Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of endoscopically visualized radiofrequency for treating sacroiliac joint pain. Methods: The study protocol was preregistered on INPLASY (INPLASY202450011). A systematic search was carried out across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science, from their inception until May 6, 2024. Peer-reviewed studies on human participants with low back pain diagnosed with sacroiliac joint pain and treated with endoscopically visualized radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were included. The study focused on evaluating changes in the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from before the commencement of endoscopically visualized radiofrequency to postoperation. The quantitative syntheses employed a random-effects model, with effect sizes reported using the mean difference. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on 6-month and 12-month postoperative time points. Results: Four studies were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. Three of the studies were case series, while one was a retrospective cohort study. The mean difference of VAS scores between the preoperative and 6-month and 12-month postoperative assessments was -5.60 and -5.96, respectively. The mean difference of the ODI between preoperative and 6-month and 12-month postoperative assessments was -21.03 and -23.67, respectively. A subgroup analysis of both outcome measurement indices at the 2 follow-up time points did not reveal any statistically significant differences. Conclusion Endoscopically visualized RFA demonstrates potential as a treatment modality for sacroiliac joint pain; however, there is currently insufficient evidence to substantiate its long-term efficacy.

Aneurysm, Dissecting/surgery* ; Aorta, Thoracic/surgery* ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery* ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Humans ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Surgical Procedures

INTRODUCTIONHepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been reported in B-cell lymphoma patients with resolved hepatitis B (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-negative and hepatitis B core antibody [HBcAb]-positive). This study aimed to assess HBV reactivation and hepatitis occurrence in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with resolved hepatitis B receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy compared with HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-negative patients to identify risk factors for HBV reactivation and hepatitis occurrence and to analyze whether HBV reactivation and hepatitis affect the survival of DLBCL patients with resolved hepatitis B.

METHODSWe reviewed the clinical data of 278 patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab-containing therapy between January 2004 and May 2008 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, China. Predictive factors for HBV reactivation, hepatitis development, and survival were examined by univariate analysis using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test and by multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model.

RESULTSAmong the 278 patients, 165 were HBsAg-negative. Among these 165 patients, 6 (10.9%) of 55 HBcAb-positive (resolved HBV infection) patients experienced HBV reactivation compared with none (0%) of 110 HBcAb-negative patients (P = 0.001). Patients with resolved hepatitis B had a higher hepatitis occurrence rate than HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-negative patients (21.8% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.013). HBcAb positivity and elevated baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were independent risk factors for hepatitis. Among the 55 patients with resolved hepatitis B, patients with elevated baseline serum ALT or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were more likely to develop hepatitis than those with normal serum ALT or AST levels (P = 0.037, P = 0.005, respectively). An elevated baseline AST level was an independent risk factor for hepatitis in these patients. Six patients with HBV reactivation recovered after immediate antiviral therapy, and chemotherapy was continued. HBcAb positivity, HBV reactivation, or hepatitis did not negatively affect the survival of DLBCL patients.

CONCLUSIONSDLBCL patients with resolved hepatitis B may have a higher risk of developing HBV reactivation and hepatitis than HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-negative patients. Close monitoring and prompt antiviral therapy are required in these patients.

China ; Hepatitis B ; Hepatitis B Antibodies ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens ; Hepatitis B virus ; Humans ; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse ; Mortality ; Prognosis ; Risk Factors ; Rituximab ; Virus Activation

This study was aimed to investigate the relevance of nilotinib in combination with tetrandrine (Tet) on reversing multidrug resistance and inducing apoptosis of K562/A02 cell line and its mechanism. Methyl-thiazol tetrazolium (MTT) assay was employed to examine the pharmacological effect of nilotinib or Tet alone on K562/A02 cell line, the IC(50) of daunorubicin (DNR) on K562/A02 cell line treated with nilotinib and Tet was calculated; the flow cytometry (FCM) was employed to detect the apoptosis rate of K562/A02. The expression of bax/survivin mRNA was determined by RT-PCR, and the expression of bax/survivin protein was assayed by Western blot. The results showed that after being treated by 5 nmol/L nilotinib or 1.0 µml/L Tet for 48 hours, IC(50) of DNR to K562/A02 was 5.71 ± 0.72 mg/L or 6.52 ± 0.43 mg/L, respectively, while in their combined treatment, IC(50) decreased to 3.12 ± 0.13 mg/L. Nilotinib or Tet alone could increase DNR-inducing apoptosis rate of K562/A02 cell, while the apoptosis rate of K562/A02 increased remarkably in combination treatment of nilotinib with Tet. After being treated with 5 nmol/L nilotinib or 1.0 µml/L Tet alone for 48 hours, the expressions of bax mRNA and BAX protein was up-regulated, while both effects were more obvious in combination treatment of nilotinib with Tet. Treatment with 5 nmol/L nilotinib or 1.0 µmol/L Tet alone for 48 hours down-regulated the expression of survivin mRNA and its protein, while treatment of nilotinib in combination with Tet had more significant effect on down-regulation of their expression. It is concluded that the K562/A02 cells are resistant to DNR, nilotinib or Tet alone both can partially reverse resistance of K562/A02 cells to DNR, increase the apoptosis rate of K562/A02 cells. Combination of nilotinib with Tet shows obvious synergistic action, mechanism of which may associate with up-regulation of bax mRNA and BAX protein expressions and down-regulation of survivin mRNA and its protein expressions.
Apoptosis ; drug effects ; Benzylisoquinolines ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Daunorubicin ; pharmacology ; Drug Resistance, Multiple ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic ; Humans ; Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins ; genetics ; K562 Cells ; Pyrimidines ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; bcl-2-Associated X Protein ; genetics

