OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy of meridian sinew manipulation releasing technique combined with heat-sensitive moxibustion for simple obesity. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with simple obesity were selected, on the basis of the conventional treatment, the patients were treated with meridian sinew manipulation releasing technique on the affected meridian sinews in the abdomen and lower limbs, about 30 min a time. After releasing, using the moxibustion sensation localization method in the abdominal regions with high heat-sensitivity frequency (including acupoints such as Zhongwan [CV12], Tianshu [ST25], Qihai [CV6], Guanyuan [CV4]), 2 heat-sensitive acupoints were selected for moxibustion and moxibustion was applied at each acupoint for 40 min, or until the heat-sensitive moxibustion sensation disappeared. The patients were treated once every other day for a total of 20 times. The weight, body mass index (BMI), body fat rate, waist circumference and hip circumference of the patients before and after treatment were observed, and the clinical efficacy was evaluated after treatment. RESULTS: After treatment, the weight, BMI, body fat rate, waist circumference and hip circumference of the patients were decreased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 93.1% (27/29). CONCLUSION Meridian sinew manipulation releasing technique combined with heat-sensitive moxibustion can effectively treat simple obesity, the treatment from the perspective of meridian sinews provides a new idea and plan for simple obesity.
Humans ; Moxibustion ; Female ; Male ; Obesity/physiopathology* ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Acupuncture Points ; Meridians ; Young Adult ; Treatment Outcome ; Aged ; Combined Modality Therapy

Objective To compare the effect of sodium hualuronate(SH)and platelet rich plasma(PRP)injections in the treatment of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis(GJO).Methods Sixty-three patients with GJO were randomly assigned to receive either PRP(PRP group,n=29)or SH(SH group,n=34)injec-tions.The injections were administered into the glenohumeral joint under ultrasound guidance.The patients were assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons(ASES)score and modified University of California(UCLA)shoulder joint score before injection and at 1,6,12 months of injection.Results There were no statistically significant differences in the general data between the two groups(P>0.05).Compared with before injection,the VAS scores at 1,6,and 12 months after injection in the two groups were significantly decreased(P<0.05).The VAS score at 12 months after injection in the SH group was significantly increased(P<0.05).The VAS score at 12 months after injection in the PRP group was lower than that in the SH group(P<0.05).The ASES scores showed a significant increase at 1 month after injection compared to before treatment(P<0.05),moreover the ASES scores at 6 months after injection in the PRP group were higher than those in the SH group(P<0.05).Compared with before injection,the modified UCLA shoulder joint scores at 1,6 months after injection in the two groups were significantly in-creased(P<0.05),moreover the scores of the modified UCLA shouder joint scores at 6 months after injec-tion in the PRP group were higher than those in the SH group(P<0.05).Conclusion Pain relief in intraar-ticular injection of PRP in GJO patients is more significant than intraarticular injection of SH,moreover PRP is significantly superior to SH in improving the shoulder joint function of the patients.