1.Clinical efficacy of 3D laparoscopic radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer: a prospective rando-mized controlled study
Qiuxian CHEN ; Mingqiao LIAN ; Mingjie LIAN ; Yuqin SUN ; Chenbin LYU ; Lisheng CAI ; Qianhui XU
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery 2025;24(3):367-373
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of 3D laparoscopic radical gastrec-tomy of gastric cancer.Methods:The prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. The clinical data of 90 patients undergoing total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer in Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January to December 2022 were selected. Patients were randomly divided into the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group by the method of random number table. Patients underwent 3D or 2D laparoscopic radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer. Observation indicators: (1) grouping of enrolled patients; (2) intra-operative and postoperative situations; (3) feelings of the major surgeon during the operation. Com-parison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of count data between groups wsa conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was conducted using the nonparametric test. Results:(1) Group of enrolled patients. A total of 90 patients eligible for total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer were selected. There were 56 males and 34 females, aged (61±7)years. All 90 patients were randomly divided into the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group, with 45 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of abdominal surgery, surgical method, tumor site and TNM staging between the two groups ( P>0.05), indicating comparability. (2) Intraoperative and postoperative situations. The operation time of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group were (196±12)minutes and (204±14)minutes, respectively. The digestive tract reconstruction time of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group were (81±8)minutes and (87±12)minutes, respectively. There were significant differences in operation time and digestive tract reconstruction time between the two groups ( t=-2.85, -2.43, P<0.05). After surgery, 3 cases of the 3D laparoscopic group experienced complications (1 case of abdominal infection, 2 cases of intestinal obstruction), and 8 cases of the 2D laparoscopic group experienced complications (2 cases of anastomotic leakage, 2 cases of abdominal infection, 4 cases of intestinal obstruction). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups ( χ2=2.59, P>0.05). (3) Feelings of the major surgeon during the operation. After surgery, the major surgeon completed a questionnaire survey. The score of image quality perception of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group were 4.73±0.08 and 4.46±0.09, respectively. The score of hand-eye coordination experience of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group were 4.60±0.09 and 4.55±0.08, respectively. The score of operation comfort of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group were 4.81±0.05 and 4.62±0.08, respectively. The score of eye comfort of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group 4.49±0.07 and 4.68±0.07, respectively. There were significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups ( t=15.04, 2.57, 13.51, -12.88, P<0.05). Conclusions:Compared with 2D laparoscopy, 3D laparoscopic radical gastrec-tomy of gastric cancer has shorter operation time and digestive tract reconstruction time, does not increase postoperative complications, and has better feelings of the major surgeon in image quality perception, hand-eye coordination experience and operation comfort.
2.Clinical efficacy of 3D laparoscopic radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer: a prospective rando-mized controlled study
Qiuxian CHEN ; Mingqiao LIAN ; Mingjie LIAN ; Yuqin SUN ; Chenbin LYU ; Lisheng CAI ; Qianhui XU
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery 2025;24(3):367-373
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of 3D laparoscopic radical gastrec-tomy of gastric cancer.Methods:The prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. The clinical data of 90 patients undergoing total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer in Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January to December 2022 were selected. Patients were randomly divided into the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group by the method of random number table. Patients underwent 3D or 2D laparoscopic radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer. Observation indicators: (1) grouping of enrolled patients; (2) intra-operative and postoperative situations; (3) feelings of the major surgeon during the operation. Com-parison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of count data between groups wsa conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was conducted using the nonparametric test. Results:(1) Group of enrolled patients. A total of 90 patients eligible for total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer were selected. There were 56 males and 34 females, aged (61±7)years. All 90 patients were randomly divided into the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group, with 45 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of abdominal surgery, surgical method, tumor site and TNM staging between the two groups ( P>0.05), indicating comparability. (2) Intraoperative and postoperative situations. The operation time of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group were (196±12)minutes and (204±14)minutes, respectively. The digestive tract reconstruction time of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group were (81±8)minutes and (87±12)minutes, respectively. There were significant differences in operation time and digestive tract reconstruction time between the two groups ( t=-2.85, -2.43, P<0.05). After surgery, 3 cases of the 3D laparoscopic group experienced complications (1 case of abdominal infection, 2 cases of intestinal obstruction), and 8 cases of the 2D laparoscopic group experienced complications (2 cases of anastomotic leakage, 2 cases of abdominal infection, 4 cases of intestinal obstruction). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups ( χ2=2.59, P>0.05). (3) Feelings of the major surgeon during the operation. After surgery, the major surgeon completed a questionnaire survey. The score of image quality perception of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group were 4.73±0.08 and 4.46±0.09, respectively. The score of hand-eye coordination experience of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group were 4.60±0.09 and 4.55±0.08, respectively. The score of operation comfort of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group were 4.81±0.05 and 4.62±0.08, respectively. The score of eye comfort of the 3D laparoscopic group and the 2D laparoscopic group 4.49±0.07 and 4.68±0.07, respectively. There were significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups ( t=15.04, 2.57, 13.51, -12.88, P<0.05). Conclusions:Compared with 2D laparoscopy, 3D laparoscopic radical gastrec-tomy of gastric cancer has shorter operation time and digestive tract reconstruction time, does not increase postoperative complications, and has better feelings of the major surgeon in image quality perception, hand-eye coordination experience and operation comfort.
