1.Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Bing-Qi WU ; Da-Yue CHEN ; Lee Kai Xing ALVIN ; Pang-Hsuan HSIAO ; Chia-Yu LIN ; Michael Jian-Wen CHEN ; Ling-Yi LI ; Chien-Ying LAI ; Hsien-Te CHEN ; Chun TSENG
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique 2024;9(2):142-153
Objective:
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of endoscopically visualized radiofrequency for treating sacroiliac joint pain.
Methods:
The study protocol was preregistered on INPLASY (INPLASY202450011). A systematic search was carried out across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science, from their inception until May 6, 2024. Peer-reviewed studies on human participants with low back pain diagnosed with sacroiliac joint pain and treated with endoscopically visualized radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were included. The study focused on evaluating changes in the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from before the commencement of endoscopically visualized radiofrequency to postoperation. The quantitative syntheses employed a random-effects model, with effect sizes reported using the mean difference. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on 6-month and 12-month postoperative time points.
Results:
Four studies were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. Three of the studies were case series, while one was a retrospective cohort study. The mean difference of VAS scores between the preoperative and 6-month and 12-month postoperative assessments was -5.60 and -5.96, respectively. The mean difference of the ODI between preoperative and 6-month and 12-month postoperative assessments was -21.03 and -23.67, respectively. A subgroup analysis of both outcome measurement indices at the 2 follow-up time points did not reveal any statistically significant differences.
Conclusion
Endoscopically visualized RFA demonstrates potential as a treatment modality for sacroiliac joint pain; however, there is currently insufficient evidence to substantiate its long-term efficacy.
2.Vascular endothelial growth factor C as a predictor of early recurrence and poor prognosis of resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer.
Shuo Chueh CHEN ; Chuen Ming SHIH ; Guan Chin TSENG ; Wei Erh CHENG ; Jean CHIOU ; Michael HSIAO ; Min Liang KUO ; Jen Liang SU ; Chih Yi CHEN
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2011;40(7):319-324
INTRODUCTIONStage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is potentially curable after completely resection, but early recurrence may infl uence prognosis. This study hypothesises that vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) plays a key role in predicting early recurrence and poor survival of patients with stage I NSCLC.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThe expression of VEGF-C was immuno-histochemically (IHC) analysed in tumour samples of primary stage I NSCLC and correlated to early recurrence (< 36 months), disease-free survival, and overall survival in all 49 patients.
RESULTSEarly recurrence was identifi ed in 16 patients (33%), and the early recurrence rate in strong and weak VEGF-C activity was significantly different (P = 0.016). VEGF-C was also an independent risk factor in predicting early recurrence (HR = 3.98, P = 0.02). Patients with strong VEGF-C staining also had poor 3-year disease-free survival (P = 0.008) and overall survival (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONStrong VEGF-C IHC staining could be a biomarker for predicting early recurrence and poor prognosis of resected stage I NSCLC, if the results of the present study are confirmed in a larger study. A more aggressive adjuvant therapy should be used in this group of patients.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biomarkers ; blood ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; blood ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Survival Analysis ; Taiwan ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A ; blood ; metabolism

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail