Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) is technically challenging and is associated with a risk of adverse events, particularly when lesions are located near the major papilla. Pancreatic duct (PD) stent may reduce the risk of post-ESD pancreatitis; however, no standard strategy has been established. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PD stent placement combined with ESD for SNADETs near the major papilla. Methods: This was a retrospective study of duodenal ESD after prophylactic PD stent placement in patients with SNADET near the major papilla at a university hospital between March 2014 and September 2023. Results: Four lesions were located within 5 mm of the major papilla, and seven within 5 to 10 mm. The median interval between stent placement and ESD was 2 days. The en bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% and 90.9%, respectively. No stent migration occurred during ESD, and all mucosal defects were completely closed using endoscopic clips. Delayed bleeding and post-ESD pancreatitis were observed in one and two cases, respectively. Conclusions PD stent placement combined with ESD is an effective treatment strategy for SNADETs near the major papilla. However, the risk of post-ESD pancreatitis remains, indicating the need for further preventive strategies.

Background/Aims: Intestinal Behçet disease is typically associated with ileocecal punched-out ulcers and significant morbidity and mortality. Intestinal ultrasound is a noninvasive imaging technique for disease monitoring. However, no previous reports have compared intestinal ultrasound with endoscopic ulcer activity or histopathological findings for intestinal Behçet disease. We evaluated the usefulness of intestinal ultrasound for assessing the activity of ileocecal ulcers in intestinal Behçet disease. Methods: We retrospectively compared intestinal ultrasound findings with 73 corresponding endoscopic images and 6 resected specimens. The intestinal ultrasound findings were assessed for 7 parameters (bowel wall thickness, vascularity [evaluated using the modified Limberg score with color Doppler], bowel wall stratification, white-plaque sign [strong hyperechogenic lines or spots], mesenteric lymphadenopathy, extramural phlegmons, and fistulas), and endoscopic ulcer activity was classified into active, healing, and scar stages. Histopathological findings were evaluated by consensus among experienced pathologists. Results: Bowel wall thickness (P< 0.001), vascularity (P< 0.001), loss of bowel wall stratification (P= 0.015), and white-plague sign (P= 0.013) were significantly exacerbated in the endoscopic active ulcer stage. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a bowel wall thickness of > 5.5 mm (sensitivity 89.7%, specificity 85.3%) was potentially useful for detecting active lesions. When compared with histopathological findings, an increase in bowel wall thickness reflected the ulcer marginal ridge, and the white-plaque sign reflected the ulcer bottom. Conclusions Intestinal ultrasound is useful for monitoring intestinal ulcer activity in intestinal Behçet disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In clinical practice, colonoscopy has been regarded as the gold standard for the evaluation of disease severity as well as mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis (UC). Some activity indices incorporating patient symptoms as parameters have been shown to reflect the endoscopic activity of UC. The aim of this study was to examine whether self-reported symptoms with visual analog scales (VAS) can predict endoscopic activity. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 150 UC patients who underwent colonoscopy with submission of VAS scores of 4 symptoms: general condition, bloody stools, stool form, and abdominal pain (0: no symptoms, 10: the most severe symptoms). Each VAS score was compared with colonoscopic activity assessed with the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES). RESULTS: All VAS scores were significantly correlated with the endoscopic severity (Spearman correlation coefficients of general condition, bloody stools, stool form, and abdominal pain: 0.63, 0.64, 0.58, and 0.43, respectively). Mucosal healing defined as MES 0 alone was predicted by VAS score < 1.5 on general condition or 0 on bloody stools with sensitivity of 0.84 and 0.76 and specificity of 0.66 and 0.76, respectively. Additionally, VAS score < 2.5 on stool form predicted active lesions in distal colorectum alone with sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.66, suggesting that this item could predict the indication of topical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported VAS scores on symptoms were correlated with endoscopic activity of UC. To clarify the relationship between VAS and mucosal healing, further validation studies are needed.
Abdominal Pain ; Colitis, Ulcerative* ; Colonoscopy ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ulcer* ; Visual Analog Scale*