Objective To observe the clinical effects of the stereotaxic oblique-pulling manipulation under different mechanical parameters in the treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation,and to explore the muscle-relaxing effects of the stereotaxic oblique-pulling manipulation and the traditional lumbar oblique-pulling manipula-tion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation under the optimal mechanical parameters.Methods Using a three-factor,three-level orthogonal test method,27 LDH patients included in this study were randomly divided into 9 parameter groups,with 3 patients in each group,and were treated with different parameters of the stereotactic angled wrench method.3 factors were set up for the pressing force,the number of times,and the treatment interval,and each factor consisted of 3 levels,i.e.,pressing force:300～400 N,400～500 N,and 500～600 N;the number of times pressed 3 levels were set up:6 times,9 times,12 times;3 levels of treatment interval:1 day interval,2 days interval,3 days interval.After screening the optimal mechanical parameters through VAS,ODI and FDD evaluation indexes,94 patients were included and randomly divided into two groups;the treatment group was stereotaxic oblique-pulling manipulation under the configuration of optimal mechanical parameters,and the control group was the traditional lumbar oblique-pulling manipulation,and the changes of patients'VAS and ODI scores as well as the thickness of multifidus muscle and cross-sectional area before and after treatment were observed in the treatment of the two groups of patients.Through the comparison of lumbar multifidus muscle between healthy volunteers and patients with lumbar keyboard herniation,the characteristics of lumbar disc herniation multifidus muscle were clarified.The correlation between each observation index and parameter was analyzed by the statistical analysis software SPSS 26.0 to derive the optimal parameters for manipulative treatment.Results Orthogonal test analysis yielded that the order of influence on the efficacy was pressing force>treatment interval>pressing times,and the pressure interval with the best efficacy was:500～600 N,the number of times was 12 times,and the Treatment internal of 2 days.The degree of degeneration of lumbar multifidus muscle in patients with lumbar disc herniation was more obvious compared with that of healthy volunteers,and the difference was stati stically signifi-cant(P<0.05).Observed in both groups of patients with lumbar disc herniation after 6 weeks of treatment time,the VAS and ODI scores of both groups decreased significantly after treatment compared with those before treatment(P<0.05),with greater improvement in the treatment group.The results of the multifidus muscle showed that after treatment,the treatment group could significantly increase the resting thickness,contraction thickness,contraction rate and cross-sectional area of the multifidus muscle had significant changes(P<0.05),in which the contraction thickness,contraction rate before and after the treatment changes were more significant than the control group.Conclusions The stereotaxic oblique-pulling manipulation is effective in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation,in which the manipulation parameter pressure of 500～600 N,the number of presses 12 times,and the treatment interval of 2 days once for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation has better analgesia and improves the dysfunction effect.Compared with the traditional lumbar oblique-pulling manipulation,the stereotaxic oblique-pulling manipulation is better in improving the pain symptoms and dysfunction of patients with lumbar disc hernia-tion,as well as the resting thickness of the multifidus muscle,the contraction thickness,the contraction rate of change,and the cross-sectional area.

OBJECTIVE:In recent years,the number of clinical research reports on acupuncture and manipulation for the treatment of greater occipital neuralgia has gradually increased,but the quality is uneven.There is currently no literature evaluating the quality of published reports,which is not conducive to the promotion of clinical use of these therapies.Therefore,this article assessed the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on acupuncture and manipulation for greater occipital neuralgia.METHODS:Cochrane Library,PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),VIP,WanFang Data,and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database(CBM)from inception to May 20,2024 were searched.The reporting quality of included randomized controlled trials was independently evaluated by two investigators using the CONSORT statement,STRICTA checklist,and Cochrane bias of risk assessment tool.A third investigator resolved any disagreement.RESULTS:A total of 62 articles were included.Based on the CONSORT statement,59.46％(22/37)of all entries had a reporting rate of less than 50％,mainly including"Identification as a randomized trial in the title(1/62,1.61％),""How sample size was determined(7/62,11.29％),""Implementation(1/62,1.61％),""Blinding(1/62,1.61％),"and"Reports of Funding(4/62,6.45％)."According to the STRICTA checklist,29.41％(5/17)of all entries had a reporting rate of less than 50％,mainly including"Details of other interventions(7/58,12.07％),""Setting and context of treatment(0/58,0％),"and"Description of participating acupuncturists(0/58,0％)."CONCLUSION:The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on acupuncture and manipulation therapy for greater occipital neuralgia remains low.Future researchers need to make greater efforts to strictly adhere to the CONSORT statement and STRICTA checklist during trial design,implementation,and reporting.This will facilitate the standardization of research in this field and enhance the reliability and reproducibility of the research results.

OBJECTIVE:In recent years,the number of clinical research reports on acupuncture and manipulation for the treatment of greater occipital neuralgia has gradually increased,but the quality is uneven.There is currently no literature evaluating the quality of published reports,which is not conducive to the promotion of clinical use of these therapies.Therefore,this article assessed the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on acupuncture and manipulation for greater occipital neuralgia.METHODS:Cochrane Library,PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),VIP,WanFang Data,and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database(CBM)from inception to May 20,2024 were searched.The reporting quality of included randomized controlled trials was independently evaluated by two investigators using the CONSORT statement,STRICTA checklist,and Cochrane bias of risk assessment tool.A third investigator resolved any disagreement.RESULTS:A total of 62 articles were included.Based on the CONSORT statement,59.46％(22/37)of all entries had a reporting rate of less than 50％,mainly including"Identification as a randomized trial in the title(1/62,1.61％),""How sample size was determined(7/62,11.29％),""Implementation(1/62,1.61％),""Blinding(1/62,1.61％),"and"Reports of Funding(4/62,6.45％)."According to the STRICTA checklist,29.41％(5/17)of all entries had a reporting rate of less than 50％,mainly including"Details of other interventions(7/58,12.07％),""Setting and context of treatment(0/58,0％),"and"Description of participating acupuncturists(0/58,0％)."CONCLUSION:The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on acupuncture and manipulation therapy for greater occipital neuralgia remains low.Future researchers need to make greater efforts to strictly adhere to the CONSORT statement and STRICTA checklist during trial design,implementation,and reporting.This will facilitate the standardization of research in this field and enhance the reliability and reproducibility of the research results.

Objective To observe the clinical effects of the stereotaxic oblique-pulling manipulation under different mechanical parameters in the treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation,and to explore the muscle-relaxing effects of the stereotaxic oblique-pulling manipulation and the traditional lumbar oblique-pulling manipula-tion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation under the optimal mechanical parameters.Methods Using a three-factor,three-level orthogonal test method,27 LDH patients included in this study were randomly divided into 9 parameter groups,with 3 patients in each group,and were treated with different parameters of the stereotactic angled wrench method.3 factors were set up for the pressing force,the number of times,and the treatment interval,and each factor consisted of 3 levels,i.e.,pressing force:300～400 N,400～500 N,and 500～600 N;the number of times pressed 3 levels were set up:6 times,9 times,12 times;3 levels of treatment interval:1 day interval,2 days interval,3 days interval.After screening the optimal mechanical parameters through VAS,ODI and FDD evaluation indexes,94 patients were included and randomly divided into two groups;the treatment group was stereotaxic oblique-pulling manipulation under the configuration of optimal mechanical parameters,and the control group was the traditional lumbar oblique-pulling manipulation,and the changes of patients'VAS and ODI scores as well as the thickness of multifidus muscle and cross-sectional area before and after treatment were observed in the treatment of the two groups of patients.Through the comparison of lumbar multifidus muscle between healthy volunteers and patients with lumbar keyboard herniation,the characteristics of lumbar disc herniation multifidus muscle were clarified.The correlation between each observation index and parameter was analyzed by the statistical analysis software SPSS 26.0 to derive the optimal parameters for manipulative treatment.Results Orthogonal test analysis yielded that the order of influence on the efficacy was pressing force>treatment interval>pressing times,and the pressure interval with the best efficacy was:500～600 N,the number of times was 12 times,and the Treatment internal of 2 days.The degree of degeneration of lumbar multifidus muscle in patients with lumbar disc herniation was more obvious compared with that of healthy volunteers,and the difference was stati stically signifi-cant(P<0.05).Observed in both groups of patients with lumbar disc herniation after 6 weeks of treatment time,the VAS and ODI scores of both groups decreased significantly after treatment compared with those before treatment(P<0.05),with greater improvement in the treatment group.The results of the multifidus muscle showed that after treatment,the treatment group could significantly increase the resting thickness,contraction thickness,contraction rate and cross-sectional area of the multifidus muscle had significant changes(P<0.05),in which the contraction thickness,contraction rate before and after the treatment changes were more significant than the control group.Conclusions The stereotaxic oblique-pulling manipulation is effective in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation,in which the manipulation parameter pressure of 500～600 N,the number of presses 12 times,and the treatment interval of 2 days once for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation has better analgesia and improves the dysfunction effect.Compared with the traditional lumbar oblique-pulling manipulation,the stereotaxic oblique-pulling manipulation is better in improving the pain symptoms and dysfunction of patients with lumbar disc hernia-tion,as well as the resting thickness of the multifidus muscle,the contraction thickness,the contraction rate of change,and the cross-sectional area.

