1.Energy drink consumption among Korean adolescents: prevalence and associated factors
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics 2024;67(10):531-539
Background:
Energy drinks are gaining popularity among young people worldwide. However, little is known about their consumption among Korean adolescents.Purpose: To examine the prevalence and factors associated with energy drink consumption among Korean adolescents.
Methods:
This study used data from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Surveys conducted in 2014–2017 and in 2019. A total of 325,210 participants aged 12–18 years were included. The prevalence of energy drink consumption (with 95% confidence intervals) was estimated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the association between energy drink consumption and sociodemographic and individual factors.
Results:
The prevalence of consuming energy drinks 3 or more times during the previous 7 days increased significantly from 3.2% in 2014 to 12.2% in 2019 (P for trend<0.001). This increasing trend was observed in all subgroups regardless of sex, school grade, region of residence, subjective economic status, family cohabitation status, and academic achievement. Data from the 2014–2017 and 2019 surveys revealed that boys, high schoolers, city-dwelling adolescents, adolescents with low economic status, those not living with their families, and those with low academic achievement were more likely to consume energy drinks. However, the relationship between energy drink consumption and the associated factors differed by survey year and school grade. In 2019, higher energy drink consumption among middle schoolers was associated with sex (male), low economic status, not living with family, and low academic achievement; however, higher energy drink consumption among high schoolers was associated with city-dwelling, high economic status, not living with family, and high academic achievement.
Conclusion
Energy drink consumption is common, has recently increased among Korean adolescents, and varies according to sociodemographic and individual factors. Further research to monitor the energy drink consumption of adolescents and understand their attitudes toward and factors influencing energy drink consumption is needed to develop policies and educational strategies for energy drink consumption.
2.Energy drink consumption among Korean adolescents: prevalence and associated factors
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics 2024;67(10):531-539
Background:
Energy drinks are gaining popularity among young people worldwide. However, little is known about their consumption among Korean adolescents.Purpose: To examine the prevalence and factors associated with energy drink consumption among Korean adolescents.
Methods:
This study used data from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Surveys conducted in 2014–2017 and in 2019. A total of 325,210 participants aged 12–18 years were included. The prevalence of energy drink consumption (with 95% confidence intervals) was estimated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the association between energy drink consumption and sociodemographic and individual factors.
Results:
The prevalence of consuming energy drinks 3 or more times during the previous 7 days increased significantly from 3.2% in 2014 to 12.2% in 2019 (P for trend<0.001). This increasing trend was observed in all subgroups regardless of sex, school grade, region of residence, subjective economic status, family cohabitation status, and academic achievement. Data from the 2014–2017 and 2019 surveys revealed that boys, high schoolers, city-dwelling adolescents, adolescents with low economic status, those not living with their families, and those with low academic achievement were more likely to consume energy drinks. However, the relationship between energy drink consumption and the associated factors differed by survey year and school grade. In 2019, higher energy drink consumption among middle schoolers was associated with sex (male), low economic status, not living with family, and low academic achievement; however, higher energy drink consumption among high schoolers was associated with city-dwelling, high economic status, not living with family, and high academic achievement.
Conclusion
Energy drink consumption is common, has recently increased among Korean adolescents, and varies according to sociodemographic and individual factors. Further research to monitor the energy drink consumption of adolescents and understand their attitudes toward and factors influencing energy drink consumption is needed to develop policies and educational strategies for energy drink consumption.
3.Energy drink consumption among Korean adolescents: prevalence and associated factors
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics 2024;67(10):531-539
Background:
Energy drinks are gaining popularity among young people worldwide. However, little is known about their consumption among Korean adolescents.Purpose: To examine the prevalence and factors associated with energy drink consumption among Korean adolescents.
Methods:
This study used data from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Surveys conducted in 2014–2017 and in 2019. A total of 325,210 participants aged 12–18 years were included. The prevalence of energy drink consumption (with 95% confidence intervals) was estimated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the association between energy drink consumption and sociodemographic and individual factors.
Results:
The prevalence of consuming energy drinks 3 or more times during the previous 7 days increased significantly from 3.2% in 2014 to 12.2% in 2019 (P for trend<0.001). This increasing trend was observed in all subgroups regardless of sex, school grade, region of residence, subjective economic status, family cohabitation status, and academic achievement. Data from the 2014–2017 and 2019 surveys revealed that boys, high schoolers, city-dwelling adolescents, adolescents with low economic status, those not living with their families, and those with low academic achievement were more likely to consume energy drinks. However, the relationship between energy drink consumption and the associated factors differed by survey year and school grade. In 2019, higher energy drink consumption among middle schoolers was associated with sex (male), low economic status, not living with family, and low academic achievement; however, higher energy drink consumption among high schoolers was associated with city-dwelling, high economic status, not living with family, and high academic achievement.
Conclusion
Energy drink consumption is common, has recently increased among Korean adolescents, and varies according to sociodemographic and individual factors. Further research to monitor the energy drink consumption of adolescents and understand their attitudes toward and factors influencing energy drink consumption is needed to develop policies and educational strategies for energy drink consumption.
