This consensus will introduce the characteristics of fillers used in the surgical cavities of domestic nasal surgery patients based on relevant literature and expert opinions. It will also provide recommendations for the selection of cavity fillers for different nasal diseases, with chronic sinusitis as a representative example.
Humans ; Nasal Cavity/surgery* ; Nasal Surgical Procedures ; China ; Consensus ; Sinusitis/surgery* ; Dermal Fillers

Allergen-specific immunotherapy（AIT） remains the only therapeutic approach with the potential to modify the natural course of allergic rhinitis（AR）. Nevertheless, considerable inter-individual variability exists in patients'responses to AIT. To facilitate more reliable assessment of treatment efficacy, the China Rhinopathy Research Cooperation Group（CRRCG） convened young and middle-aged nasal experts in China to formulate the present consensus. The recommended subjective outcome measures for AIT comprise symptom scores, medication scores, combined symptom and medication scores, quality-of-life assessments, evaluation of disease control, and assessment of comorbidities. Objective indicators may supplement these measures. Currently available objective approaches include skin prick testing, nasal provocation testing, and allergen exposure chambers. However, these methods remain constrained by practical limitations and are not yet appropriate for routine implementation in clinical efficacy evaluation. In addition, several biomarkers, including sIgE and the sIgE/tIgE ratio, sIgG4, serum IgE-blocking activity, IgA, cytokines and chemokines, as well as immune cell surface molecules and their functional activity, have been shown to have associations with AIT outcomes. While these biomarkers may complement subjective assessments, they are subject to significant limitations. Consequently, large-scale multicenter trials and real-world evidence are required to strengthen the evidence base. The present consensus underscores the necessity of integrating patients'subjective experiences with objective testing throughout the treatment process, thereby providing a more comprehensive and accurate framework for efficacy evaluation. Looking forward, future investigations should prioritize the incorporation of multi-omics data and artificial intelligence methodologies, which hold promise for overcoming current limitations in assessment strategies and for advancing both the standardization and personalization of AIT.
Humans ; Allergens/immunology* ; China ; Consensus ; Desensitization, Immunologic ; Immunoglobulin E ; Quality of Life ; Rhinitis, Allergic/therapy* ; Treatment Outcome ; East Asian People

ObjectiveTo review the interoceptive assessment tools in terms of structure, content and psychometric properties, based on the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). MethodsThe literature on interoceptive evaluation tools was retrieved from databases of CNKI, PubMed, Medline and EBSCO. The principal structures and contents of the assessment tools were analyzed based on the ICF framework, and the quality of the psychometric properties were appraised using COSMIN. ResultsA total of 13 interoceptive assessment tools were ultimately included, involving 16 literature references. There were five interoceptive sensitivity tools, four accuracy tools and four awareness tools. In terms of content, interoceptive sensitivity tools involved 33 categories of body functions, six categories of activities and participation, and one of environmental factors; while interoceptive accuracy tools only involved seven categories of body function, and two of activities and participation items; interoceptive awareness tools involved 30 categories of body function, four categories of activities and participation, and three of environmental factors. In terms of psychometric properties, Body Perception Questionnaire-Short Form (BPQ-SF) was the sensitivity tool with the best reliability and validity (qualified rate of 7/8), followed by Interoceptive Sensitivity Questionnaire (ISQ) (qualified rate of 6/8). Most of the accuracy tools adopted standardized measurement methods, but lacked sufficient reliability and validity verification. The awareness tools were good in reliability and validity (qualified rate above 5/8), especially Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-1) and Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) (qualified rate of 8/8). ConclusionBPQ-SF and ISQ are recommended for interoceptive sensitivity assessment, Water-loading Test and Heart-beat Tracking Task for interoceptive accuracy assessment, and MAIA-1 and BAQ for interoceptive awareness assessment.

