Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and current status of reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RLDG) compared with multiport laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (MLDG) based on a 2019 nationwide survey of surgical gastric cancer treatments by the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA). Materials and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively from March to December 2020 using data from the 2019 KGCA nationwide survey database. To compare RLDG and MLDG based on age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, histological type, tumor invasion, and lymph node metastasis, propensity score matching was performed. Results: Of the 14,076 registered patients with gastric cancer, the five-port approach was the most favored for multiport gastrectomy, accounting for 6,396 (70.9%) cases, followed by the four-port approach, with 1,462 (16.2%) cases. The single-port approach was used in 303 (3.4%) cases, the two-port approach in 95 (1.1%) cases, and the three-port approach in 731 (8.1%) cases. RLDG was performed in 805 patients (6.4%), MLDG was conducted in 4,831 patients (34.3%), and 804 patients were 1:1 matched in each group. The average operation time was shorter in the RLDG (168.2±49.1 min vs. 179.5±61.5 min, P<0.001). No significant difference was found in blood loss (84.8±115.9 cc vs. 75.5±119.6 cc, P=0.152), overall complication rates (11.3% vs. 13.1%, P=0.254), or complications ≥ to grade IIIa (3.2% vs. 4.4%, P=0.240). Conclusions This study revealed that RLDG is a safe and effective surgical option for gastric cancer with the potential to offer shorter operation times without increasing the risk of complications.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and current status of reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RLDG) compared with multiport laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (MLDG) based on a 2019 nationwide survey of surgical gastric cancer treatments by the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA). Materials and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively from March to December 2020 using data from the 2019 KGCA nationwide survey database. To compare RLDG and MLDG based on age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, histological type, tumor invasion, and lymph node metastasis, propensity score matching was performed. Results: Of the 14,076 registered patients with gastric cancer, the five-port approach was the most favored for multiport gastrectomy, accounting for 6,396 (70.9%) cases, followed by the four-port approach, with 1,462 (16.2%) cases. The single-port approach was used in 303 (3.4%) cases, the two-port approach in 95 (1.1%) cases, and the three-port approach in 731 (8.1%) cases. RLDG was performed in 805 patients (6.4%), MLDG was conducted in 4,831 patients (34.3%), and 804 patients were 1:1 matched in each group. The average operation time was shorter in the RLDG (168.2±49.1 min vs. 179.5±61.5 min, P<0.001). No significant difference was found in blood loss (84.8±115.9 cc vs. 75.5±119.6 cc, P=0.152), overall complication rates (11.3% vs. 13.1%, P=0.254), or complications ≥ to grade IIIa (3.2% vs. 4.4%, P=0.240). Conclusions This study revealed that RLDG is a safe and effective surgical option for gastric cancer with the potential to offer shorter operation times without increasing the risk of complications.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and current status of reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RLDG) compared with multiport laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (MLDG) based on a 2019 nationwide survey of surgical gastric cancer treatments by the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA). Materials and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively from March to December 2020 using data from the 2019 KGCA nationwide survey database. To compare RLDG and MLDG based on age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, histological type, tumor invasion, and lymph node metastasis, propensity score matching was performed. Results: Of the 14,076 registered patients with gastric cancer, the five-port approach was the most favored for multiport gastrectomy, accounting for 6,396 (70.9%) cases, followed by the four-port approach, with 1,462 (16.2%) cases. The single-port approach was used in 303 (3.4%) cases, the two-port approach in 95 (1.1%) cases, and the three-port approach in 731 (8.1%) cases. RLDG was performed in 805 patients (6.4%), MLDG was conducted in 4,831 patients (34.3%), and 804 patients were 1:1 matched in each group. The average operation time was shorter in the RLDG (168.2±49.1 min vs. 179.5±61.5 min, P<0.001). No significant difference was found in blood loss (84.8±115.9 cc vs. 75.5±119.6 cc, P=0.152), overall complication rates (11.3% vs. 13.1%, P=0.254), or complications ≥ to grade IIIa (3.2% vs. 4.4%, P=0.240). Conclusions This study revealed that RLDG is a safe and effective surgical option for gastric cancer with the potential to offer shorter operation times without increasing the risk of complications.

Background: Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is reportedly associated with a higher risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the clinical implications of ICS have not been sufficiently verified to determine their effect on the prognosis of pneumonia. Methods: The electronic health records of patients hospitalized for pneumonia with underlying COPD were retrospectively reviewed. Pneumonia was confirmed using chest radiography or computed tomography. The clinical outcomes of pneumonia in patients with COPD who received ICS and those who received long-acting bronchodilators other than ICS were compared. Results: Among the 255 hospitalized patients, 89 met the inclusion criteria. The numbers of ICS and non-ICS users were 46 and 43, respectively. The CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age ≥65 years) scores at the initial presentation of pneumonia were comparable between the two groups. The proportions of patients with multilobar infiltration, pleural effusion, and complicated pneumonia in the radiological studies did not vary between the two groups. Additionally, the defervescence time, proportion of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stays, and mortality rate at 30 and 90 days were not significantly different between the two groups. ICS use and blood eosinophils count were not associated with all pneumonia outcomes and mortality in multivariate analyses. Conclusion The clinical outcomes of pneumonia following ICS use in patients with COPD did not differ from those in patients treated without ICS. Thus, ICS may not contribute to the severity and outcomes of pneumonia in patients with COPD.

Objectives: . This study evaluates the enduring efficacy and patient satisfaction of dupilumab with interdose interval adjustments based on the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Methods: . A retrospective analysis was conducted on 44 patients who had been treated with dupilumab for over 6 months. This study targeted individuals diagnosed with CRSwNP according to the 2020 edition of the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps Criteria. The treatment involved an add-on dupilumab regimen, where the interdose interval was adjusted based on the SNOT-22 scores. Dosage adjustments were made such that patients with initial SNOT-22 scores greater than 40 were tapered to a target level of 20 or less. Similarly, for patients with initial scores of 40 or less, the treatment aimed for an improvement of 50% or more. At each visit, the effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated using SNOT-22, nasal polyp scores (NPS), and a subjective satisfaction questionnaire adapted from the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v.1.4). Results: . The adjustment of the interdose interval for dupilumab based on SNOT-22 scores demonstrated sustained improvements in patients’ subjective symptoms, satisfaction, and NPS. The mean (standard deviation) SNOT-22 scores significantly decreased from 46.04 (22.30) to 14.72 (13.66) over 6 months (P<0.001). Similarly, NPS scores improved from 3.20 (2.24) to 1.72 (1.46) within the same period (P<0.001). Satisfaction scores, ranging from 0 to 5, consistently remained above 3.5 for up to 6 months (P=0.166). Additionally, there was a significant correlation between the improvement in the nasal symptom domain of the SNOT-22 scores and higher satisfaction scores. Conclusion . Adjusting dupilumab dosing intervals based on SNOT-22 scores from the outset resulted in sustained efficacy and patient satisfaction in Korean patients with CRSwNP. This approach will meaningfully assist clinicians in determining the optimal dupilumab dosing interval.

Objectives: . This study evaluates the enduring efficacy and patient satisfaction of dupilumab with interdose interval adjustments based on the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Methods: . A retrospective analysis was conducted on 44 patients who had been treated with dupilumab for over 6 months. This study targeted individuals diagnosed with CRSwNP according to the 2020 edition of the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps Criteria. The treatment involved an add-on dupilumab regimen, where the interdose interval was adjusted based on the SNOT-22 scores. Dosage adjustments were made such that patients with initial SNOT-22 scores greater than 40 were tapered to a target level of 20 or less. Similarly, for patients with initial scores of 40 or less, the treatment aimed for an improvement of 50% or more. At each visit, the effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated using SNOT-22, nasal polyp scores (NPS), and a subjective satisfaction questionnaire adapted from the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v.1.4). Results: . The adjustment of the interdose interval for dupilumab based on SNOT-22 scores demonstrated sustained improvements in patients’ subjective symptoms, satisfaction, and NPS. The mean (standard deviation) SNOT-22 scores significantly decreased from 46.04 (22.30) to 14.72 (13.66) over 6 months (P<0.001). Similarly, NPS scores improved from 3.20 (2.24) to 1.72 (1.46) within the same period (P<0.001). Satisfaction scores, ranging from 0 to 5, consistently remained above 3.5 for up to 6 months (P=0.166). Additionally, there was a significant correlation between the improvement in the nasal symptom domain of the SNOT-22 scores and higher satisfaction scores. Conclusion . Adjusting dupilumab dosing intervals based on SNOT-22 scores from the outset resulted in sustained efficacy and patient satisfaction in Korean patients with CRSwNP. This approach will meaningfully assist clinicians in determining the optimal dupilumab dosing interval.

Objectives: . This study evaluates the enduring efficacy and patient satisfaction of dupilumab with interdose interval adjustments based on the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Methods: . A retrospective analysis was conducted on 44 patients who had been treated with dupilumab for over 6 months. This study targeted individuals diagnosed with CRSwNP according to the 2020 edition of the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps Criteria. The treatment involved an add-on dupilumab regimen, where the interdose interval was adjusted based on the SNOT-22 scores. Dosage adjustments were made such that patients with initial SNOT-22 scores greater than 40 were tapered to a target level of 20 or less. Similarly, for patients with initial scores of 40 or less, the treatment aimed for an improvement of 50% or more. At each visit, the effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated using SNOT-22, nasal polyp scores (NPS), and a subjective satisfaction questionnaire adapted from the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v.1.4). Results: . The adjustment of the interdose interval for dupilumab based on SNOT-22 scores demonstrated sustained improvements in patients’ subjective symptoms, satisfaction, and NPS. The mean (standard deviation) SNOT-22 scores significantly decreased from 46.04 (22.30) to 14.72 (13.66) over 6 months (P<0.001). Similarly, NPS scores improved from 3.20 (2.24) to 1.72 (1.46) within the same period (P<0.001). Satisfaction scores, ranging from 0 to 5, consistently remained above 3.5 for up to 6 months (P=0.166). Additionally, there was a significant correlation between the improvement in the nasal symptom domain of the SNOT-22 scores and higher satisfaction scores. Conclusion . Adjusting dupilumab dosing intervals based on SNOT-22 scores from the outset resulted in sustained efficacy and patient satisfaction in Korean patients with CRSwNP. This approach will meaningfully assist clinicians in determining the optimal dupilumab dosing interval.

Purpose: Bariatric surgery is the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity, but postoperative pain impedes recovery. Currently available pain-recovery treatments have patient safety concerns. This led to a noninferiority study of Welpass (Genewel Co., Ltd.) vs. On-Q PainBuster (B. Braun), each used alongside a traditional method of continuous local anesthetic administration, in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Methods: In this single-center prospective randomized clinical trial, patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the treatment group (Welpass) and the control group (On-Q PainBuster), with ketorolac administered as needed after surgery according to the protocol. To assess efficacy, the total amount of ketorolac used up to 72 hours postoperatively was measured.Additionally, ketorolac usage and numerical rating scales (NRS) were recorded at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after operation. Results: The total amounts of ketorolac used in the 72 hours postoperatively were 188.0 ± 84.6 mg in the treatment group and 198.7 ± 50.0 mg in the control group. The efficacy of the treatment group was noninferior to that of the control group, since the lower limit (–29.9 mg) of the confidence interval for the difference with the control group was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin (–35.0 mg). Furthermore, when the NRS was evaluated after bariatric surgery, there was no significant difference in scores between the 2 groups at each time point (P > 0.05). Conclusion We found no difference in effect on pain between the 2 groups, supporting the use of Welpass in clinical practice for pain management in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Background/Aims: Palliative chemotherapy (PC) is not standardized for patients with advanced ampulla of Vater adenocarcinoma (AA). This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated first-line PC outcomes in patients with AA. Methods: Patients diagnosed with AA between January 2010 and December 2020 who underwent PC were enrolled from 10 institutions. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to the chemotherapy regimen were analyzed. Results: Of 255 patients (mean age, 64.0±10.0 years; male, 57.6%), 14 (5.5%) had locally advanced AA and 241 (94.5%) had metastatic AA. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) was administered as first-line chemotherapy to 192 patients (75.3%), whereas capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) was administered to 39 patients (15.3%). The median OS of all patients was 19.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3 to 22.3), and that of patients who received GP and CAPOX was 20.4 months (95% CI, 17.2 to 23.6) and 16.0 months (95% CI, 11.2 to 20.7), respectively. The median PFS of GP and CAPOX patients were 8.4 months (95% CI, 7.1 to 9.7) and 5.1 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 7.8), respectively. PC for AA demonstrated improved median outcomes in both OS and PFS compared to conventional bile duct cancers that included AA. Conclusions While previous studies have shown mixed prognostic outcomes when AA was analyzed together with other biliary tract cancers, our study unveils a distinct clinical prognosis specific to AA on a large scale with systemic anticancer therapy. These findings suggest that AA is a distinct type of tumor, different from other biliary tract cancers, and AA itself could be expected to have a favorable response to PC.

Background/Aims: Synchronous multiple gastric cancer (SMGC) accounts for approximately 6% to 14% of gastric cancer (GC) cases. This study aimed to identify risk factors for SMGC. Methods: A total of 14,603 patients diagnosed with GC were prospectively enrolled. Data including age, sex, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, family history, p53 expression, microsatellite instability, cancer classification, lymph node metastasis, and treatment were collected. Risk factors were analyzed using logistic regression analysis between a single GC and SMGC. Results: The incidence of SMGC was 4.04%, and that of early GC (EGC) and advanced GC (AGC) was 5.43% and 3.11%, respectively. Patients with SMGC were older (65.33 years vs 61.75 years, p<0.001) and more likely to be male. Lymph node metastasis was found in 27% of patients with SMGC and 32% of patients with single GC. Multivariate analysis showed that SMGC was associated with sex (male odds ratio [OR], 1.669; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.223 to 2.278; p=0.001), age (≥65 years OR, 1.532; 95% CI, 1.169 to 2.008; p=0.002), and EGC (OR, 1.929; 95% CI, 1.432 to 2.600; p<0.001). Survival rates were affected by Lauren classification, sex, tumor size, cancer type, distant metastasis, and venous invasion but were not related to the number of GCs. However, the survival rate of AGC with SMGC was very high. Conclusions SMGC had unique characteristics such as male sex, older age, and EGC, and the survival rate of AGC, in which the intestinal type was much more frequent, was very good (Trial registration number: NCT04973631).