Objective: Perinatal depression often remains undertreated due to concerns about antidepressant exposure during fertility treatment, pregnancy, or breastfeeding. Non-pharmacological, home-based interventions such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) present a promising alternative; however, real-world evidence in perinatal populations remains limited. Methods: This prospective observational study included 38 women who received infertility, pregnancy, or postpartum treatment at four hospitals in South Korea. Participants self-administered anodal tDCS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 20–28 sessions over 4 weeks. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 8. Subjective health perception was measured at baseline using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Time had a significant effect on depressive symptoms (Wald χ2=90.75, p<0.001), with the largest reduction observed during the first 2 weeks. The CES-D scores remained significantly lower than baseline at week 8, 4 weeks after treatment ended. Subjective health perception was significantly associated with baseline depression severity (Wald χ2=26.41, p<0.001), and its interaction with time was also significant (Wald χ2=320.18, p<0.001). Participants with poorer perceived health (scores 4–5) experienced greater depressive symptom reductions than those with more favorable perceptions (scores 1–2). Conclusion Home-based tDCS was feasible and associated with clinically meaningful improvement in depressive symptoms among perinatal women. Those who initially perceived their health more negatively showed greater response, suggesting subjective health perception may serve as a useful moderator and potential marker to inform personalized treatment strategies.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a stroke subtype with high mortality and poor functional outcomes. Prompt occlusion of a ruptured aneurysm at an early stage is crucial to prevent rebleeding, which can result in even higher mortality and more severe disabilities. The most critical initial decision in SAH management is the choice of treatment method with surgical clipping or endovascular coiling. We aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical guideline to select the optimal initial treatment in patients with SAH. We developed this guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted across four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and KoreaMed) to answer two population, intervention, comparison, outcome questions comparing clipping and coiling. The risk of bias was assessed using ROB 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagrams and meta-analyses were generated for functional outcome and mortality. We included six randomized control trials (RCTs) and 58 observational studies. Meta-analysis of RCTs showed that coiling improved functional outcomes compared to clipping (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86–0.97). No significant mortality difference was observed in RCTs (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.91–2.09), but non-RCTs favored clipping for reduced mortality (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69–0.86). However, it is difficult to generalize these findings to all clinical situations, as patients with SAH have a highly variable clinical course. Final treatment decision should be tailored to the individual patient’s status, including aneurysm location, morphology, and the expertise available at the treatment center. Such decisions are best made by specialists such as a board-certified physician and should be explained to the patient and their caregivers, along with the rationale for selecting the most appropriate treatment at the given hospital. Korea has many certified endovascular neurosurgeons, cerebrovascular surgeons, and certified cerebrovascular centers. Proper selection of the most suitable treatment method by certified physicians and centers would greatly benefit patient outcomes and healthcare professionals.

Accurate and early identification of stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) in emergency settings is essential for improving patient outcomes and ensuring the efficient allocation of medical resources. This clinical practice guideline systematically reviews domestic and international literature and conducts meta-analyses to evaluate the utility and diagnostic accuracy of stroke assessment tools used in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). We developed a guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of diagnostic EMS assessment tools for diagnosing stroke and LVO. Overall, 70 non-randomized control studies were selected for this study. A meta-analysis was conducted with a subgroup analysis to distinguish between patients with stroke and those with LVO. EMS tools demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity for diagnosing stroke. In the prehospital setting, using validated EMS stroke assessment tools is recommended for the early identification of stroke and LVO. Upon hospital arrival, stroke specialists should conduct further evaluation and triage to confirm the diagnosis and guide appropriate management. Delays in diagnosing LVO are frequently unacceptable. While experts advocate for the use of EMS assessment tools to facilitate early identification of LVO, these tools alone lack adequate sensitivity. Therefore, further diagnostic evaluations and consultation with stroke specialists upon hospital arrival are recommended.

The mothership (MS) model, where patients are directly transferred to a thrombectomy-capable center, and the drip-and-ship (DS) model, where thrombolysis is initiated at the nearest primary stroke center before transfer for thrombectomy, are the primary transport modes for patients with stroke. We aimed to establish guidelines for selecting the appropriate transfer strategy based on emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO). We developed this guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted across four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and KoreaMed) to answer three Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions comparing MS and DS models. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagrams and meta-analyses were generated for functional outcomes, mortality, and successful recanalization. Twenty-six non-randomized controlled studies showed that the MS model improved good functional outcomes by approximately 14% compared with the DS model (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–1.30). Fifteen studies reported that mortality in the MS and DS models showed no significant differences (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.84–1.11). Twenty-four studies revealed no significant difference in successful recanalization between the MS and DS models (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.68–1.10). The MS model should be considered first to improve the functional outcome of patients with LVO. However, if thrombectomy cannot be performed immediately after thrombolysis, or if a thrombectomy-enabled hospital is not nearby, the DS model should be considered by stroke specialists depending on transportation time and regional factors. We suggest a mixed approach with the DS model based on specific circumstances or regions to ensure the optimum treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Appropriate transport for patients with LVO improves the prognosis of AIS.

Background: This study examined gender differences in occupational stress, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation by considering the potential moderating effect of grit on Korean employees. Methods: A total of 11,369 participants (7,735 men and 3,634 women) aged 19–65 years, employed across 18 private companies and local government organizations in Korea, completed questionnaires including the Short Grit Scale, Korean Occupational Stress Scale, and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale between April 2020 and March 2022.Suicidal ideation was assessed based on its presence or absence. Mediation and moderation analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences PROCESS macro. Results: Depressive symptoms partially mediated the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation in male employees, whereas depressive symptoms fully mediated the relationship in female employees. Grit moderated the relationship between depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation in male employees but not in female employees.Furthermore, the moderated mediating effect of grit in male employees on the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation provided less protection in cases of severe depression. The cross-sectional design does not allow for causal inferences. Conclusion These findings contribute to understanding of the gender differences in the impact of depressive symptoms on the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation, as well as the protective effect of grit. These findings highlight the need for genderspecific approaches to prevent suicidal ideation among employees.

Background: This study examined gender differences in occupational stress, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation by considering the potential moderating effect of grit on Korean employees. Methods: A total of 11,369 participants (7,735 men and 3,634 women) aged 19–65 years, employed across 18 private companies and local government organizations in Korea, completed questionnaires including the Short Grit Scale, Korean Occupational Stress Scale, and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale between April 2020 and March 2022.Suicidal ideation was assessed based on its presence or absence. Mediation and moderation analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences PROCESS macro. Results: Depressive symptoms partially mediated the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation in male employees, whereas depressive symptoms fully mediated the relationship in female employees. Grit moderated the relationship between depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation in male employees but not in female employees.Furthermore, the moderated mediating effect of grit in male employees on the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation provided less protection in cases of severe depression. The cross-sectional design does not allow for causal inferences. Conclusion These findings contribute to understanding of the gender differences in the impact of depressive symptoms on the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation, as well as the protective effect of grit. These findings highlight the need for genderspecific approaches to prevent suicidal ideation among employees.

Background: This study examined gender differences in occupational stress, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation by considering the potential moderating effect of grit on Korean employees. Methods: A total of 11,369 participants (7,735 men and 3,634 women) aged 19–65 years, employed across 18 private companies and local government organizations in Korea, completed questionnaires including the Short Grit Scale, Korean Occupational Stress Scale, and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale between April 2020 and March 2022.Suicidal ideation was assessed based on its presence or absence. Mediation and moderation analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences PROCESS macro. Results: Depressive symptoms partially mediated the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation in male employees, whereas depressive symptoms fully mediated the relationship in female employees. Grit moderated the relationship between depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation in male employees but not in female employees.Furthermore, the moderated mediating effect of grit in male employees on the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation provided less protection in cases of severe depression. The cross-sectional design does not allow for causal inferences. Conclusion These findings contribute to understanding of the gender differences in the impact of depressive symptoms on the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation, as well as the protective effect of grit. These findings highlight the need for genderspecific approaches to prevent suicidal ideation among employees.

Background: This study examined gender differences in occupational stress, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation by considering the potential moderating effect of grit on Korean employees. Methods: A total of 11,369 participants (7,735 men and 3,634 women) aged 19–65 years, employed across 18 private companies and local government organizations in Korea, completed questionnaires including the Short Grit Scale, Korean Occupational Stress Scale, and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale between April 2020 and March 2022.Suicidal ideation was assessed based on its presence or absence. Mediation and moderation analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences PROCESS macro. Results: Depressive symptoms partially mediated the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation in male employees, whereas depressive symptoms fully mediated the relationship in female employees. Grit moderated the relationship between depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation in male employees but not in female employees.Furthermore, the moderated mediating effect of grit in male employees on the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation provided less protection in cases of severe depression. The cross-sectional design does not allow for causal inferences. Conclusion These findings contribute to understanding of the gender differences in the impact of depressive symptoms on the relationship between occupational stress and suicidal ideation, as well as the protective effect of grit. These findings highlight the need for genderspecific approaches to prevent suicidal ideation among employees.

Background: Atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and insulin resistance, contributes to the development of vascular complications. Statin therapy is the primary approach to dyslipidemia management in T2D, however, the role of non-statin therapy remains unclear. Ezetimibe reduces cholesterol burden by inhibiting intestinal cholesterol absorption. Fibrates lower triglyceride levels and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels via peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor alpha agonism. Therefore, when combined, these drugs effectively lower non-HDL-C levels. Despite this, few clinical trials have specifically targeted non-HDL-C, and the efficacy of triple combination therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates, has yet to be determined. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial involving 3,958 eligible participants with T2D, cardiovascular risk factors, and elevated non-HDL-C (≥100 mg/dL). Participants, already on moderate-intensity statins, will be randomly assigned to either Ezefeno (ezetimibe/fenofibrate) addition or statin dose-escalation. The primary end point is the development of a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and diabetic microvascular events over 48 months. Conclusion This trial aims to assess whether combining statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate is as effective as, or possibly superior to, statin monotherapy intensification in lowering cardiovascular and microvascular disease risk for patients with T2D. This could propose a novel therapeutic approach for managing dyslipidemia in T2D.