Objective:To explore the risk factors of delayed extubation after expanded thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis.Methods:Patients with myasthenia gravis who underwent expanded thymectomy from May 2021 to January 2024 and were admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) after surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided in to the delayed extubation and successful extubation according to the length of mechanical ventilation whether exceeding than 48 hours. Multivariable logistics regression was used to explore the risk factors for delayed extubation after expanded thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis.Results:A total of 95 patients were included.15 (15.8%) of whom were delayed extubation. Compared with the successful extubation patients, the length of mechanical ventilation (94.0 h vs. 15.5 h, P<0.001), ICU station (7.1 days vs. 1.7 days, P<0.001), and hospitalization station (16.0 days vs. 9.1 days, P<0.001) were significantly prolonged in the delayed extubation patients. Adjusted for age,gender, BMI, clinical classification, pathological classification of thymoma, dose of pyridostigmine preoperative, perioperative pneumonia, preoperative pulmonary dysfunction, SBT passing for the first time, neck lift time greater than 20 seconds, the multivariable logistic regression shown, the risk of delayed extubation increased by 29% ( OR=1.290, 95% CI 1.090-1.714), 1% ( OR=1.009, 95% CI 1.002-1.034), 3.9-fold ( OR=4.977, 95% CI 1.486-10.939), and 64% ( OR=1.635, 95% CI 1.396-2.682) for every 60 mg/day increase in preoperative dose of pyridostigmine, pathological classification of thymoma, perioperative pneumonia, and preoperative pulmonary dysfunction, respectively. Neck lift time greater than 20 seconds can reduce the risk of delayed extubation 48% ( OR=0.524, 95% CI 0.322-0.794). Conclusion:Preoperative administration of a large dose of pyridostigmine, pulmonary dysfunction, pathological classification of thymoma, and perioperative pneumonia were risk factors for delayed extubation after thymectomy in these patients. And neck lift time greater than 20 seconds decreased the risk of delayed extubation. In the clinical practice,for high risk of MG patients with delayed extubation, the neck lifting test may be used to assess muscle strength and reduce the occurance of tracheal reintubation and its advise effects.

Objective:To develop and validate a perioperative oral care protocol for patients undergoing oral vestibular approach endoscopic thyroid cancer radical surgery, providing practical guidance for clinical nursing.Methods:The protocol was constructed through literature analysis and Delphi expert consultation. A prospective non-randomized controlled study was conducted using convenience sampling, enrolling 60 patients who underwent oral vestibular approach endoscopic thyroid cancer radical surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University Thyroid Center between August 2023 and May 2024. Participants were divided into control group (from August to December, 2023) and experimental group (from January to May, 2024) based on admission dates with 30 cases in each group. The control group received routine care, while the experimental group received the developed oral care protocolin on the basis of the control group. Postoperative pain scores, mouth-opening difficulties, and oral cleanliness were compared on days 1, 3, and 7 after surgery.Results:The final protocol comprised 7 first-level indicators (team collaboration, health education, preoperative oral assessment, preoperative management, intraoperative management, postoperative management, and discharge follow-up), 17 second-level indicators, and 49 third-level indicators. The control group had 4 males and 26 females, with an age of (29.57 ± 5.34) years; the experimental group had 6 males and 24 females, with an age of (29.87 ± 6.25) years. On postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, the pain scores were 3.87 ± 1.01, 3.30 ± 0.92, and 2.53 ± 0.68 in the control group and 3.20 ± 0.87, 2.10 ± 0.76, and 1.50 ± 0.51 in the experimental group, respectively. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( t = 2.89, 5.12, 6.34, all P<0.05). For mouth-opening difficulties, the control group had 6, 13, and 15 patients with grade I on postoperativedays 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 10, 20, and 25 patients with gradeⅠ. The control group had 20, 14, and 14 patients with gradeⅡonpostoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 17, 10, and 5 patients with gradeⅡ. The control group had 4, 3, and 1 patients with grade Ⅲ on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 3, 0, and 0 patients with grade Ⅲ. There were 0 cases in both groups with grade Ⅳ. The differences between the two groups on postoperative days 3, and 7 were statistically significant ( χ2 = 10.45, 18.67, both P<0.05). For oral cleanliness, the control group had 3, 4, and 5 patients with excellent cleanliness on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 11, 16, and 19 patients with excellent cleanliness. The control group had 20, 22, and 23 patients with good cleanliness on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 18, 13, and 10 patients with good cleanliness. The control group had 7 (23.33%), 4 (13.33%), and 2 (6.67%) patients with poor cleanliness on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 1 (3.33%), 1 (3.33%), and 1 (3.33%) patients with poor cleanliness. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( χ2 = 9.19, 11.32, 16.68, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The developed perioperative oral care protocol is scientifically sound, feasible, and practical. Following the intervention, significant decreases in pain scores, alleviation of trismus symptoms, and marked improvements in oral cleanliness were observed in patients compared to pre-intervention assessments, and worth further clinical application.

Objective:To investigate the clinical features, treatment strategies, and prognosis of pediatric Castleman disease (CD), with the aim of enhancing disease recognition and improving diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 29 children diagnosed with CD at the Children′s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between January 2016 and January 2024. Age, sex, initial presentations, routine blood test, inflammatory indicators, coagulation function test, immunoglobulin level, histopathological examination, imaging examination, treatment and follow-ups were recorded. Patients were classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of symptoms: the symptomatic Castleman disease group (SC) and the asymptomatic Castleman disease group (AC). All patients were followed for a minimum of six months. Clinical characteristics, therapeutic regimens, and outcomes were compared between the two groups.For the measurement information, the independent samples t test was used for comparison between groups of data that conformed to normal distribution; the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups of data that did not conform to normal distribution. The Chi-square test or Fisher′s exact probability method was used for comparison between groups of count data. Results:A total of 29 pediatric CD cases were included, comprising 15 males and 14 females. The number of patients diagnosed as unicentric Castleman disease (UCD) was 21, with the rest 8 as multicentric Castleman disease (MCD). There were 11 patients (37.9%) in the SC group and 18 patients (62.1%) in the AC group. The median age at onset was 10.0 years (interquartile range: 6.5-12.2 years). The most common initial presentation was mass ( n=20), followed by fever ( n=2), amaemia ( n=2), fever with fatigue ( n=2), rash ( n=1), abdominal pain ( n=1), and cough ( n=1). The frequently involved sites were neck ( n=8), abdominal cavity ( n=5), mediastinum ( n=3), retroperitoneum ( n=2), and one case each in the back, upper arm, and pelvis. The maximum lesion volume reached 1 040 cm 3. Compared to the AC group, the SC group had significantly lower hemoglobin levels [108.0(92.0, 123.0)g/L vs. 127.0(117.5, 139.0)g/L, Z=-2.35, P=0.019] and significantly higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) [38.0(3.0, 87.0)mg/L vs. 0.6(0.5, 3.8)mg/L, Z=-2.19, P=0.029], prothrombin time[12.6(11.4, 13.3)s vs. 11.3(10.5, 11.7)s, Z=-2.64, P=0.008], and fibrinogen [4.5(3.5, 5.4)g/L vs. 2.1(1.9, 2.6)g/L, Z=-3.04, P=0.002]. All patients underwent MRI/CT and ultrasonography; however, only 2 cases were diagnosed as CD by ultrasound. All patients underwent surgical excision of the mass, and diagnoses were confirmed by histopathological examination. Among the SC group, 4 patients (4/11, 36.4%) required postoperative treatment with glucocorticoids alone or in combination with immunosuppressants and biologics. The overall prognosis was favorable, with follow-up ranging from 6 months to 7 years and no reported mortality. One case, initially misdiagnosed as systemic lupus erythematosus, was later confirmed to be CD complicated with paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP); this patient experienced recurrent fever, rash, and elevated CRP, and continued to require low-dose glucocorticoids and tacrolimus during the 4-year follow-up. Conclusion:In chileren, CD is most common in the neck and surgical resection yields favorable outcomes. Approximately 37.9% of patients present with systemic symptoms, of which about 36.4% require postoperative systemic therapy such as glucocorticosteroids. CD complicated with PNP may be misdiagnosed. Symptomatic cases are often associated with anemia, elevated CRP levels, and coagulation abnormalities. UCD pediatric patients without complications have a good prognosis and there′s no need for long-term medications after surgery. About 37.5% of MCD pediatric patients require glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, biotherapy or chemotherapy to control symptoms in the postoperative period. Imaging modalities have limited diagnostic value, and histopathological examination remains the gold standard for diagnosis.

Objective:To explore the clinical and genetic characteristics of dyskeratosis congenita (DC).Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical, laboratory, imaging, pathological, genetic, and treatment data of 6 DC patients diagnosed at the Children′s Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2010 to June 2025.Results:Among the 6 DC patients, 1 case was of Hoyeraal-Hreidarsson syndrome, 4 were male, and 2 were female. The diagnosis age 0.9-6.1 years. All 6 cases presented with bone marrow failure; 5 cases had a classic triad of skin and mucous membrane (mucosal leukoplakia, abnormal skin pigmentation, nail dystrophy); 5 cases had growth retardation, among which 2 cases had intrauterine growth retardation. Two cases had diarrhea and 1 case had abnormal liver function; 1 case had stiff and deformed limbs, accompanied by limited mobility, and dry and obstructive balanitis; 1 case had recurrent eyelid inflammation, middle ear inflammation, and nasal inflammation. All 6 cases had decreased B cell numbers, and 4 cases also had decreased natural killer cell numbers. There were 3 cases of children with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, of which 1 case of CMV infection led to retinal frosted branch angiitis and subsequent intracranial CMV infection resulting in death, and 1 case had CMV enteritis and died of hemophagocytic syndrome. Among 4 cases of boys, 3 cases had DKC1 gene variations and 1 case had an unknown variation gene; 2 cases of girls had TINF2 gene variations. The TINF2 c.860T>A (p.L287Q) variation site was a new mutation. Among 6 patients with DC, 2 cases died, 3 cases survived and 1 case was lost to follow-up.Conclusions:The DKC1 and TINF2 genes are common pathogenic genes in patients with DC. Bone marrow failure is a clue for the early identification of DC. The triad of skin and mucous membrane is its typical clinical manifestation. Children with DC generally have reduced B cells and natural killer killer cells, and have a high risk of fatal CMV infection. The overall prognosis is poor.

Objective To explore the surgical treatment experience of primary giant gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GIST)(with isolated lesions with a maximum diameter＞10 cm).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and pathological data of 67 patients with primary giant GIST admitted from January 2018 to December 2024.Among them,35 cases underwent surgical operations after preoperative neoadjuvant therapy(25 effective cases and 10 ineffective cases)(neoadjuvant therapy group).Due to the initial diagnosis assessment expecting radical(R0)resection(13 cases),or preoperative complications(12 cases),or difficulty in obtaining a pathological diagnosis through puncture biopsy(7 cases),32 cases underwent direct surgery without neoadjuvant therapy(direct surgery group).Compare the general information,tumor condition,surgical condition,postoperative recovery,postoperative pathology,postoperative adjuvant therapy,and recurrence between two groups.Results Comparative analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference(P＞0.05)between the neoadjuvant therapy group and the direct surgery group in terms of gender,age,primary tumor location,initial maximum diameter,growth type,localized or locally advanced stage,and postoperative follow-up time.The maximum diameters of the tumors before surgery in the neoadjuvant therapy group and the direct surgery group were(12.4±7.1)cm and(18.2±5.0)cm respectively,and the operation times were(125.4±30.6)minutes and(153.0±31.7)minutes respectively.The intraoperative blood loss was(228.3±76.4)ml and(300.3±67.2)ml,respectively.The postoperative hospital stay was(9.1±2.6)days and(11.1±3.2)days,respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P＜0.05).The proportion of laparoscopic surgery in the neoadjuvant therapy group was 17.1％,which was higher than that in the direct surgery group(0),and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the proportion of tumor rupture,combined organ resection,postoperative complications and postoperative recurrence(P＞0.05).Conclusion Primary giant gastrointestinal stromal tumors can mostly be reduced in size and progression through neoadjuvant therapy,improving the chances of minimally invasive surgery.However,there is also a risk of tumor progression during neoadjuvant therapy leading to increased surgical difficulty or even loss of curative surgical opportunities.

