Background: Meniscal scaffold implantation has been introduced as a treatment for meniscal injuries, but there is still no clear consensus on its clinical impact, including its chondroprotective effect. This review aimed to assess the chondroprotective effects, clinical outcomes, and survivorship of meniscal scaffold implantation compared to meniscectomy, as well as among different types of scaffolds. Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was performed on the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, encompassing articles published until June 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and comparative studies published in English that reported results using collagen meniscal implant (CMI) and polyurethane meniscal scaffold for meniscal tear were included. Results: A total of 421 studies were initially identified across databases, and a systematic review was conducted on 8 studies involving 596 patients. Among the 5 studies that addressed the chondroprotective effect, none found that meniscal scaffolds had a higher chondroprotective effect compared to meniscectomy. In studies comparing CMI and meniscectomy, the Lysholm score results showed a mean difference (MD) range between –5.90 and –4.40. In the case of visual analog scale score, the MD ranged from –1.0 to 1.0. In studies comparing polyurethane meniscal scaffolds and CMI, the Tegner score results showed an MD range of –2.0 to 0.4. Conclusions There was no superiority in chondroprotective effects for both CMI and polyurethane meniscal scaffolds compared to meniscectomy. Although meniscal scaffolds may provide improvements in clinical outcomes, no clinically relevant differences were observed in comparison to meniscectomy. There are no discernible differences between the 2 types of scaffolds.

Background: The treatment of Kümmell disease (KD) is controversial. Corpectomy and reconstruction or osteotomy with long-level fusion was traditionally performed for the advanced KD. However, these procedures can be disadvantageous for elderly patients.Several alternative surgical procedures including transpedicular intravertebral cage augmentation (TPICA) or vertebroplasty (VP) combined with short-segment fixation (SSF) have been suggested to minimize the surgical burden. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous TPICA plus SSF with VP plus SSF for advanced thoracolumbar (T11–L2) KD and to introduce our novel percutaneous TPICA technique using specially designed cannulated cage trials. Methods: We devised specially designed cannulated cage trials to make the TPICA procedure safer and more reproducible, minimizing the risk of the pedicle medial wall violation. All consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous TPICA or VP combined with SSF for advanced thoracolumbar KD, from January 2021 to June 2022, with ≥ 1-year follow-up at a single institution, were included. Perioperative details, clinical outcomes (visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index), and radiological outcomes (anterior vertebral body compression percentage and vertebral kyphotic angle [VKA] of the fractured vertebra, and local Cobb angle [LCA]) were collected and compared between the groups. Results: A total of 42 patients were enrolled, with 21 patients in each group. There were no patients with pedicle medial wall fracture in the TPICA group. Both procedures provided significantly favorable radiological outcomes compared to those preoperatively. No significant differences were observed in the changes over time in all radiological parameters between the groups. Loss of correction during the follow-up period was significantly smaller in patients with TPICA than in those with VP in VKA (median [interquartile range], 2.15 [0.30–2.80] vs. 2.90 [0.90–6.53]; p = 0.030) and LCA (2.70 ± 2.90 vs. 5.17 ± 4.40, p = 0.037). Conclusions Both procedures are minimally invasive and useful options for advanced KD, especially for elderly patients with high comorbidity. Our novel percutaneous TPICA technique using cannulated cage trials, being safer and more reproducible, may allow spine surgeons to easily perform TPICA.

