Objective: The association of lipid parameters with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the impact of kidney function on this association have not been thoroughly evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service Cohort database, we identified 2,343,882 subjects with T2DM in 2015–2016. Baseline lipid levels and kidney function were evaluated and followed up until December 2020. Subjects were classified into three groups according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): ≥60, 30–59, or <30 mL/min/ 1.73 m2 . We analyzed the diabetes group with eGFR ≥60 and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL as a reference group. Results: The risk of CVD began to increase at LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL in the eGFR ≥60 mL/min/m2group. The risk of CVD in the eGFR 30–59 mL/min/m2 group was increased by 43%, even in the LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and the risk increased progressively with LDL-C category. Among subjects with eGFR 30–59 mL/min/m2 , LDL-C 70–99, 100–129, 130–159, and ≥160 mg/ dL were significantly associated with the risk of CVD, with hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.48 (1.43–1.53), 1.54 (1.49–1.60), 1.55 (1.48–1.63), and 1.88 (1.77–2.00), respectively. In the eGFR <30 mL/min/m2 group, a 3.3-fold increased risk of CVD was seen, even at LDL-C <70 mg/dL. Conclusion The cutoff levels of LDL-C that increase CVD risk in patients with T2DM depend on kidney function, which influences the relationship between LDL-C and CVD risk in patients with T2DM.

Objective: The association of lipid parameters with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the impact of kidney function on this association have not been thoroughly evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service Cohort database, we identified 2,343,882 subjects with T2DM in 2015–2016. Baseline lipid levels and kidney function were evaluated and followed up until December 2020. Subjects were classified into three groups according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): ≥60, 30–59, or <30 mL/min/ 1.73 m2 . We analyzed the diabetes group with eGFR ≥60 and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL as a reference group. Results: The risk of CVD began to increase at LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL in the eGFR ≥60 mL/min/m2group. The risk of CVD in the eGFR 30–59 mL/min/m2 group was increased by 43%, even in the LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and the risk increased progressively with LDL-C category. Among subjects with eGFR 30–59 mL/min/m2 , LDL-C 70–99, 100–129, 130–159, and ≥160 mg/ dL were significantly associated with the risk of CVD, with hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.48 (1.43–1.53), 1.54 (1.49–1.60), 1.55 (1.48–1.63), and 1.88 (1.77–2.00), respectively. In the eGFR <30 mL/min/m2 group, a 3.3-fold increased risk of CVD was seen, even at LDL-C <70 mg/dL. Conclusion The cutoff levels of LDL-C that increase CVD risk in patients with T2DM depend on kidney function, which influences the relationship between LDL-C and CVD risk in patients with T2DM.

Background: The relationship between circulating lipid levels and the risk for heart failure (HF) is controversial. We aimed to examine this association, and whether it is modified by the duration of diabetes or treatment regimens in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: Individuals (n=2,439,978) who underwent health examinations in 2015 to 2016 were identified from the Korean National Health Information Database. Subjects were categorized according to the duration of diabetes (new-onset, <5, 5–10, or ≥10 years) and number of antidiabetic medications. Incident HF was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code I50 as the primary diagnosis during hospitalization. The risk for HF was estimated using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. Results: During a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 151,624 cases of HF occurred. An inverse association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and incident HF was observed in the new-onset diabetes group, with an approximately 25% lower risk in those with LDL-C levels of 100–129, 130–159, and ≥160 mg/dL, compared to those with levels <70 mg/dL. However, J-shaped associations were noted in the long-standing diabetes group, with a 16% higher risk in those with LDL-C level ≥160 mg/dL, compared to those with levels <70 mg/dL. Similar patterns were observed in the relationship between total cholesterol or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the risk for HF, and when subjects were grouped according to the number of antidiabetic medications instead of diabetes duration. Conclusion Different associations between lipid levels and the risk for HF were noted according to disease progression status among individuals with diabetes.

Background: The relationship between circulating lipid levels and the risk for heart failure (HF) is controversial. We aimed to examine this association, and whether it is modified by the duration of diabetes or treatment regimens in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: Individuals (n=2,439,978) who underwent health examinations in 2015 to 2016 were identified from the Korean National Health Information Database. Subjects were categorized according to the duration of diabetes (new-onset, <5, 5–10, or ≥10 years) and number of antidiabetic medications. Incident HF was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code I50 as the primary diagnosis during hospitalization. The risk for HF was estimated using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. Results: During a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 151,624 cases of HF occurred. An inverse association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and incident HF was observed in the new-onset diabetes group, with an approximately 25% lower risk in those with LDL-C levels of 100–129, 130–159, and ≥160 mg/dL, compared to those with levels <70 mg/dL. However, J-shaped associations were noted in the long-standing diabetes group, with a 16% higher risk in those with LDL-C level ≥160 mg/dL, compared to those with levels <70 mg/dL. Similar patterns were observed in the relationship between total cholesterol or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the risk for HF, and when subjects were grouped according to the number of antidiabetic medications instead of diabetes duration. Conclusion Different associations between lipid levels and the risk for HF were noted according to disease progression status among individuals with diabetes.