BACKGROUND: At present, there are few reports on systematic evaluation/meta reevaluation of acupuncture for lumbar disc herniation through radar plot in and outside China, which are insufficient to provide references for clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systematic reviews/meta-analysis of acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation qualitatively and quantitatively by using the multiple evaluation thinking of radar plot so as to provide visual and scientific decision-making means for clinical practice and medical research. METHODS: Computer retrieval was performed in eight Chinese and English databases to collect data of systematic reviews/meta-analysis of acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. The retrieval time was from database establishment to August 2019. Moreover, the multiple evaluations were carried out from six dimensions, including publiscation year, research type, A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 methodological quality score, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analys is (PRISMA) quality score, homogeneous, and publication bias risk so as to calculate average rank score. The quality of all included outcome indicators was graded using GRADE evidence quality assessment tools. Excel 2013 was used to draw and optimize the radar plot for intuitive analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 11 qualified studies were included. According to data extraction, the radar plot showed that the included 11 articles scored 6.95 in the quality of the average rank. Some issues were found such as item registration, structured abstract, search strategy, exclusion literature list, and publication bias. Grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) evidence quality scores are low, with very low quality as the main reason. The literature quality of systematic reviews/meta-analysis of acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation was not high. The methodological quality and reporting quality should be improved and continuously strengthened in order to further improve the quality of literature. As a visual and effective method of graphic evaluation, the radar plot can show the distribution of required data intuitively and concisely.

OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the literature quality of systematic reviews/Meta-analysis of oral administration of traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation （LDH） using radar plot， and to provide scientific and effective evidence for clinical use of medicine. METHODS： Retrieving CNKI， VIP， Wanfang database， CBM， PubMed， Cochrane library and Embase during the establishement of database to Oct. 1st， 2018， the literatures about systematic reviews/Meta-analysis of oral administration of TCM in the treatment of LDH were collected. After data extraction of literatures met inclusion criteria， the quality literatures were evaluated from 6 aspects of radar plot （year of publication， design type， AMSTAR methodological quality evaluation， PRISMA reprot quality evaluation， homogeneous， publication bias risk）. The average score of rank number was calculated. Moreover， Excel 2010， Adobe Illustrator CC and other software were used to draw and optimize the radar plot. RESULTS： A total of 6 qualified literatures were included； average score of rank number of 6 aspects were 3.83， 4.67， 3.83， 3.67， 6.00， 4.67， scoring 4.56 in average. Multivariate evaluation of radar plot showed that 2 studies had higher qualities and only 1 study had lower qualities relatively. However， problems could be found such as information selection bias， inclusion and exclusion criteria， publication situation， limitations， project registration. CONCLUSIONS： The literature quality of systematic review/Meta-analysis of oral administration of TCM in the treatment of LDH need to be improved， starting with strengthening methodological quality and reporting quality. Radar plot is a visual and effective method of graphic evaluation， which is worth popularizing and applying in the future.

Raman imaging yields high specificity and sensitivity when compared to other imaging modalities, mainly due to its fingerprint signature. However, intrinsic Raman signals are weak, thus limiting medical applications of Raman imaging. By adsorbing Raman molecules onto specific nanostructures such as noble metals, Raman signals can be significantly enhanced, termed surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Recent years have witnessed great interest in the development of SERS nanoprobes for Raman imaging. Rationally designed SERS nanoprobes have greatly enhanced Raman signals by several orders of magnitude, thus showing great potential for biomedical applications. In this review we elaborate on recent progress in design strategies with emphasis on material properties, modifying factors, and structural parameters.