3.Electron-beam irradiation therapy for keloids: retrospective study of 578 cases
Yuliang SUN ; Xin LIAN ; Nan LIU ; Mingjie ZHANG ; Lei HE ; Bofei LIU ; Fuquan ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2013;22(6):443-445
Objective To analyze the outcomes of radiotherapy for keloids by high energy electron beams and the factors influencing the treatment outcome.Methods From Jan 1998 to Jun 2012,846lesions in 578 patients received radiotherapy.The median age is 29 years old (range 5-80 years old).There are 841 lesions with postoperative radiotherapy and 39 lesions with skin-grafting.656 lesions treated within 1 day after operations.The max diameter of 348 keloids are > 5 cm.We used 6 MeV and 7 MeV electron-beam radiation therapy.The total dose ranging from 16-18 Gy/2f (interval 1 week).Treatment fields including entire keloid scars,and any suture/puncture holes with a 1 cm-margin around the lesion were used.The skin grafting patients need radiotherapy after the flap survived (about 10-15 days after the operation).The median follow-up period was 36 months (range 8-185 months).Results There are 736 (87.0%) of 846 lesions with radiotherapy effective.Other 89 (10.5%) lesions relapse in 4-33 months (median 12 months).21 lesions were of no avail.The univarate analysis shows that keloids length,keloids location,skin-grafting,interval between operations and irradiations are the influencing factors of outcomes (P =0.007,0.000,0.000,0.001).The multivariate analysis shows that keloids location and skin-grafting remained statistically significant differences (P =0.001,0.001).Most of the recurrence cases are large and bent scars.Conclusions High-energy electron-beam radiotherapy for keloids can receive good outcomes.Treatment fields flat is very important for electron-beam radiotherapy.
4.Clinical analysis of 48 cases of kidney transplantation from cardiac death donors.
Yingzi MING ; Qifa YE ; Mingjie SHAO ; Xingguo SHE ; Hong LIU ; Shaojun YE ; Ke CHENG ; Jie ZHAO ; Qiquan WAN ; Ying MA ; Yujun ZHAO ; Ying NIU ; Lian LIU ; Sheng ZHANG ; Lijun ZHU
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2012;37(6):598-605
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the recovery of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving kidney transplant from cardiac death donors, and to assess graft survival in China from this type of donor.
METHODS:
A total of 48 cases of patients with ESRD have received the kidneys from cardiac death donors in our hospital between February 2010 and March 2012. We retrospectively analyzed data on the preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine concentrations, on the survival of recipients and allografts with a view to investigating prognoses after this type of kidney transplant.
RESULTS:
Primary non-function (PNF) did not occur in any of the 48 recipients. Delayed graft function (DGF) occurred in 18 of 48 (37.5%) of kidneys from cardiac death donors, but the occurrence of DGF did not adversely influence patient's survival (P=0.098) or graft survival (P=0.447). Seven of 48 (14.6%) recipients lost their graft. Over a median follow-up period of 8 months (range 0.5-23 months), 39 of 41(95.1%) recipients' graft function had fully recovered. The actuarial graft and patient's survival rates at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after transplantation were 95.7%, 93.0%, 90.0%, 87.5%, and 100%, 94.9%, 90%, 87.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
As the legislation of donation after brain death (DBD) has not been ratified in China, the use of kidneys from cardiac death donors might be an effective way to increase the number of kidneys available for transplantation here. Our experience indicates good short- and mid-term outcomes with transplants from cardiac death donors.
Adult
;
Brain Death
;
Cadaver
;
Death, Sudden, Cardiac
;
Delayed Graft Function
;
epidemiology
;
Female
;
Graft Survival
;
Humans
;
Kidney Transplantation
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Tissue Donors
;
statistics & numerical data

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail