1.Modified tragus edge incision and transmasseteric anteroparotid approach to condyle reconstruction.
Hui TANG ; Lang WANG ; Lei WANG ; Pengcheng RAO ; Daowen LUO ; Guangxin FU ; Jingang XIAO
West China Journal of Stomatology 2023;41(3):290-296
OBJECTIVES:
This study aimed to analyze the application value of a modified tragus edge incision and transmasseteric anteroparotid approach to condyle reconstruction.
METHODS:
Condyle reconstruction was performed in 16 patients (9 females and 7 males) with modified tragus edge incision and transmasseteric anteroparotid approach. After regular follow-up, the function of condyle reconstruction was evaluated by clinical indicators, such as parotid salivary fistula, facial nerve function, mouth opening, occlusal relationship, and facial scar. The morphology of rib graft rib cartilage was evaluated by imaging indicators, such as panoramic radiography, CT, and three-dimensional CT image reconstruction.
RESULTS:
At 6-36 months postoperative follow-up, all patients had good recovery of facial appearance, concealed incisional scar, no parotid salivary fistula, good mouth opening, and occlusion. One case had temporary facial paralysis and recovered after treatment. Radiographic evaluation further showed that costochondral graft survived in normal anatomic locations.
CONCLUSIONS
The modified tragus edge incision and transmasseteric anteroparotid approach can effectively reduce parotid salivary fistula and facial nerve injury in condylar reconstruction. The surgical field was clearly exposed, and the incision scar was concealed without increasing the incidence of other complications. Thus, this approach is worthy of clinical promotion.
Male
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Mandibular Condyle/surgery*
;
Cicatrix/surgery*
;
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods*
;
Mandibular Fractures/surgery*
;
Oral Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Mini suture anchor: An effective device for reduction and fixation of displaced temporomandibular joint disc with intracapsular condylar fracture.
Shubhechha SHAKYA ; Kai-De LI ; Dou HUANG ; Zuo-Qiang LIU ; Zhi-Ru LIU ; Lei LIU
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2022;25(1):49-53
PURPOSE:
The main aim is to provide clinical reference for the application of mini suture anchor in the reduction and fixation of displaced temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc with intracapsular condylar fracture.
METHODS:
From October 2018 to October 2019, 21 patients (31 sides) with intracapsular condylar fractures and articular disc displacement from West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University were included. The selection criteria were: (1) mandibular condylar fractures accompanied by displacement of the TMJ disc, confirmed by clinical examination, CT scan and other auxiliary examinations; (2) indication for surgical treatment; (3) no surgical contraindications; (4) no previous history of surgery in the operative area; (5) no facial nerve injury before the surgery; (6) informed consent to participate in the research program and (7) complete data. Patients without surgical treatment were excluded. The employed patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after operation. Outcomes were assessed by success rate of operation, TMJ function and radiological examination results at 3 months after operation. Data were expressed as number and percent and analyzed using SPSS 19.0.
RESULTS:
All the surgical procedures were completed successfully and all the articular discs were firmly attached to the condyles. The articular disc sufficiently covered the condylar head after the fixation. The fixation remained stable when the mandible was moved in each direction by the surgeons. No complications occurred. The functions of the TMJ were well-recovered postoperatively in most cases. CT scan revealed that the screws were completely embedded in the bone without loosening or displacement.
CONCLUSION
Mini suture anchor can provide satisfactory stabilization for the reduced articular disc and also promote the recovery of TMJ functions.
Humans
;
Joint Dislocations/surgery*
;
Mandible
;
Mandibular Condyle
;
Mandibular Fractures/surgery*
;
Suture Anchors
;
Temporomandibular Joint Disc/surgery*
3.Virtual surgical planning is a useful tool in the surgical management of mandibular condylar fractures.
Shubhechha SHAKYA ; Kai-De LI ; Dou HUANG ; Zuo-Qiang LIU ; Xiao ZHANG ; Lei LIU
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2022;25(3):151-155
PURPOSE:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the application value of virtual surgical planning in the management of mandibular condylar fractures and to provide a reliable reference.
