Objective:To investigate the clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection in children and the efficacy of interferon combined with ganciclovir.Methods:A total of 252 children with Epstein-Barr virus infection who received treatment in Liaocheng Maternal and Child Health Hospital from June 2018 to February 2020 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to undergo treatment either with ganciclovir alone (control group, n = 126) or interferon combined with ganciclovir (experimental group, n = 126). General condition, clinical manifestation, clinical outcomes, and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups. Results:The 252 children with Epstein-Barr virus infection were divided into four groups according to different age brackets: infancy (3.97%), early childhood (53.57%), preschool (28.97%), school age (13.49%). Children at the early childhood and preschool ages accounted for high proportions. Their clinical manifestations included fever, pharyngeal congestion, cervical lymph node swelling, and pharyngeal pain. Children with hepatosplenomegaly accounted for the highest proportion (44.12%) among those at the school age, and children with binocular edema accounted for the highest proportion (10.37%) among those at the early childhood age. The time to defervesce, eyelid edema, and lymph node regression in the experimental group were (3.55 ± 1.58) hours, (3.82 ± 1.17) hours, and (9.55 ± 1.60) hours respectively, which were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(4.40 ± 1.80) hours, (5.33 ± 1.58) hours, (10.44 ± 1.66) hours, t = 3.64, 2.47, 2.67, P < 0.001, P = 0.024, 0.009]. The total response rate was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group [96.03% (107/126) vs. 84.92% (121/126), χ2 = 9.03, P = 0.003]. Conclusion:Epstein-Barr virus infection has different clinical manifestations in children at different ages. Interferon combined with ganciclovir is more effective on Epstein-Barr virus infection than ganciclovir alone.

Objective To discuss the formation mechanism of teardrop fracture of the axis and observe the clinical efficacy of anterior or posterior induction operation according to the fracture type.Methods Thirteen patients with teardrop fracture of the axis treated from May 2001 to October 2010 were involved in the study.There were 10 males and 3 females,at age range of 18-55 years (mean,35.5 years).Four patients were combined with cervical spinal cord injury (one patient with grade C and two with grade D according American Spinal Injury Association,ASIA).Injury causes included traffic injury in 11 patients and fall from height in two.After admission,the anteroposterior,lateral and mouth X-ray films,spiral CT sagittal reconstruction and MRI examination of the cervical vertebra were performed in all the patients.According to the injury mechanism,there were 10 patients with extension fractures treated with C2,3 intervertebral bone fusion and internal fixation through submandibular retropharyngeal approach and three with flexion fractures treated with posterior C2,3 intervertebral bone fusion and pedicle screw fixation.The clinical efficacy was also observed. Results All patients received complete exposure and effective reduction and fixation.The average time of anterior exposure and posterior exposure was 77 minutes and 125 minutes,respectively.No surgical complications occurred.All patients were followed up for 9-34 months (mean,13 months).Reexamination at four months after operation displayed bone healing in all patients.There was no lessening or breakage of the internal fixators.The spinal function of three patients with ASIA grade D injury and that of one patient with ASIA grade C injury recovered to normal at postoperative 1.5 and 6 months respectively. Conclusion The surgical approaches for teardrop fracture of the axis developed in the light of the fracture formation mechanism are beneficial and safe.