Background: s/Aims: Left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) is a commonly performed liver resection. The Rex-recess technique, an extrahepatic Glissonian approach through the umbilical fissure, provides earlier extrahepatic vascular control, potentially resulting in safer and faster resections. However, comparative data between these approaches is limited. This study aims to compare the Rex-recess technique with the standard technique for LLS regarding operative parameters, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative outcomes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 48 consecutive adult patients who underwent open LLS at a tertiary hepatobiliary centre between January 2021 and November 2025. Patients were categorized based on the surgical technique used: standard technique (n = 25) and Rex-recess technique (n = 23). Primary outcomes assessed included operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirements, and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes focused on selected early postoperative recovery parameters. Results: Baseline demographics were comparable between groups. The Rex-recess technique significantly reduced operative time (90 ± 17.1 minutes vs. 162 ± 27.2 minutes; p < 0.0001) and intraoperative blood loss (80 ± 42.3 mL vs. 250 ± 67.2 mL; p < 0.0001).Other postoperative outcomes, including complication rates and length of hospital stay, were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions The Rex-recess approach appears to be a feasible and anatomically sound technique for LLS, offering advantages in operative efficiency, such as reduced operative time and blood loss. However, due to the retrospective design and non-randomized allocation, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results.

Background: s/Aims: The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols has demonstrated significant advantages for patients by mitigating surgical stress and expediting recovery across a spectrum of surgical procedures worldwide. This investigation seeks to assess the effectiveness of the ERAS protocol specifically in the context of major liver resections within our geographical region. Methods: Our department conducted retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, gathered from consenting individuals who underwent liver resections from January 2018 to December 2023. The assessment encompassed baseline characteristics, preoperative indications, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications among patients undergoing liver surgery. Results: Among the included 184 patients (73 standard care, 111 ERAS program), the baseline characteristics were similar. Median postoperative hospital stay differed significantly: 5 days (range: 3–13 days) in ERAS, and 11 days (range: 6–22 days) in standard care (p < 0.001). Prophylactic abdominal drainage was less in ERAS (54.9%) than in standard care (86.3%, p < 0.001). Notably, in ERAS, 88.2% initiated enteral feeding orally on postoperative day 1, significantly higher than in standard care (47.9%, p < 0.001). Early postoperative mobilization was more common in ERAS (84.6%) than in standard care (36.9%, p < 0.001). Overall complication rates were 21.9% in standard care, and 8.1% in ERAS (p = 0.004). Conclusions Our investigation highlights the merits of ERAS protocol; adherence to its diverse components results in significant reduction in hospital length of stay, and reduced occurrence of postoperative complications, improving short-term recovery post liver resection