Objective:To evaluate the consistency of steady-state blood trough concentration of vancomycin and minimum inhibitory concentration to the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC/MIC) and promote the rational use of vancomycin.Methods:It was a single center retrospective study. The clinical data of patients admitted to Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020, who were treated with vancomycin and met the inclusion criteria, were collected. Vancomycin calculator was used to calculate AUC/MIC. According to the steady-state blood trough concentration and AUC/MIC standards, the patients were divided into not meeting standard group, meeting standard group, and exceeding standard group, respectively. The standard-reaching status of steady-state blood trough concentration and AUC/MIC in each group was evaluated, as well as the consistency in patients under the 2 different grouping methods. The patients who met the AUC/MIC standard were divided into not meeting standard group, meeting standard group, and exceeding standard group based on steady-state blood trough concentration. The anti-infection efficacy and incidence of vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury (VA-AKI) were evaluated between the different groups to assess clinical effectiveness and safety.Results:A total of 153 patients were included in the study. Among them, 98 (64.1%) patients were male, with age of 61.0 (53.0, 73.0) years, body mass index of 23.9 (21.5, 27.0) kg/m 2, creatinine clearance rate of 107.2 (84.1, 147.0) ml/min, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡscore of 9.0 (6.0, 14.0) points. Among the 153 patients, the AUC/MIC and steady-state blood trough concentration did not meet standards in 86 cases, met the standards in 17 cases, and exceeded the upper limit of the standards in 14 cases; the results were consistent in 117 cases for both methods, and the consistency rate was 76.5%; the results were inconsistent in 36 patients (23.5%). Among the 36 patients, the steady-state blood trough concentration did not meet the standard in 34 cases [with initial steady-state blood trough concentration of 13.9 (12.8, 14.4) mg/L], while the AUC/MIC met the standard [437 (420, 471)]. AUC/MIC met the standard in 51 patients (33.3%), of which 34 had the steady-state blood trough concentration of less than 15.0 mg/L, and 17 had the concentration of 15.0-20.0 mg/L; the efficacy of anti-infection was 88.2% and 13/17, respectively, the incidence of VA-AKI was 2.9% and 1/17, respectively; the difference was not significant (all P>0.05). No patients had the steady-state blood trough concentration over than 20.0 mg/L. Conclusions:The consistence between steady-state trough concentration of vancomycin and AUC/MIC is 76.5%, which is acceptable. For those who meet the AUC/MIC standard for vancomycin, even if the steady-state blood trough concentration is less than 15.0 mg/L, as long as the AUC/MIC meets the standard, the efficacy and safety can be guaranteed.

Objective To explore the surgical treatment experience of primary giant gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GIST)(with isolated lesions with a maximum diameter＞10 cm).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and pathological data of 67 patients with primary giant GIST admitted from January 2018 to December 2024.Among them,35 cases underwent surgical operations after preoperative neoadjuvant therapy(25 effective cases and 10 ineffective cases)(neoadjuvant therapy group).Due to the initial diagnosis assessment expecting radical(R0)resection(13 cases),or preoperative complications(12 cases),or difficulty in obtaining a pathological diagnosis through puncture biopsy(7 cases),32 cases underwent direct surgery without neoadjuvant therapy(direct surgery group).Compare the general information,tumor condition,surgical condition,postoperative recovery,postoperative pathology,postoperative adjuvant therapy,and recurrence between two groups.Results Comparative analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference(P＞0.05)between the neoadjuvant therapy group and the direct surgery group in terms of gender,age,primary tumor location,initial maximum diameter,growth type,localized or locally advanced stage,and postoperative follow-up time.The maximum diameters of the tumors before surgery in the neoadjuvant therapy group and the direct surgery group were(12.4±7.1)cm and(18.2±5.0)cm respectively,and the operation times were(125.4±30.6)minutes and(153.0±31.7)minutes respectively.The intraoperative blood loss was(228.3±76.4)ml and(300.3±67.2)ml,respectively.The postoperative hospital stay was(9.1±2.6)days and(11.1±3.2)days,respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P＜0.05).The proportion of laparoscopic surgery in the neoadjuvant therapy group was 17.1％,which was higher than that in the direct surgery group(0),and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the proportion of tumor rupture,combined organ resection,postoperative complications and postoperative recurrence(P＞0.05).Conclusion Primary giant gastrointestinal stromal tumors can mostly be reduced in size and progression through neoadjuvant therapy,improving the chances of minimally invasive surgery.However,there is also a risk of tumor progression during neoadjuvant therapy leading to increased surgical difficulty or even loss of curative surgical opportunities.