Human ; Primary Health Care ; Review

BACKGROUND

One of the major challenges of the Philippine health system is the shortage of “primary care physicians”. With the passage of the Universal Health Care Law in the Philippines in 2019, there is an increased demand for primary care physicians to improve population-wide access to basic primary care service.

This study was done to determine the factors involved in the inclination of medical students in the National Capital Region (NCR) to become primary care physicians.

A qualitative study, particularly a phenomenological approach, utilizing semi-structured interviews was done in eighteen (18) first to third year medical students in the National Capital Region, Philippines. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

A total of 4 themes were deduced from the individual interviews including: 1) influence of internal motivators, 2) influence of people, education, and extracurricular activities, 3) perceptions of how the Philippine health system sees, treats, and incentivizes primary care physicians, and 4) how the macrosystem positions primary care practice contributes to the inclination to become primary care physicians. The participants emphasized service as a value they uphold in being inclined to be primary care physicians.

An interplay between internal and external factors influenced the inclination of medical students in choosing primary care and further reinforced by their desire to be part of the solution to the problems in the current healthcare system to address the needs of society.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic became a severe public health threat to the Philippines, overwhelming the health system and its healthcare workers. As infections spread globally, it became imperative to understand the infection prevention practices (e.g., face mask-wearing, handwashing, social distancing) to better understand the pandemic and its effects on the healthcare workforce. Objective: The study aims to describe the sociodemographic and medical profile and the COVID-19 infection prevention practices, and the correlation between both among employees of a medical center in the National Capital Region (NCR), Philippines, Methods: The analytic cross-sectional study utilized an online survey administered to employees of a medical center in NCR, Philippines. A total of 112 responses were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze respondents’ sociodemographic and medical characteristics and summarize their COVID-19 infection prevention practices. Spearman’s rank correlation and Pearson’s chi-square tests were performed to determine the association of the respondents’ sociodemographic and medical profiles with their corresponding infection prevention practices. Results: Majority of respondents were between ages 30-50 (52.68%), female (71.43%), with college (83.93%) as their highest educational attainment, single (70.54%), and without comorbidities (66.07%). 76.5% (72/94) of respondents living in multi-person households lived with familial ties, and 59.6% (56/94) of respondents living in a multi-person household lived with at least one member considered a high-risk individual (i.e., a senior citizen with comorbidities). The respondents practiced face mask-wearing (4.92) and respiratory etiquette (4.90) the most, whereas reduction of unnecessary outings (3.81), not drinking alcohol (3.81), and sleeping at least 7 hours per day (3.42) were least practiced. Results showed that only age and having chronic kidney disease correlated with infection prevention practices with a p-value of <0.05, showing that people with chronic kidney disease and those aged 30-50 were more likely to engage in infection prevention practices. Conclusion The study findings provide insight into sociodemographic and medical factors that may contribute to adherence to infection prevention practices among the hospital-based workforce. Recommendations for further research were discussed.
COVID-19 ; Hospitals

Background: Dizziness is a commonly encountered symptom in the primary care which can be caused, most of the time by benign condition and rarely due to serious conditions needing higher level of care. Objective: To develop a clinical guideline and pathway that will serve as guide in the diagnosis and management of adult patients with dizziness in primary care and outpatient setting Methods: A guideline development team was formed which is composed of family and community medicine specialists from different institutions. Searching, selection and assessment of the latest evidence on dizziness diagnosis and management was done using the search terms: “dizziness”, “diagnosis”, “management”, and “primary care”. Formulation of the recommendation was done using Grade approach and graded with modified GRADEPro and expert panel consensus. External review was also done by an expert in otorhinolaryngology. Recommendations: Clinical Assessment •Recommendation1.Askforthepatient’sdescriptionofdizzinessandclassifythepatientintooneofthefourtypes: vertigo, presyncope, disequilibrium, and lightheadedness and classify as acute/episodic or chronic/sustained. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation2.Obtainamedicalhistoryfocusingonthetiming,triggers,associatedsymptoms,riskfactorsfor atherosclerotic vascular disease, and functional status or quality of life. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation3.Performaphysicalexaminationfocusingonvitalsigns,HEENT(includingotoscopy),cardiovascular and neurologic examination. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation4.PerformspecialphysicalexaminationslikeDix-Hallpikemaneuverforacuteepisodictriggeredvertigo to check for BPPV (most common cause of peripheral vertigo), HINTS plus test for spontaneous episodic vertigo to check for stroke and hyperventilation provocation test for patients suspected of anxiety (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation5.Elicitredflagsthatshouldwarrantreferrallikeseveredizzinessandassociated,alteredmentalstatus, loss of consciousness and abnormal vital signs. Other symptoms like chest pain, palpitations, dyspnea, neurologic deficit may warrant referral for evaluation and management. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation6.Forpatientsconsultingviatelemedicine,obtainamedicalhistoryfocusingonthetiming,triggers, associated symptoms, risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease, and functional status or quality of life, and observe and conduct self-physical examination (vital signs, mental status, ocular and facial nerve) (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) Diagnostic •Recommendation7.Laboratorytestingisnotroutinelyrecommendedamongpatientswithdizziness.However,testingmay be requested if there is a need to identify a definite etiology to guide treatment and should be guided by the classification of dizziness, possible etiology, and the medical history and physical examination. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence).Recommendation8.Forpatientswithvertigoandwithauditorysymptoms(i.e.,hearingloss,tinnitusandauralfullness, etc.), pure tone audiometry speech test may be requested if available. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation9.Forpatientswithpresyncope/syncopeandachronicmedicalconditionisbeingconsidered,complete blood count may be requested for those with probable blood dyscrasia, serum blood glucose may be requested for those with diabetes, electrocardiogram and lipid profile may be requested for those with cardiovascular disease. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation10.Forpatientswithdisequilibriumandwithanabnormalneurologicphysicalexaminationfinding,CT scan may be requested. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) Pharmacologic •Recommendation11.Empirictrialofshortcourse(7days)pharmacologictreatmentforsymptomreliefshouldbeoffered. Referral should be considered if the dizziness become more severe or it did not improve in 7 days. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation12.Forpatientswithmildtomoderatevertigo,offerhistamineanalogue(betahistine)orantihistamine (meclizine, diphenhydramine, dimenhydrinate or cinnarizine) for symptom relief. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation13.Forpatientswithmildtomoderatevertigoassociatedwithmigraine(vestibularmigraine),aside from symptom relief, offer any of the triptans as preventive medication. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation14.Forpatientswhosedizzinessisdescribedasdisequilibrium(gaitimbalance)orpresyncope(near faintness) or dizziness with anxiety attack, offer symptomatic treatment and intervention based on the underlying cause or consider referral to appropriate specialist. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) Non-pharmacologic •Recommendation15.Allpatientsshouldbeprovidedwithhealtheducationoncauses,triggersandfollowup.(Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation16.Allpatientsshouldbeadvisedonappropriatedietandlifestylemodification.(StrongRecommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation17.Dependingonthenatureofvertigo,educateandtrainthepatientoncanalrepositioningmaneuver and vestibular rehabilitation. Referral to rehabilitation medicine may be considered. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation18.Thepatient’sfamilymustalsobeprovidedwithhealtheducationandidentifyacaregivertoassist and promote compliance to management. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation19.Encouragecommunity-basedvestibularrehabilitationactivitiessuchasgroupbalancetraining exercise. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) Patient Outcomes •Recommendation20.Thepatientshouldknowthenatureofdizziness,causesandpotentialcomplicationsanddevelop skills in postural exercises. (Strong Recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence) •Recommendation21.Decreaseinfrequencyandseverityshouldexpectedwithin48hoursandresolutionisexpectedwithin a month. (Strong Recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence) •Recommendation22.Improvedqualityoflifeshouldalsobeelicited.(StrongRecommendation,ModerateQualityEvidence) •Recommendation23.Referraltoappropriatespecialtyshouldbedoneifnoresolutionorprogressionofsymptomsor impaired quality of life for more than a month. (Strong Recommendation, Expert Opinion) Implementation The committee shall disseminate the guidelines through presentations and via journal publications. The QA committee shall be in charge of implementation of the guideline and pathway.
Community Health Services ; Dizziness ; Partnership Practice