METHODS:
This was a prospective randomized controlled study and recruited 50 patients requiring surgical treatment for their mandibular condylar fractures. The inclusion criteria were patients (1) diagnosed with a condylar fracture by two clinically experienced doctors and required surgical treatment; (2) have given consent for the surgical treatment; and (3) had no contraindications to the surgery. Patients were excluded from this study if: (1) they were diagnosed with a non-dislocated or only slightly dislocated condylar fracture; (2) the comminuted condylar fracture was too severe to be treated with internal reduction and fixation; or (3) patients could not complete follow-up for 3 months. There were 33 male and 17 female patients with 33 unilateral condylar fractures and 17 bilateral condylar fractures included. The 50 patients were randomly (random number) divided into control group (25 patients with 35 sides of condylar fractures) and experimental group (25 patients with 32 sides of condylar fractures). Virtual surgical planning was used in the experimental group, but only clinical experience was used in the control group. The patients were followed up for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after operation. Variables including the rate of perfect reduction by radiological analysis, the average distance of deviation between preoperative and postoperative CT measurements using Geomagic software and postoperative clinical examinations (e.g., mouth opening, occlusion) were investigated for outcome measurement. SPSS 19 was adopted for data analysis.
RESULTS:
The average operation time was 180.60 min in the experimental group and 223.2 min in the control group. One week postoperatively, CT images showed that the anatomic reduction rate was 90.63% (29/32) in the experimental group and 68.57% (24/35) in the control group, revealing significant difference (X2 = 4.919, p = 0.027). Geomagic comparative analysis revealed that the average distance of deviation was also much smaller in the experimental group than that in the control group (0.639 mm vs. 0.995 mm; t = 3.824, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
These findings suggest that virtual surgical planning can assist surgeons in surgical procedures, reduce operative time, and improve the anatomic reduction rate & accuracy, and thus of value in the diagnosis and treatment of condylar fractures.
Female
;
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods*
;
Fractures, Comminuted
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Mandibular Condyle/surgery*
;
Mandibular Fractures/surgery*
;
Prospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
4.Management of isolated mandibular body fractures in adults
José ; Florencio F. Lapeñ ; a, Jr. ; Joselito F. David ; Ann Nuelli B. Acluba - Pauig ; Jehan Grace B. Maglaya ; Enrico Micael G. Donato ; Francis V. Roasa ; Philip B. Fullante ; Jose Rico A. Antonio ; Ryan Neil C. Adan ; Arsenio L. Pascual III ; Jennifer M. de Silva- Leonardo ; Mark Anthony T. Gomez ; Isaac Cesar S. De Guzman ; Veronica Jane B. Yanga ; Irlan C. Altura ; Dann Joel C. Caro ; Karen Mae A. Ty ; Elmo . R. Lago Jr ; Joy Celyn G. Ignacio ; Antonio Mario L. de Castro ; Policarpio B. Joves Jr. ; Alejandro V. Pineda Jr. ; Edgardo Jose B. Tan ; Tita Y. Cruz ; Eliezer B. Blanes ; Mario E. Esquillo ; Emily Rose M. Dizon ; Joman Q. Laxamana ; Fernando T. Aninang ; Ma. Carmela Cecilia G. Lapeñ ; a
Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2021;36(Supplements):1-43
Objective:
The mandible is the most common fractured craniofacial bone of all craniofacial fractures in the Philippines, with the mandibular body as the most involved segment of all mandibular fractures. To the best of our knowledge, there are no existing guidelines for the diagnosis and management of mandibular body fractures in particular. General guidelines include the American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAOHNSF) Resident Manual of Trauma to the Face, Head, and Neck chapter on Mandibular Trauma, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery section on the Mandibular Angle, Body, and Ramus, and a 2013 Cochrane Systematic Review on interventions for the management of mandibular fractures. On the other hand, a very specific Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Unilateral Condylar Fracture of the Mandible was published by the Ministry of Health Malaysia in 2005. Addressing the prevalence of mandibular body fractures, and dearth of specific guidelines for its diagnosis and management, this clinical practice guideline focuses on the management of isolated mandibular body fractures in adults.
Purpose:
This guideline is meant for all clinicians (otolaryngologists – head and neck surgeons, as well as primary care and specialist physicians, nurses and nurse practitioners, midwives and community health workers, dentists, and emergency first-responders) who may provide care to adults aged 18 years and above that may present with an acute history and physical and/or laboratory examination findings that may lead to a diagnosis of isolated mandibular body fracture and its subsequent medical and surgical management, including health promotion and disease prevention. It is applicable in any setting (including urban and rural primary-care, community centers, treatment units, hospital emergency rooms, operating rooms) in which adults with isolated mandibular body fractures would be identified, diagnosed, or managed. Outcomes are functional resolution of isolated mandibular body fractures; achieving premorbid form; avoiding use of context-inappropriate diagnostics and therapeutics; minimizing use of ineffective interventions; avoiding co-morbid infections, conditions, complications and adverse events; minimizing cost; maximizing health-related quality of life of individuals with isolated mandibular body fracture; increasing patient satisfaction; and preventing recurrence in patients and occurrence in others.
Action Statements
The guideline development group made strong recommendationsfor the following key action statements: (6) pain management- clinicians should routinely evaluate pain in patients with isolated mandibular body fractures using a numerical rating scale (NRS) or visual analog scale (VAS); analgesics should be routinely offered to patients with a numerical rating pain scale score or VAS of at least 4/10 (paracetamol and a mild opioid with or without an adjuvant analgesic) until the numerical rating pain scale score or VAS is 3/10 at most; (7) antibiotics- prophylactic antibiotics should be given to adult patients with isolated mandibular body fractures with concomitant mucosal or skin opening with or without direct visualization of bone fragments; penicillin is the drug of choice while clindamycin may be used as an alternative; and (14) prevention- clinicians should advocate for compliance with road traffic safety laws (speed limit, anti-drunk driving, seatbelt and helmet use) for the prevention of motor vehicle, cycling and pedestrian accidents and maxillofacial injuries.The guideline development group made recommendations for the following key action statements: (1) history, clinical presentation, and diagnosis - clinicians should consider a presumptive diagnosis of mandibular fracture in adults presenting with a history of traumatic injury to the jaw plus a positive tongue blade test, and any of the following: malocclusion, trismus, tenderness on jaw closure and broken tooth; (2) panoramic x-ray - clinicians may request for panoramic x-ray as the initial imaging tool in evaluating patients with a presumptive clinical diagnosis; (3) radiographs - where panoramic radiography is not available, clinicians may recommend plain mandibular radiography; (4) computed tomography - if available, non-contrast facial CT Scan may be obtained; (5) immobilization - fractures should be temporarily immobilized/splinted with a figure-of-eight bandage until definitive surgical management can be performed or while initiating transport during emergency situations; (8) anesthesia - nasotracheal intubation is the preferred route of anesthesia; in the presence of contraindications, submental intubation or tracheostomy may be performed; (9) observation - with a soft diet may serve as management for favorable isolated nondisplaced and nonmobile mandibular body fractures with unchanged pre - traumatic occlusion; (10) closed reduction - with immobilization by maxillomandibular fixation for 4-6 weeks may be considered for minimally displaced favorable isolated mandibular body fractures with stable dentition, good nutrition and willingness to comply with post-procedure care that may affect oral hygiene, diet modifications, appearance, oral health and functional concerns (eating, swallowing and speech); (11) open reduction with transosseous wiring - with MMF is an option for isolated displaced unfavorable and unstable mandibular body fracture patients who cannot afford or avail of titanium plates; (12) open reduction with titanium plates - ORIF using titanium plates and screws should be performed in isolated displaced unfavorable and unstable mandibular body fracture; (13) maxillomandibular fixation - intraoperative MMF may not be routinely needed prior to reduction and internal fixation; and (15) promotion - clinicians should play a positive role in the prevention of interpersonal and collective violence as well as the settings in which violence occurs in order to avoid injuries in general and mandibular fractures in particular.
Mandibular Fractures
;
Jaw Fractures
;
Classification
;
History
;
Diagnosis
;
Diagnostic Imaging
;
Therapeutics
;
Diet Therapy
;
Drug Therapy
;
Rehabilitation
;
General Surgery
5.Treatment of mandibular angle fracture: Revision of the basic principles.
Behnam BOHLULI ; Ebrahim MOHAMMADI ; Iman Zoljanah OSKUI ; Nima MOARAMNEJAD
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2019;22(2):117-119
Biodynamics of mandibular angle fractures has been extensively discussed in the literature in search for the best way to fixate and expedite recovery of trauma patients. Pioneers like Michelet and Champy had the greatest impact on evolving of osteosynthesis in maxillofacial traumatology; they introduced their basic principles frequently used to describe the biomechanics of mandibular fixation. Their concept states when a physiologic load is applied on mandibular teeth a negative tension will be created at superior border and a positive pressure will appear at inferior border. These simple definitions are the basis for the advent of fixation modalities in mandibular angle fracture. This article sought to reassess these principals based on load location via finite elements method.
Biomechanical Phenomena
;
Dental Stress Analysis
;
Finite Element Analysis
;
Fracture Fixation, Internal
;
methods
;
Humans
;
Mandible
;
physiopathology
;
Mandibular Fractures
;
physiopathology
;
surgery
;
Tooth
;
physiology
6.Comparison of two incisions for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular body fractures: A randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the surgical outcome.
Sasikala BALASUBRAMANIAN ; Elavenil PANNEERSELVAM ; Gayathri GOPI ; Komagan PRABHU NAKKEERAN ; Aditi RAJENDRA SHARMA ; Krishnakumar RAJA VB
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2019;22(1):34-40
PURPOSE:
The purpose of the study is to compare the surgical access and post-operative outcome of two intra-oral incisions used for approaching a mandibular body fracture.
METHODS:
This clinical trial involved 60 patients with mandibular body fractures who were randomly allocated to control and study groups. The fractures were approached using the routine vestibular incision in the control group and crevicular incision with vertical release in the study group. The effects of incision design on the post-surgical outcome variables like swelling, trismus, paresthesia, wound healing and gingival recession were statistically analysed with non-parametric tests by using SPSS 22.0 software. Comparison of continuous variables between the groups and time points was done using Mann Whitney test and Friedman test respectively. Chi-square test was used to compare proportions between groups. Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction was used for pair wise comparisons.
RESULTS:
The study group demonstrated favourable surgical outcome in the immediate postoperative phase as compared to the control group. The difference in mouth opening, swelling and neurosensory impairment between the two groups was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Crevicular incision was found to be an ideal alternative to vestibular incision in achieving surgical access and fixation of mandibular body fractures with reduction in postoperative patient discomfort and better surgical outcome.
Adult
;
Female
;
Fracture Fixation, Internal
;
methods
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Mandibular Fractures
;
physiopathology
;
surgery
;
Middle Aged
;
Open Fracture Reduction
;
methods
;
Orthognathic Surgical Procedures
;
methods
;
Surgical Wound
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Young Adult
7.Postoperative malocclusion after maxillofacial fracture management: a retrospective case study
Sang Yun KIM ; Yong Hoon CHOI ; Young Kyun KIM
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2018;40(1):27-
PURPOSE: Various complications occur when a maxillofacial fracture is malunionized or improperly resolved. Malocclusion is the most common complication, followed by facial deformity, temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD), and neurological symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental treatment of postoperative complications after maxillofacial fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, nine patients with a postoperative complication after maxillofacial fracture who had been performed the initial operation from other units and were referred to the authors’ department had been included. Of the nine patients, six had mandibular fractures, one had maxillary fractures, one had maxillary and mandibular complex fractures, and one had multiple facial fractures. All the patients had tooth fractures, dislocations, displacements, and alveolar bone fractures at the time of trauma, but complications occurred because none of the patients underwent preoperative and postoperative dental treatment. Malocclusion and TMD are the most common complications, followed by dental problems (pulp necrosis, tooth extrusion, osteomyelitis, etc.) due to improper treatment of teeth and alveolar bone injuries. The patients were referred to the department of dentistry to undergo treatment for the complications. One of the nine patients underwent orthognathic surgery for a severe open bite. Another patient underwent bone reconstruction using an iliac bone graft and vestibuloplasty with extensive bone loss. The other patients, who complained of moderate occlusal abnormalities and TMDs such as mouth-opening limitation, underwent occlusal treatment by prosthodontic repair and temporomandibular joint treatment instead of surgery. RESULTS: One patient who underwent orthognathic surgery had complete loss of open bite and TMD after surgery. One patient who underwent reconstruction using an iliac bone graft had a good healing process. Other patients were treated with splint, injection, and physical therapy for mouth-opening limitation and temporomandibular joint pain. After treatment, the TMDs were resolved, but the remaining occlusal abnormalities were resolved with prosthetic restoration. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the severity of malocclusion and TMJ symptom and the feasibillity of reoperation, nonsurgical methods such as orthodontic and prosthodontic treatments and splint therapy can be used to manage the dental and TMD complication after the trauma surgery. However, reoperation needs to be strongly considered for severe malocclusion and TMD problem. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40902-018-0167-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Congenital Abnormalities
;
Dentistry
;
Dislocations
;
Fractures, Bone
;
Humans
;
Malocclusion
;
Mandibular Fractures
;
Maxillary Fractures
;
Necrosis
;
Open Bite
;
Orthodontic Extrusion
;
Orthognathic Surgery
;
Osteomyelitis
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Reoperation
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Splints
;
Temporomandibular Joint
;
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
;
Tooth
;
Tooth Fractures
;
Transplants
;
Vestibuloplasty
8.Complications of the retromandibular transparotid approach for low condylar neck and subcondylar fractures: a retrospective study.
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2018;44(2):73-78
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the rates of complications, morbidity, and safety with the transparotid approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted and consisted of 53 surgically treated patients in the past five years for low condylar neck and subcondylar fractures. Only patients with malocclusion and who underwent open reduction with internal fixation with the retromandibular transparotid approach were included. The examined parameters were postoperative suboptimal occlusion, deflection, saliva fistula, and facial nerve weakness. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients had an open reduction with internal fixation on 55 sides (41 males, 77.4%; mean age, 42 years [range, 18–72 years]). Four patients (7.5%) experienced transient facial nerve weakness of the marginal mandibular branch, but none was permanent. Four patients had a salivary fistula, and 5 patients showed postoperative malocclusion, where one needed repeat surgery after one year. One patient showed long-term deflection. No other complications were observed. CONCLUSION: The retromandibular transparotid approach is a safe procedure for open reduction and internal fixation of low condylar neck and subcondylar fractures, and it has minimal complications.
Facial Nerve
;
Fistula
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Malocclusion
;
Mandibular Fractures
;
Neck*
;
Parotid Gland
;
Reoperation
;
Retrospective Studies*
;
Saliva
;
Surgery, Oral
9.A working paradigm for managing mandibular fractures under regional anesthesia.
Natarajan CHELLAPPA ; Vikas MESHRAM ; Prajwalit KENDE ; Jayant LANDGE ; Neha AGGARWAL ; Manish TIWARI
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2018;44(6):275-281
OBJECTIVES: Isolated mandibular fractures contribute to approximately 45% of maxillofacial traumas. Improper management of mandibular fractures can cause myriad potential complications and can lead to serious functional and aesthetic sequelae. The objective of the study is to design a stepwise approach for managing isolated mandibular fractures using open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with regional anesthesia on outpatient basis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with isolated mandibular fractures presenting to the department of maxillofacial surgery were selected for ORIF under regional anesthesia based on occlusion, age, socioeconomic status, general condition, habits, and allied medical ailments. Standard preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative protocols were followed. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 4 weeks up to a maximum of 1 year. RESULTS: Of 23 patients who received regional anesthesia, all but one had good postoperative functional occlusion. One patient was hypersensitive and had difficulty tolerating the procedure. Two patients developed an extraoral draining sinus, one of whom was managed with local curettage, while the other required hardware removal. One patient, who was a chronic alcoholic, returned 1 week after treatment with deranged fracture segments after he fell while intoxicated. CONCLUSION: With proper case selection following a stepwise protocol, the majority of mandibular fractures requiring ORIF can be managed with regional anesthesia and yield minimal to no complications.
Alcoholics
;
Anesthesia, Conduction*
;
Curettage
;
Humans
;
Mandibular Fractures*
;
Outpatients
;
Social Class
;
Surgery, Oral
10.Correlation between Condylar Fracture Pattern after Parasymphyseal Impact and Condyle Morphological Features: A Retrospective Analysis of 107 Chinese Patients.
Lu HAN ; Ting LONG ; Wei TANG ; Lei LIU ; Wei JING ; Wei-Dong TIAN ; Jie LONG ;
Chinese Medical Journal 2017;130(4):420-427
BACKGROUNDThe treatment of the condylar fractures is difficult. Factors that result in the fractures are complex. The objective of this morphometric study was to investigate the relationship between condylar fracture patterns and condylar morphological characteristics.
METHODSWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 107 patients admitted to the West China Hospital of Stomatology for bilateral condylar fractures caused by parasymphyseal impact. The patients were divided into five groups according to the type of condylar fracture. Ten parameters were evaluated on three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction mandible models through the Mimics 16.0 (Materialize Leuven, Belgium) anthropometry toolkit. Each parameter of the 3D models was analyzed using multivariate analysis. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to examine the relationships between the five groups.
RESULTSThe results showed that the differences of condylar head width (M1), condylar neck width (M3), the ratio of condylar head width to condylar anteroposterior diameter (M1/M2), the ratio of condylar head width to condylar neck width (M1/M3), the ratio of condylar height to ramus height (M8/M7), and mandibular angle (M10) were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Type A condylar head fractures were positively associated with M1 (compared to Type B: OR =1.627, 95% CI: 1.123, 2.359; compared to Type C: OR = 1.705, 95% CI: 1.170, 2.484) and M1/M2 (compared to Type B: OR =1.034, 95% CI: 0.879, 2.484). Type B condylar head fractures were negatively associated with M10 (compared to Type C: OR = 0.909, 95% CI: 0.821, 1.007). Condylar neck fractures were negatively associated with M3 (compared to condylar head: OR = 0.382, CI: 0.203, 0.720 ; compared to condylar base: OR = 0.436, 95% CI: 0.218, 0.874), and positively associated with M1/M3 (compared to condylar head: OR = 1.229, 95% CI: 1.063, 1.420 compared to condylar base: OR = 1.223, 95% CI: 1.034, 1.447). Condylar base fractures were positively associated with M10 (OR = 1.095, 95% CI: 1.008, 1.189) and negatively associated with M8/M7 (OR = 0.855, 95% CI: 0.763, 0.959) as compared with condylar head fractures.
CONCLUSIONSCondylar fracture pattern is associated with the anatomical features of the condyles when a fracture occurs from parasymphyseal impact.
Adult ; Female ; Fractures, Bone ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Mandibular Condyle ; injuries ; surgery ; Mandibular Fractures ; surgery ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail