1.Evaluation index system of teaching quality in clinical teaching bases under the background of medical-education collaboration
Wenjuan ZHOU ; Wangxing KANG ; Miaoxuan XIE ; Wenhuang HUANG
Modern Hospital 2025;25(8):1300-1304
Objective To develop a standardized evaluation index system for assessing teaching quality in clinical teach-ing bases,providing a framework for self-assessment and continuous improvement.Methods An initial set of evaluation indica-tors was developed through a comprehensive literature review.Using the Delphi method,expert opinions were collected via struc-tured questionnaires from 22 specialists in the field.Indicator weights were determined through the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.The evaluation frequency and interpretive meaning of each indicator were subsequently established.Results A hierar-chical evaluation index system was constructed,consisting of 3 primary indicators,7 secondary indicators,and 17 tertiary indica-tors.The weight and significance of each indicator were defined.Based on expert consensus,it is recommended that evaluations be conducted once per academic semester.Conclusion The proposed evaluation index system aligns with both clinical and edu-cational principles,features comprehensive and practical content,and is well-suited for self-assessment by clinical teaching ba-ses.It provides a robust reference for enhancing the overall quality of clinical education.
2.Evaluation index system of teaching quality in clinical teaching bases under the background of medical-education collaboration
Wenjuan ZHOU ; Wangxing KANG ; Miaoxuan XIE ; Wenhuang HUANG
Modern Hospital 2025;25(8):1300-1304
Objective To develop a standardized evaluation index system for assessing teaching quality in clinical teach-ing bases,providing a framework for self-assessment and continuous improvement.Methods An initial set of evaluation indica-tors was developed through a comprehensive literature review.Using the Delphi method,expert opinions were collected via struc-tured questionnaires from 22 specialists in the field.Indicator weights were determined through the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.The evaluation frequency and interpretive meaning of each indicator were subsequently established.Results A hierar-chical evaluation index system was constructed,consisting of 3 primary indicators,7 secondary indicators,and 17 tertiary indica-tors.The weight and significance of each indicator were defined.Based on expert consensus,it is recommended that evaluations be conducted once per academic semester.Conclusion The proposed evaluation index system aligns with both clinical and edu-cational principles,features comprehensive and practical content,and is well-suited for self-assessment by clinical teaching ba-ses.It provides a robust reference for enhancing the overall quality of clinical education.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail