Objective:To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM).Methods:A retrospective case series study was conducted. Clinical and follow-up data of 73 MPeM patients who received pemetrexed and cisplatin (AP regimen)-based treatment at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2004 to December 2022 were collected. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform the survival analysis; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the influencing factors of prognosis by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.Results:In 73 MPeM patients, there were 33 males and 40 females, with a median age of 57 years old (range: 20-76 years old). Among them, 41 patients (56.2%) were aged ≥55 years old, 5 patients (6.8%) had a history of asbestos exposure, 45 patients (61.6%) presented with ascites, and 32 patients (43.8%) had distant metastasis, 70 patients (95.9%) were epithelioid subtype, 38 patients (52.1%) underwent surgery, and 3 patients (4.1%) received radiotherapy. The median OS time of all patients was 30 months (95% CI: 25-50 months), and the median PFS time was 8 months (95% CI: 6-14 months). Univariate analysis results showed that the differences in OS and PFS between patients with different ages (<55 years old vs. ≥55 years old: the median OS time not reached vs. 25 months, P < 0.001; the median PFS time 13 months vs. 7 months, P = 0.046) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (1 point vs. 2 points: the median OS time 37 months vs. 21 months, P < 0.001; the median PFS time 14 months vs. 4 months, P = 0.004) were statistically significant. There were statistically significant differences in OS among patients with different status of surgery (with vs. without: the median OS time 37 months vs. 24 months, P = 0.020), history of asbestos exposure (with vs. without: the median OS time 32 months vs. 18 months, P = 0.002) and distant metastasis (with vs. without: the median OS time 58 months vs. 20 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis results showed that ECOG score of 2 points ( HR = 5.04, 95% CI: 1.29-19.73, P = 0.020) and distant metastasis ( HR = 4.26, 95% CI: 1.77-10.24, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for OS of patients. Conclusions:Most MPeM patients are female, the epithelioid subtype is predominant, and the overall prognosis is poor. However, patients aged <55 years old, without history of asbestos exposure, with a good general condition, with surgery, or without distant metastasis have relatively good prognosis.

Objective:To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM).Methods:A retrospective case series study was conducted. Clinical and follow-up data of 73 MPeM patients who received pemetrexed and cisplatin (AP regimen)-based treatment at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2004 to December 2022 were collected. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform the survival analysis; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the influencing factors of prognosis by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.Results:In 73 MPeM patients, there were 33 males and 40 females, with a median age of 57 years old (range: 20-76 years old). Among them, 41 patients (56.2%) were aged ≥55 years old, 5 patients (6.8%) had a history of asbestos exposure, 45 patients (61.6%) presented with ascites, and 32 patients (43.8%) had distant metastasis, 70 patients (95.9%) were epithelioid subtype, 38 patients (52.1%) underwent surgery, and 3 patients (4.1%) received radiotherapy. The median OS time of all patients was 30 months (95% CI: 25-50 months), and the median PFS time was 8 months (95% CI: 6-14 months). Univariate analysis results showed that the differences in OS and PFS between patients with different ages (<55 years old vs. ≥55 years old: the median OS time not reached vs. 25 months, P < 0.001; the median PFS time 13 months vs. 7 months, P = 0.046) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (1 point vs. 2 points: the median OS time 37 months vs. 21 months, P < 0.001; the median PFS time 14 months vs. 4 months, P = 0.004) were statistically significant. There were statistically significant differences in OS among patients with different status of surgery (with vs. without: the median OS time 37 months vs. 24 months, P = 0.020), history of asbestos exposure (with vs. without: the median OS time 32 months vs. 18 months, P = 0.002) and distant metastasis (with vs. without: the median OS time 58 months vs. 20 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis results showed that ECOG score of 2 points ( HR = 5.04, 95% CI: 1.29-19.73, P = 0.020) and distant metastasis ( HR = 4.26, 95% CI: 1.77-10.24, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for OS of patients. Conclusions:Most MPeM patients are female, the epithelioid subtype is predominant, and the overall prognosis is poor. However, patients aged <55 years old, without history of asbestos exposure, with a good general condition, with surgery, or without distant metastasis have relatively good prognosis.

OBJECTIVESTo identify whether Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) encoded latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) can induce tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1) expression and promote its anti-apoptosis activity via the NF-kappaB signaling pathway, and assess that LMP1 suppresses apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODSA stable transfected cell line HNE2-LMP1 was established by introducing LMP1 cDNA into HNE2 cells. Transactivation of TRAF1 was determined by luciferase reporter assay, while expression of TRAF1 mRNA was detected by RT-PCR and expression of TRAF1 protein and caspase 3 by Western blot analysis. Apoptosis activity was observed through fluorescence staining.

RESULTSLMP1 induced TRAF1 expression in NPC cells and caused a decrease in apoptosis. This induction could be blocked by antisense LMP1. Moreover, LMP1-mediated induction of a TRAF1 promoter-driven reporter gene was significantly impaired when the kappaB site kappaB1 or kappaB5 was disrupted, whereas mutation of kappaB3 had only a minor effect on LMP1 dependent up-regulation of the reporter gene.

CONCLUSIONLMP1 induces TRAF1 expression and promotes its anti-apoptosis activity via the NF-kappaB signaling pathway, which may be one of the mechanisms that LMP1 uses to suppress apoptosis in NPC cells.

Apoptosis ; physiology ; Humans ; NF-kappa B ; physiology ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; physiopathology ; Protein Biosynthesis ; Signal Transduction ; physiology ; TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 1 ; Tumor Cells, Cultured ; Viral Matrix Proteins ; physiology