BACKGROUND: Hospitalization in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) exposes preterm infants to adverse stimuli, including continuous 24-hour lighting. There is currently no standardized NICU layout advised for the best development of preterm neonates. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of cycled light (CL) exposure on clinical outcomes in premature infants admitted to NICU as synthesized in previous studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This meta-analysis protocol was developed following the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. A search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases using the MeSH/key words: ―light exposure‖ AND pre-term AND cycled AND (RCT OR trials OR ―randomized controlled trial). The pooled Mean Difference with corresponding 95% CI was computed for weight gain, duration until start of enteral feeding, and duration of ICU stay using the Mantel–Haenszel random-effect model. RESULTS: Nine studies were included. The pooled mean difference showed that among preterm infants who had cycled light exposure, average daily weight gain (MD=6.24 grams, 95%CI=1.36 to 11.13, p=0.01) was significantly higher than those with continuous light exposure. The average time to start enteral feeding (MD=-3.84 days, 95%CI=-7.56 to -0.13, p=0.04) and average ICU stay (MD=-8.43 days, 95%CI=-12.54 to -4.31, p<0.0001) among neonates who had cycled light exposure were significantly shorter. CONCLUSION Benefits were seen in preterm infants when exposed to cycled light as opposed to continuous light. CL exposed infants showed a daily weight gain that was 6.24 grams higher, on average, and began enteral feeding nearly 4 days sooner. It led to a decrease in the duration of ICU stay by around 8 to 9 days on average. Further trials to determine the impact of cycled light exposure on morbidity and mortality among preterm neonates is recommended.
Human ; Male,Female ; Systematic review ; Meta-analysis ; Infant, Premature ; Intensive care units, Neonatal ; Intensive care, Neonatal ; Light ; Lighting ; Critical care

OBJECTIVE: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common mental disorder in children. It is unclear how nutrition and dietary components relate to ADHD. Some studies suggest that children with ADHD have lower serum levels of vitamin D than healthy controls. In the current study, the effects of Vitamin D supplementation on ADHD were reviewed and analyzed using available literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis and systematic review were performed. Children less than 18 years old diagnosed with ADHD given Vitamin D supplementation or placebo were included. A search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases from inception to August 2024 using the MeSH keywords: "Vitamin D" AND (ADHD OR Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) AND (children OR pediatric OR adolescents) AND randomized controlled trial. Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was used as an effect measure and pooled using random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: The pooled SMS showed significantly lower ADHD scores (SMD=-0.59, 95%CI=-1.06 to -0.11, p=0.01), lower inattentive scores (SMD=-0.61, 95%CI=-1.00 to -0.23, p=0.002), and lower hyperactivity scores (SMD=-0.64, 95%CI=-1.08 to -0.20, p=0.004) in children given Vitamin D supplementation. The adverse events reported were minor only and did not vary significantly between intervention and control groups. CONCLUSION Vitamin D treatment as an adjuvant to methylphenidate alleviated ADHD symptoms without significant adverse effects, correlating with enhanced vitamin D levels. Given the robust evidence and well-structured randomized controlled trials, we strongly advocate for the integration of vitamin D supplementation with ADHD treatment.
Human ; Male,Female ; Adolescent: 13-18 yrs old ; Child Preschool: 2-5 yrs old ; Child: 6-12 yrs old ; Vitamin D ; meta-analysis ; systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To reveal the gap between the evidence of systematic reviews (SRs) and clinical concerns by systematically summarizing the evidence on acupuncture and moxibustion for frozen shoulder and investigating the concerns and needs of clinicians in treatment with acupuncture and moxibustion for this disease. METHODS: The articles of SR and Meta-analysis on acupuncture and moxibustion for frozen shoulder were searched from CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, EMbase and Cochrane Library, starting from the inception of each database up to December 31st, 2022. Two researchers screened the articles and extracted data independently. Using AMSTAR-2, the methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated. Based on systematic reviews and expert discussion, a questionnaire on clinical concerns of acupuncture and moxibustion for frozen shoulder was developed and distributed to clinicians. The discrepancies between the evidence and clinical concerns were compared from 5 dimensions, including population, interventions, control measures, outcome indicators and review time points. RESULTS: The evidence gaps existed between SRs and clinical concerns. In the existing studies, the needs of personalized treatment were not fully considered in terms of different syndromes/patterns of frozen shoulder and stages of illness, the outcome indicators were not employed properly, the time for outcome measurement was vague, the control groups were set up outside of standardization, and the methodological quality was lower. CONCLUSION It is suggested that future studies should improve the quality of methodology, lay more consideration to different patient groups, optimize outcome indicators and standardize the setting of control groups, so as to better meet the needs of patients and achieve the best match between evidence and clinicians' needs.
Humans ; Acupuncture Therapy ; Bursitis/therapy* ; Evidence Gaps ; Moxibustion ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Meta-Analysis as Topic