OBJECTIVETo investigate the reversible effect of nilotinib, BrTet (5-bromotetrandrine) and their combination on multidrug resistance cell line K562/A02 and its mechanism.

METHODSCell proliferation inhibition was assessed by MTT method and cell apoptosis by flow cytometry (FCM). The expression of mdr1 mRNA was determined by RT-PCR, and the expression of P-gp was assessed by Western blot.

RESULTSAfter 48 h 5 nmol/L nilotinib or 0.5 µmol/L BrTet treatment, IC(50) of daunorubicin (DNR) to K562/A02 was 4.52 mg/L or 5.41 mg/L respectively; While on combinative treatment, its IC(50) decreased to 2.98 mg/L. Nilotinib or BrTet alone was not able to increase the DNR induced apoptosis rate of K562/A02 cell (P > 0.05), while on combination treatment the apoptosis rate increased remarkably. After 48 h 5 nmol/L nilotinib or 0.5 µmol/L BrTet treatment alone, gray-scale value of mdr1 mRNA was 0.48 ± 0.04 or 0.64 ± 0.01, respectively; while on combinative treatment the value decreased to 0.35 ± 0.04. The P-gp expression level in K562/A02 cells was 0.61 ± 0.05, or 0.52 ± 0.02 when treated with 5 nmol/L nilotinib or 0.5 µmol/L BrTet alone for 48 h, but on combination treatment, the level decreased to 0.44 ± 0.03.

CONCLUSIONNilotinib or BrTet alone can partially reverse drug resistance of K562/A02 cells. The mechanism may be associated with the decrease of mdr1 mRNA and P-gp expression and increase of the apoptosis rate. And there is a synergistic action with these two agants in combination.

ATP-Binding Cassette, Sub-Family B, Member 1 ; metabolism ; Daunorubicin ; pharmacology ; Drug Resistance, Multiple ; drug effects ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; drug effects ; Humans ; K562 Cells

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEResearch has shown that 5-bromotetrandrine (BrTet) can effectively reverse multidrug resistance (MDR). Imatinib plays an important role in cell proliferation. This study explored the efficacy of the combination of imatinib and BrTet on reversing MDR of tumor cells and its mechanism.

METHODSCytoxicity was assessed by MTT assay. Apoptosis of K562/A02 cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. The expressions of mdr1 mRNA and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) were detected using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blot analysis.

RESULTSAfter 48 h of treatment with 0.0625 micromol/L imatinib, 0.5 micromol/L BrTet, or both, the 50% inhibition concentration (IC50) of daunorubicin (DNR) for the K562/A02 cells were 5.69 mg/L, 5.41 mg/L, and 2.19 mg/L, respectively. The gray-scale values of mdr1 mRNA expression in the K562/A02 cells were 0.65+/-0.02, 0.64+/-0.01, and 0.25+/-0.03, respectively. The expression levels of P-gp were 0.74+/-0.02, 0.52+/-0.02, and 0.29+/-0.02, respectively. All decreased significantly in the K562/A02 cells treated with both imatinib and BrTet compared to cells treated with imatinib and BrTet alone (P<0.05). The apoptosis rates of the K562/A02 cells increased without a significant difference after treatment with DNR, imatinib, or BrTet (P>0.05), while increased significantly after treatment with DNR combined with imatinib, BrTet, or both (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONSThe MDR of K562/A02 cells may be partially reversed by imatinib or BrTet, and the mechanism may be related to the downregulation of mdr1 mRNA and P-gp expression and the upregulation of the rate of apoptosis in K562/A02 cells. Imatinib combined with BrTet showed a synergistic effect on K562/A02 cells.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Sub-Family B ; ATP-Binding Cassette, Sub-Family B, Member 1 ; genetics ; metabolism ; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic ; pharmacokinetics ; pharmacology ; Antineoplastic Agents ; pharmacology ; Apoptosis ; drug effects ; Benzamides ; Benzylisoquinolines ; pharmacology ; Cell Proliferation ; drug effects ; Daunorubicin ; pharmacokinetics ; pharmacology ; Down-Regulation ; Drug Resistance, Multiple ; drug effects ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; drug effects ; Drug Synergism ; Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic ; Humans ; Imatinib Mesylate ; K562 Cells ; drug effects ; Piperazines ; pharmacology ; Pyrimidines ; pharmacology ; RNA, Messenger ; metabolism