included type V fracture as well. The mean age of patients in these studies was 32 years. The mean follow-up period was 24.3 months (ranging from 6 to 65 months). The time of radiological union was documented from 2 to 4.5 months. Constant and disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand scores were most used as the criteria for patient outcomes. The size of the lateral fragment that can accommodate/provide bicortical fracture was documented in only 3 studies. The mean incidence of removal of hook plate was 86.9%. In contrast, the mean incidence of removal of locking plate was 27.0%. Superficial wound infection was documented in 5 studies and deep wound infection was seen in 1 study. The mean union rate for hook plate was 97.0% compared to 100% for locking plate. Complications associated with hook plate have been documented in 11 studies. The most commonly reported incidence of complication was acromial osteolysis. The quality of studies was assessed using modified Coleman score. Other than 2 studies that were considered for the study that met the "fair" standard all of them were considered "poor" based on the modified Coleman score. CONCLUSION Both hook plate and locking plate provide acceptable operative treatment options for the lateral end of clavicle fracture. However, a consideration of surgeons' experience, the likelihood of a second operation, and the size of the lateral fragment should be considered when choosing between the 2 types of implants.
Humans ; Clavicle/surgery* ; Bone Plates ; Fractures, Bone/surgery* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation*

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare pregabalin and gabapentin for mean postoperative visual analog score (VAS) for pain in patients undergoing single-level lumbar microdiscectomy for intervertebral disc prolapse at a tertiary care hospital. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Pregabalin has a superior pharmacokinetic profile and analgesic effect at lower doses than gabapentin; however, analgesic efficacy must be established during the perioperative period after lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was carried out at our institute from February to October 2011 on 78 patients, with 39 participants in each study group. Patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy were randomized to group A (gabapentin) or group B (pregabalin) and started on trial medicines one week before surgery. The VAS for pain was recorded at 24 hours and one week postoperatively. RESULTS: Both groups had similar baseline variables, with mean ages of 42 and 39 years in groups A and B, respectively, and a majority of male patients in each group. The mean VAS values for pain at 24 hours for gabapentin vs. pregabalin were comparable (1.97±0.84 vs. 1.6±0.87, respectively; p=0.087) as were the results at one week after surgery (0.27±0.45 vs. 0.3±0.46, respectively; p=0.79). None of the patients required additional analgesia postoperatively. After adjusting for age and sex, the VAS value for group B patients was 0.028 points lower than for group A patients, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.817, R²=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin is equivalent to gabapentin for the relief of postoperative pain at a lower dose in patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy. Therefore, other factors, such as dose, frequency, cost, pharmacokinetics, and side effects of these medicines, should be taken into account whenever it is prescribed.
Analgesia ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Male ; Pain, Postoperative* ; Perioperative Period ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pregabalin* ; Prolapse ; Spine ; Tertiary Healthcare

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to determine the change in management brought about by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine in alert and awake patients with facet dislocation and spinal cord injury presenting within 4 hours after injury. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spinal cord injury is a common clinical entity. The role of MRI is well established in evaluating spinal trauma. However, the time at which MRI should be used is still controversial. METHODS: Retrospective data from 2002-2010 was evaluated. All of the alert and awake patients with spinal cord injury, based on clinical examination with facet dislocation diagnosed on lateral cervical spine X-rays, were included. A questionnaire was also conducted, the data of which consisted of demographic details including age and sex, the mechanism of injury, clinical examination, X-ray findings, MRI findings, whether or not surgery was performed and the time elapsed since injury. Data was analyzed using SPSS ver. 17.0. Continuous variables such as age were expressed in terms of mean +/- standard deviation. Categorical variables such as change in management, X-ray/MRI findings and neurological motor level were assessed in terms of percentage. RESULTS: Fifty patients participated in our study. All these patients had spinal cord injury with defined motor levels. The mean age was 35.5 +/- 8.95 years (range, 20 to 52 years). Fifty percent showed a motor level at C6 level. None of the patients required any change in management based on the MRI. CONCLUSIONS: MRI of the spine in awake patients within 4 hours after injury does not change the management of patients. However, we can hypothesize that such patients can proceed to traction without waiting for the MRI.
Dislocations ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ; Magnetics ; Magnets ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Cord Injuries ; Spine ; Traction ; Surveys and Questionnaires

This study involves mathematical simulation model such as in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) development for various extended release formulations of nimesulide loaded hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) microparticles (M1, M2 and M3 containing 1, 2, and 3 g HPMC, respectively and 1 g drug in each) having variable release characteristics. In vitro dissolution data of these formulations were correlated to their relevant in vivo absorption profiles followed by predictability worth analysis of these Level A IVIVC. Nimaran was used as control formulation to validate developed formulations and their respective models. The regression coefficients of IVIVC plots for M1, M2, M3 and Nimaran were 0.834 9, 0.831 2, 0.927 2 and 0.898 1, respectively. The internal prediction error for all formulations was within limits, i.e., < 10%. A good IVIVC was found for controlled release nimesulide loaded HPMC floating M3 microparticles. In other words, this mathematical simulation model is best fit for biowaiver studies which involves study parameters as those adopted for M3 because the value of its IVIVC regression coefficient is the closest to 1 as compared to M1 and M2.
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; administration & dosage ; pharmacokinetics ; Cross-Over Studies ; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors ; administration & dosage ; pharmacokinetics ; Delayed-Action Preparations ; Humans ; Hypromellose Derivatives ; Methylcellulose ; analogs & derivatives ; Microspheres ; Models, Chemical ; Sulfonamides ; administration & dosage ; pharmacokinetics

This study involves mathematical simulation model such as in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) development for various extended release formulations of nimesulide loaded hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) microparticles (M1, M2 and M3 containing 1, 2, and 3 g HPMC, respectively and 1 g drug in each) having variable release characteristics. In vitro dissolution data of these formulations were correlated to their relevant in vivo absorption profiles followed by predictability worth analysis of these Level A IVIVC. Nimaran was used as control formulation to validate developed formulations and their respective models. The regression coefficients of IVIVC plots for M1, M2, M3 and Nimaran were 0.834 9, 0.831 2, 0.927 2 and 0.898 1, respectively. The internal prediction error for all formulations was within limits, i.e., < 10%. A good IVIVC was found for controlled release nimesulide loaded HPMC floating M3 microparticles. In other words, this mathematical simulation model is best fit for biowaiver studies which involves study parameters as those adopted for M3 because the value of its IVIVC regression coefficient is the closest to 1 as compared to M1 and M2.