Background: and Purpose Although gastrointestinal (GI) surgery can affect drug efficacy, its impact on oral anticoagulants (OACs) remains unclear. This study investigated the impact of GI surgery on the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Using a nationwide South Korean claims database, AF patients prescribed OACs between 2015 and 2021 were analyzed. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke, and secondary outcomes were major bleeding, all-cause death, and composite outcome (ischemic stroke, major bleeding, all-cause death). Outcomes were compared by OAC type (DOAC vs. warfarin) and GI surgery status using inverse probability of treatment weighting and a Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard model with time-varying covariates. Results: Among 388,214 AF patients (mean age, 71.9 yr; 42.7% male), 6,907 (1.8%) underwent GI surgery. The effect of GI surgery differed between warfarin and DOACs for ischemic stroke (Pint= 0.018), with increased risk for warfarin (adjusted HR [aHR]: 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–4.62), but not for DOACs (aHR: 0.97 [95% CI 0.77–1.22]) after surgery. Effects of surgery on major bleeding, all-cause death, and composite outcome did not differ. In post–GI surgery setting, DOACs demonstrated lower ischemic stroke risk (aHR: 0.35 [95% CI 0.17–0.72]) and comparable risks for other outcomes. Exploratory analyses by surgery location suggested a more favorable profile of DOACs after upper GI surgery. Conclusions In AF patients, GI surgery significantly increased ischemic stroke risk among warfarin users, but not among DOAC users. DOACs showed generally favorable profiles after GI surgery and may remain a reasonable anticoagulant, with potentially more favorable profile after upper GI surgery.

This review focuses on the diagnostic algorithm for nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), a significant male factor contributing to infertility. NOA, characterized by the absence of sperm in the ejaculate, requires a systematic diagnostic approach to identify reversible conditions, genetic factors, and prognosis for achieving pregnancy. The diagnostic pathway involves semen analysis and a comprehensive evaluation for hormonal deficiencies, anatomical abnormalities, and genetic factors. The importance of medical history, physical examination, endocrine evaluation, imaging, and genetic testing is emphasized. This review highlights the significance of differentiating NOA from obstructive azoospermia (OA) and outlines key considerations for effective management, including surgical sperm retrieval and assisted reproductive techniques. Testicular biopsy is discussed as a definitive method to distinguish obstructive cases from nonobstructive cases, providing valuable prognostic information. Overall, a thorough and systematic diagnostic approach is essential for the effective management of men suspected with NOA, offering insights into potential treatment options and reproductive outcomes.
Humans ; Azoospermia/therapy* ; Male ; Algorithms ; Semen Analysis ; Testis/pathology* ; Sperm Retrieval ; Biopsy ; Infertility, Male/etiology*

Background: s/Aims: Plasma pregenomic hepatitis B virus RNA (pgRNA) is a novel biomarker in chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB). We aimed to describe the longitudinal profile of pgRNA and factors influencing its levels in CHB patients on nucleoside analogue (NUC). Methods: Serial plasma samples from 1,354 CHB patients started on first-line NUC were evaluated. Time of NUC initiation was taken as baseline (year 0), followed by 1-year, 3-year and 5-year of NUC therapy. pgRNA was measured by Research Use Only RealTime HBV RNA v2.0 (0.2 mL) (Abbott Diagnostics) with lower limit of detection of 0.8 log U/mL (~20 copies/mL). Results: Among 1,354 subjects (median age at baseline 49.8 [interquartile range, IQR 40.2–57.3]) years, 65.2% male, 16.1% hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive, 28.6% cirrhotic), baseline median HBV RNA was 3.68 (IQR 2.42–5.19) log U/mL. Upon NUC therapy, median pgRNA levels were 2.45 (IQR 1.82–3.62), 2.23 (IQR 1.67–3.05) and 2.14 (IQR 1.48–2.86) log U/mL at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively, with the corresponding log U/mL reductions of 0.82, 1.20 and 1.54. Undetectable/ unquantifiable pgRNA was achieved in 13.5%, 15.9% and 20.1% of patients at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Older age, male sex, HBeAg-negativity and high PAGE-B score were associated with lower pgRNA. Conclusions Plasma pgRNA declines are modest under NUC therapy, with only 16.3% achieving RNA undetectability after 5 years of first-line NUC indicating cccDNA silencing has not been achieved in the majority of patients. Clinical characteristics should be taken into consideration when interpreting the plasma pgRNA level.

Background: s/Aims: Plasma pregenomic hepatitis B virus RNA (pgRNA) is a novel biomarker in chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB). We aimed to describe the longitudinal profile of pgRNA and factors influencing its levels in CHB patients on nucleoside analogue (NUC). Methods: Serial plasma samples from 1,354 CHB patients started on first-line NUC were evaluated. Time of NUC initiation was taken as baseline (year 0), followed by 1-year, 3-year and 5-year of NUC therapy. pgRNA was measured by Research Use Only RealTime HBV RNA v2.0 (0.2 mL) (Abbott Diagnostics) with lower limit of detection of 0.8 log U/mL (~20 copies/mL). Results: Among 1,354 subjects (median age at baseline 49.8 [interquartile range, IQR 40.2–57.3]) years, 65.2% male, 16.1% hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive, 28.6% cirrhotic), baseline median HBV RNA was 3.68 (IQR 2.42–5.19) log U/mL. Upon NUC therapy, median pgRNA levels were 2.45 (IQR 1.82–3.62), 2.23 (IQR 1.67–3.05) and 2.14 (IQR 1.48–2.86) log U/mL at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively, with the corresponding log U/mL reductions of 0.82, 1.20 and 1.54. Undetectable/ unquantifiable pgRNA was achieved in 13.5%, 15.9% and 20.1% of patients at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Older age, male sex, HBeAg-negativity and high PAGE-B score were associated with lower pgRNA. Conclusions Plasma pgRNA declines are modest under NUC therapy, with only 16.3% achieving RNA undetectability after 5 years of first-line NUC indicating cccDNA silencing has not been achieved in the majority of patients. Clinical characteristics should be taken into consideration when interpreting the plasma pgRNA level.

Background: s/Aims: Plasma pregenomic hepatitis B virus RNA (pgRNA) is a novel biomarker in chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB). We aimed to describe the longitudinal profile of pgRNA and factors influencing its levels in CHB patients on nucleoside analogue (NUC). Methods: Serial plasma samples from 1,354 CHB patients started on first-line NUC were evaluated. Time of NUC initiation was taken as baseline (year 0), followed by 1-year, 3-year and 5-year of NUC therapy. pgRNA was measured by Research Use Only RealTime HBV RNA v2.0 (0.2 mL) (Abbott Diagnostics) with lower limit of detection of 0.8 log U/mL (~20 copies/mL). Results: Among 1,354 subjects (median age at baseline 49.8 [interquartile range, IQR 40.2–57.3]) years, 65.2% male, 16.1% hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive, 28.6% cirrhotic), baseline median HBV RNA was 3.68 (IQR 2.42–5.19) log U/mL. Upon NUC therapy, median pgRNA levels were 2.45 (IQR 1.82–3.62), 2.23 (IQR 1.67–3.05) and 2.14 (IQR 1.48–2.86) log U/mL at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively, with the corresponding log U/mL reductions of 0.82, 1.20 and 1.54. Undetectable/ unquantifiable pgRNA was achieved in 13.5%, 15.9% and 20.1% of patients at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Older age, male sex, HBeAg-negativity and high PAGE-B score were associated with lower pgRNA. Conclusions Plasma pgRNA declines are modest under NUC therapy, with only 16.3% achieving RNA undetectability after 5 years of first-line NUC indicating cccDNA silencing has not been achieved in the majority of patients. Clinical characteristics should be taken into consideration when interpreting the plasma pgRNA level.

Apparently balanced chromosomal structural rearrangements are known to cause male infertility and account for approximately 1% of azoospermia or severe oligospermia. However, the underlying mechanisms of pathogenesis and etiologies are still largely unknown. Herein, we investigated apparently balanced interchromosomal structural rearrangements in six cases with azoospermia/severe oligospermia to comprehensively identify and delineate cryptic structural rearrangements and the related copy number variants. In addition, high read-depth genome sequencing (GS) (30-fold) was performed to investigate point mutations causative of male infertility. Mate-pair GS (4-fold) revealed additional structural rearrangements and/or copy number changes in 5 of 6 cases and detected a total of 48 rearrangements. Overall, the breakpoints caused truncations of 30 RefSeq genes, five of which were associated with spermatogenesis. Furthermore, the breakpoints disrupted 43 topological-associated domains. Direct disruptions or potential dysregulations of genes, which play potential roles in male germ cell development, apoptosis, and spermatogenesis, were found in all cases (n = 6). In addition, high read-depth GS detected dual molecular findings in case MI6, involving a complex rearrangement and two point mutations in the gene DNAH1. Overall, our study provided the molecular characteristics of apparently balanced interchromosomal structural rearrangements in patients with male infertility. We demonstrated the complexity of chromosomal structural rearrangements, potential gene disruptions/dysregulation and single-gene mutations could be the contributing mechanisms underlie male infertility.
Azoospermia/genetics* ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Humans ; Infertility, Male/genetics* ; Male ; Oligospermia/genetics* ; Translocation, Genetic

Purpose: Medical schools have faced various challenges in preparing their clinical students for the frontlines of a pandemic. This study investigated medical students’ satisfaction with their institutions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with the intention of guiding educators in future public health crises. Methods: In this cross-sectional study surveying students in clinical rotations, the primary outcome was overall satisfaction regarding medical schools’ responses to the pandemic, and the four secondary outcomes were school communication, exposure to COVID-19, availability of personal protective equipment, and access to COVID-19 testing. Results: The survey was distributed to ten medical schools, of which 430 students responded for a response rate of 13.0%. While most students were satisfied (61.9%, n=266) with their schools’ response, more than one in five (21.9%, n=94) were dissatisfied. Among the four secondary outcomes, communication with students was most predictive of overall satisfaction. Conclusion In future crises, schools can best improve student satisfaction by prioritizing timely communication.