Purpose: This study aimed to explore the practices, perceptions, and barriers related to specialty palliative care (SPC) referrals among oncologists in Korea, highlighting the clinical implications of early integration. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional online survey targeting board-certified hemato-oncology specialists was conducted between August 1-25, 2024. The survey assessed referral practices, attitudes toward early SPC integration, referral criteria, barriers, and institutional characteristics. Results: A total of 227 oncologists participated (response rate, 36.7%). Among them, 68.7% reported frequent SPC referrals, with higher referral rates observed among younger physicians, those in tertiary hospitals, and institutions with in-house SPC teams (p < 0.001). Although 74.9% supported early SPC integration, referrals were often inconsistently timed, frequently occurring after disease progression or at the discontinuation of chemotherapy. For time-based referrals, the most commonly endorsed triggers were disease progression despite palliative second-line treatment and a prognosis of expected mortality within 6-12 months. Need-based referral triggers such as patient or family requests (96.5%), psychological distress (89.9%), or uncontrolled symptoms (83.3%), were also widely endorsed. The major barriers to early SPC integration included patient and family resistance (70.0%) and limited availability of SPC teams (34.4%). Conclusion This study emphasizes the importance of systematic efforts to promote timely SPC integration in Korea, including education to raise patient awareness, improved referral systems, and enhanced infrastructure. The positive attitudes toward early SPC among oncologists reflect a growing recognition of its value, highlighting the need for strategies that align with international standards.

Objective: This study investigated potential relationships between the kinetics of nucleolar precursor bodies (NPBs) in the pronucleus and developmental morphokinetics and euploidy in human preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles. Methods: The morphokinetic analysis of 200 blastocysts obtained from 53 PGT-A cycles was performed retrospectively in a time-lapse incubator. At the time of pronuclear breakdown (PNBD), we categorized the blastocysts into two groups based on the kinetic degree of clustering NPBs at the interface of the two pronuclei: clustered NPBs (CL) and non-clustered NPBs (NCL). We then compared morphokinetic parameters, abnormal behavioral events, and the rate of aneuploidy between the two groups. Results: Pronuclear fading and the first cleavage occurred earlier in the NCL group than in the CL group. However, the initiation of blastocyst formation and blastocyst expansion was delayed in the NCL group relative to the CL group. No differences were found in the rate of abnormal cleavage events, such as multinucleation at the 2-cell stage, direct cleavage from one to three cells, and from two to five cells between the CL and NCL groups. However, the fragmentation rate at the 8-cell stage was higher in the NCL group than in the CL group (10.3% vs. 1.9%, p<0.05). Additionally, the euploid rate in the CL group was significantly higher than in the NCL group (37.9% vs. 12.4%, p<0.05). Conclusion These results demonstrate the effectiveness of combining NPB clustering at PNBD with morphokinetics as a parameter for selecting embryos with higher developmental potential in in vitro fertilization.

Objective: This study investigated potential relationships between the kinetics of nucleolar precursor bodies (NPBs) in the pronucleus and developmental morphokinetics and euploidy in human preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles. Methods: The morphokinetic analysis of 200 blastocysts obtained from 53 PGT-A cycles was performed retrospectively in a time-lapse incubator. At the time of pronuclear breakdown (PNBD), we categorized the blastocysts into two groups based on the kinetic degree of clustering NPBs at the interface of the two pronuclei: clustered NPBs (CL) and non-clustered NPBs (NCL). We then compared morphokinetic parameters, abnormal behavioral events, and the rate of aneuploidy between the two groups. Results: Pronuclear fading and the first cleavage occurred earlier in the NCL group than in the CL group. However, the initiation of blastocyst formation and blastocyst expansion was delayed in the NCL group relative to the CL group. No differences were found in the rate of abnormal cleavage events, such as multinucleation at the 2-cell stage, direct cleavage from one to three cells, and from two to five cells between the CL and NCL groups. However, the fragmentation rate at the 8-cell stage was higher in the NCL group than in the CL group (10.3% vs. 1.9%, p<0.05). Additionally, the euploid rate in the CL group was significantly higher than in the NCL group (37.9% vs. 12.4%, p<0.05). Conclusion These results demonstrate the effectiveness of combining NPB clustering at PNBD with morphokinetics as a parameter for selecting embryos with higher developmental potential in in vitro fertilization.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Objective: This study investigated potential relationships between the kinetics of nucleolar precursor bodies (NPBs) in the pronucleus and developmental morphokinetics and euploidy in human preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles. Methods: The morphokinetic analysis of 200 blastocysts obtained from 53 PGT-A cycles was performed retrospectively in a time-lapse incubator. At the time of pronuclear breakdown (PNBD), we categorized the blastocysts into two groups based on the kinetic degree of clustering NPBs at the interface of the two pronuclei: clustered NPBs (CL) and non-clustered NPBs (NCL). We then compared morphokinetic parameters, abnormal behavioral events, and the rate of aneuploidy between the two groups. Results: Pronuclear fading and the first cleavage occurred earlier in the NCL group than in the CL group. However, the initiation of blastocyst formation and blastocyst expansion was delayed in the NCL group relative to the CL group. No differences were found in the rate of abnormal cleavage events, such as multinucleation at the 2-cell stage, direct cleavage from one to three cells, and from two to five cells between the CL and NCL groups. However, the fragmentation rate at the 8-cell stage was higher in the NCL group than in the CL group (10.3% vs. 1.9%, p<0.05). Additionally, the euploid rate in the CL group was significantly higher than in the NCL group (37.9% vs. 12.4%, p<0.05). Conclusion These results demonstrate the effectiveness of combining NPB clustering at PNBD with morphokinetics as a parameter for selecting embryos with higher developmental potential in in vitro fertilization.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.