Background: The relationship between circulating lipid levels and the risk for heart failure (HF) is controversial. We aimed to examine this association, and whether it is modified by the duration of diabetes or treatment regimens in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: Individuals (n=2,439,978) who underwent health examinations in 2015 to 2016 were identified from the Korean National Health Information Database. Subjects were categorized according to the duration of diabetes (new-onset, <5, 5–10, or ≥10 years) and number of antidiabetic medications. Incident HF was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code I50 as the primary diagnosis during hospitalization. The risk for HF was estimated using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. Results: During a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 151,624 cases of HF occurred. An inverse association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and incident HF was observed in the new-onset diabetes group, with an approximately 25% lower risk in those with LDL-C levels of 100–129, 130–159, and ≥160 mg/dL, compared to those with levels <70 mg/dL. However, J-shaped associations were noted in the long-standing diabetes group, with a 16% higher risk in those with LDL-C level ≥160 mg/dL, compared to those with levels <70 mg/dL. Similar patterns were observed in the relationship between total cholesterol or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the risk for HF, and when subjects were grouped according to the number of antidiabetic medications instead of diabetes duration. Conclusion Different associations between lipid levels and the risk for HF were noted according to disease progression status among individuals with diabetes.

Objective: The association of lipid parameters with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the impact of kidney function on this association have not been thoroughly evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service Cohort database, we identified 2,343,882 subjects with T2DM in 2015–2016. Baseline lipid levels and kidney function were evaluated and followed up until December 2020. Subjects were classified into three groups according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): ≥60, 30–59, or <30 mL/min/ 1.73 m2 . We analyzed the diabetes group with eGFR ≥60 and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL as a reference group. Results: The risk of CVD began to increase at LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL in the eGFR ≥60 mL/min/m2group. The risk of CVD in the eGFR 30–59 mL/min/m2 group was increased by 43%, even in the LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and the risk increased progressively with LDL-C category. Among subjects with eGFR 30–59 mL/min/m2 , LDL-C 70–99, 100–129, 130–159, and ≥160 mg/ dL were significantly associated with the risk of CVD, with hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.48 (1.43–1.53), 1.54 (1.49–1.60), 1.55 (1.48–1.63), and 1.88 (1.77–2.00), respectively. In the eGFR <30 mL/min/m2 group, a 3.3-fold increased risk of CVD was seen, even at LDL-C <70 mg/dL. Conclusion The cutoff levels of LDL-C that increase CVD risk in patients with T2DM depend on kidney function, which influences the relationship between LDL-C and CVD risk in patients with T2DM.

Background: The relationship between circulating lipid levels and the risk for heart failure (HF) is controversial. We aimed to examine this association, and whether it is modified by the duration of diabetes or treatment regimens in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: Individuals (n=2,439,978) who underwent health examinations in 2015 to 2016 were identified from the Korean National Health Information Database. Subjects were categorized according to the duration of diabetes (new-onset, <5, 5–10, or ≥10 years) and number of antidiabetic medications. Incident HF was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code I50 as the primary diagnosis during hospitalization. The risk for HF was estimated using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. Results: During a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 151,624 cases of HF occurred. An inverse association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and incident HF was observed in the new-onset diabetes group, with an approximately 25% lower risk in those with LDL-C levels of 100–129, 130–159, and ≥160 mg/dL, compared to those with levels <70 mg/dL. However, J-shaped associations were noted in the long-standing diabetes group, with a 16% higher risk in those with LDL-C level ≥160 mg/dL, compared to those with levels <70 mg/dL. Similar patterns were observed in the relationship between total cholesterol or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the risk for HF, and when subjects were grouped according to the number of antidiabetic medications instead of diabetes duration. Conclusion Different associations between lipid levels and the risk for HF were noted according to disease progression status among individuals with diabetes.

Objective: The association of lipid parameters with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the impact of kidney function on this association have not been thoroughly evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service Cohort database, we identified 2,343,882 subjects with T2DM in 2015–2016. Baseline lipid levels and kidney function were evaluated and followed up until December 2020. Subjects were classified into three groups according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): ≥60, 30–59, or <30 mL/min/ 1.73 m2 . We analyzed the diabetes group with eGFR ≥60 and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL as a reference group. Results: The risk of CVD began to increase at LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL in the eGFR ≥60 mL/min/m2group. The risk of CVD in the eGFR 30–59 mL/min/m2 group was increased by 43%, even in the LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and the risk increased progressively with LDL-C category. Among subjects with eGFR 30–59 mL/min/m2 , LDL-C 70–99, 100–129, 130–159, and ≥160 mg/ dL were significantly associated with the risk of CVD, with hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.48 (1.43–1.53), 1.54 (1.49–1.60), 1.55 (1.48–1.63), and 1.88 (1.77–2.00), respectively. In the eGFR <30 mL/min/m2 group, a 3.3-fold increased risk of CVD was seen, even at LDL-C <70 mg/dL. Conclusion The cutoff levels of LDL-C that increase CVD risk in patients with T2DM depend on kidney function, which influences the relationship between LDL-C and CVD risk in patients with T2DM.

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.