1.Fracture resistance of premolar screw-retained implant-supported hybrid abutment crowns with monolithic restorations after thermomechanical aging
Junichi HONDA ; Ryoki TAKANO ; Takuma SAITO ; Tatsuro KOBAYASHI ; Kei KUBOCHI ; Markus Bernhard BLATZ ; Futoshi KOMINE
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2026;18(1):36-45
PURPOSE:
. This study evaluated the fracture resistance of premolar screwretained implant-supported hybrid abutment crowns (HACs) fabricated from different monolithic restorative materials following artificial aging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
. Forty-four titanium implant analogs were restored with HACs fabricated from four materials: 5 mol% yttria-partially stabilized monolithic zirconia (ST), strength-gradient multilayered zirconia (YM), lithium disilicate ceramic (LD), and resin composite containing dispersed nanoparticles (CM) (n = 11 per group). All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 cycles) and mechanical loading (1.2 million cycles) to simulate 5 years of clinical service.Fracture resistance was evaluated under compressive loading, and failure modes were analyzed using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy.Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Steel-Dwass tests (α = 0.05).
RESULTS:
. Significant differences were found among all groups (P = 0.00033-0.0022). The YM group exhibited the highest median fracture resistance (2.06 kN, IQR: 2.00 – 2.60 kN), followed by ST (1.74 kN, IQR: 1.69 – 1.80 kN), LD (1.29 kN, IQR: 1.14 – 1.41 kN), and CM (0.87 kN, IQR: 0.79 – 0.92 kN). All specimens survived the artificial aging protocols. Distinct fracture patterns were observed depending on the restorative material, with zirconia-based groups showing more favorable resistance than resin composite.
CONCLUSION
. All tested HACs exhibited fracture resistance values exceeding maximum bite forces, supporting their clinical applicability. Strength-gradient multilayered zirconia demonstrated superior reliability after simulated 5-year aging, emphasizing its structural advantage and broader safety margin compared with other restorative materials.
2.Shear bond strength of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces
Fusun OZER ; Elif PAK-TUNC ; Nesrin ESEN DAGLI ; Deepika RAMACHANDRAN ; Deniz SEN ; Markus Bernhard BLATZ
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2018;10(5):340-346
PURPOSE: In this study, the shear bond strengths (SBS) of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven different cements [Polycarboxylate (PCC), Glass-Ionomer (GIC), Zinc phospahate (ZPC), Self-adhesive resin (RXU), Resin (C&B), and Temporary cements ((RXT) and (TCS))] were bonded to a total number of 224 square blocks (5×5×3 mm) made of one pure metal [Titanium (CP Ti) and two metal alloys [Gold-Platinum (Au-Pt) and Cobalt-Chrome (Co-Cr)] under 10 N and 50 N seating forces. SBS values were determined and data were analyzed with 3-way ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons and interactions among groups were analyzed with Tukey's simultaneous confidence intervals. RESULTS: Overall mean scores indicated that Co-Cr showed the highest SBS values (1.96±0.4) (P < .00), while Au-Pt showed the lowest among all metals tested (1.57±0.4) (P < .00). Except for PCC/CP Ti, RXU/CP Ti, and GIC/Au-Pt factor level combinations (P < .00), the cements tested under 10 N seating force showed no significantly higher SBS values when compared to the values of those tested under 50 N seating force (P>.05). The PCC cement showed the highest mean SBS score (3.59±0.07) among all cements tested (P < .00), while the resin-based temporary luting cement RXT showed the lowest (0.39±0.07) (P < .00). CONCLUSION: Polycarboxylate cement provides reliable bonding performance to metal surfaces. Resin-based temporary luting cements can be used when retrievability is needed. GIC is not suitable for permanent cementation of fixed dental prostheses consisting of CP Ti or Au-Pt substructures.
Alloys
;
Cementation
;
Dental Prosthesis
;
Metals
;
Polycarboxylate Cement
;
Zinc

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail