1.Accuracy of ultrasound-measured skin-to-hyoid bone distance for predicting difficult mask ventilation in patients with obesity: a prospective observational study
Maha MOSTAFA ; Israa ELGENEIDI ; Ahmed HASANIN ; Mostafa ALI ; Hanan MOSTAFA ; Nader Noshy NAGUIB
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2026;79(3):353-359
Background:
The risk of difficult mask ventilation (DMV) is high in patients with obesity. Therefore, we evaluated the accuracy of ultrasound-measured skin-to-hyoid bone distance (SHD) for predicting DMV in this population.
Methods:
This prospective observational study included adult patients with obesity scheduled for elective surgery. Preoperative airway assessment included the modified Mallampati test, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, upper lip bite test, mouth opening, neck mobility, STOP-Bang score, and the SHD measured by a handheld ultrasound probe. The mask ventilation grade was evaluated using the 4-level Han score, and grades 3 and 4 were considered as DMV. The primary outcome was the ability of SHD to predict DMV using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. A multivariate model including the STOP-Bang score, modified Mallampati test, upper lip bite test, and SHD was also assessed.
Results:
Data from 326 patients were analyzed. The DMV incidence was 22/326 (6.7%). Patients with DMV were predominantly male and had higher weight, STOP-Bang score, modified Mallampati grade, upper lip bite class, and SHD than did those with easy mask ventilation. The AUC (95% CI) of the SHD for predicting DMV was 0.88 (0.84–0.92). An SHD > 1.9 cm had a positive-predictive value of 27%, while its negative-predictive value was 99% (for SHD ≤ 1.9 cm). Multivariate analysis revealed that the SHD was an independent predictor of DMV.
Conclusions
In patients with obesity, SHD measured by a handheld ultrasound probe is an independent predictor of DMV and can accurately predict DMV. An SHD ≤ 1.9 cm can exclude DMV with 99% accuracy.
2.Hemodynamic effects of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine infusion for prophylaxis against spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in the elderly population undergoing hip fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial
Maha MOSTAFA ; Ahmed HASANIN ; Mahmoud MOSTAFA ; Mai Y TAHA ; Mohamed ELSAYAD ; Fatma Alzahraa HAGGAG ; Omar TAALAB ; Ashraf RADY ; Bassant ABDELHAMID
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2021;74(4):308-316
Background:
Elderly population are at increased risk of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension increasing their risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine (NE) versus phenylephrine (PE) in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia.
Methods:
Elderly patients scheduled for hip fracture surgery were randomized to receive either NE infusion (8 µg/min) (NE group, n = 31) or PE infusion (100 µg/min) (PE group, n = 31) after spinal anesthesia. Outcomes included mean heart rate, mean blood pressure, cardiac output, incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension, incidence of bradycardia, and incidence of hypertension.
Results:
Sixty-two patients with a mean age of 71 ± 6 years were included in the final analysis (31 patients in each group). The NE group showed a higher mean heart rate and cardiac output than the PE group. The NE group had a lower incidence of reactive bradycardia (10% vs. 36%, P = 0.031) and hypertension (3% vs. 36%, P = 0.003) than the PE group. No study participant developed hypotension, and the mean blood pressure was comparable between the two groups.
Conclusions
Both NE and PE infusions effectively prevented spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. However, NE provided more hemodynamic stability than PE; maintaining the heart rate, higher cardiac output, less reactive bradycardia, and hypertension.
3.Hemodynamic effects of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine infusion for prophylaxis against spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in the elderly population undergoing hip fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial
Maha MOSTAFA ; Ahmed HASANIN ; Mahmoud MOSTAFA ; Mai Y TAHA ; Mohamed ELSAYAD ; Fatma Alzahraa HAGGAG ; Omar TAALAB ; Ashraf RADY ; Bassant ABDELHAMID
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2021;74(4):308-316
Background:
Elderly population are at increased risk of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension increasing their risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine (NE) versus phenylephrine (PE) in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia.
Methods:
Elderly patients scheduled for hip fracture surgery were randomized to receive either NE infusion (8 µg/min) (NE group, n = 31) or PE infusion (100 µg/min) (PE group, n = 31) after spinal anesthesia. Outcomes included mean heart rate, mean blood pressure, cardiac output, incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension, incidence of bradycardia, and incidence of hypertension.
Results:
Sixty-two patients with a mean age of 71 ± 6 years were included in the final analysis (31 patients in each group). The NE group showed a higher mean heart rate and cardiac output than the PE group. The NE group had a lower incidence of reactive bradycardia (10% vs. 36%, P = 0.031) and hypertension (3% vs. 36%, P = 0.003) than the PE group. No study participant developed hypotension, and the mean blood pressure was comparable between the two groups.
Conclusions
Both NE and PE infusions effectively prevented spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. However, NE provided more hemodynamic stability than PE; maintaining the heart rate, higher cardiac output, less reactive bradycardia, and hypertension.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail