Objective:The level of discipline construction is an important indicator of a hospital′s comprehensive strength and core competitiveness.Establishing a scientific, reasonable, and effective performance evaluation system for the clinical medicine advantageous disciplines is of particular significance for university affiliated hospitals to strengthen discipline construction, improve governance systems, and promote high-quality development of hospitals.Methods:The Delphi method was used to determine the reliability of the indicator system by measuring the positivity coefficient, authority level, coefficient of variation, and coordination coefficient.Using Analytic Hierarchy Process, judgment matrix was established to determine the corresponding weights of elements, and calculate the total weight coefficients of each indicator, as well the consistency of the judgment matrix was checked.Results:The Cronbach′s coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.945, indicating high reliability.The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of expert consultation were 90.0%and 94.7%.Two rounds′ expert authority coefficients were 0.743 and 0.720.And the Kendall harmony coefficient was 0.196~0.731. The differences mentioned above were statistically significant(all P<0.05).Through two rounds consultation, a performance evaluation system for the clinical medicine advantageous disciplines was constructed, including 8 primary indicators and 24 secondary indicators.The weight coefficients of the primary indicators were 0.126, 0.208, 0.091, 0.162, 0.178, 0.118, 0.068, 0.049, and the total weight coefficients of each indicator were calculated, which showed good logical reliability. Conclusions:The performance evaluation system for the clinical medicine advantageous disciplines has strong scientific validity.It can provide evaluation tools for promoting the rational allocation and efficient utilization of hospital resources.

Objective:The level of discipline construction is an important indicator of a hospital′s comprehensive strength and core competitiveness.Establishing a scientific, reasonable, and effective performance evaluation system for the clinical medicine advantageous disciplines is of particular significance for university affiliated hospitals to strengthen discipline construction, improve governance systems, and promote high-quality development of hospitals.Methods:The Delphi method was used to determine the reliability of the indicator system by measuring the positivity coefficient, authority level, coefficient of variation, and coordination coefficient.Using Analytic Hierarchy Process, judgment matrix was established to determine the corresponding weights of elements, and calculate the total weight coefficients of each indicator, as well the consistency of the judgment matrix was checked.Results:The Cronbach′s coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.945, indicating high reliability.The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of expert consultation were 90.0%and 94.7%.Two rounds′ expert authority coefficients were 0.743 and 0.720.And the Kendall harmony coefficient was 0.196~0.731. The differences mentioned above were statistically significant(all P<0.05).Through two rounds consultation, a performance evaluation system for the clinical medicine advantageous disciplines was constructed, including 8 primary indicators and 24 secondary indicators.The weight coefficients of the primary indicators were 0.126, 0.208, 0.091, 0.162, 0.178, 0.118, 0.068, 0.049, and the total weight coefficients of each indicator were calculated, which showed good logical reliability. Conclusions:The performance evaluation system for the clinical medicine advantageous disciplines has strong scientific validity.It can provide evaluation tools for promoting the rational allocation and efficient utilization of hospital resources.

Objective:Under the background of the high-quality development of public hospitals, the affiliated hospitals of universities need to explore the effective path of interdisciplinary integration based on the current development status of disciplines, adjust the orientation, mechanism and goal of disciplinary development, and achieve the coordinated development of disciplines. This paper aims to provide exploratory ideas for the formulation of relevant systems and strategies of interdisciplinary integration for hospitals.Methods:This paper analyzes the internal influencing factors of interdisciplinary integration and development of hospitals from the perspective of discipline construction participants, and combines the overall requirements of high-quality development of public hospitals with the GREP model to build a strategic analysis framework for interdisciplinary integration of university affiliated hospitals.Results:Hospitals can use this strategic analysis framework to find problems through discipline self-evaluation, interviews, interdisciplinary integration mode and horizontal comparison of typical experiences, and grasp the main problems according to the basic steps of GREP problem solving, propose solutions, and finally draw conclusions.Conclusions:Based on four dimensions, GREP model provides a strategic analysis framework for the implementation path of promoting interdisciplinary integration in hospital design, and has certain practical significance for the formulation of hospital related strategies.