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate and re-evaluate the surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty(RA-TKA) compared with to conventional total knee arthroplasty(C-TKA). METHODS: Ten databases, including PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, JBI, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, were comprehensively searched from inception to September 2024. Eligible studies included systematic reviews and meta-analysis comparing the surgical outcomes of RA-TKA and C-TKA. Two independen researchers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Methodological quality was evaluated using the AMSTAR tool, while the certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE system. The degree of overlap among primary studies included in the systematic reviews/meta-analyses was investigated using the corrected covered area (CCA). RESULTS: A total of 15 systematic reviews/Meta-analyses were included, 5 were rateak as high quality, 1 as moderate quality, and 9 as low quality. A total of 53 pieces of evidence were identified, 11 pieces of evidence were of high quality, 19 were of moderate quality, 16 were of low quality, and 7 were of very low quality. Ten studies assessed the Knee Society score(KSS) and performed a meta-analysis. Among these, seven studies reported that there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative KSS scores between the two surgical methods. Nine studies evaluated the Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS) score, with seven indicating no statistically significant difference in HSS scores following surgery. Twelve studies examined the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score postoperatively, and five found no significant difference between the two surgical approaches. Five studies compared the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle deviation between the two groups, all of which demonstrated that the HKA angle deviation in RA-TKA was significantly lower than in C-TKA. Eight studies reported on the range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint after surgery, with six showing no statistically significant difference between the two methods. Finally, nine studies compared the duration of the surgical procedures, all of which concluded that RA-TKA required a longer operative time than C-TKA. CONCLUSION With regard to functional outcomes, no statistically significant difference was observed between RA-TKA and C-TKA. Nevertheless, RA-TKA demonstrates advantages in terms of surgical accuracy, precision, and alignment correction.
Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods* ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Treatment Outcome ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Systematic Reviews as Topic

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to re-evaluate the systematic reviews and meta-analyses on statins for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) and construct an umbrella review, thereby providing robust evidence-based for the clinical application of statins in ED treatment. METHODS: A comprehensive computerized search was conducted across CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, WOS, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to September 12, 2024, for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing statin interventions in ED. The methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality of the included studies were assessed and summarized using PRISMA 2020, AMSTAR 2, and GRADE systems. RESULTS: Four systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. According to the AMSTAR 2 evaluation, one paper was rated as low quality, while the remaining three were classified as very low quality. PRISMA 2020 evaluation results indicated that the average score of the four included studies was 29, with all being of medium quality but exhibiting partial deficiencies. The proportion of fully consistent items across the four studies ranged from 52.38% to 80.95%. GRADE system tool evaluation revealed 11 outcome indicators, of which only one was rated as intermediate evidence. The remainders were categorized as low or very low evidence, with no high-quality evidence identified. CONCLUSION Statins demonstrate efficacy in treating ED. However, the current quality of relevant systematic reviews is suboptimal, with notable deficiencies in methodological, reporting, and evidential quality. Further high-quality studies are warranted to provide more reliable evidence-based medical guidance for clinical practice.
Humans ; Erectile Dysfunction/drug therapy* ; Male ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Systematic Reviews as Topic

Aims: We evaluated the efficacy of active video games as weight reduction intervention among obese children and adolescents by synthesizing available published evidence.

Materials and methods: A meta-analysis was performed using nine RCTs based on the PRISMA guidelines. Children less than 18 years of age who are Obese I and Obese II and underwent active video games intervention or standard weight management programs were included. A search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, and HERDIN databases from inception to September 2024 databases using the MeSH and key words: (“video games” or “digital games” or “console games” or “electronic games”) AND (“weight loss” or BMI or obesity) AND (children OR pediatric OR adolescents) AND (RCT OR trials OR “randomized controlled trial). Pooled mean difference was used to determine effectiveness on reducing weight and BMI.

Results: The pooled mean difference showed significantly lower post-intervention weight (in kg) (MD=-2.97, 95%CI=-5.15 to -0.78, p=0.008) and significantly lower post-intervention BMI z-score (MD=-0.12, 95%CI=-0.13 to -0.10, p<0.000001) on children with AVG intervention. There was also lower post-intervention BMI on children with AVG intervention (MD=-1.27, 95%CI=-2.93 to 0.38). However, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.13).

Conclusion:Active video games showed a significant benefit in weight reduction among obese children. Usual lifestyle modification interventions may be challenging due to lack of motivation and poor adherence among younger demographics. AVGs present a novel approach by integrating entertainment with physical activity, thereby addressing these barriers.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Infant: 1-23 Months ; Child Preschool: 2-5 Yrs Old ; Child: 6-12 Yrs Old ; Adolescent: 13-18 Yrs Old ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Adolescent ; Meta-analysis ; Video Games ; Life Style ; Exercise ; Electronics

Background: The number of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or those people without dementia who are experiencing age-related cognitive decline, has increased in recent years. Conveniently, several interventions to delay cognitive decline exist, where cognitively stimulating activities (CSA) have been receiving too much attention. However, its beneficial effects have not been well established among older people with MCI due to conflicting findings. Objectives: This study aimed to assess and summarize the available evidence on the effects of CSA on the overall cognitive functioning of older people with MCI. Specifically, it sought to answer the PICO question, “In older people with MCI, does engagement in cognitively stimulating activities improve cognitive function?” Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the effects of CSA on older people with MCI were conducted. Three studies met the inclusion criteria from the 1,328 records from BioMed Central, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases and 156 articles from WorldCat, DSpace Saint Louis University, and Google Scholar databases and catalogs. Effect size values were inspected using the random-effects model. Data were summarized as standardized mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals in the forest plot. Results: This meta-analysis which compared studies that employed similar methodologies, found that CSA has a significant, large effect in improving cognitive functioning among older people with MCI, evidenced by an SMD of 0.798 (95% CI = 0.510-1.085, p = 0.001). While its superiority over other interventions that improve cognitive function was not observed in this study, it was still found that using CSA was helpful in terms of its cost-effectiveness. Also, heterogeneity across studies was non-significant (Cochran’s Q = 0.151, df = 2, p = 0.927, I2 = 0.00%). These results mean that clinical heterogeneity was absent even though a diverse range of CSA was employed. Additionally, methodological diversity was not present since there were no variations in the study design and minimal variability in the risk of bias assessment. Conclusion Overall, it is acknowledged that CSA are effective and practical, inexpensive, non-pharmacologic cognitive training approaches to delay cognitive decline among older people with MCI. However, interpreting this study’s significant, large effect, and non-significant heterogeneity warrants caution.
Cognition ; Cognitive Dysfunction ; Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Reflective practice is widely recognized as a fundamental component of nursing education and professional development that had the potential to enhance critical thinking skills. This study intended to evaluate the effect of reflective practice interventions on the critical thinking capability of student nurses.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The quantitative, meta-analysis design was employed. CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, Health Sources and Google Scholar databases weresearched forpublications in English until December 2020.The studies were subjected to quality assessment with the JBI checklist, systematic data extraction and statistical analysis using Comprehensive Meta-analysis version 3.0.

FINDINGS

A total of four studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Reflective practice strategies such as journaling/journal writing and self-regulated learning had effectively enhance critical thinking skills of student nurses (summary effect=0.24; 95% CI [0.13-0.44]; p-value= 0.00004). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the strength of the findings and the publication bias was assessed and found to be minimal.

CONCLUSION

Reflective practice interventions had positive impact on the improvement of critical thinking capacity of nursing students. With the practical implications for nursing education and professional development, this study had recommended to integrate reflective practice strategies into the curriculum and training programs.

Human ; Reflective Practice ; Cognitive Reflection ; Critical Thinking ; Thinking ; Meta-analysis ; Nursing ; Sustainable Development Goals ; Sustainable Development

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF) are rare, chronic autoimmune blistering diseases primarily treated with systemic glucocorticoids. Long-term use of glucocorticoids can result in significant adverse effects, leading to the exploration of steroid-sparing adjuvants. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids alone versus in combination with adjuvants for treating PV and PF.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoids alone versus with steroid-sparing adjuvants in treatment of PV and PF.

METHODS

This research was a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared systemic glucocorticoids with or without steroid-sparing adjuvants in treating PV and PF. A total of 20 RCTs were included after meeting the inclusion criteria, comprising 1169 patients diagnosed with PV or PF. Primary outcomes were remission rates, while secondary outcomes included relapse rates, disease control, and the occurrence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Studies involving rituximab and cyclophosphamide demonstrated significantly higher remission rates compared to other adjuvants or glucocorticoid monotherapy. Adverse events were common, particularly with high-dose glucocorticoids.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis found that rituximab and cyclophosphamide were superior steroid-sparing adjuvants in the treatment of PV and PF. Other adjuvants, such as azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, also showed efficacy but had a higher incidence of adverse events. Further studies were needed to optimize treatment protocols and reduce long-term complications.

Meta-analysis ; Pemphigus ; Pemphigus Foliaceus ; Pemphigus Vulgaris

BACKGROUND

Long-term administration of conventional acne medications implies the potential risk of increasing microbial resistance, and safety risks. Recent interest has grown in probiotics as a potential treatment and as an adjunct for acne vulgaris.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of oral probiotics in reducing the severity of acne vulgaris compared to placebo or conventional treatments.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant studies, and randomized controlled trials of acne vulgaris treatment with probiotic therapy were included. Outcomes include decrease in total lesion count/percent change from baseline, improvement of severity scores, inflammation related indicators, and gene expression. Changes in outcomes were calculated by effect size or pooled odds ratio.

RESULTS

A total of 2 RCTs involving 100 participants were included. Both studies show low risk on the risk bias criteria. The data of 2 RCTs reporting severity scores (AGSS and GAGS) supports that probiotics can improve their scores and thereby their condition. For inflammation-related indicators, only 1 RCT showed that probiotics can improve the IGF1 and FOXO1 gene expression in the skin. Regarding safety, only Eguren et al. reported adverse event. Their RCT showed that the incidence of adverse events was low and no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the probiotics investigated in both studies may be given as adjuvant treatment for acne vulgaris as they improve the clinical course of patients.

Human ; Acne Vulgaris ; Probiotics ; Meta-analysis