Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of the BUN/ALB in canine pyometra before and after surgery. Methods: In this retrospective study, BUN/ALB was compared among survivors, nonsurvivors, and healthy dogs. The BUN/ALB was calculated as blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) ÷ albumin (g/dL). Analyses included one-way analysis of variance with the Holm-Sidak post hoc test, Mann–Whitney tests, Jonckheere–Terpstra trend analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Preoperative BUN/ALB was higher in dogs with pyometra than in healthy dogs, with the highest values in non-survivors. ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 and an optimal cut-off of 8.935 (sensitivity of 73.08%, specificity of 90.91%).Postoperatively, the BUN/ALB remained higher in non-survivors (AUC, 0.81; cut-off, 8.445;sensitivity, 68.28%, specificity, 83.33%). Conclusions and Relevance: The BUN/ALB was significantly associated with mortality in dogs with pyometra both pre- and postoperatively. The BUN/ALB may serve as a simple, inexpensive, and readily available prognostic marker to support clinical decision-making in canine pyometra.

Purpose: While fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens are recommended second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been no studies comparing different regimens head-to-head. Materials and Methods: We performed individual patient-level meta-analysis based on data from the intention-to-treat population of the phase 2b NIFTY trial (liposomal irinotecan [nal-IRI] plus fluorouracil and leucovorin [5-FU/LV] vs. 5-FU/LV; NCT03542508) and the phase 2 FIReFOX trial (modified oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFOX] vs. modified irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFIRI]; NCT03464968). Pairwise log-rank tests and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling with shared frailty to account for the trial's effect were used to compare overall survival (OS) between regimens. Results: A total of 277 patients were included. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (n=88) showed significantly better OS compared to the mFOLFOX group (n=49, pairwise log-rank, p=0.02), and mFOLFIRI group (n=50, p=0.03). Multivariable analysis showed consistent trends in OS with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.39 (mFOLFOX vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 2.07; p=0.11) and 1.36 (mFOLFIRI vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.03; p=0.13), respectively. Compared to the 5-FU/LV group, the mFOLFOX group and the mFOLFIRI group did not show differences in terms of OS (pairwise log-rank p=0.83 and p=0.58, respectively). The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group experienced more frequent diarrhea, while the mFOLFOX group experienced peripheral neuropathy. Conclusion Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed favorable survival outcomes compared to mFOLFOX, mFOLFIRI, or 5-FU/LV. The safety profiles of these regimens should be considered along with efficacy.

Purpose: While fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens are recommended second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been no studies comparing different regimens head-to-head. Materials and Methods: We performed individual patient-level meta-analysis based on data from the intention-to-treat population of the phase 2b NIFTY trial (liposomal irinotecan [nal-IRI] plus fluorouracil and leucovorin [5-FU/LV] vs. 5-FU/LV; NCT03542508) and the phase 2 FIReFOX trial (modified oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFOX] vs. modified irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFIRI]; NCT03464968). Pairwise log-rank tests and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling with shared frailty to account for the trial's effect were used to compare overall survival (OS) between regimens. Results: A total of 277 patients were included. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (n=88) showed significantly better OS compared to the mFOLFOX group (n=49, pairwise log-rank, p=0.02), and mFOLFIRI group (n=50, p=0.03). Multivariable analysis showed consistent trends in OS with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.39 (mFOLFOX vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 2.07; p=0.11) and 1.36 (mFOLFIRI vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.03; p=0.13), respectively. Compared to the 5-FU/LV group, the mFOLFOX group and the mFOLFIRI group did not show differences in terms of OS (pairwise log-rank p=0.83 and p=0.58, respectively). The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group experienced more frequent diarrhea, while the mFOLFOX group experienced peripheral neuropathy. Conclusion Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed favorable survival outcomes compared to mFOLFOX, mFOLFIRI, or 5-FU/LV. The safety profiles of these regimens should be considered along with efficacy.

Purpose: While fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens are recommended second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been no studies comparing different regimens head-to-head. Materials and Methods: We performed individual patient-level meta-analysis based on data from the intention-to-treat population of the phase 2b NIFTY trial (liposomal irinotecan [nal-IRI] plus fluorouracil and leucovorin [5-FU/LV] vs. 5-FU/LV; NCT03542508) and the phase 2 FIReFOX trial (modified oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFOX] vs. modified irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFIRI]; NCT03464968). Pairwise log-rank tests and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling with shared frailty to account for the trial's effect were used to compare overall survival (OS) between regimens. Results: A total of 277 patients were included. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (n=88) showed significantly better OS compared to the mFOLFOX group (n=49, pairwise log-rank, p=0.02), and mFOLFIRI group (n=50, p=0.03). Multivariable analysis showed consistent trends in OS with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.39 (mFOLFOX vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 2.07; p=0.11) and 1.36 (mFOLFIRI vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.03; p=0.13), respectively. Compared to the 5-FU/LV group, the mFOLFOX group and the mFOLFIRI group did not show differences in terms of OS (pairwise log-rank p=0.83 and p=0.58, respectively). The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group experienced more frequent diarrhea, while the mFOLFOX group experienced peripheral neuropathy. Conclusion Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed favorable survival outcomes compared to mFOLFOX, mFOLFIRI, or 5-FU/LV. The safety profiles of these regimens should be considered along with efficacy.

This case report highlights the significance of pre-operative screening for congenital anomalies such as uterine horn aplasia and renal agenesis in cats undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy (OHE), which may induce or exacerbate postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). An eight-month-old female mixed-breed cat was presented for an elective ovariohysterectomy. The absence of a left kidney with left-sided segmental uterine aplasia was observed in the cat during the OHE procedure. AKI was diagnosed on postoperative day (POD) 1, characterized by renal enlargement and abnormal levels of renal function parameters on blood tests. After treatment renal function blood tests normalised on POD 12.This case underscores the necessity of pre-operative screening for renal agenesis in cats undergoing OHE to prevent and manage potential postoperative AKI.Identifying such congenital anomalies can improve surgical planning and postoperative care, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Carotid body paraganglioma is the common type of carotid body tumor for which angiography, carotid artery balloon occlusion test (BOT) and tumor embolization could be considered before the surgery. We analyzed cases in a single institute and reviewed related literature to investigate the necessity of these preoperative examinations.Subjects and Method Medical records of patients who were diagnosed with paraganglioma were retrospectively analyzed from 2000 to 2019. Results: Sixteen patients were identified. Of the total, 14 patients underwent surgery at this institute, and 13 underwent angiography. Of the 13 patients who underwent angiography, 6 patients underwent carotid artery BOT, and 12 patients underwent tumor embolization. The average tumor size of 6 patients who underwent carotid artery BOT was 28.7 mm, and 8 patients who did not undergo carotid artery BOT was 30.1 mm. The average tumor size of 12 patients who underwent tumor embolization was 29.4 mm. Two patients did not undergo tumor embolization, and their average tumor size was 30 mm. In 1 patient, both preoperative angiography and carotid artery BOT were performed, but tumor embolization was not performed due to spasm of tumor vessels. Conclusion Preoperative carotid artery BOT can be performed to reduce side effects in patients with the potential for carotid resection. In addition, tumor embolization is performed regardless of tumor size. By reducing the amount of bleeding during surgery and reducing the size of the tumor, it is possible to secure an appropriate surgical field of view to facilitate operation during surgery; however, its effectiveness needs to be clearly identified.

PURPOSE: We report two cases of intraocular lens (IOL) pupillary optic capture following IOL scleral fixation treated with argon laser iridotomy. CASE SUMMARY: (Case 1) A 69-year-old man presented with suddenly decreased visual acuity of the left eye. The best-corrected visual acuity was finger count (FC) 30 cm in the left eye. Slit lamp examination revealed subluxation of the left eye IOL. An IOL scleral fixation and anterior vitrectomy were performed and no specific findings were observed. During the follow-up period, pupillary optic capture was repeated without specific causes, such as trauma, or IOL decentration thus, argon laser iridotomy was performed. (Case 2) A 77-year-old man presented with a 3-day history of congestion of the left eye and decreased visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity was 0.4 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the left eye. Slit lamp examination revealed subluxation of the left eye IOL. An IOL scleral fixation and anterior vitrectomy were performed, and no specific findings were observed. During the follow-up period, pupillary optic capture was found, and IOL repositioning and argon laser iridotomy were performed. CONCLUSIONS: Laser iridotomy can be used to prevent recurrence of pupillary optic capture in eyes with IOL scleral fixation without decentration or distortion.
Aged ; Argon ; Estrogens, Conjugated (USP) ; Fingers ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Recurrence ; Slit Lamp ; Visual Acuity ; Vitrectomy

Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to develop clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer. This Task Force conducted a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to the key questions. Evidence-based recommendations were then created on the basis of these articles. An external expert review and Delphi questionnaire were applied to reach consensus regarding the recommendations. The resulting guidelines focus on the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer with the assumption that surgery is the selected treatment modality after a multidisciplinary discussion in any context. These guidelines do not, therefore, address non-surgical treatment such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The committee developed 62 evidence-based recommendations in 32 categories intended to assist clinicians during management of patients with laryngeal cancer and patients with laryngeal cancer, and counselors and health policy-makers.
Advisory Committees ; Consensus ; Counseling ; Drug Therapy ; Glottis ; Humans ; Laryngeal Neoplasms* ; Neck*