4.Energy drink consumption among Korean adolescents: prevalence and associated factors
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics 2024;67(10):531-539
Background:
Energy drinks are gaining popularity among young people worldwide. However, little is known about their consumption among Korean adolescents.Purpose: To examine the prevalence and factors associated with energy drink consumption among Korean adolescents.
Methods:
This study used data from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Surveys conducted in 2014–2017 and in 2019. A total of 325,210 participants aged 12–18 years were included. The prevalence of energy drink consumption (with 95% confidence intervals) was estimated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the association between energy drink consumption and sociodemographic and individual factors.
Results:
The prevalence of consuming energy drinks 3 or more times during the previous 7 days increased significantly from 3.2% in 2014 to 12.2% in 2019 (P for trend<0.001). This increasing trend was observed in all subgroups regardless of sex, school grade, region of residence, subjective economic status, family cohabitation status, and academic achievement. Data from the 2014–2017 and 2019 surveys revealed that boys, high schoolers, city-dwelling adolescents, adolescents with low economic status, those not living with their families, and those with low academic achievement were more likely to consume energy drinks. However, the relationship between energy drink consumption and the associated factors differed by survey year and school grade. In 2019, higher energy drink consumption among middle schoolers was associated with sex (male), low economic status, not living with family, and low academic achievement; however, higher energy drink consumption among high schoolers was associated with city-dwelling, high economic status, not living with family, and high academic achievement.
Conclusion
Energy drink consumption is common, has recently increased among Korean adolescents, and varies according to sociodemographic and individual factors. Further research to monitor the energy drink consumption of adolescents and understand their attitudes toward and factors influencing energy drink consumption is needed to develop policies and educational strategies for energy drink consumption.
5.The Korean Academy of Asthma Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines for sublingual immunotherapy
Gwanghui RYU ; Hye Mi JEE ; Hwa Young LEE ; Sung-Yoon KANG ; Kyunghoon KIM ; Ju Hee KIM ; Kyung Hee PARK ; So-Young PARK ; Myong Soon SUNG ; Youngsoo LEE ; Eun-Ae YANG ; Jin-Young MIN ; Eun Kyo HA ; Sang Min LEE ; Yong Won LEE ; Eun Hee CHUNG ; Sun Hee CHOI ; Young-Il KOH ; Seon Tae KIM ; Dong-Ho NAHM ; Jung Won PARK ; Jung Yeon SHIM ; Young Min AN ; Man Yong HAN ; Jeong-Hee CHOI ; Yoo Seob SHIN ; Doo Hee HAN ;
Allergy, Asthma & Respiratory Disease 2024;12(3):125-133
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has been used for over a century and has been demonstrated to be effective in treating patients with various allergic diseases. AIT allergens can be administered through various routes, including subcutaneous, sublingual, intralymphatic, oral, or epicutaneous routes. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has recently gained clinical interest, and it is considered an alternative treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma. This review provides an overview of the current evidence-based studies that address the use of SLIT for treating AR, including (1) mechanisms of action, (2) appropriate patient selection for SLIT, (3) the current available SLIT products in Korea, and (4) updated information on its efficacy and safety. Finally, this guideline aims to provide the clinician with practical considerations for SLIT.
6.The Korean Academy of Asthma Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines for allergen immunotherapy
Hwa Young LEE ; Sung-Yoon KANG ; Kyunghoon KIM ; Ju Hee KIM ; Gwanghui RYU ; Jin-Young MIN ; Kyung Hee PARK ; So-Young PARK ; Myongsoon SUNG ; Youngsoo LEE ; Eun-Ae YANG ; Hye Mi JEE ; Eun Kyo HA ; Yoo Seob SHIN ; Sang Min LEE ; Eun Hee CHUNG ; Sun Hee CHOI ; Young-Il KOH ; Seon Tae KIM ; Dong-Ho NAHM ; Jung Won PARK ; Jung Yeon SHIM ; Young Min AN ; Doo Hee HAN ; Man Yong HAN ; Yong Won LEE ; Jeong-Hee CHOI ;
Allergy, Asthma & Respiratory Disease 2024;12(3):102-124
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a causative treatment of allergic diseases in which allergen extracts are regularly administered in a gradually escalated doses, leading to immune tolerance and consequent alleviation of allergic diseases. The need for uniform practice guidelines in AIT is continuously growing as the number of potential candidates for AIT increases and new therapeutic approaches are tried. This updated version of the Korean Academy of Asthma Allergy and Clinical Immunology recommendations for AIT, published in 2010, proposes an expert opinion by specialists in allergy, pediatrics, and otorhinolaryngology. This guideline deals with the basic knowledge of AIT, including mechanisms, clinical efficacy, allergen standardization, important allergens in Korea, and special consideration in pediatrics. The article also covers the methodological aspects of AIT, including patient selection, allergen selection, schedule and doses, follow-up care, efficacy measurements, and management of adverse reactions. Although this guideline suggests the optimal dosing schedule, an individualized approach and modifications are recommended considering the situation for each patient and clinic.
7.Corrigendum: Korean treatment recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis
Mi Ryoung SEO ; Jina YEO ; Jun Won PARK ; Yeon-Ah LEE ; Ju Ho LEE ; Eun Ha KANG ; Seon Mi JI ; Seong-Ryul KWON ; Seong-Kyu KIM ; Tae-Jong KIM ; Tae-Hwan KIM ; Hye Won KIM ; Min-Chan PARK ; Kichul SHIN ; Sang-Hoon LEE ; Eun Young LEE ; Hoon Suk CHA ; Seung Cheol SHIM ; Youngim YOON ; Seung Ho LEE ; Jun Hong LIM ; Han Joo BAEK ;
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 2024;31(1):62-63
8.The timing of adenomyosis diagnosis and its impact on pregnancy outcomes: a national population-based study
Young Mi JUNG ; Wonyoung WI ; Hwa Seon KOO ; Seung-Hyuk SHIM ; Soo-young OH ; Seung Mi LEE ; Jin Hoon CHUNG ; SiHyun CHO ; Hyunjin CHO ; Min-Jeong OH ; Geum Joon CHO ; Hye-Sung WON
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2024;67(3):270-278
Objective:
Adenomyosis impacts pregnancy outcomes, although there is a lack of consensus regarding the actual effects. It is likely, however, that the severity of adenomyosis or ultrasound findings or timing of diagnosis can have different effects on adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs).
Methods:
In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of the timing of adenomyosis diagnosis on pregnancy outcomes. Singleton pregnant women who delivered between 2017 and 2022 were analyzed based on the timing of adenomyosis diagnosis, using a national database. The final cohort was classified into three groups: 1) group 1, without adenomyosis; 2) group 2, those diagnosed with adenomyosis before pregnancy; and 3) group 3, those diagnosed with adenomyosis during pregnancy.
Results:
A total of 1,226,475 cases were ultimately included in this study. Women with a diagnosis of adenomyosis had a significantly higher risk of APOs including hypertensive disorder during pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), postpartum hemorrhage, placental abruption, preterm birth, and delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant even after adjusting for covariates. In particular, concerning HDP, the risk was highest in group 3 (group 2: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.15 vs. group 3: aOR, 1.36). However, the highest GDM risk was in group 2 (GDM; group 2: aOR, 1.24 vs. group 3: aOR, 1.04).
Conclusion
The increased risk of APO differed depending on the timing of adenomyosis diagnosis. Therefore, efforts for more careful monitoring and prevention of APOs may be necessary when such women become pregnant.
9.Korean treatment recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis
Mi Ryoung SEO ; Jina YEO ; Jun Won PARK ; Yeon-Ah LEE ; Ju Ho LEE ; Eun Ha KANG ; Seon Mi JI ; Seong-Ryul KWON ; Seong-Kyu KIM ; Tae-Jong KIM ; Tae-Hwan KIM ; Hye Won KIM ; Min-Chan PARK ; Kichul SHIN ; Sang-Hoon LEE ; Eun Young LEE ; Hoon Suk CHA ; Seung Cheol SHIM ; Youngim YOON ; Seung Ho LEE ; Jun Hong LIM ; Han Joo BAEK ;
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2024;39(1):200-200
10.Korean treatment recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis
Mi Ryoung SEO ; Jina YEO ; Jun Won PARK ; Yeon-Ah LEE ; Ju Ho LEE ; Eun Ha KANG ; Seon Mi JI ; Seong-Ryul KWON ; Seong-Kyu KIM ; Tae-Jong KIM ; Tae-Hwan KIM ; Hye Won KIM ; Min-Chan PARK ; Kichul SHIN ; Sang-Hoon LEE ; Eun Young LEE ; Hoon Suk CHA ; Seung Cheol SHIM ; Youngim YOON ; Seung Ho LEE ; Jun Hong LIM ; Han Joo BAEK ;
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 2023;30(3):151-169
We aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for treating axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) in Korea. The development committee was constructed, key clinical questions were determined, and the evidence was searched through online databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, KoreaMed, and KMbase. Systematic literature reviews were conducted, quality of evidence was determined, and draft recommendations were formulated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. Recommendations that reached 80% consensus among a voting panel were finalized. Three principles and 21 recommendations were determined. Recommendations 1 and 2 pertain to treatment strategies, regular disease status assessment, and rheumatologist-steered multidisciplinary management. Recommendations 3 and 4 strongly recommend patient education, exercise, and smoking cessation. Recommendations 5~12 address pharmacological treatment of active disease using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, sulfasalazine, biologics, and Janus kinase inhibitors.Recommendations 13~16 address treatment in stable disease. We suggest against spa and acupuncture as therapies (Recommendation 17). Recommendations 18 and 19 pertain to total hip arthroplasty and spinal surgery. Monitoring of comorbidities and drug toxicities are recommended (Recommendations 20 and 21). Recommendations for axSpA treatment in a Korean context were developed based on comprehensive clinical questions and evidence. These are intended to guide best practice in the treatment of axSpA.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail