1.Survival impact of radiotherapy for patients with de novo metastatic rectal cancer
Harvey Yu-Li SU ; Yun-Hsuan LIN ; Ko-Chao LEE ; Yueh-Ming LIN ; Chun-Chieh HUANG ; Eng-Yen HUANG ; Tai-Jan CHIU ; Shih-Yu HUANG ; Chia-Che WU ; Chang-Ting LIN ; Ming-Chun KUO ; Kai-Lung TSAI
Annals of Coloproctology 2026;42(1):94-102
Purpose:
Metastatic rectal cancer (mRC) is a highly lethal and complex disease that demands a multidisciplinary treatment approach. However, the clinical effectiveness of radiotherapy (RT) for de novo mRC remains controversial and uncertain.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study examined medical records from Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for patients with histologically confirmed de novo mRC diagnosed between January 2015 and December 2020. All patients received standard systemic therapy and radical surgery when feasible. The primary outcome, overall survival (OS), was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox regression model.
Results:
Among 271 patients included in the analysis, 117 received RT and 154 did not. The median OS was significantly longer in the RT group compared with the non-RT group (27.8 months vs. 21.9 months; P=0.046). Multivariate analysis identified several independent predictors of OS: age ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26–2.27; P=0.001), primary tumor resection (HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.90–3.61; P<0.001), M1b or M1c disease (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.44–2.69; P<0.001), and receipt of RT (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.02–1.94; P=0.036).
Conclusion
RT significantly improves OS in patients with mRC, underscoring its role in treatment strategies. These findings support its inclusion in therapeutic protocols and highlight the need for larger, multicenter trials to confirm and extend these results.
7.Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Rhizotomy for the Treatment of Facetogenic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature
Chao-Jui CHANG ; Yuan-Fu LIU ; Yu-Meng HSIAO ; Wei-Lun CHANG ; Yi-Hung HUANG ; Keng-Chang LIU ; Che-Chia HSU ; Ming-Long YEH ; Cheng-Li LIN
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique 2025;10(Suppl 1):S42-S51
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a pervasive and debilitating condition, affecting millions of individuals globally and imposing a significant burden on healthcare systems. Traditional treatment modalities often have limited efficacy, leading to the exploration of novel therapeutic interventions. Endoscopic rhizotomy (ER) has emerged as a promising technique, particularly for managing facetogenic pain. This systematic review presents a comprehensive overview of the historical evolution, current practices, and clinical outcomes associated with ER in the treatment of CLBP. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, covering publications up to February 1, 2024, utilizing specific keywords related to low back pain (LBP) and full-endoscopic lumbar rhizotomy. Data extraction focused on patient demographics, clinical outcomes, and any reported complications associated with this procedure. Ten selected studies, comprising a total of 529 patients, were included. Approximately 96.7% to 97.8% of patients who underwent ER reported excellent or good results based on the MacNab score. Patients treated with ER demonstrated significantly better visual analogue scale scores (mean difference: -2.39; 95% confidence interval [C]I, -3.15 to -1.63; p<0.00001) and showed greater improvement on the Oswestry Disability Index (mean difference: -19.97; 95% CI, -37.48 to -2.46; p=0.03) than those treated with traditional percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (TPRA). No major postoperative complications were reported. Full-endoscopic lumbar rhizotomy represents a significant advancement in the treatment of CLBP, especially in cases involving facetogenic pain. The procedure offers superior outcomes compared to TPRA, with higher patient satisfaction rates and improved clinical outcomes. The absence of major complications highlights its potential as a therapeutic option for facetogenic LBP. However, the findings are limited by the small number of studies, varying follow-up durations, and potential publication bias.
8.Management of ulcerative colitis in Taiwan: consensus guideline of the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease updated in 2023
Hsu-Heng YEN ; Jia-Feng WU ; Horng-Yuan WANG ; Ting-An CHANG ; Chung-Hsin CHANG ; Chen-Wang CHANG ; Te-Hsin CHAO ; Jen-Wei CHOU ; Yenn-Hwei CHOU ; Chiao-Hsiung CHUANG ; Wen-Hung HSU ; Tzu-Chi HSU ; Tien-Yu HUANG ; Tsung-I HUNG ; Puo-Hsien LE ; Chun-Che LIN ; Chun-Chi LIN ; Ching-Pin LIN ; Jen-Kou LIN ; Wei-Chen LIN ; Yen-Hsuan NI ; Ming-Jium SHIEH ; I-Lun SHIH ; Chia-Tung SHUN ; Tzung-Jiun TSAI ; Cheng-Yi WANG ; Meng-Tzu WENG ; Jau-Min WONG ; Deng-Chyang WU ; Shu-Chen WEI
Intestinal Research 2024;22(3):213-249
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and is characterized by alternating periods of inflammation and remission. Although UC incidence is lower in Taiwan than in Western countries, its impact remains considerable, demanding updated guidelines for addressing local healthcare challenges and patient needs. The revised guidelines employ international standards and recent research, emphasizing practical implementation within the Taiwanese healthcare system. Since the inception of the guidelines in 2017, the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease has acknowledged the need for ongoing revisions to incorporate emerging therapeutic options and evolving disease management practices. This updated guideline aims to align UC management with local contexts, ensuring comprehensive and context-specific recommendations, thereby raising the standard of care for UC patients in Taiwan. By adapting and optimizing international protocols for local relevance, these efforts seek to enhance health outcomes for patients with UC.
9.Management of Crohn’s disease in Taiwan: consensus guideline of the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease updated in 2023
Jia-Feng WU ; Hsu-Heng YEN ; Horng-Yuan WANG ; Ting-An CHANG ; Chung-Hsin CHANG ; Chen-Wang CHANG ; Te-Hsin CHAO ; Jen-Wei CHOU ; Yenn-Hwei CHOU ; Chiao-Hsiung CHUANG ; Wen-Hung HSU ; Tzu-Chi HSU ; Tien-Yu HUANG ; Tsung-I HUNG ; Puo-Hsien LE ; Chun-Che LIN ; Chun-Chi LIN ; Ching-Pin LIN ; Jen-Kou LIN ; Wei-Chen LIN ; Yen-Hsuan NI ; Ming-Jium SHIEH ; I-Lun SHIH ; Chia-Tung SHUN ; Tzung-Jiun TSAI ; Cheng-Yi WANG ; Meng-Tzu WENG ; Jau-Min WONG ; Deng-Chyang WU ; Shu-Chen WEI
Intestinal Research 2024;22(3):250-285
Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic, fluctuating inflammatory condition that primarily affects the gastrointestinal tract. Although the incidence of CD in Taiwan is lower than that in Western countries, the severity of CD presentation appears to be similar between Asia and the West. This observation indicates the urgency for devising revised guidelines tailored to the unique reimbursement system, and patient requirements in Taiwan. The core objectives of these updated guidelines include the updated treatment choices and the integration of the treat-to-target strategy into CD management, promoting the achievement of deep remission to mitigate complications and enhance the overall quality of life. Given the diversity in disease prevalence, severity, insurance policies, and access to medical treatments in Taiwan, a customized approach is imperative for formulating these guidelines. Such tailored strategies ensure that international standards are not only adapted but also optimized to local contexts. Since the inception of its initial guidelines in 2017, the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (TSIBD) has acknowledged the importance of continuous revisions for incorporating new therapeutic options and evolving disease management practices. The latest update leverages international standards and recent research findings focused on practical implementation within the Taiwanese healthcare system.
10.Personalization of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder According to the Existing Psychiatric Comorbidity
Po-Han CHOU ; Yen-Feng LIN ; Ming-Kuei LU ; Hsin-An CHANG ; Che-Sheng CHU ; Wei Hung CHANG ; Taishiro KISHIMOTO ; Alexander T. SACK ; Kuan-Pin SU
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2021;19(2):190-205
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) are evidenced-based treatments for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who fail to respond to standard first-line therapies. However, although various TMS protocols have been proven to be clinically effective, the response rate varies across clinical applications due to the heterogeneity of real-world psychiatric comorbidities, such as generalized anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, or substance use disorder, which are often observed in patients with MDD. Therefore, individualized treatment approaches are important to increase treatment response by assigning a given patient to the most optimal TMS treatment protocol based on his or her individual profile. This literature review summarizes different rTMS or TBS protocols that have been applied in researches investigating MDD patients with certain psychiatric comorbidities and discusses biomarkers that may be used to predict rTMS treatment response. Furthermore, we highlight the need for the validation of neuroimaging and electrophysiological biomarkers associated with rTMS treatment responses. Finally, we discuss on which directions future efforts should focus for developing the personalization of the treatment of depression with rTMS or iTBS.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail