Purpose: Children with tic disorders/Tourette syndrome (TD/TS) frequently present with co-occurring neuropsychiatric conditions, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and a range of behavioral issues. However, these accompanying problems may be overlooked during diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate the neurocognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with TD/TS who visited a pediatric clinic. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of children diagnosed with TD/TS at a secondary referral center in Korea. A subset of these data was statistically compared with those from healthy controls. To minimize confounding factors, only children with cognitive development within the normal range were included. Results: Data from 36 children with TD/TS (27 males, nine females; ages 6 to 14 years, mean 9.5±2.1) were analyzed. The mean Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) on the Korean–Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children (K-WISC) was 98.8±11.7 (n=24). Compared with healthy controls (n=38), the TD/TS group (n=13) scored significantly lower on the Perceptual Reasoning Index, despite no group difference in overall FSIQ (K-WISC-IV). On the Korean Child Behavior Checklist, the TD/TS group showed significantly higher rates of clinical-range scores in multiple domains, including anxiety, somatic complaints, attention problems, and obsessive-compulsive behaviors (P<0.05). The mean Korean-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Rating Scale-IV (K-ARS-IV) score was 11.3±7.7, with 17.1% of participants exceeding the clinical threshold. Conclusion Children with TD/TS and normal cognitive development demonstrate specific neurocognitive weaknesses and elevated behavioral/emotional problems. Early behavioral and cognitive assessments should be incorporated into the initial evaluation.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of supplemental automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) added to mammography-based breast cancer screening for women with nondense breasts. Materials and Methods: A retrospective search of radiology databases at two tertiary institutions identified asymptomatic women with nondense breasts who underwent breast cancer screening using both digital mammography (DM) and supplemental ABUS between January 2020 and December 2023. We excluded women without sufficient follow-up data or those without an established final diagnosis, including histopathologic results. The performance measures of DM alone and ABUS combined with DM (ABUS plus DM) were compared. The primary outcome was the cancer detection rate (CDR), and the secondary outcomes were sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup analyses were performed for women with scattered fibroglandular density and almost entirely fatty breasts. Results: A total of 2,904 pairs of screening examinations were performed in 1,683 women (59 ± 10 years), detecting 26 cancers. In comparison with DM alone, ABUS plus DM showed higher CDR (9.0 vs. 7.9 per 1,000 examinations, P < 0.001), higher sensitivity (100% [26/26] vs. 88.5% [23/26], P < 0.001), and lower specificity (95.0% [2,735/2,878] vs. 97.9% [2,817/2,878], P < 0.001). In women with scattered fibroglandular density, ABUS increased the CDR from 7.4 to 8.5 per 1,000 examinations and improved the sensitivity from 87.0% [20/23] to 100% [23/23] (P < 0.001). In women with almost entirely fatty breasts, ABUS plus DM showed the same CDR (16.4 per 1,000 examinations) and sensitivity (100% [3/3]) as DM alone. Three cancers (11.5% [3/26]), all of which were stage T1N0, were detected only by supplemental ABUS. Conclusion Supplemental ABUS improved cancer detection and sensitivity in women with nondense breasts, with the benefits primarily observed in those with scattered fibroglandular density.

Objective: : This study investigated the relationship between arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) levels in the first 24 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and clinical outcomes in neurocritically ill brain tumor patients. Methods: : In this single-center retrospective study of 2123 brain tumor patients, we analyzed PaO2 levels from arterial blood gas samples within 24 hours of ICU admission. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality. Analysis utilized multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: : PaO2 exceeding 91.5 mmHg was defined as hyperoxia. The non-hyperoxia group showed higher 28-day mortality than the hyperoxia group (15.5% vs. 6.0%, p<0.002), a trend that persisted after IPTW adjustment (10.7% vs. 6.6%, p=0.019). In IPTW-adjusted regression, non-hyperoxia remained significant (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82–5.77). Survival analysis demonstrated significantly higher survival rates in the hyperoxia group (p<0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed significant heterogeneity across tumor types (p for interaction <0.001), with protective effects observed in malignant brain tumors (adjusted OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.88– 6.51) and brain metastases (adjusted OR, 3.86; 95% CI, 2.31–6.44), but not in benign tumors (adjusted OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.22–5.87). Conclusion : Elevated PaO2 levels within the first 24 hours of ICU admission were associated with decreased mortality rates, suggesting oxygenation as a potential therapeutic target in brain tumor patients. The protective effects were most pronounced in patients with malignant brain tumors and brain metastases, supporting a tumor type-specific approach to oxygenation management.

Background: Radioactive iodine treatment (RAIT) is an essential therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer. However, unforeseen complications arising during thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) can lead to Cancellation of the scheduled treatment. This study aimed to identify cases in which THW-RAIT was discontinued due to THW-related complications and to explore potentially preventable causes to improve patient management. Methods: Among 4,174 patients who underwent THW-RAIT between 2012 and 2024, 39 did not complete the planned treatment. After excluding Cancellations unrelated to THW, 11 (0.26%) patients with unexpected THW-related medical issues were analyzed. Results: The median age of the included patients was 61 years (range, 23 to 70), and 10 were male. The reasons for THW-RAIT Cancellation were hyponatremia (n=1), abnormal liver function (n=1), renal dysfunction (n=3), and combined liver and renal dysfunction (n=6). The patient with hyponatremia was taking a thiazide diuretic. Most cases of liver dysfunction were associated with prior use of herbal medications, whereas renal dysfunction was linked to diuretic or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, pre-existing conditions such as single kidney or diabetic nephropathy, or inadequate oral intake during low-iodine preparation. Two cases of concurrent liver and renal dysfunction were attributed to rhabdomyolysis following intense exercise or heavy physical labor. Conclusion Enhanced patient education, comprehensive pre-treatment assessment, and careful avoidance of high-risk medications are essential to prevent THW-related complications and minimize disruptions in RAIT.

Objective: Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma. Methods: An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis. Results: COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores. Conclusion This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.

Objective: Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma. Methods: An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis. Results: COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores. Conclusion This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.

Objective: Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma. Methods: An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis. Results: COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores. Conclusion This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.

Objective: Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma. Methods: An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis. Results: COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores. Conclusion This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.

Objective: Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma. Methods: An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis. Results: COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores. Conclusion This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.

Background: The increasing rate of excess body weight (EBW) in the global population has led to growing health concerns, including cancer-related EBW. We aimed to estimate the population attributable fraction (PAF) of cancer incidence and deaths linked to EBW in Korean individuals from 2015 to 2030 and to compare its value with various body mass index cutoffs. Methods: Levin’s formula was used to calculate the PAF; the prevalence rates were computed using the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, while the relative risks of specific cancers related to EBW were estimated based on the results of Korean cohort studies. To account for the 15-year latency period when estimating the PAF in 2020, the prevalence rates from 2015 and attributable cases or deaths from 2020 were used. Results: The PAF attributed to EBW was similar for both cancer incidence and deaths using either the World Health Organization (WHO) Asian-Pacific region standard or a modified Asian standard, with the WHO standard yielding the lowest values. In the Korean population, the PAFs of EBW for cancer incidence were 2.96% in men and 3.61% in women, while those for cancer deaths were 0.67% in men and 3.06% in women in 2020. Additionally, PAFs showed a gradual increase in both sexes until 2030. Conclusion The EBW continues to have a significant impact on cancer incidence and deaths in Korea. Effective prevention strategies targeting the reduction of this modifiable risk factor can substantially decrease the cancer burden.