Objective:To explore the application effects of application of rehabilitation care decision-making scheme based on case management model in severe burn patients.Methods:The study was a non-randomized historical control study. Thirty patients who met the inclusion criteria and received routine rehabilitation nursing in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (the Third Military Medical University, hereinafter referred to as the hospital) from April 2021 to March 2022 were included in routine rehabilitation nursing group (26 males and 4 females, aged 48.50 (31.75, 56.25) years), and 30 patients who met the inclusion criteria and received case management rehabilitation nursing in the hospital from April 2022 to March 2023 were included in case management rehabilitation nursing group (22 males and 8 females, aged 46.00 (36.75, 55.25) years). The length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, total hospitalization day, and total hospitalization cost of the patients in two groups were recorded. At admission, convalescence, discharge, and 6 months after injury, the patients' life quality was evaluated by the concise burn specific health scale, the sleep quality was evaluated by the Pittsburgh sleep quality index, and the functional independence was evaluated by the functional independence rating scale. At convalescence, discharge, and 6 months after injury, the patients' scar status was evaluated by the Vancouver scar scale. At 6 months after injury, a third-party satisfaction questionnaire was used to investigate the efficacy satisfaction of patients.Results:The length of ICU stay and total hospitalization day of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group were both significantly shorter than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group (with Z values of -1.97 and -1.99, respectively, P<0.05), and the total hospitalization cost was less than that in routine rehabilitation nursing group ( Z=-1.99, P<0.05). At discharge and 6 months after injury, the life quality scores of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group were significantly higher than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group (with t values of -3.19 and -4.43, respectively, P<0.05), while the sleep quality scores were significantly lower than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group (with Z values of -2.18 and -3.33, respectively, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in cognitive function scores of functional independence of patients between the 2 groups at admission, convalescence, discharge, and 6 months after injury ( P>0.05). The exercise function scores and total scores of functional independence of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group at convalescence, discharge, and 6 months after injury were significantly higher than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group (with Z values of -4.37, -2.73, -4.10, -4.37, -2.64, and -4.06, respectively, P<0.05). The scar pigmentation scores of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group at 6 months after injury were significantly lower than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group ( Z=-2.05, P<0.05), and the scar vascularity scores of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group at discharge and 6 months after injury in case management rehabilitation nursing group were significantly lower than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group (with Z values of -3.16 and -2.07, respectively, P<0.05). The scar pliability scores (with Z values of -3.16, -2.45, and -4.38, respectively, P<0.05), thickness scores (with Z values of -2.56, -2.35, and -4.70, respectively, P<0.05), and total scores (with Z values of -3.77, -3.04, and -3.13, respectively, P<0.05) of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group at convalescence, discharge, and 6 months after injury were significantly lower than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group. At 6 months after injury, the efficacy satisfaction scores of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group were 4.00 (3.00, 4.25), which were significantly higher than 3.00 (2.00, 4.00) in routine rehabilitation nursing group ( Z=-2.72, P<0.05). Conclusions:The implementation of rehabilitation care decision-making scheme based on case management model can optimize the cost efficiency, improve the effectiveness of clinical treatment, and enhance the life quality and satisfaction of the curative effect of severe burn patients.

Objective:To examine the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade in neonates.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of two neonates with PICC-related pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade admitted to Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) between October 2019 and February 2021. Literature was searched using keywords "peripherally inserted central catheter", "central venous catheter", "deep venous catheter", "pericardial effusion", "cardiac tamponade", and "neonate" in databases including CNKI, Wanfang, Yiigle, VIP Database, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases up to June 2023. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of neonates with PICC-related pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade were summarized. Descriptive statistical analysis was used, and Fisher's exact test was employed to compare the impact of different treatment methods on the prognosis of the infants.Results:(1) Case report: Both infants experienced sudden onset of decreased heart rate and oxygen saturation, respiratory distress, pallor, and cyanosis of the lips. Case 1 did not undergo pericardiocentesis, while Case 2 did. Both infants died. (2) Literature review: A total of 25 articles (six in Chinese and 19 in English) were retrieved, involving 45 infants. Including the two cases from our institution, there were 47 infants in total. Among the 47 infants, 44 (94%) were preterm, and three (6%) were full-term. The gestational age of 46 infants was (29.5±3.9) weeks, with one full-term infant not reporting a specific gestational age. The birth weight of 46 infants was (1 227±600) g, with 43 (91%) being low birth weight infants. Nine cases (19%) did not specify the insertion site; 32 cases (68%) had the catheter inserted from the upper limb and six cases (13%) from the lower limb. After the onset of pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade symptoms, the catheter tip was located at or near the right atrium in 26 cases (55%), at the junction of the vena cava and right atrium in three cases (6%), within the pericardial cavity or cardiac silhouette in three cases (6%), in the superior vena cava in two cases (4%), in the pulmonary artery in one case (2%), in the left atrium in one case (2.1%), and in the right ventricle in one case (2%). Ten cases (21%) did not specify the exact location. Among the 47 cases, 13 (28%) experienced catheter migration, and 11 (23%) had catheter kinking or angulation. Thirty cases (64%) underwent pericardiocentesis, one case (2%) underwent pericardiotomy, and 16 cases (34%) received conservative treatment. The cure rate in the non-conservative treatment group (pericardiocentesis or pericardiotomy) was 81% (25/31), higher than that in the conservative treatment group (6/16) (Fisher's exact test, P=0.004). Conclusion:Once sudden hemodynamic or respiratory abnormalities occur, cardiac ultrasound should be promptly performed to confirm the diagnosis, and pericardiocentesis should be timely conducted to improve the survival rate of the neonates.

Neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia, clinically presenting as jaundice, is a ubiquitous and commonly a benign metabolic condition in newborn infants.It is a leading cause of hospitalization of neonates in the first week of life.Serum bilirubin has been considered as the most potent superoxide with the peroxyl radical scavenger activity.However, uncontrolled hyperbilirubinaemia or rapidly rising bilirubin can reach a neurotoxic concentration, potentially leading to central nervous system sequelae.Thus, the health status of jaundiced newborn infants is dependent on striking an appropriate balance between the protective effects of serum bilirubin and the risk of bilirubin neurotoxicity.In order to standardize the management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (jaundice), many countries have developed clinical practice management guidelines.This review sorted out and briefly interpreted the main contents of clinical management guidelines for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia drafted by the American Academy of Pediatrics and other countries, aiming to provide references of clinical diagnosis and treatment practice to domestic pediatrician.

Anemia and blood transfusion are common clinical problems in newborns, especially premature infants.What are the definition and influencing factors of neonatal anemia? What is the difference between anemia in preterm infants and full-term infants? What are the changes of pathophysiology and their effects on tissues and cells during neonatal anemia? What are the prevention strategies and treatment methods of neonatal anemia? Is there a uniform hemoglobin threshold for neonatal transfusion of red blood cells? What are the risks of blood transfusion? In view of the above problems, this review proposed that the definition of anemia should consider the effects of gestational age, day age, intrauterine or postnatal development status(such as growth retardation), nutrition and so on. "Physiological anemia of infancy" can occur in healthy term infants; "anemia of prematurity" can not be considered as a physiologic and benign event, which is related to the low level of endogenous erythropoietin and iatrogenic blood loss.It is emphasized that neonatal anemia(especially premature infants) is preventable and can be prevented, and prevention is more important than treatment.Neonates lack a uniform hemoglobin threshold and are at risk of blood transfusion during red blood cell transfusion.

Objective:To explore the application effects of mind mapping combined with scenario simulation training on the ability training of junior nurses in hospital transfer of patients with critical burns and trauma.Methods:A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. From December 2019 to December 2020, 55 female junior nurses from the Institute of Burn Research of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (the Third Military Medical University) who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study and divided into routine group (27 nurses, aged (24.0±0.9) years) and combined group (28 nurses, aged (24.2±0.8) years), according to the random number table. The nurses in routine group were trained with hospital transfer of patients with critical burns and trauma by theory combined with operational skill, and the nurses in combined group were trained with hospital transfer of patients with critical burns and trauma by mind mapping combined with scenario simulation training. Before and after the training, the self-made theoretical examination papers and skill assessment items were used for the examination and assessment to nurses, and their scores were calculated and compared. The self-made emergency ability scoring system was used to evaluate the emergency disposal ability of nurses from five dimensions, including team cooperation ability, emergency response ability, operative technique ability, specialized business ability, and nurse-patient communication ability, and their scores were calculated and compared. The non-standard implementation rates of transfer nursing measures, such as incomplete preparation of goods, poor communication effect of patients, inadequate pipeline nursing, unclear handover, and inadequate final treatment, were calculated and compared in the process of transporting highly simulated human (hereinafter referred to as simulated human) by nurses before and after training; and the rate of disease change and successful rate of transport of simulated human were calculated and compared after training. After assessment, self-made satisfaction questionnaire was used to compare nurses' satisfaction with the training mode, content, and effects. Data were statistically analyzed with independent sample t test, Pearson chi-square test, or Yates corrected chi-square test. Results:Fifty-five enrolled nurses were fully involved in the training, examination, assessment, and questionnaire filling. Before training, there were no statistically significant differences in theoretical examination and skill assessment scores between the 2 groups ( P>0.05); After training, the theoretical examination and skill assessment scores of nurses in combined group were significantly higher than those in routine group (with t values of -3.89 and -4.24, respectively, P<0.05). Before training, there were no statistically significant differences in the scores of each item of emergency disposal ability between the 2 groups ( P>0.05); after training, the scores in terms of team cooperation ability, emergency response ability, operative technique ability, specialized business ability, and nurse-patient communication ability of nurses in combined group were significantly higher than those in routine group (with t values of -6.49, -6.44, -2.21, -2.85, and -2.34, respectively, P<0.05). Before training, there were no statistically significant differences in the non-standard implementation rates of transfer nursing measures of nurses between the 2 groups ( P>0.05); after training, the non-standard rates of incomplete preparation of goods, unclear handover, and inadequate final treatment of nurses in combined group were significantly lower than those in routine group (with t values of 3.87, 5.89, and 5.28, respectively, P<0.05). After training, the rate of disease change of simulated human of nurses in combined group was 7.14% (2/28), which was significantly lower than 33.33% (9/27) in routine group ( χ2=5.89, P<0.05); the successful rate of transport was 96.43% (27/28), which was significantly higher than 74.07% (20/27) in routine group ( χ2=3.87, P<0.05). After assessment, the total score of training satisfaction and scores of satisfaction with training mode and training effect of nurses in combined group were significantly higher than those in routine group (with t values of 5.22, 4.67, and 10.71, respectively, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the satisfaction score on training content between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Evidence-based mind mapping combined with scenario simulation training significantly improves the nursing skills and emergency handling capabilities of junior nurses in transferring patients with critical burns and trauma.

Objective:To investigate the status of knowledge, attitude, and behavior of enteral nutrition implemented by nurses in burn intensive care unit (BICU) and analyze its influencing factors.Methods:A multi-center cross-sectional survey research method was used. On May 8 th, 2022, 107 BICU nurses who met the inclusion criteria were selected from the burn departments of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (the Third Military Medical University), Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Guiyang Steel Factory Staff Hospital, and the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. The self-made nurses' enteral nutrition nursing knowledge-attitude-behavior questionnaire for severely burned patients was used to investigate the nurses' gender, age, working years, professional title, position, highest educational background, and whether they received systematic training in knowledge of enteral nutrition, the scores of each factor, and the total scores of knowledge, attitude, and behavior dimensions of enteral nutrition in nurses. The nurses were classified according to the general data, and the total scores of their knowledge, attitude, and behavior of enteral nutrition were calculated. Data were statistically analyzed with independent sample t test, one-way analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test. According to the results of univariate analysis and combined with clinical experience and significance, the generalized linear model analysis was carried out to screen the independent influencing factors of the total scores of knowledge, attitude, and behavior of enteral nutrition in BICU nurses. Results:A total of 107 nurses were surveyed, and 107 valid questionnaires were collected, with an effective recovery rate of 100%. In the BICU nurses' enteral nutrition knowledge-attitude-behavior questionnaire, the total scores of knowledge, attitude, and behavior were 44±13, 87±15, and 70±19, respectively. Most of the BICU nurses in this survey were female, aged 22-48 (31±6) years, and the number of nurses worked for 1-5, 6-10, and ≥11 years was evenly distributed. The majority of the professional titles of nurses were nurses, positions were responsible nurses, and the highest educational background was undergraduate. Forty-four nurses received systematic training in knowledge of enteral nutrition. There were statistically significant differences in the total scores of knowledge of enteral nutrition among BICU nurses with different ages, working years, professional titles, positions, highest educational background, and whether they received systematic training in knowledge of enteral nutrition (with H values of 27.36, 15.27, and 10.19, respectively, Z values of -3.33, -2.59, and -6.46, respectively, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the total scores of attitude and behavior of enteral nutrition among BICU nurses with different gender, ages, working years, professional titles, positions, highest educational background, and whether they received systematic training in knowledge of enteral nutrition ( P>0.05). Age (26-30, 31-35, and ≥36 years old), highest educational background (undergraduate), and the systematic training received in enteral nutrition knowledge were the independent influencing factors for the total score of knowledge of enteral nutrition in BICU nurses (with 95% confidence intervals of 0.12-0.36, 0-0.30, 0.03-0.31, 0.01-0.32, and 0.19-0.40, respectively, standardized regression coefficients of 0.24, 0.15, 0.17, 0.17, and 0.29, respectively, P<0.05). There were no independent influencing factors for the total scores of enteral nutrition attitude and behavior of BICU nurses in different characteristics ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The BICU nurses have low cognitive level in the implementation of enteral nutrition, their concept needs to be updated in time, and their behavior needs to be further standardized. Age (26-30, 31-35, and ≥36 years old), highest educational background (undergraduate), and the systematic training received in enteral nutrition knowledge were the independent influencing factors for the knowledge of enteral nutrition in BICU nurses.

COVID-19 ; Communication ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pandemics ; Retrospective Studies ; SARS-CoV-2

OBJECTIVE: To identify the key biochemical indicators that affect the clinical type and outcomes of COVID-19 patients and explore the application of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in COVID-19. METHODS: Ninety-three patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted in Ezhou Central Hospital from February to April in 2020 were analyzed. Among them, 43 patients were selected from Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with the diagnosis of critical type of COVID-19, and 50 cases of common type were selected from the Department of Respiratory Medicine. The baseline data, blood routine test and biochemical indexes of the patients were collected on the first day of admission. NLRs of the patients were calculated, and COX survival analysis according to the NLR 4-category method was performed. The patients' outcomes were analyzed with receiver operating curves (ROCs). The patients were divided into two groups according to NLR cutoff value for comparison of the biochemical indexes. Based on the patients' outcomes, NLR cutoff value classification and clinical classification, multiple binary logistics regression was performed to screen the key variables and explore their significance in COVID-19. RESULTS: The NLR four-category method was not applicable for prognostic evaluation of the patients. The cut-off value of NLR for predict the prognosis of COVID-19 was 11.26, with a sensitivity of 0.903 and a specificity of 0.839; the laboratory indicators of the patients with NLR < 11.26 were similar to those in patients of the common type; the indicators were also similar between patients with NLR≥11.26 and those with critical type COVID-19. NLR, WBC, NEUT, PCT, DD, BUN, TNI, BNP, and LDH had significant effects on the clinical classification and outcome of the patients ( < 0.05); Cr, Ca, PH, and Lac had greater impact on the outcome of the patients ( < 0.05), while Na, PCO had greater impact on the clinical classification of the patients ( < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS NLR can be used as an important reference for clinical classification, prognostic assessment, and biochemical abnormalities of COVID-19. Patients of critical type more frequently have bacterial infection with more serious inflammatory reactions, severer heart, lung and kidney damages, and much higher levels of DD and LDH than those of the common type. NLR, NEUT, DD, TNI, BNP, LDH, Ca, PCT, PH, and Lac have obvious influence on the prognosis of COVID-19 and should be observed dynamically.
Betacoronavirus ; Blood Cell Count ; standards ; Coronavirus Infections ; blood ; diagnosis ; physiopathology ; Humans ; Lymphocytes ; cytology ; Neutrophils ; cytology ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral ; blood ; diagnosis ; physiopathology ; Prognosis ; ROC Curve ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index

OBJECTIVE: To identify the key biochemical indicators that affect the clinical type and outcomes of COVID-19 patients and explore the application of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in COVID-19. METHODS: Ninety-three patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted in Ezhou Central Hospital from February to April in 2020 were analyzed. Among them, 43 patients were selected from Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with the diagnosis of critical type of COVID-19, and 50 cases of common type were selected from the Department of Respiratory Medicine. The baseline data, blood routine test and biochemical indexes of the patients were collected on the first day of admission. NLRs of the patients were calculated, and COX survival analysis according to the NLR 4-category method was performed. The patients' outcomes were analyzed with receiver operating curves (ROCs). The patients were divided into two groups according to NLR cutoff value for comparison of the biochemical indexes. Based on the patients' outcomes, NLR cutoff value classification and clinical classification, multiple binary logistics regression was performed to screen the key variables and explore their significance in COVID-19. RESULTS: The NLR four-category method was not applicable for prognostic evaluation of the patients. The cut-off value of NLR for predict the prognosis of COVID-19 was 11.26, with a sensitivity of 0.903 and a specificity of 0.839; the laboratory indicators of the patients with NLR < 11.26 were similar to those in patients of the common type; the indicators were also similar between patients with NLR≥11.26 and those with critical type COVID-19. NLR, WBC, NEUT, PCT, DD, BUN, TNI, BNP, and LDH had significant effects on the clinical classification and outcome of the patients ( < 0.05); Cr, Ca, PH, and Lac had greater impact on the outcome of the patients ( < 0.05), while Na, PCO had greater impact on the clinical classification of the patients ( < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS NLR can be used as an important reference for clinical classification, prognostic assessment, and biochemical abnormalities of COVID-19. Patients of critical type more frequently have bacterial infection with more serious inflammatory reactions, severer heart, lung and kidney damages, and much higher levels of DD and LDH than those of the common type. NLR, NEUT, DD, TNI, BNP, LDH, Ca, PCT, PH, and Lac have obvious influence on the prognosis of COVID-19 and should be observed dynamically.
Betacoronavirus ; Coronavirus Infections ; Humans ; Lymphocytes ; Neutrophils ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral ; Prognosis ; ROC Curve ; Retrospective Studies

Objective:To understand the etiological characteristics of an acute gastroenteritis outbreak.Methods:Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and bacteria cultures were performed for the samples, including stool samples from patients and cooks, environmental swabs, raw food material (chicken meat), collected during the outbreak. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, antibiotics susceptibility test and whole-genome sequencing were performed for the Campylobacter jejuni isolates. Results:Four stool samples from patients were positive for Campylobacter jejuni by real-time PCR, in which 1 Campylobacter jejuni strain was isolated from a case who had no antibiotic treatment. Twelve Campylobacter jejuni and 7 Campylobacter coli isolates were obtained from 4 raw chicken meat samples. The Campylobacter jejuni strain isolated from the case was resistant to nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, florfenicol and tetracycline. The MLST analysis with the whole-genome sequences confirmed that the Campylobacter jejuni isolate from the case belonged to ST10075. Antimicrobial resistance genes cmeABCR, tetO/M and blaOXA-61 were found in the genome of the isolate from the patient by the whole-genome sequencing. No mutation in 23S rRNA was found and the C257T mutation in gyrA was identified in this isolate. Conclusion:Laboratory analysis indicated that Campylobacter jejuni infection might be the major cause of this gastroenteritis outbreak.