Background: Anterior dislocation in epilepsy patients is relatively severe, difficult to treat, and prone to recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy patients who had anterior shoulder instability and to compare the results of the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy and non-epileptic groups. Methods: A total of 57 shoulders (34 dominant) in 55 patients (18–50 years, 45 men and 10 women) with anterior glenohumeral instability were included in the study and the average follow-up was 24 months. Out of 21 epilepsy patients (23 shoulders), 11 were treated with the open Latarjet procedure and 12 with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Additionally, comparisons were made between the 34 non-epileptic patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure and the epilepsy patients who underwent the same procedure. Results: In the epilepsy group, all 12 patients who underwent Bankart repair had on-track lesions, and all 11 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure had off-track lesions. In the non-epilepsy group, all cases were off-track lesions. In the epilepsy group, there was no significant difference in the postoperative clinical outcome and recurrence rate between the Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure groups. In the Latarjet group, postoperative re-dislocation rate in the non-epilepsy patients was 14% (5/34 cases), compared to 45% (5/11 cases) in the epilepsy patients, 4 of which 4 occurred during seizures. It was 41% in the Bankart repair group for on-track lesions, which was similar to the recurrence rate after the Latarjet for off-track lesions in the epilepsy group. Conclusions After the Latarjet procedure, the functional outcomes in the epilepsy group were similar to those in the non-epilepsy group, except for the higher re-dislocation rate. With either of the surgical procedures, the re-dislocation rate secondary to seizures was very high. Despite the presence of on-track lesions, the Latarjet procedure would be more preferrable for anterior stabilization in epilepsy patients, in view of the high recurrence rate with arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Background: Decreased acetabular version and posterior acetabular coverage of the femoral head have been regarded as the leading causes of sport-related posterior hip dislocation or subluxation. This study aimed to examine the posterior acetabular coverage of the femoral head in 21 patients who sustained posterior hip dislocation or subluxation during sport activities. Methods: The anterior and posterior acetabular rims on 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images were delineated on the normal side in these patients. Radiologic signs, including crossover and posterior wall signs, were examined. The fracture center level (FCL) of the posterior acetabular wall was identified on axial CT images of the injured hip and the level was marked on the normal side. The difference in the femoral head coverage by posterior and anterior acetabular rims was measured by measuring the horizontal distance between anterior and posterior acetabular rims at the FCL (posterior-anterior [P-A] index). The acetabular version was measured at the femoral head and FCL using axial CT images of the normal side. Femoral head coverage by the posterior acetabular wall on the normal side was measured using 3D-CT (areal coverage). Results: The crossover and posterior wall signs were positive in 14 and 10 patients, respectively, in 3D-CT images. The FCL was evenly distributed in the proximal half of the posterior acetabular wall. Seven patients had a P-A index of ≤ 0, and all were positive for the crossover sign. The anterior acetabular rim was relatively prominent in these patients. The acetabular version was lower at the FCL than at the femoral head center (p < 0.001). The proximal half areal coverage of the posterior acetabular wall was significantly smaller than the whole areal coverage (p = 0.003). Conclusions Superior–posterior coverage of the femoral head by the posterior acetabular wall was insufficient in patients who sustained hip posterior dislocation or subluxation during sports activities.

Background: Proximal humerus nails, frequently used for managing proximal humerus fractures, significantly enhance rotational stability and reinforce fractured fragments. Few research exists regarding the optimal number and positioning of distal screws.This study aimed to assess the stability of diverse screw configurations and scrutinize screw distribution and bone stress via finite element analysis. Methods: The humerus intramedullary nail (Humerus Interlocking Nail System; TDM) underwent assessment using finite element analysis applied to a humerus model. Three groups were established based on varying distal screw numbers and locations: all 3 distal locking holes were used in group 1; 2 screws (dynamic hole and proximal static hole) in group 2, and 2 screws (dynamic hole and distal static hole) in group 3. Finite element analysis computed stress distribution within the implant and bone for each group.A 1-mm fracture gap was simulated at the surgical neck, and stress distributions were analyzed in both normal and osteoporotic bone models. Results: Using two screws did not compromise rotational stability. Stress distribution analysis revealed stability across all groups without reaching failure strength. Group 3 exhibited a minor rise in component 11 (direct stress [force per unit area] acting on the positive and negative 1 faces in the 1-axis. direction) and component 22 (direct stress [force per unit area] acting on the positive and negative 2 faces in the 2-axis direction) stress, remaining below failure strength thresholds. Group 1 exhibited the lowest von Mises stress in the nail and screws, while groups 2 and 3 did not reach failure strength levels. Findings remained consistent in the osteoporotic model. Conclusions All 3 groups demonstrated rotational stability concerning stress distribution, indicating that using 2 screws for distal fixation does not adversely affect stability. This suggests the potential for saving surgical time and reducing radiation exposure without compromising stability.

Background: This study aimed to report the short- and midterm outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in weight-bearing shoulders. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 19 cases of ARCR and 10 cases of RSA performed in weight-bearing shoulders from 2009 to 2021. In the ARCR group, postoperative 6-month magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the tendon integrity. In the RSA group, scapular notching, acromial fracture, and implant failure were assessed using plain radiographs, and complications were recorded. In both groups, preoperative and postoperative range of motion and functional scores were documented, along with subjective satisfaction and arm use for weight-bearing on the shoulders. For patients followed up for > 5 years, a midterm analysis was performed. Results: The ARCR group included 8 men and 11 women (average age, 58.8 ± 8.0 years). Initially, Patte types 1, 2, and 3 were noted in 9, 8, and 2 patients, respectively, and 4 patients exhibited full-thickness subscapularis tears. Four patients showed supraspinatus retear, and 2 patients showed subscapularis retear. Retear of any rotator cuff was observed in 5 patients (26.3%). Twelve patients were followed up for > 5 years; 11 (91.7%) used their operated arm for weight-bearing and 9 (75.0%) were satisfied. The RSA group included 5 men and 5 women (average age, 74.3 ± 7.9 years). Procedures included RSAs for cuff tear arthropathy (n = 6), osteoarthritis (n = 3), and fracture nonunion (n = 1). No cases of dislocation, prosthesis loosening, or disassociation were observed throughout the follow-up. However, 1 patient required implant removal due to infection, and 4 patients showed stage 1 scapular notching. Five patients were followed up for > 5 years, all of whom expressed satisfaction and used their operated arms for weight-bearing, despite mean forward flexion (107.5° ± 12.6°) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (61.5 ± 5.3) being less than reported patient acceptable symptomatic state (110° and 76, respectively). Conclusions Both ARCR and RSA showed promising outcomes in terms of weight-bearing on the operated arm and subjective satisfaction at short- and midterm follow-up. Therefore, neither of these surgeries should be considered contraindicated for patients with weight-bearing shoulder conditions.

Background: Periprosthetic fracture (PPF) is a troublesome complication as it utilizes substantial healthcare resources. Recent studies about the epidemiology of PPF after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are still lacking, and there is limited national-level analysis focusing on the comorbid chronic conditions as risk factors of PPF. This study used national registry data from South Korea and aimed to investigate the epidemiology of PPF following TKA between 2010 and 2020 and identify which comorbidities contributed to the risk of PPF. Methods: Using Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) service data in South Korea, the incidence of PPF after TKA between 2010 and 2020 was evaluated and stratified by age and sex. Medical comorbidities were evaluated as possible risk factors for PPF using Cox regression analysis. Results: PPF occurred in 14,429 patients, accounting for 2.37% of total TKA patients. The prevalence of PPF by sex was 2.50% in women and 1.64% in men. The PPF rate was 2.82% in under 60 years, 2.25% in 60 to 69 years, 2.42% in 70 to 79 years, 2.29% in 80 to 89 years, and 2.12% in over 90 years. Among 17 analyzed comorbidities, 11 were found to be associated with PPF after TKA. Severe liver disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.303), hemiplegia (HR, 1.244), and dementia (HR, 1.206) were the top 3 risk factors.Although osteoporosis, pulmonary disease, peptic ulcer, and diabetes showed relatively low HRs than these top 3 factors, the incidence rates were higher. Conclusions PPF occurred in 2.37% of TKA patients in South Korea from 2010 to 2020. PPF rate was higher in women. To prevent PPF after TKA, proper patient management and education should be emphasized, particularly in patients with severe liver disease, hemiplegia, and dementia.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: Despite diabetes mellitus (DM) and pancreatitis being known risk factors for pancreatic cancer, patients with these conditions are not included in pancreatic cancer screening due to the low incidence of pancreatic cancer in these populations. This study aimed to determine the high-risk subgroup of patients with diabetes and pancreatitis that would benefit from pancreatic cancer screening. Methods: A nested case-control study was conducted using data from the National Health Information Database of the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Patients were categorized into the following groups: type 2 diabetes mellitus only (T2DM-only), pancreatitis-only (PAN-only), T2DM followed by pancreatitis (T2DM-PAN), post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus (PPDM), and no diabetes and no pancreatitis (NDNP). Conditional logistic regression was used to determine significant associations of each group with pancreatic cancer development risk. Results: The risk of pancreatic cancer was significantly higher in the T2DM-PAN (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.48 to 5.49) and PPDM (AOR, 4.71; 95% CI, 4.12 to 5.37) groups than in the NDNP group. Compared to patients in the NDNP group, those with PPDM using insulin had a 17-fold increased risk (AOR, 16.72; 95% CI, 9.50 to 29.43), and individuals with PPDM who had diabetes for less than 3 years had a more than 8-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer (AOR, 8.83; 95% CI, 5.99 to 13.01). Conclusion In patients with post-pancreatitis diabetes, insulin use or shorter duration of diabetes was associated with a higher risk of pancreatic cancer, suggesting that patients in these subgroups may require close monitoring for pancreatic cancer development.