Objective To analyze the changes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration(nAMD)before and after treatment with faricimab or ranibizumab.Methods A prospective study was conducted on 20 nAMD patients(20 eyes)who received treatment at the Ophthalmology Department of Wuhu Hospital affiliated with East China Normal University.nAMD was diagnosed with fluorescein fundus angiography,indocyanine green angiography,and optical coherence tomography(OCT).The central macular thickness(CMT),choroidal neovascularization(CNV)cross-sectional area(CSA),and CNV blood flow area(CFA)of the patients at baseline and after 4,12,and 24 weeks of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)treatment.The changes in index at different time periods and the differences in results between the two groups were studied.Results There were no statistically significant differences in age,gender,CNV type,OCT,and optical coherence tomography angiography(OCTA)morphology between the two groups of patients at baseline(all P＞0.05).CMT,CSA,and CFA decreased in both groups after treatment(all P＜0.05).CMT showed a gradual decrease in both groups after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment(all P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in CMT between 12 and 24 weeks after treatment in the faricimab group(P=0.096).In the ranibizumab group,CMT increased 24 weeks after treatment,compared with that 12 weeks after treatment(P=0.004).CSA and CFA de-creased in both groups after 12 weeks of treatment(both P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in CSA and CFA between 12 and 24 weeks after treatment in the faricimab group(P=0.085,0.095).In the ranibizumab group,CSA and CFA increased 24 weeks after treatment,compared with those 12 week after treatment(P=0.001,0.000).Inter-group comparisons showed that the CMT of patients in the faricimab group was lower than that in the ranibizumab group af-ter 24 weeks of treatment(P=0.022).There was no statistically significant difference in CSA and CFA at each time period for both groups(all P＞0.05).Conclusion Faricimab and ranibizumab have similar efficacy in the treatment of nAMD patients,but faricimab is superior to ranibizumab in sustained effects.

Objective To analyze the changes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration(nAMD)before and after treatment with faricimab or ranibizumab.Methods A prospective study was conducted on 20 nAMD patients(20 eyes)who received treatment at the Ophthalmology Department of Wuhu Hospital affiliated with East China Normal University.nAMD was diagnosed with fluorescein fundus angiography,indocyanine green angiography,and optical coherence tomography(OCT).The central macular thickness(CMT),choroidal neovascularization(CNV)cross-sectional area(CSA),and CNV blood flow area(CFA)of the patients at baseline and after 4,12,and 24 weeks of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)treatment.The changes in index at different time periods and the differences in results between the two groups were studied.Results There were no statistically significant differences in age,gender,CNV type,OCT,and optical coherence tomography angiography(OCTA)morphology between the two groups of patients at baseline(all P＞0.05).CMT,CSA,and CFA decreased in both groups after treatment(all P＜0.05).CMT showed a gradual decrease in both groups after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment(all P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in CMT between 12 and 24 weeks after treatment in the faricimab group(P=0.096).In the ranibizumab group,CMT increased 24 weeks after treatment,compared with that 12 weeks after treatment(P=0.004).CSA and CFA de-creased in both groups after 12 weeks of treatment(both P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in CSA and CFA between 12 and 24 weeks after treatment in the faricimab group(P=0.085,0.095).In the ranibizumab group,CSA and CFA increased 24 weeks after treatment,compared with those 12 week after treatment(P=0.001,0.000).Inter-group comparisons showed that the CMT of patients in the faricimab group was lower than that in the ranibizumab group af-ter 24 weeks of treatment(P=0.022).There was no statistically significant difference in CSA and CFA at each time period for both groups(all P＞0.05).Conclusion Faricimab and ranibizumab have similar efficacy in the treatment of nAMD patients,but faricimab is superior to ranibizumab in sustained effects.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.08.015.].

Osteosarcoma is a kind of bone tumor with highly proliferative and invasive properties, a high incidence of pulmonary metastasis and a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for osteosarcoma. Currently, there are no molecular targeted drugs approved for osteosarcoma treatment, particularly effective drugs for osteosarcoma with pulmonary metastases. It has been reported that fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAPα) is upregulated in osteosarcoma and critically associated with osteosarcoma progression and metastasis, demonstrating that FAPα-targeted agents might be a promising therapeutic strategy for osteosarcoma. In the present study, we reported that the FAPα-activated vinblastine prodrug Z-GP-DAVLBH exhibited potent antitumor activities against FAPα-positive osteosarcoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Z-GP-DAVLBH inhibited the growth and induced the apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells. Importantly, it also decreased the migration and invasion capacities and reversed epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of osteosarcoma cells in vitro and suppressed pulmonary metastasis of osteosarcoma xenografts in vivo. Mechanistically, Z-GP-DAVLBH suppressed the AXL/AKT/GSK-3β/β-catenin pathway, leading to inhibition of the growth and metastatic spread of osteosarcoma cells. These findings demonstrate that Z-GP-DAVLBH is a promising agent for the treatment of FAPα-positive osteosarcoma, particularly osteosarcoma with pulmonary metastases.

Histones are important structural proteins of chromatin in the nucleus, which can regulate gene transcription, and can be released from the nucleus to the outside of the cell under injury and inflammatory stimulations, thereby causing cytotoxicity and immune stimulation, and aggravating tissue damage. Extracellular histones are involved in the occurrence and development of many diseases, including sepsis, autoimmune diseases, liver injury, and acute lung injury. Therefore, its application not only can be used as a body’s biomarker of inflammation, but also it is expected to become a molecular target for the treatment of diseases. This article reviews the role of extracellular histones in the inflammatory process of liver injury.