1.Application of artificial intelligence-assisted chromosome karyotyping analysis in prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism.
Ling ZHAO ; Shiwei SUN ; Qinghua ZHENG ; Qing YU ; Chongyang ZHU ; Ling LIU ; Yueli WU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2026;43(3):180-187
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the application value of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted chromosomal karyotype analysis in the diagnosis of prenatal chromosomal mosaicism.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis at the Department of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2019 and December 2024. All cases whose fetuses were diagnosed with chromosomal mosaicism via karyotype analysis and stratified into two groups based on the analytical software employed: the conventional analysis group (n = 70), which utilized Leica analysis software for karyotype image recognition and cell counting; and the AI-assisted analysis group (n = 102), which utilized AI-assisted software for the same procedures. The clinical performance of AI-assisted karyotype analysis in diagnosing chromosomal mosaicism was comprehensively evaluated by comparing the types of mosaic karyotypes, distribution of mosaic ratios, and verification outcomes of different detection modalities between the two groups. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Ethics No.: 2024-406-01).
RESULTS:
No statistically significant difference was observed in baseline characteristics (maternal age, gestational week, and indications for prenatal diagnosis) between the two groups. Regarding the detection efficacy for numerical and structural mosaicisms, no significant difference was found in the detection of numerical mosaicism. However, the conventional analysis group exhibited a significantly higher detection rate of autosomal structural mosaicism compared to the AI-assisted group (11.43% vs. 0.98%, P < 0.05). Numerical mosaicism cases were further verified using copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The AI-assisted group demonstrated a significantly lower inconsistency rate (5.56% vs. 20.41%, P < 0.05) compared to the conventional group. For low-proportion (< 10%) chromosomal mosaicism, the AI-assisted group had a significantly lower detection rate (13.25% vs. 29.69%, P < 0.05). Subsequent validation of low-proportion mosaicism by CNV-seq and/or FISH showed a higher consistency rate in the AI-assisted group (81.82% vs. 54.55%), though the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.360).
CONCLUSION
For the karyotyping analysis of prenatal chromosomal mosaicism, AI-assisted karyotype analysis shows high accuracy and consistency in identifying numerical chromosomal mosaicism, particularly in reducing the detection of low-proportion (< 10%) mosaicism while improving verification accuracy. AI-assisted analysis can significantly improve the detection accuracy of numerical mosaicism and mitigate the risk of misclassification for low-proportion (< 10%) mosaicism, thereby providing more precise clinical evidence for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicisms.
Humans
;
Female
;
Mosaicism
;
Pregnancy
;
Karyotyping/methods*
;
Artificial Intelligence
;
Prenatal Diagnosis/methods*
;
Adult
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Chromosome Disorders/genetics*
;
Amniocentesis
2.Genetic analysis of a Chinese pedigree with rare mosaic 11q partial duplication and a literature review.
Lili ZHOU ; Chenyang XU ; Hao WU ; Sheng HUANG ; Xueqin XU ; Xiaohua TANG
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2025;42(1):94-101
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the genetic characteristics of a Chinese pedigree with rare mosaic 11q partial duplication and its pathogenetic mechanisms.
METHODS:
A pedigree which underwent prenatal diagnosis at Wenzhou Central Hospital between September 25, 2015 and November 30, 2023 was selected for the study. Clinical data were collected from the pedigree. Peripheral blood samples from the parents, amniotic fluid from the fetus, and peripheral blood sample from the neonate were obtained. Genetic testing was carried out by using G-banded chromosomal karyotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) technology. Relevant literature was searched in the CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and PubMed databases to summarize the clinical phenotypes of patients with 11q partial duplication. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Wenzhou Central Hospital (Ethics No. L2024-07-080).
