1.Predictive Factors Associated With Dysphagia in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury
Shu-Mei YANG ; Ting-Ju LAI ; Ya-Chu HSU ; Yu-Lin LU ; Hsing-Yu CHEN ; Hsiao-Ting TSAI ; Sheng-Hao CHENG ; Ming-Yen HSIAO ; Meng-Ting LIN
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2026;50(2):117-128
Objective:
To identify early clinical predictors associated with dysphagia and delayed swallowing recovery in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Methods:
In this retrospective study, we enrolled adult TBI patients admitted to the rehabilitation unit of a tertiary medical center between June 2019 and June 2023. Data on baseline characteristics, neurological status, imaging findings, and rehabilitation-related variables were collected. Swallowing function was assessed using two indicators: (1) nasogastric (NG) tube retention and (2) the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores at 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-injury. Regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors associated with dysphagia and swallowing recovery.
Results:
A total of 160 patients were included. At 1 week post-injury, longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay, poor initial sitting balance and use of sedative medication in ICU were associated with NG tube retention. At 4 weeks, lower initial Rancho Los Amigos Scale (RLAS) scores, immobility-related complications, longer hospitalization, and temporal lobe hematomas were associated with persistent NG tube dependence. By 12 weeks, older age, delayed ability to follow commands, and poor initial sitting balance remained associated with NG tube retention. FOIS outcomes were also associated with older age, delayed time to follow commands, impaired initial sitting balance, prolonged ICU stay, temporal lobe hematomas, lower initial RLAS scores, immobility-related complications, prolonged endotracheal tube placement and extended hospital stays.
Conclusion
Impaired cognitive status, poor physical function, immobility-related complications, and temporal lobe hematomas were key factors associated with dysphagia and delayed oral intake in individuals with TBI.
2.Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease: An Illustrative Case and Literature Review
Yi-Yen CHIANG ; Muhammad Hafiz HASHIM ; Chun-Chieh WANG ; Chuan-Ching HUANG ; Chih-Wei CHEN ; Shu-Hua YANG ; Ming-Hsiao HU
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique 2024;9(2):116-122
Posterior lumbar fusion surgery is a well-established procedure for treating degenerative lumbar spine diseases. Despite its surgical success over the decades, adjacent segment degeneration persisted as a problem, causing significant morbidity in patients. Various surgical fusion techniques, including open and minimally invasive procedures, have been reported for treating adjacent segment disease. Recently, endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion, including fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion through the uniportal approach and biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF), has been attempted as a minimally invasive surgical technique for lumbar fusion. This study describes the BE-TLIF technique and presents a review of the literature on this technique for treating adjacent segment disease. Our case illustration demonstrates that BE-TLIF could be a viable minimally invasive technique for addressing adjacent segment disease in revision lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
3.Treatment outcomes of patients with stage II pure endometrioid-type endometrial cancer: a Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (TGOG-2006) retrospective cohort study.
Hung Chun FU ; Jen Ruei CHEN ; Min Yu CHEN ; Keng Fu HSU ; Wen Fang CHENG ; An Jen CHIANG ; Yu Min KE ; Yu Chieh CHEN ; Yin Yi CHANG ; Chia Yen HUANG ; Chieh Yi KANG ; Yuan Yee KAN ; Sheng Mou HSIAO ; Ming Shyen YEN
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2018;29(5):e76-
OBJECTIVE: Choice of hysterectomy and adjuvant treatment for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage II endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) is still controversial. Aims of this study were to evaluate survival benefits and adverse effects of different hysterectomies with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), and to identify prognostic factors. METHODS: The patients at 14 member hospitals of the Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group from 1992 to 2013 were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into simple hysterectomy (SH) alone, SH with RT, radical hysterectomy (RH) alone, and RH with RT groups. Endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), adverse effects and prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: Total of 246 patients were enrolled. The 5-year RFS, OS, DSS and recurrence rates for the entire cohort were 89.5%, 94.3%, 96.2% and 10.2%, respectively. Patients receiving RH had more adverse effects including blood loss (p < 0.001), recurrent urinary tract infections (p = 0.013), and leg lymphedema (p = 0.038). Age over 50-year (HR = 9.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–70.9) and grade 3 histology (HR = 7.28; 95% CI, 1.45–36.6) were independent predictors of OS. Grade 3 histology was an independent predictor of RFS (HR = 5.13; 95% CI, 1.38–19.1) and DSS (HR = 5.97; 95% CI, 1.06–58.7). Patients receiving adjuvant RT had lower locoregional recurrence (p = 0.046), but no impact on survival. CONCLUSION: Different treatment modalities yield similar survival outcomes. Patients receiving SH with RT had lower locoregional recurrent with acceptable morbidity. Age and tumor grading remained significant predictors for survival among patients with FIGO 2009 stage II EEC.
Cohort Studies*
;
Endometrial Neoplasms*
;
European Union
;
Female
;
Gynecology
;
Humans
;
Hysterectomy
;
Leg
;
Lymphedema
;
Neoplasm Grading
;
Obstetrics
;
Radiotherapy
;
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies*
;
Urinary Tract Infections
;
Uterine Neoplasms

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail