Probiotics have gained increasing clinical attention as adjunctive treatment for lower gastrointestinal disorders. However, evidence supporting their therapeutic efficacy remains limited, particularly with regard to sex-related differences. This expert review provides evidence-based insights and practical recommendations for the use of probiotics in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional constipation (FC), and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), considering possible sex-related differences. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses indicates that probiotics can modestly improve global symptoms, abdominal pain, and bloating in IBS and enhance bowel movement frequency and stool consistency in FC. However, these effects are strain-specific and heterogeneous. Although clinical studies on probiotics in IBS have not confirmed significant sex-related differences, experimental animal studies using stress-induced IBS models have demonstrated sex-dependent responses to specific probiotic strains, supporting the biological plausibility of such differences. For CDI, the efficacy of probiotics in preventing primary or recurrent infections remains inconsistent across large trials, and current guidelines usually do not recommend their routine use. However, sex and age difference of immunology supports the clinical differences of CDI. Probiotics are generally considered safe for healthy individuals, although caution is advised in patients who are immunocompromised or critically ill. Clinicians should select probiotic products based on strain-specific clinical evidence, adequate viable doses, patient's characteristics, or patient’s sex. In conclusion, probiotics might play a role as adjunctive therapy for IBS and FC, with variability in responses influenced by microbial, host, and potential sex-related factors. Further research is needed to establish optimized personalized probiotic strategies.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic and relapsing gastrointestinal disorder characterized by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, leading to troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Since the publication of the 2020 Seoul Consensus on GERD, significant new evidence has emerged, particularly regarding acid-suppressive therapies and diagnostic approaches. This 2025 focused update aims to refine GERD management strategies by incorporating the latest evidence on acid suppressive therapies and regional considerations in Asian populations. This study builds on the 2020 Seoul Consensus by integrating systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert consensuses to offer updated recommendations for the definition and medical treatment of GERD. These guidelines incorporate recent advances in acid-suppressive therapies, particularly potassium-competitive acid blockers, and adopt updated diagnostic frameworks in accordance with the Lyon Consensus 2.0. Key clinical questions were identified and structured using the following format: Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome. The resulting recommendations address the initial treatment, long-term maintenance strategies, and role of personalized therapy based on disease severity, such as the grade of reflux esophagitis. Six key statements are presented: updated definition and classification of GERD (Statement 1); initial and long-term treatment strategies tailored to GERD phenotypes, such as non-erosive reflux disease, mild erosive esophagitis, and severe erosive esophagitis (Statements 2-5); and dose optimization strategies for long-term safety (Statement 6). These guidelines aim to support gastroenterologists and general healthcare providers in making individualized evidence-based decisions for GERD management.

Probiotics have gained increasing clinical attention as adjunctive treatment for lower gastrointestinal disorders. However, evidence supporting their therapeutic efficacy remains limited, particularly with regard to sex-related differences. This expert review provides evidence-based insights and practical recommendations for the use of probiotics in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional constipation (FC), and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), considering possible sex-related differences. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses indicates that probiotics can modestly improve global symptoms, abdominal pain, and bloating in IBS and enhance bowel movement frequency and stool consistency in FC. However, these effects are strain-specific and heterogeneous. Although clinical studies on probiotics in IBS have not confirmed significant sex-related differences, experimental animal studies using stress-induced IBS models have demonstrated sex-dependent responses to specific probiotic strains, supporting the biological plausibility of such differences. For CDI, the efficacy of probiotics in preventing primary or recurrent infections remains inconsistent across large trials, and current guidelines usually do not recommend their routine use. However, sex- and age-related immunologic differences support the clinical differences of CDI. Probiotics are generally considered safe for healthy individuals, although caution is advised in patients who are immunocompromised or critically ill. Clinicians should select probiotic products based on strain-specific clinical evidence, adequate viable doses, patient characteristics and sex. In conclusion, probiotics might play a role as adjunctive therapy for IBS and FC, with variability in responses influenced by microbial, host, and potential sex-related factors. Further research is needed to establish optimized personalized probiotic strategies.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are an important treatment option for ulcerative colitis, providing rapid onset of action, oral administration, and efficacy even after biologic failure. The 3 approved agents—tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib—differ in JAK isoform selectivity, leading to clinically meaningful differences in efficacy and safety. Evidence from network meta-analyses, clinical trials, and real-world studies consistently shows that upadacitinib provides the highest efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission, whereas filgotinib demonstrates the most favorable safety profile. The strong efficacy of upadacitinib and tofacitinib is particularly relevant in patients with severe disease, including acute severe ulcerative colitis, and upadacitinib maintains high efficacy regardless of prior advanced therapy exposure. JAK inhibitors also benefit extraintestinal manifestations. Although risks such as herpes zoster, serious infection, thromboembolism, and major cardiovascular events differ among agents, long-term data suggest generally acceptable safety when used appropriately. Intraclass JAK-to-JAK cycling is feasible, with about half of patients achieving steroid-free clinical remission in retrospective cohorts. Based on mechanistic, clinical, and real-world evidence, filgotinib may be a first-line option for patients with lower disease activity or when safety is a priority, whereas upadacitinib or tofacitinib may be preferred in higher disease activity. Strategically selecting agents may improve durability and outcomes.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.