RESULTS:
The pregnant woman (G3) had a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes. During her first pregnancy (G1), prenatal ultrasound indicated intrauterine growth restriction and a Dandy-Walker variant. Follow-up at 8 years of age showed developmental delays and mild intellectual disability. During her second pregnancy (G2), prenatal ultrasound revealed nasal bone hypoplasia, and the pregnancy was terminated at 23rd gestational week. During her third pregnancy (G3), all prenatal tests were normal, and the neonate showed normal growth and development at 4 months of age. The karyotype of amniotic fluid of her first pregnancy was 46,X?, and the SNP-array analysis of neonatal peripheral blood showed arr[GRCh37/hg19]11q13.4q25(70432450_134607121)×2~3, with a mosaicism rate being approximately 40%. The karyotype for her second pregnancy was 46,X?,rec(11)dup(11q)inv(11)(p15q13)dmat[6]/46,X?[27], and the SNP-array result was arr[GRCh38]11q13.4q25(71406636_135067522)×2~3, with a mosaicism rate being approximately 75%. The karyotype for her third pregnancy was 46,X?,inv(11)(p15q13)mat, and the SNP-array result was arr(XN)×1,(1~22)×2. The karyotype of the woman was 46,XX,inv(11)(p15q13), and that of her husband was 46,XY. A review of 12 similar cases (including G1) from the literature revealed that the common clinical phenotypes of 11q partial duplication included intellectual disability (12/12), developmental delay (12/12), ear abnormalities (12/12), microcephaly (10/12), seizures (8/12), hypotonia (8/12), and congenital heart malformations (7/12).
CONCLUSION
Mosaic partial duplication of 11q may underlie the genetic etiology of this pedigree. The pregnant woman is a carrier of an inversion on chromosome 11, which might have formed the mosaic 11q partial duplication through meiotic errors and mitotic trisomy rescue mechanisms during reproduction.
Adult
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Pregnancy
;
China
;
Chromosome Duplication
;
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics*
;
East Asian People/genetics*
;
Karyotyping
;
Mosaicism
;
Pedigree
;
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
;
Prenatal Diagnosis
3.Genetic analysis of two fetuses with Mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome caused by compound heterozygous variants in BUB1B and its upstream regulatory elements and a literature Review.
Jiangbo QU ; Wenjuan ZHU ; Ju WANG ; Lu GAO ; Dongyi YU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2025;42(4):446-453
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the genetic etiology of two fetuses with Mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome (MVA) in a pedigree.
METHODS:
A 30-year-old pregnant woman, who presented at the Center for Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis of Shandong Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital on November 16, 2023, was enrolled. Clinical data of the pedigree were collected, and peripheral blood samples from the parents and amniotic fluid samples from the two fetuses were obtained for genomic DNA extraction. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on both fetuses, followed by Sanger sequencing for familial validation and pathogenicity analysis of candidate variants. Chromosomal karyotyping of the parents was conducted to quantify the proportion of premature chromatid separation (PCS). This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shandong Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital (Ethics No. 2024-034).
RESULTS:
Both fetuses exhibited structural brain anomalies and developmental delays during the second trimester. Amniocyte karyotyping revealed low-level mosaic aneuploidy involving multiple chromosomes, while chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) showed no abnormalities. Pregnancy termination was performed for fetus 1. WES identified compound heterozygous variants in BUB1B, i.e., c.2363_2364del (p.S788Cfs*29) and ss804270619: G>A, in both fetuses. Sanger sequencing confirmed paternal inheritance of c.2363_2364del and maternal inheritance of ss804270619:G>A. According to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants, the c.2363_2364del variant was classified as likely pathogenic (PVS1 + PM2_Supporting). Parental karyotyping demonstrated PCS traits, with a higher proportion of abnormal metaphases in the father.
CONCLUSION
The compound heterozygous variants c.2363_2364del (p.S788Cfs*29) and ss804270619: G>A in BUB1B may constitute the genetic etiology of the two MVA fetuses in this pedigree.
Humans
;
Female
;
Pregnancy
;
Adult
;
Mosaicism
;
Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics*
;
Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis*
;
Pedigree
;
Heterozygote
;
Prenatal Diagnosis
;
Aneuploidy
;
Male
;
Fetus
;
Karyotyping
4.Analysis of a child with Congenital leukemia and mosaicism trisomy 21 syndrome without GATA1 gene mutation.
Liya ZHANG ; Yu LIU ; Yu DING ; Lulu YAN ; Fei LI ; Qingqing JIE ; Shuni SUN ; Lili CHEN ; Xiamin JIN
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2025;42(6):751-755
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the genetic characteristics and pathogenesis for a child with mosaicism trisomy 21 and Congenital leukemia (CL).
METHODS:
A child who was admitted to Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital in March 2023 was selected as the study subject. A retrospective analysis was carried out on the clinical data, laboratory test results, immunophenotyping, and genetic characteristics of the child. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Hospital (Ethics No.: EC2024-063).
RESULTS:
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that the child has mosaicism trisomy of chromosome 21, with a ratio of approximately 74%. In addition, copy number variations involving multiple OMIM genes that could explain his clinical phenotype were detected and rated as pathogenic based on the guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). No pathogenic variant was detected with the GATA1 gene. Blood immune typing of the child conformed to the immunophenotype of acute myeloid leukemia.
CONCLUSION
For children with trisomy 21, even in the absence of GATA1 gene variants, the occurrence of CL should be monitored, and early diagnosis and treatment are of great significance for improving the prognosis.
Child, Preschool
;
Humans
;
DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics*
;
Down Syndrome/genetics*
;
GATA1 Transcription Factor/genetics*
;
Leukemia/congenital*
;
Mosaicism
;
Mutation
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Whole Genome Sequencing
5.A case of Turner syndrome with double pseudo-isodicentric X chromosome and mosaic karyotype diagnosed prenatally and a literature review.
Famei XU ; Yingxin ZHANG ; Wanxiao HAO ; Xiaoming YU ; Yifang JIA
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2025;42(6):756-761
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the mechanism for the occurrence and phenotypic characteristics of Turner syndrome based on a prenatally diagnosed case of a mosaic karyotype containing double pseudo-isodicentric X chromosome and a review of relevant literature.
METHODS:
A fetus diagnosed with increased risk for trisomy 21 at the Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University in August 2023 was selected as the study subject. Clinical data of the fetus was collected. Following amniocentesis, chromosomal G-banding karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were carried out. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital (Ethics No.: SWYX No. 2022-287).
RESULTS:
The early-trimester screening suggested a high risk of trisomy 21 (1/19), with free β-hCG of 116 ng/mL (MoM value 2.35), PAPP-A of 0.394 ng/mL (MoM value 0.12), and NT value of 1.3 mm, though no abnormality was found in the fetus at 19 weeks gestation. The karyotype of amniocyte was determined as 46,X,psu idic(X)(p11.21)[55]/45,X[27]/47,X,psu idic(X)(p11.21)×2[5]/46,XX[13]. CMA has yielded a result of arr[GRCh37] Xp22.33p11.21(168552_55585678)×1[0.67],Xp11.21q28(55703291_155233098)×3[0.5].
CONCLUSION
Karyotypes of Turner syndrome are complex and diverse, and a rare 46,X,psu idic(X)(p11.21)[55]/45,X[27]/47,X,psu idic(X)(p11.21)×2[5]/46,XX[13] mosaic karyotype with double pseudo-isodicentric X chromosome has been identified. Literature review suggested that this karyotype may lead to phenotypic diversification and a risk of reduced sensitivity to hormone therapy.
Humans
;
Turner Syndrome/diagnosis*
;
Female
;
Pregnancy
;
Chromosomes, Human, X/genetics*
;
Mosaicism
;
Prenatal Diagnosis
;
Karyotyping
;
Adult
;
Karyotype
;
Amniocentesis
6.The value of combined CNV-Seq and chromosomal karyotyping for the detection of amniocytic mosaicisms and a literature review.
Panlai SHI ; Ruonan ZHU ; Junhong ZHAO ; Xiangdong KONG
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2023;40(8):954-959
OBJECTIVE:
To assess the value of combined copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and chromosomal karyotyping for the diagnosis of amniocytic mosaicisms, in addition with a literature review.
METHODS:
Forty cases of amniocytic mosaicisms detected at the Genetic and Prenatal Diagnosis Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2018 to December 2021, in addition with 245 mosaicisms retrieved from 11 recent literature were evaluated in terms of detection rate, consistency rate, and pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS:
The detection rate of amniocytic mosaicisms was 0.46% (40/8 621) in our center. And its consistency rate with chromosomal karyotyping was 75.0% (30/40). After genetic counseling, 30 (75.0%) couples had opted to terminate the pregnancy, 5 (12.5%) had decided to continue with the pregnancy, 3 (7.5%) fetuses were born alive, and 2 cases (5.0%) were lost in touch. By contrast, 245 cases (0.39%) of mosaicisms were identified among 63 577 amniotic samples, with a consistency rate of 62.8% (103/164) with other techniques. Among these, 114 cases (55.1%) were terminated, 75 (36.2%) were born alive, and 18 (8.7%) were lost during the follow up.
CONCLUSION
Combined CNV-seq and chromosomal karyotyping has a high value for the detection of amniotic mosaicisms.
Pregnancy
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Mosaicism
;
Chromosome Disorders/genetics*
;
DNA Copy Number Variations
;
Chromosome Aberrations
;
Karyotyping
;
Prenatal Diagnosis/methods*
7.Genetic analysis of an infant death due to a paternally derived FOXF1 somatic-gonadal mosaic variant.
Jing WANG ; Qingwen ZHU ; Aiming CUI ; Mengsi LIN ; Xian CAO
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2023;40(9):1176-1180
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the genetic characteristics and cause of death for an infant with alveolar capillary dysplasia and pulmonary vein misalignment (ACD/MPV).
METHODS:
An infant with ACD/MPV diagnosed at the Affiliated Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nantong University in September 2022 was selected as the study subject. Clinical data of the infant were collected. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was carried out to detect genetic variants in the skin tissue, and Sanger sequencing was performed for verifying the candidate variants in the parents. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to determine the mosaicism ratio of the variant in different germ layer-derived samples from the father.
RESULTS:
The infant had died within 2 days after birth due to hypoxemia and respiratory distress. WES revealed that she has harbored a c.433C>T nonsense variant in exon 1 of the FOXF1 gene, which was unreported previously. Sanger sequencing has verified the variant in the infant, with her mother's locus being the wild-type and a minor variant peak noted in her father. ddPCR indicated that the mosaic ratio of the c.433C>T variant in the father's sperm was 27.18%, with the mosaic ratios of the variant in tissues originating from the three germ layers ranging from 11% to 28%.
CONCLUSION
The c.433C>T variant derived from the paternal germline and somatic mosaicism of the FOXF1 gene had probably predisposed to the neonatal death of this infant. ddPCR is an effective method for detecting mosaic variants.
Female
;
Humans
;
Pregnancy
;
Child
;
Infant
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Male
;
Semen
;
Infant Death
;
Exons
;
Mosaicism
;
Forkhead Transcription Factors/genetics*
8.Study of a fetus with confined placental mosaicism for trisomy 2 in conjunct with fetal uniparental disomy and a literature review.
Chunqiang LIU ; Yan LYU ; Yulin JIANG ; Qingwei QI ; Xiya ZHOU ; Na HAO ; Mengmeng LI ; Mouhuizi GAI
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2023;40(12):1461-1465
OBJECTIVE:
To carry out genetic analysis for a fetus with confined placental mosaicism (CPM) for trisomy 2 (T2) in conjunct with fetal uniparental disomy (UPD).
METHODS:
Amniocentesis and chromosomal karyotyping was carried out for a pregnant woman with a high risk for chromosome 2 anomalies indicated by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) and trio-whole exome sequencing (Trio-WES) were carried out. Ultrasonography was used to closely monitor the fetal growth. Multifocal sampling of the placenta was performed after delivery for copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq).
RESULTS:
The fetus was found to have a normal chromosomal karyotype. SNP-array has revealed multiple regions with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 2. Trio-WES confirmed the presence of maternal UPD for chromosome 2. Ultrasonography has revealed intrauterine growth restriction and oligohydramnios. Intrauterine fetal demise had occurred at 23+4 weeks of gestation. Pathological examination had failed to find salient visceral abnormality. The placenta was proved to contain complete T2 by CNV-seq.
CONCLUSION
T2 CPM can cause false positive result for NIPT and may be complicated with fetal UPD, leading to adverse obstetric outcomes such as intrauterine growth restriction, oligohydramnios and intrauterine fetal demise.
Female
;
Humans
;
Pregnancy
;
Amniocentesis
;
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2/genetics*
;
DNA Copy Number Variations
;
Fetal Death
;
Fetal Growth Retardation/genetics*
;
Fetus
;
Mosaicism
;
Oligohydramnios
;
Placenta
;
Trisomy/genetics*
;
Uniparental Disomy/genetics*
9.Genetic analysis of a child with mosaicism Turner syndrome.
Jingzhen GAO ; Jingjing ZHAO ; Xiangyu ZHAO ; Lin LI
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2023;40(12):1566-1569
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the genetic characteristics of a child with mosaicism Turner syndrome.
METHODS:
A child who had presented at Linyi People's Hospital on May 19, 2022 due to short stature was selected as the study subject. The child was subjected to combined chromosomal karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA).
RESULTS:
The child was found to have a 46,X,i(X)(q10)[94]/45,X[6] karyotype. The result of FISH was nucish(XYpter,XYqter)1[78]/(XYpter)1,(XYqter)3[122]. CMA result for her peripheral blood sample was arr[hg19]Xp22.33p11.1(168551_58526888)×1, and that for her oral mucosal cells was arr[hg19]Xp22.33p11.1(168551_58526888)1-2,Xq11.2q28(63000001_155233098)×2-3. By integrating the above findings, her molecular karyotype was determined as mos 46,X,i(X)(q10)[94]/45,X[6].arr[hg19]Xp22.33p11.1(168551_58526888)×1-2,Xq11.2q28(63000001_155233098)×2-3.nucish(XYpter)1,(XYqter)3[122]/(XYpter,XYqter)1[78], which has indicated mosaicism Turner syndrome.
CONCLUSION
The 46,X,i(X)(q10)/45,X mosaicism probably underlay the pathogenesis in this child.
Humans
;
Child
;
Female
;
Turner Syndrome/genetics*
;
Mosaicism
;
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
;
Karyotyping
;
Karyotype
10.Genetic analysis and reproductive intervention of 7 families with gonadal mosaicism for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Bodi GAO ; Xiaowen YANG ; Xiao HU ; Wenbing HE ; Xiaomeng ZHAO ; Fei GONG ; Juan DU ; Qianjun ZHANG ; Guangxiu LU ; Ge LIN ; Wen LI
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2023;40(4):423-428
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the genetic basis for 7 families with gonadal mosaicism for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).
METHODS:
For the 7 families presented at the CITIC Xiangya Reproductive and Genetic Hospital from September 2014 to March 2022, clinical data were collected. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) was carried out for the mother of the proband from family 6. Peripheral venous blood samples of the probands, their mothers and other patients from the families, amniotic fluid samples from families 1 ~ 4 and biopsied cells of embryos cultured in vitro from family 6 were collected for the extraction of genomic DNA. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was carried out for the DMD gene, and short tandem repeat (STR)/single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based haplotypes were constructed for the probands, other patients, fetuses and embryos.
RESULTS:
The results of MLPA showed that the probands and the fetuses/probands' brothers in families 1 ~ 4, 5, 7 had carried the same DMD gene variants, whilst the probands' mothers were all normal. The proband in family 6 carried the same DMD gene variant with only 1 embryo (9 in total) cultured in vitro, and the DMD gene of the proband's mother and the fetus obtained through the PGT-M were normal. STR-based haplotype analysis showed that the probands and the fetuses/probands' brothers in families 1 ~ 3 and 5 have inherited the same maternal X chromosome. SNP-based haplotype analysis showed that the proband from family 6 has inherited the same maternal X chromosome with only 1 embryo (9 in total) cultured in vitro. The fetuses in families 1 and 6 (via PGT-M) were both confirmed to be healthy by follow up, whilst the mothers from families 2 and 3 had chosen induced labor.
CONCLUSION
Haplotype analysis based on STR/SNP is an effective method for judging gonad mosaicism. Gonad mosaicisms should be suspected for women who have given births to children with DMD gene variants but with a normal peripheral blood genotype. Prenatal diagnosis and reproductive intervention may be adapted to reduce the births of further affected children in such families.
Male
;
Pregnancy
;
Child
;
Humans
;
Female
;
Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/diagnosis*
;
Dystrophin/genetics*
;
Mosaicism
;
Exons
;
Prenatal Diagnosis/methods*
;
Nucleotides

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail