Background: and Purpose: Brain atrophy, characterized by sulcal widening and ventricular enlargement, is a hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease. Visual assessments are subjective and variable, while automated methods struggle with subtle intensity differences and standardization, highlighting limitations in both approaches. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a novel method focusing on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) regions by assessing segmentation accuracy, detecting stage-specific atrophy patterns, and testing generalizability to unstandardized datasets. Methods: We utilized T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data from 3,315 participants from Samsung Medical Center and 1,439 participants from other hospitals. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and W-scores were calculated for each region of interest (ROI) to assess stage-specific atrophy patterns. Results: The segmentation demonstrated high accuracy, with average DSC values exceeding 0.9 for ventricular and hippocampal regions and above 0.8 for cortical regions. Significant differences in W-scores were observed across cognitive stages (cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, dementia of Alzheimer’s type) for all ROIs (all, p<0.05). Similar trends were observed in the images from other hospitals, confirming the algorithm’s generalizability to datasets without prior standardization. Conclusions This study demonstrates the robustness and clinical applicability of a novel CSF-focused segmentation method for assessing brain atrophy. The method provides a scalable and objective framework for evaluating structural changes across cognitive stages and holds potential for broader application in neurodegenerative disease research and clinical practice.

Background: and Purpose: Brain atrophy, characterized by sulcal widening and ventricular enlargement, is a hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease. Visual assessments are subjective and variable, while automated methods struggle with subtle intensity differences and standardization, highlighting limitations in both approaches. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a novel method focusing on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) regions by assessing segmentation accuracy, detecting stage-specific atrophy patterns, and testing generalizability to unstandardized datasets. Methods: We utilized T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data from 3,315 participants from Samsung Medical Center and 1,439 participants from other hospitals. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and W-scores were calculated for each region of interest (ROI) to assess stage-specific atrophy patterns. Results: The segmentation demonstrated high accuracy, with average DSC values exceeding 0.9 for ventricular and hippocampal regions and above 0.8 for cortical regions. Significant differences in W-scores were observed across cognitive stages (cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, dementia of Alzheimer’s type) for all ROIs (all, p<0.05). Similar trends were observed in the images from other hospitals, confirming the algorithm’s generalizability to datasets without prior standardization. Conclusions This study demonstrates the robustness and clinical applicability of a novel CSF-focused segmentation method for assessing brain atrophy. The method provides a scalable and objective framework for evaluating structural changes across cognitive stages and holds potential for broader application in neurodegenerative disease research and clinical practice.

Background: and Purpose: Brain atrophy, characterized by sulcal widening and ventricular enlargement, is a hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease. Visual assessments are subjective and variable, while automated methods struggle with subtle intensity differences and standardization, highlighting limitations in both approaches. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a novel method focusing on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) regions by assessing segmentation accuracy, detecting stage-specific atrophy patterns, and testing generalizability to unstandardized datasets. Methods: We utilized T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data from 3,315 participants from Samsung Medical Center and 1,439 participants from other hospitals. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and W-scores were calculated for each region of interest (ROI) to assess stage-specific atrophy patterns. Results: The segmentation demonstrated high accuracy, with average DSC values exceeding 0.9 for ventricular and hippocampal regions and above 0.8 for cortical regions. Significant differences in W-scores were observed across cognitive stages (cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, dementia of Alzheimer’s type) for all ROIs (all, p<0.05). Similar trends were observed in the images from other hospitals, confirming the algorithm’s generalizability to datasets without prior standardization. Conclusions This study demonstrates the robustness and clinical applicability of a novel CSF-focused segmentation method for assessing brain atrophy. The method provides a scalable and objective framework for evaluating structural changes across cognitive stages and holds potential for broader application in neurodegenerative disease research and clinical practice.

Background: and Purpose: Brain atrophy, characterized by sulcal widening and ventricular enlargement, is a hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease. Visual assessments are subjective and variable, while automated methods struggle with subtle intensity differences and standardization, highlighting limitations in both approaches. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a novel method focusing on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) regions by assessing segmentation accuracy, detecting stage-specific atrophy patterns, and testing generalizability to unstandardized datasets. Methods: We utilized T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data from 3,315 participants from Samsung Medical Center and 1,439 participants from other hospitals. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and W-scores were calculated for each region of interest (ROI) to assess stage-specific atrophy patterns. Results: The segmentation demonstrated high accuracy, with average DSC values exceeding 0.9 for ventricular and hippocampal regions and above 0.8 for cortical regions. Significant differences in W-scores were observed across cognitive stages (cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, dementia of Alzheimer’s type) for all ROIs (all, p<0.05). Similar trends were observed in the images from other hospitals, confirming the algorithm’s generalizability to datasets without prior standardization. Conclusions This study demonstrates the robustness and clinical applicability of a novel CSF-focused segmentation method for assessing brain atrophy. The method provides a scalable and objective framework for evaluating structural changes across cognitive stages and holds potential for broader application in neurodegenerative disease research and clinical practice.

Objective: Since its development in 2002 by the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology and the Korean Society for Affective Disorders, the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder (KMAP-DD) has undergone five revisions. Methods: To improve survey efficiency, reflect general clinical practice, and facilitate comparisons with previous KMAP-DD revisions, the overall structure of the questionnaire was retained. The six sections of the questionnaire were as follows:1) pharmacological treatment strategies for major depressive disorder with and without psychotic features; 2) pharmacological treatment strategies for persistent depressive disorder and other depressive disorder subtypes; 3) consensus on treatment-resistant depression; 4) selection of an antidepressant in consideration of safety, adverse effects, and comorbid physical conditions; 5) treatment strategies for special populations (children/adolescents, elderly, and women); and 6) non-pharmacological biological therapies. First-, second-, and third-line treatment recommendations were statistically derived. Results: Compared to KMAP-DD 2021, only minor changes were noted, due to the limited introduction of new medications or treatment modalities. Nonetheless, notable shifts included an increased preference for atypical antipsychotics (AAPs), and higher preference of combination strategies involving AAPs and mood stabilizers, indicating a more proactive and intensive treatment trend in Korea. Conclusion KMAP-DD is expected to serve as a valuable clinical resource by providing expert consensus-based recommendations on specific treatment strategies and pharmacological options for major depressive disorders, thereby supporting the integration of real-world clinical practice with evidence-based medicine.

Background: It is well known that a large number of patients with diabetes also have dyslipidemia, which significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination drugs consisting of metformin and atorvastatin, widely used as therapeutic agents for diabetes and dyslipidemia. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group and phase III multicenter study included adults with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels >7.0% and <10.0%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >100 and <250 mg/dL. One hundred eighty-five eligible subjects were randomized to the combination group (metformin+atorvastatin), metformin group (metformin+atorvastatin placebo), and atorvastatin group (atorvastatin+metformin placebo). The primary efficacy endpoints were the percent changes in HbA1c and LDL-C levels from baseline at the end of the treatment. Results: After 16 weeks of treatment compared to baseline, HbA1c showed a significant difference of 0.94% compared to the atorvastatin group in the combination group (0.35% vs. −0.58%, respectively; P<0.0001), whereas the proportion of patients with increased HbA1c was also 62% and 15%, respectively, showing a significant difference (P<0.001). The combination group also showed a significant decrease in LDL-C levels compared to the metformin group (−55.20% vs. −7.69%, P<0.001) without previously unknown adverse drug events. Conclusion The addition of atorvastatin to metformin improved HbA1c and LDL-C levels to a significant extent compared to metformin or atorvastatin alone in diabetes and dyslipidemia patients. This study also suggested metformin’s preventive effect on the glucose-elevating potential of atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, insufficiently controlled with exercise and diet. Metformin and atorvastatin combination might be an effective treatment in reducing the CVD risk in patients with both diabetes and dyslipidemia because of its lowering effect on LDL-C and glucose.