1.Super-minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery:technical innovations and clinical research progress
Pan LU ; Lin CHEN ; Yingjie HUANG ; Kai LI ; Mingchao YI ; Dean MU ; Qiang WANG ; Wei ZHANG
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2025;34(10):2265-2271
With the continuous evolution of minimally invasive surgical concepts,operative techniques are progressively advancing from"minimal injury"toward"scarless"approaches.Super-minimally laparoscopic surgery(SMLS)is a novel surgical modality developed on the basis of conventional laparoscopic techniques through the innovation and recombination of operative elements,aiming to achieve smaller trauma and improved cosmetic outcomes.Utilizing the umbilical skin fold as a natural scar-concealing site,SMLS establishes no more than two primary operating channels(maximum diameter≤15 mm),supplemented by auxiliary ports≤2 mm in diameter on the abdominal wall.Combined with innovative separable surgical instruments and high-definition visualization systems,this approach provides a systematic solution to key issues such as residual access-site scarring.This review summarizes the development,technical innovations,current clinical applications,and potential aesthetic value of SMLS in the evolution of minimally invasive surgery,aiming to offer theoretical insights and research reference for its future promotion and technical refinement.
2.Super-minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery:technical innovations and clinical research progress
Pan LU ; Lin CHEN ; Yingjie HUANG ; Kai LI ; Mingchao YI ; Dean MU ; Qiang WANG ; Wei ZHANG
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2025;34(10):2265-2271
With the continuous evolution of minimally invasive surgical concepts,operative techniques are progressively advancing from"minimal injury"toward"scarless"approaches.Super-minimally laparoscopic surgery(SMLS)is a novel surgical modality developed on the basis of conventional laparoscopic techniques through the innovation and recombination of operative elements,aiming to achieve smaller trauma and improved cosmetic outcomes.Utilizing the umbilical skin fold as a natural scar-concealing site,SMLS establishes no more than two primary operating channels(maximum diameter≤15 mm),supplemented by auxiliary ports≤2 mm in diameter on the abdominal wall.Combined with innovative separable surgical instruments and high-definition visualization systems,this approach provides a systematic solution to key issues such as residual access-site scarring.This review summarizes the development,technical innovations,current clinical applications,and potential aesthetic value of SMLS in the evolution of minimally invasive surgery,aiming to offer theoretical insights and research reference for its future promotion and technical refinement.
3.Comparison of short-term efficacy between laparoscopic surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for radical resection of rectal cancer
Xiaopeng LI ; Jing LI ; Wei WANG ; Mingchao MU ; Chenye ZHAO ; Zilu CHEN ; Junhui YU ; Xiongwei HUO ; Xuejun SUN
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences) 2023;44(6):990-995
【Objective】 To explore the feasibility, safety and clinical application value of laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) by comparing the postoperative pathological data, surgery-related variables and postoperative recovery between laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery with NOSE and laparoscopic-assisted radical rectal cancer surgery. 【Methods】 A retrospective analysis was conducted on 74 patients who underwent radical rectal cancer surgery with anus preservation in the Department of General Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from July 2017 to April 2022. Among them, 38 cases underwent surgery with specimen extraction through an abdominal auxiliary incision (auxiliary incision group), and 36 cases underwent surgery with specimen extraction through a natural orifice (NOSES group). The differences in the efficacy of the two surgeries were evaluated by comparing the postoperative pathological data, surgical variables, and postoperative recovery of the two groups. 【Results】 There were no statistically significant differences in general data and postoperative pathological data between the two groups (all P>0.05). The NOSES group exhibited significantly shorter operative time, time to first flatus, time to first oral intake postoperatively, and postoperative hospital stay compared to the auxiliary incision group (all P<0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and whether secondary surgeries were performed (all P>0.05). 【Conclusion】 Laparoscopic surgery with NOSE for rectal cancer is safe and feasible with minimally invasive and accelerated recovery, which is worth promoting and applying in clinical practice.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail