PURPOSE: We evaluated the short-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent modified scleral fixation of an intraocular lens (IOL) using a scleral tunnel and groove. METHODS: From June 2016 to May 2017, 34 eyes of 34 patients who underwent modified scleral fixation of an IOL using a scleral tunnel and groove were retrospectively studied. We evaluated the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure (IOP), spherical equivalent, and postoperative complications at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The BCVA was 0.85 ± 0.83 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) before surgery and 0.38 ± 0.61 logMAR at 6 months (p = 0.001). The corneal endothelial cell count was 1,955.12 ± 217/mm2 and 1,852.59 ± 190/mm2, before and after surgery, respectively, which was not significantly different (p = 0.186). Postoperative complications occurred in eight eyes (23.5%); IOP elevation in one eye (2.9%), IOL tilt or decentration in two eyes (5.7%), optic capture in four eyes (11.4%), and cystic macular edema in one eye (2.9%). The spherical equivalent showed myopic changes after surgery and decreased significantly over time (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Modified scleral fixation of the IOL using a scleral tunnel and groove improved the BCVA, but did not significantly affect corneal endothelial cell loss. This procedure can be a good alternative to conventional scleral fixation of an IOL, which has advantages in shortened surgical time and easy surgical manipulation.
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss ; Endothelial Cells ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Macular Edema ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical outcomes of combined vitrectomy and intrascleral fixation of a new posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC IOL) as a treatment for IOL dislocation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective interventional study at our medical facility from January 2015 to January 2017. Posteriorly dislocated IOLs were removed with pars plana vitrectomy. Two intrascleral tunnels, 2.0 mm in length, were created 1.5 mm to the limbus at 6 and 12 o'clock positions. Both haptics of new foldable acrylic 3-piece IOLs were inserted into the tunnel until the IOL was secured in a central position. We analyzed the preexisting ocular condition, visual acuity (VA), and refractive error preoperatively and postoperatively, and recorded postoperative complications. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (50 eyes) were enrolled in the study. The mean follow-up period was 12.8 ± 6.6 months. A best-corrected VA of 6/12 or better was achieved in 43 eyes (86%). The mean VA significantly improved from 0.32 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at baseline to 0.18 logMAR at last follow-up (p = 0.03). The refractive status after intrascleral fixation of the PC IOL revealed a mean hyperopic shift of +1.09 ± 1.28 diopters from the predicted spherical equivalent. Postoperative vitreous hemorrhages occurred in six cases and were cleared without visual compromise. Cystoid macular edema was well-controlled by topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) medications in two cases. In two cases, IOL dislocation recurred and required re-operation. There were no serious adverse events of suture-related complications, retinal detachment, corneal compromise, or endophthalmitis in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that use of combined vitrectomy and intrascleral fixation of PC IOLs is a safe and efficient technique to correct IOL dislocation. We observed good visual outcomes with only minor complications.
Dislocations ; Endophthalmitis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Macular Edema ; Postoperative Complications ; Refractive Errors ; Retinal Detachment ; Retrospective Studies ; Visual Acuity ; Vitrectomy ; Vitreous Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND: This is part of a prospective study carried out as a national project to secure standardized public resources for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in Korea. We compared various characteristics of long-standing T2DM patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and macular edema (ME). METHODS: From September 2014 to July 2015, T2DM patients with disease duration of at least 15 years were recruited at a single university hospital. Clinical data and samples were collected according to the common data elements and standards of procedure developed by the Korean Diabetes Association Research Council. Each participant was assessed by ophthalmologists for DR and ME. RESULTS: Among 220 registered patients, 183 completed the ophthalmologic assessment. DR was associated with longer disease duration (odds ratio [OR], 1.071; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001 to 1.147 for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy [NPDR]) (OR, 1.142; 95% CI, 1.051 to 1.242 for proliferative diabetic retinopathy [PDR]) and the use of long-acting insulin (OR, 4.559; 95% CI, 1.672 to 12.427 for NPDR) (OR, 4.783; 95% CI, 1.581 to 14.474 for PDR), but a lower prevalence of a family history of cancer (OR, 0.310; 95% CI, 0.119 to 0.809 for NPDR) (OR, 0.206; 95% CI, 0.063 to 0.673 for PDR). ME was associated with higher glycosylated hemoglobin levels (OR, 1.380; 95% CI, 1.032 to 1.845) and the use of rapid-acting insulin (OR, 5.211; 95% CI, 1.445 to 18.794). CONCLUSION: Various clinical features were associated with DR and ME. Additional epidemiological and biorepository-based studies using this cohort are being conducted to deepen our understanding of diabetic complications in Korea.
Cohort Studies ; Common Data Elements ; Diabetes Complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* ; Diabetic Retinopathy* ; Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated ; Humans ; Insulin, Long-Acting ; Insulin, Short-Acting ; Korea ; Macular Edema ; Prevalence ; Prospective Studies

PURPOSE: To compare the additive effects of two types of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), bromfenac 0.1% or ketorolac 0.45%, relative to topical steroid alone in cataract surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total 91 subjects scheduled to undergo cataract operation were randomized into three groups: Group 1, pre/postoperative bromfenac 0.1%; Group 2, pre/postoperative preservative-free ketorolac 0.45%; and Group 3, postoperative steroid only, as a control. Outcome measures included intraoperative change in pupil size, postoperative anterior chamber inflammation control, change in macular thickness and volume, and ocular surface status after operation. RESULTS: Both NSAID groups had smaller intraoperative pupil diameter changes compared to the control group (p<0.05). There was significantly less ocular inflammation 1 week and 1 month postoperatively in both NSAID groups than the control group. The changes in central foveal subfield thickness measured before the operation and at postoperative 1 month were 4.30+/-4.25, 4.87+/-6.03, and 12.47+/-12.24 microm in groups 1 to 3, respectively. In the control group, macular thickness and volume increased more in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), compared to those without DM. In contrast, in both NSAID groups, NSAIDs significantly reduced macular changes in subgroups of patients with or without DM. Although three ocular surface parameters were worse in group 1 than in group 2, these differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: Adding preoperative and postoperative bromfenac 0.1% or ketorolac 0.45% to topical steroid can reduce intraoperative miosis, postoperative inflammation, and macular changes more effectively than postoperative steroid alone.
Aged ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/*administration & dosage/pharmacology ; Benzophenones/*administration & dosage/pharmacology ; Bromobenzenes/*administration & dosage/pharmacology ; *Cataract ; *Cataract Extraction ; Female ; Humans ; Inflammation/prevention & control ; Ketorolac/*administration & dosage/pharmacology ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Macular Edema/*prevention & control ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Miosis/*prevention & control ; Phacoemulsification ; Postoperative Complications/drug therapy ; Postoperative Period ; Premedication ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: To report transient corneal edema after phacoemulsification as a predictive factor for the development of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME). METHODS: A total of 150 eyes from 150 patients (59 men and 91 women; mean age, 68.0 ± 10.15 years) were analyzed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography 1 week and 5 weeks after routine phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Transient corneal edema detected 1 week after surgery was analyzed to reveal any significant relationship with the development of PCME 5 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Transient corneal edema developed in 17 (11.3%) of 150 eyes 1 week after surgery. A history of diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with development of transient corneal edema (odds ratio [OR], 4.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41 to 11.54; p = 0.011). Both diabetes mellitus and transient corneal edema were significantly associated with PCME development 5 weeks after surgery (OR, 4.58; 95% CI, 1.56 to 13.43; p = 0.007; and OR, 6.71; CI, 2.05 to 21.95; p = 0.003, respectively). In the 8 eyes with both diabetes mellitus and transient corneal edema, 4 (50%) developed PCME 5 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Transient corneal edema detected 1 week after routine cataract surgery is a predictive factor for development of PCME. Close postoperative observation and intervention is recommended in patients with transient corneal edema.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cornea/*pathology ; Corneal Edema/*diagnosis/etiology ; Female ; Fluorescein Angiography ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fundus Oculi ; Glucosinolates ; Humans ; Macular Edema/diagnosis/*etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Phacoemulsification ; Pseudophakia/*complications/diagnosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolon with or without rescue laser therapy (intravitreal triamcinolone injection [IVTA] group), bevacizumab with or without rescue laser treatment (intravitreal bevacizumab injection [IVB] group), or a combination of both with or without rescue laser therapy (IVTA + IVB group), with standard care for patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 151 patients treated with intravitreal injection with or without rescue laser for treatment of macular edema caused by BRVO, and who were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. During the observation period, rescue grid laser or repeated intravitreal injection with initial drug was performed if recurrence of macular edema was confirmed. Visual acuity, change in visual acuity, and intraocular pressure were compared in each phase. RESULTS: Totals of 16%, 5.6%, and 0% of participants in the three groups showed significant visual loss of more than three lines of the Snellen chart at last follow-up. The IVTA group was the least effective treatment modality, with statistical significance. The development rates of elevated intraocular pressure were similar among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although IVTA yielded effects similar to those of standard grid photocoagulation based on the Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion study, IVB or IVTA + IVB with or without rescue laser treatment resulted in improvement in visual acuity at 24 months after the start of treatment and was associated with few serious adverse side effects. Thus, these approaches could be useful for treating macular edema arising secondary to BRVO.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/*administration & dosage ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage ; Humans ; Intravitreal Injections ; Laser Therapy/*methods ; Macular Edema/diagnosis/etiology/*therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Recurrence ; Retinal Vein Occlusion/*complications/diagnosis/therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Treatment Outcome ; Triamcinolone Acetonide/*administration & dosage ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/*antagonists & inhibitors ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolon with or without rescue laser therapy (intravitreal triamcinolone injection [IVTA] group), bevacizumab with or without rescue laser treatment (intravitreal bevacizumab injection [IVB] group), or a combination of both with or without rescue laser therapy (IVTA + IVB group), with standard care for patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 151 patients treated with intravitreal injection with or without rescue laser for treatment of macular edema caused by BRVO, and who were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. During the observation period, rescue grid laser or repeated intravitreal injection with initial drug was performed if recurrence of macular edema was confirmed. Visual acuity, change in visual acuity, and intraocular pressure were compared in each phase. RESULTS: Totals of 16%, 5.6%, and 0% of participants in the three groups showed significant visual loss of more than three lines of the Snellen chart at last follow-up. The IVTA group was the least effective treatment modality, with statistical significance. The development rates of elevated intraocular pressure were similar among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although IVTA yielded effects similar to those of standard grid photocoagulation based on the Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion study, IVB or IVTA + IVB with or without rescue laser treatment resulted in improvement in visual acuity at 24 months after the start of treatment and was associated with few serious adverse side effects. Thus, these approaches could be useful for treating macular edema arising secondary to BRVO.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/*administration & dosage ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage ; Humans ; Intravitreal Injections ; Laser Therapy/*methods ; Macular Edema/diagnosis/etiology/*therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Recurrence ; Retinal Vein Occlusion/*complications/diagnosis/therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Treatment Outcome ; Triamcinolone Acetonide/*administration & dosage ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/*antagonists & inhibitors ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To evaluate patients' self-recognition of reduced visual acuity due to recurring macular edema in retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of patients who were diagnosed with recurring macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion was performed. The proportion of patients who recognized reduced visual acuity due to the recurrence of macular edema and who visited the hospital before the scheduled follow-up date was determined. Parameters including age, sex, diagnosis, visual acuity before recurrence of macular edema, and extent of visual acuity reduction due to recurrence of macular edema were compared in patients who recognized a reduction in visual acuity and those who did not. The proportion of patients who visited the hospital promptly was also determined. RESULTS: Forty eyes of 40 patients were included in the analysis. Sixteen and 24 patients were diagnosed with central retinal vein occlusion and branch retinal vein occlusion, respectively. Twenty-one patients (52.5%) recognized reduced visual acuity due to recurring macular edema. These patients were younger (59.2 +/- 7.6 vs. 64.8 +/- 9.4 years, p = 0.046), had better visual acuity before recurrence of macular edema (0.52 +/- 0.48 vs. 1.02 +/- 0.46, p = 0.002), and exhibited a greater reduction in visual acuity after recurrence of macular edema (0.34 +/- 0.24 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.13, p = 0.003). Only four patients visited the hospital before the scheduled follow-up date, and all of these patients lived relatively close to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: For prompt treatment of recurring macular edema, more intensive education about the self-estimation of visual acuity is necessary, particularly for elderly patients who have relatively poor visual acuity. In addition, a simple and easy way to identify the recurrence of macular edema at the local clinic should be established for patients who live relatively far from the hospital.
Female ; Fluorescein Angiography ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fundus Oculi ; Humans ; Macular Edema/*diagnosis/etiology/physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Patient Readmission ; Recurrence ; Retinal Vein Occlusion/*complications/diagnosis/physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; *Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical features and outcomes of patients referred for management of dropped lens fragments during cataract surgery. METHODS: The medical records of 22 eyes from 22 patients who were referred to our hospital to undergo pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for management of dropped lens fragments after phacoemulsification surgery at private clinics were reviewed. Data including patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, factors associated with dropped lens fragment, and postoperative complications were recorded. The factors were compared between 2 patient groups: postoperative Snellen acuity of 0.5 or better and acuity less than 0.5. The statistical significances of differences in factors between the 2 groups were calculated. RESULTS: The mean interval between cataract surgery and PPV was 2.6 +/- 3.7 days. At the final examination, the mean postoperative acuity was 0.57 +/- 0.20, and 16 eyes (72.7%) had a visual outcome of 0.5 or better. After excluding 7 eyes with other pre-existing ocular co-morbidities, 14 eyes (93.0%) achieved a final visual acuity of 0.5 or better. Multivariate analysis showed that the predictor for visual outcomes of 0.5 or better was absence of preoperative eye disease (p = 0.007). Complications after PPV included 2 (9.0%) cases of cystoid macular edema and 1 (4.5%) case of retinal detachment. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt referral and surgical management within 1 week for dropped lens fragments during cataract surgery may achieve a better visual outcome in cases with no pre-existing eye disease.
Cataract ; Demography ; Eye ; Eye Diseases ; Humans ; Macular Edema ; Medical Records ; Multivariate Analysis ; Phacoemulsification ; Postoperative Complications ; Referral and Consultation ; Retinaldehyde ; Visual Acuity ; Vitrectomy

INTRODUCTIONThis study aims to compare the long-term efficacy of 25-gauge vitrectomy to that of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for the treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

MATERIALS AND METHODSThe medical records of 46 eyes of 46 consecutive patients were reviewed. Twenty-seven eyes underwent 25-gauge vitrectomy (VIT Group) and 19 eyes received 1.25 mg of IVB (IVB Group). The best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) in logarithm of minimum angle resolution units and central macular thicknesses (CMTs) were evaluated before and 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial treatment.

RESULTSThere was no significant difference in the pre-treatment BCVA and CMT between the 2 groups. In the VIT Group, the preoperative BCVA was 0.59 and the CMT was 587.3 μm and the BCVA was 0.35 and the CMT was 286.6 μm, 12 months after the vitrectomy. Both values were significantly (P <0.05) better at 12 months than the preoperative values. In the IVB Group, the average number of IVB was 2.4 during the 1-year period. The BCVA was 0.69 and the CMT was 590.9 μm before the IVB, and the BCVA was 0.36 and the CMT was 360.1 μm, 12 months after the initial IVB. The improvements of these 2 parameters were significant (P <0.05) at 12 months after the initial IVB. The differences in the BCVA and CMT at 12 months between the 2 groups were not significant.

CONCLUSIONThese results suggest that the 25-gauge vitrectomy and IVB have similar effects in improving the BCVA and CMT in eyes with ME secondary to BRVO. However, IVB often required several injections to preserve the improvement.

Aged ; Angiogenesis Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; therapeutic use ; Bevacizumab ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intravitreal Injections ; Macula Lutea ; pathology ; Macular Edema ; etiology ; therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retinal Vein Occlusion ; complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A ; antagonists & inhibitors ; Visual Acuity ; Vitrectomy ; methods