1.Single port–assisted diverting ileostomy formation for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection
Kyong-Min KANG ; Heung-Kwon OH ; Hong-min AHN ; Hye-Rim SHIN ; Min-Hyeong JO ; Mi-Jeong CHOI ; Duck-Woo KIM ; Sung-Bum KANG
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2025;28(1):47-49
Stoma formation for fecal diversion is a common procedure in patients with various complicated conditions after colorectal surgery, such as anastomotic leakage. The singleincision laparoscopic approach for stoma creation offers several advantages, including a reduction in surgical wounds and related complications as well as optimal visualization of the surgical field. This video demonstrates a single-port–assisted diverting ileostomy in a 61-yearold man with anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection for advanced rectal cancer.
2.A practical guide for enteral nutrition from the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Part I. prescribing enteral nutrition orders
Ye Rim CHANG ; Bo-Eun KIM ; In Seok LEE ; Youn Soo CHO ; Sung-Sik HAN ; Eunjung KIM ; Hyunjung KIM ; Jae Hak KIM ; Jeong Wook KIM ; Sung Shin KIM ; Eunhee KONG ; Ja Kyung MIN ; Chi-Min PARK ; Jeongyun PARK ; Seungwan RYU ; Kyung Won SEO ; Jung Mi SONG ; Minji SEOK ; Eun-Mi SEOL ; Jinhee YOON ; Jeong Meen SEO ;
Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism 2025;17(1):3-8
Purpose:
This study aimed to develop a comprehensive practical guide for enteral nutrition (EN) designed to enhance patient safety and reduce complications in Korea. Under the leadership of the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN), the initiative sought to standardize EN procedures, improve decision-making, and promote effective multidisciplinary communication.
Methods:
The KSPEN EN committee identified key questions related to EN practices and organized them into seven sections such as prescribing, delivery route selection, formula preparation, administration, and quality management. Twenty-one experts, selected based on their expertise, conducted a thorough literature review to formulate evidence-based recommendations. Drafts underwent peer review both within and across disciplines, with final revisions completed by the KSPEN Guideline Committee. The guide, which will be published in three installments, addresses critical elements of EN therapy and safety protocols.
Results:
The practical guide recommends that EN orders include detailed elements and advocates the use of electronic medical records for communication. Standardized prescription forms and supplementary safety measures are outlined. Review frequency is adjusted according to patient condition—daily for critically ill or unstable patients and as dictated by institutional protocols for stable patients. Evidence indicates that adherence to these protocols reduces mortality, complications, and prescription errors.
Conclusion
The KSPEN practical guide offers a robust framework for the safe delivery of EN tailored to Korea’s healthcare context. It emphasizes standardized protocols and interdisciplinary collaboration to improve nutritional outcomes, patient safety, and operational efficiency. Rigorous implementation and monitoring of adherence are critical for its success.
3.A practical guide for enteral nutrition from the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Part I. prescribing enteral nutrition orders
Ye Rim CHANG ; Bo-Eun KIM ; In Seok LEE ; Youn Soo CHO ; Sung-Sik HAN ; Eunjung KIM ; Hyunjung KIM ; Jae Hak KIM ; Jeong Wook KIM ; Sung Shin KIM ; Eunhee KONG ; Ja Kyung MIN ; Chi-Min PARK ; Jeongyun PARK ; Seungwan RYU ; Kyung Won SEO ; Jung Mi SONG ; Minji SEOK ; Eun-Mi SEOL ; Jinhee YOON ; Jeong Meen SEO ;
Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism 2025;17(1):3-8
Purpose:
This study aimed to develop a comprehensive practical guide for enteral nutrition (EN) designed to enhance patient safety and reduce complications in Korea. Under the leadership of the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN), the initiative sought to standardize EN procedures, improve decision-making, and promote effective multidisciplinary communication.
Methods:
The KSPEN EN committee identified key questions related to EN practices and organized them into seven sections such as prescribing, delivery route selection, formula preparation, administration, and quality management. Twenty-one experts, selected based on their expertise, conducted a thorough literature review to formulate evidence-based recommendations. Drafts underwent peer review both within and across disciplines, with final revisions completed by the KSPEN Guideline Committee. The guide, which will be published in three installments, addresses critical elements of EN therapy and safety protocols.
Results:
The practical guide recommends that EN orders include detailed elements and advocates the use of electronic medical records for communication. Standardized prescription forms and supplementary safety measures are outlined. Review frequency is adjusted according to patient condition—daily for critically ill or unstable patients and as dictated by institutional protocols for stable patients. Evidence indicates that adherence to these protocols reduces mortality, complications, and prescription errors.
Conclusion
The KSPEN practical guide offers a robust framework for the safe delivery of EN tailored to Korea’s healthcare context. It emphasizes standardized protocols and interdisciplinary collaboration to improve nutritional outcomes, patient safety, and operational efficiency. Rigorous implementation and monitoring of adherence are critical for its success.
4.A practical guide for enteral nutrition from the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Part I. prescribing enteral nutrition orders
Ye Rim CHANG ; Bo-Eun KIM ; In Seok LEE ; Youn Soo CHO ; Sung-Sik HAN ; Eunjung KIM ; Hyunjung KIM ; Jae Hak KIM ; Jeong Wook KIM ; Sung Shin KIM ; Eunhee KONG ; Ja Kyung MIN ; Chi-Min PARK ; Jeongyun PARK ; Seungwan RYU ; Kyung Won SEO ; Jung Mi SONG ; Minji SEOK ; Eun-Mi SEOL ; Jinhee YOON ; Jeong Meen SEO ;
Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism 2025;17(1):3-8
Purpose:
This study aimed to develop a comprehensive practical guide for enteral nutrition (EN) designed to enhance patient safety and reduce complications in Korea. Under the leadership of the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN), the initiative sought to standardize EN procedures, improve decision-making, and promote effective multidisciplinary communication.
Methods:
The KSPEN EN committee identified key questions related to EN practices and organized them into seven sections such as prescribing, delivery route selection, formula preparation, administration, and quality management. Twenty-one experts, selected based on their expertise, conducted a thorough literature review to formulate evidence-based recommendations. Drafts underwent peer review both within and across disciplines, with final revisions completed by the KSPEN Guideline Committee. The guide, which will be published in three installments, addresses critical elements of EN therapy and safety protocols.
Results:
The practical guide recommends that EN orders include detailed elements and advocates the use of electronic medical records for communication. Standardized prescription forms and supplementary safety measures are outlined. Review frequency is adjusted according to patient condition—daily for critically ill or unstable patients and as dictated by institutional protocols for stable patients. Evidence indicates that adherence to these protocols reduces mortality, complications, and prescription errors.
Conclusion
The KSPEN practical guide offers a robust framework for the safe delivery of EN tailored to Korea’s healthcare context. It emphasizes standardized protocols and interdisciplinary collaboration to improve nutritional outcomes, patient safety, and operational efficiency. Rigorous implementation and monitoring of adherence are critical for its success.
5.Single port–assisted diverting ileostomy formation for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection
Kyong-Min KANG ; Heung-Kwon OH ; Hong-min AHN ; Hye-Rim SHIN ; Min-Hyeong JO ; Mi-Jeong CHOI ; Duck-Woo KIM ; Sung-Bum KANG
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2025;28(1):47-49
Stoma formation for fecal diversion is a common procedure in patients with various complicated conditions after colorectal surgery, such as anastomotic leakage. The singleincision laparoscopic approach for stoma creation offers several advantages, including a reduction in surgical wounds and related complications as well as optimal visualization of the surgical field. This video demonstrates a single-port–assisted diverting ileostomy in a 61-yearold man with anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection for advanced rectal cancer.
6.A practical guide for enteral nutrition from the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Part I. prescribing enteral nutrition orders
Ye Rim CHANG ; Bo-Eun KIM ; In Seok LEE ; Youn Soo CHO ; Sung-Sik HAN ; Eunjung KIM ; Hyunjung KIM ; Jae Hak KIM ; Jeong Wook KIM ; Sung Shin KIM ; Eunhee KONG ; Ja Kyung MIN ; Chi-Min PARK ; Jeongyun PARK ; Seungwan RYU ; Kyung Won SEO ; Jung Mi SONG ; Minji SEOK ; Eun-Mi SEOL ; Jinhee YOON ; Jeong Meen SEO ;
Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism 2025;17(1):3-8
Purpose:
This study aimed to develop a comprehensive practical guide for enteral nutrition (EN) designed to enhance patient safety and reduce complications in Korea. Under the leadership of the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN), the initiative sought to standardize EN procedures, improve decision-making, and promote effective multidisciplinary communication.
Methods:
The KSPEN EN committee identified key questions related to EN practices and organized them into seven sections such as prescribing, delivery route selection, formula preparation, administration, and quality management. Twenty-one experts, selected based on their expertise, conducted a thorough literature review to formulate evidence-based recommendations. Drafts underwent peer review both within and across disciplines, with final revisions completed by the KSPEN Guideline Committee. The guide, which will be published in three installments, addresses critical elements of EN therapy and safety protocols.
Results:
The practical guide recommends that EN orders include detailed elements and advocates the use of electronic medical records for communication. Standardized prescription forms and supplementary safety measures are outlined. Review frequency is adjusted according to patient condition—daily for critically ill or unstable patients and as dictated by institutional protocols for stable patients. Evidence indicates that adherence to these protocols reduces mortality, complications, and prescription errors.
Conclusion
The KSPEN practical guide offers a robust framework for the safe delivery of EN tailored to Korea’s healthcare context. It emphasizes standardized protocols and interdisciplinary collaboration to improve nutritional outcomes, patient safety, and operational efficiency. Rigorous implementation and monitoring of adherence are critical for its success.
7.A practical guide for enteral nutrition from the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Part I. prescribing enteral nutrition orders
Ye Rim CHANG ; Bo-Eun KIM ; In Seok LEE ; Youn Soo CHO ; Sung-Sik HAN ; Eunjung KIM ; Hyunjung KIM ; Jae Hak KIM ; Jeong Wook KIM ; Sung Shin KIM ; Eunhee KONG ; Ja Kyung MIN ; Chi-Min PARK ; Jeongyun PARK ; Seungwan RYU ; Kyung Won SEO ; Jung Mi SONG ; Minji SEOK ; Eun-Mi SEOL ; Jinhee YOON ; Jeong Meen SEO ;
Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism 2025;17(1):3-8
Purpose:
This study aimed to develop a comprehensive practical guide for enteral nutrition (EN) designed to enhance patient safety and reduce complications in Korea. Under the leadership of the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN), the initiative sought to standardize EN procedures, improve decision-making, and promote effective multidisciplinary communication.
Methods:
The KSPEN EN committee identified key questions related to EN practices and organized them into seven sections such as prescribing, delivery route selection, formula preparation, administration, and quality management. Twenty-one experts, selected based on their expertise, conducted a thorough literature review to formulate evidence-based recommendations. Drafts underwent peer review both within and across disciplines, with final revisions completed by the KSPEN Guideline Committee. The guide, which will be published in three installments, addresses critical elements of EN therapy and safety protocols.
Results:
The practical guide recommends that EN orders include detailed elements and advocates the use of electronic medical records for communication. Standardized prescription forms and supplementary safety measures are outlined. Review frequency is adjusted according to patient condition—daily for critically ill or unstable patients and as dictated by institutional protocols for stable patients. Evidence indicates that adherence to these protocols reduces mortality, complications, and prescription errors.
Conclusion
The KSPEN practical guide offers a robust framework for the safe delivery of EN tailored to Korea’s healthcare context. It emphasizes standardized protocols and interdisciplinary collaboration to improve nutritional outcomes, patient safety, and operational efficiency. Rigorous implementation and monitoring of adherence are critical for its success.
8.Single port–assisted diverting ileostomy formation for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection
Kyong-Min KANG ; Heung-Kwon OH ; Hong-min AHN ; Hye-Rim SHIN ; Min-Hyeong JO ; Mi-Jeong CHOI ; Duck-Woo KIM ; Sung-Bum KANG
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2025;28(1):47-49
Stoma formation for fecal diversion is a common procedure in patients with various complicated conditions after colorectal surgery, such as anastomotic leakage. The singleincision laparoscopic approach for stoma creation offers several advantages, including a reduction in surgical wounds and related complications as well as optimal visualization of the surgical field. This video demonstrates a single-port–assisted diverting ileostomy in a 61-yearold man with anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection for advanced rectal cancer.
9.Pleural Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Maximum Standardized Uptake Value as Predictive Indicators of Visceral Pleural Invasion in Clinical T1N0M0 Lung Adenocarcinoma
Hye Rim NA ; Seok Whan MOON ; Kyung Soo KIM ; Mi Hyoung MOON ; Kwanyong HYUN ; Seung Keun YOON
Journal of Chest Surgery 2024;57(1):44-52
Background:
Visceral pleural invasion (VPI) is a poor prognostic factor that contributes to the upstaging of early lung cancers. However, the preoperative assessment of VPI presents challenges. This study was conducted to examine intraoperative pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (pCEA) level and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as predictive markers of VPI in patients with clinical T1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma.
Methods:
A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of 613 patients who underwent intraoperative pCEA sampling and lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Of these, 390 individuals with clinical stage I adenocarcinoma and tumors ≤30 mm were included. Based on computed tomography findings, these patients were divided into pleural contact (n=186) and non-pleural contact (n=204) groups. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to analyze the association between pCEA and SUVmax in relation to VPI. Additionally, logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for VPI in each group.
Results:
ROC curve analysis revealed that pCEA level greater than 2.565 ng/mL (area under the curve [AUC]=0.751) and SUVmax above 4.25 (AUC=0.801) were highly predictive of VPI in patients exhibiting pleural contact. Based on multivariable analysis, pCEA (odds ratio [OR], 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14–7.87; p=0.026) and SUVmax (OR, 5.25; 95% CI, 1.90–14.50; p=0.001) were significant risk factors for VPI in the pleural contact group.
Conclusion
In patients with clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting pleural contact, pCEA and SUVmax are potential predictive indicators of VPI. These markers may be helpful in planning for lung cancer surgery.
10.Effect of prophylactic abdominal drainage on postoperative pain in laparoscopic hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a single-center observational study in Korea
Sung Seo HWANG ; Heung-Kwon OH ; Hye-Rim SHIN ; Tae-Gyun LEE ; Mi Jeong CHOI ; Min Hyeong JO ; Hong-min AHN ; Hyeonjeong PARK ; Hyun Hee SIM ; Eunjeong JI ; Anuj Naresh SINGHI ; Duck-Woo KIM ; Sung-Bum KANG
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2024;27(2):76-84
Purpose:
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of prophylactic abdominal drainage (AD) in laparoscopic hemicolectomy, focusing on assessing postoperative pain outcomes.
Methods:
Patients were categorized into two groups: those with and without AD (AD group vs.no-AD group). A numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to assess postoperative pain on each postoperative day (POD). Further, the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce intergroup bias.
Results:
In total, 204 patients who underwent laparoscopic hemicolectomies by a single surgeon between June 2013 and September 2022 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. After adjusting for IPTW, NRS scores on POD 2 were significantly lower in the no-AD group (3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 0.8, p = 0.043). Further examination of postoperative outcomes showed no statistically significant differences in complications between the AD (17.3%) and no-AD (12.4%) groups (p = 0.170). The postoperative length of hospital stay was 7.3 ± 2.8 days in the AD group and 6.9 ± 3.0 days in the no-AD group, with no significant difference (p = 0.298). Time to first flatus was 3.0 ± 0.9 days in the AD group and 2.7 ± 0.9 days in the no-AD group, with no significant difference (p = 0.078). Regarding readmission within 1 month, there were four cases each in the AD (2.3%) and no-AD (1.7%) groups, with no significant difference (p = 0.733).
Conclusion
Laparoscopic hemicolectomy without AD resulted in no significant differences in postoperative clinical outcomes, except for postoperative pain. This finding suggests that prophylactic AD may exacerbate postoperative pain.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail