OBJECTIVES

This study aims to explore the perceptions of UST Occupational Therapy students regarding AI chatbots in the context of school-related activities. It will further focus on their concerns, utility, and perceived effects of AI on learning related to school activities

A qualitative descriptive design will be used and will utilize three focus group discussions, one for each year level (first, second, and third-year students), to gather extensive and accurate accounts of students’ perceptions. Thematic analysis, using manual coding and following Braun and Clarke’s six-phase analytic framework, will be employed for data analysis.

The study is expected to generate themes describing students’ perceived usefulness, concerns, and learning-related impacts of AI, providing insights that may support the responsible and informed integration of AI in occupational therapy education.

Background: Conventional machine learning (ML) models for predicting surgical outcomes have limitations in generalizability. We explored large language models (LLMs) as scalable alternatives to conventional ML models in predicting postoperative outcomes, including in-hospital 30-day mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods: This study utilized the Informative Surgical Patient for Innovative Research Environment (INSPIRE) dataset (n = 80 985) from South Korea for model development and internal validation, and the Medical Informatics Operating Room Vitals and Events Repository (MOVER) dataset (n = 6265) from the United States for external validation. The study compared three different LLMs—Generative Pre-trained Transformer [GPT]-4o, Llama-3-70B, and OpenBioLLM-70B—against MLs using various prompt engineering approaches. LLMs were evaluated with different model parameter quantizations (4-bit normalized floating point vs. 16-bit brain floating point). Results: OpenBioLLM-70B was comparable to eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) across all tasks (in-hospital 30-day mortality: area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.782 [95% CI, 0.748–0.813] vs. 0.791 [95% CI, 0.753–0.825]; ICU admission: AUROC 0.595 [95% CI, 0.581–0.609] vs. 0.594 [95% CI, 0.580–0.608]; AKI: AUROC 0.830 [95% CI, 0.802–0.855] vs. 0.823 [95% CI, 0.792–0.851]) during external validation. Open-source LLMs maintained performance with 4-bit quantization, reducing computational requirements by 75%. Conclusions The findings support the versatility and efficiency of LLMs for clinical decision support through on-premises compatibility, addressing data privacy. Further validation with diverse datasets is needed to ensure their reliability and applicability across different perioperative settings.

BACKGROUND

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on respiratory virus activity in children has been studied globally, but no published study in the Philippines has provided viral profiling and epidemiological data on children during and after the pandemic’s peak.

To identify respiratory pathogens detected using a multiplex RT-PCR assay (BioFire® Respiratory 2.1 Panel) among pediatric patients with respiratory symptoms admitted to St. Luke’s Medical Center–Global City during (March 2020–February 2022) and after (March 2022–March 2023) the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic; to compare the prevalence of these pathogens between the two periods; and to assess the clinico-demographic characteristics, diagnostic test results, and clinical outcomes of patients with single-pathogen infections versus co-infections.

A single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted through a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients with respiratory symptoms tested using a multiplex RT-PCR assay (BioFire® Respiratory 2.1 Panel) at St. Luke’s Medical Center–Global City from March 2020 to March 2023.

Of 739 children, 92.02% were positive for at least one respiratory pathogen, mostly viruses. Rhinovirus/enterovirus (50.59%), RSV (19.71%), and COVID-19 (12.50%) were the most common. COVID-19 and Influenza A were more prevalent during the peak, while rhinovirus/enterovirus and adenovirus were higher post-peak. Most patients were male, aged 1–5 years, and cough (89.99%) was the most common symptom. Normal leukocyte, CRP, and procalcitonin levels were observed in 70.09%, 47.31%, and 68.25%, respectively. No significant differences were noted in diagnostic test results based on pathogen detection. Antibiotics were given to 53.31% of patients, and 99.86% were discharged. The average length of stay was 3.69 days.

The prevalence of respiratory pathogens among children admitted to our institution during and after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic predominantly consisted of viruses, showing statistically significant differences. Rhinovirus/enterovirus and RSV were the leading respiratory pathogens in both periods. The peak group showed a higher prevalence of COVID-19 and Influenza A whereas the post-peak group exhibited a higher prevalence of rhinovirus/enterovirus and adenovirus. Single viral infections were more prevalent compared to co-infections

Purpose: Endosseous titanium dental implants are widely regarded as the gold standard for replacing missing teeth. Despite the proven osseointegration of titanium implants, particularly those with enhanced surface modifications, concerns remain regarding esthetics, the risk of peri-implantitis, and potential hypersensitivity. Consequently, alternative materials, such as zirconia, have received increasing attention in recent years. This study evaluated the osseointegration parameters of zirconia implants placed in the mandibles of beagle dogs, as a preliminary in vivo evaluation of zirconia dental implants in South Korea. Materials and Methods: Seven 8-month-old beagle dogs underwent premolar extraction followed by placement of implants in the healed mandibular ridges. The following implants were used in this study: six turned-surface titanium implants, six rough-surface titanium implants, and six zirconia implants, following which the implants and surrounding tissues were harvested en bloc for histological analyses. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and new bone area (BA) percentages (%) were calculated and compared between the groups. Statistical analyses were conducted using ANOVA, with the significance level set at p < .05. Results: Histological analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in BIC between the rough-surface titanium and zirconia implants, although the turned-surface titanium implants exhibited significantly lower BIC than the other two groups (p < .05). No significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of BA. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that zirconia implants achieve BIC comparable to that of rough-surface titanium implants, suggestive of their potential clinical application.

Smile design has transitioned from traditional analog methods to modern digital techniques. This case report presents a smile design technique using a digital workflow facilitated by an application on smart devices as a reference. This approach enables real-time chairside modifications, incorporating the patient’s preferences. Furthermore, it improves communication among the patient, clinician, and dental technician, providing an efficient solution for prosthetic rehabilitation.

Purpose: Endosseous titanium dental implants are widely regarded as the gold standard for replacing missing teeth. Despite the proven osseointegration of titanium implants, particularly those with enhanced surface modifications, concerns remain regarding esthetics, the risk of peri-implantitis, and potential hypersensitivity. Consequently, alternative materials, such as zirconia, have received increasing attention in recent years. This study evaluated the osseointegration parameters of zirconia implants placed in the mandibles of beagle dogs, as a preliminary in vivo evaluation of zirconia dental implants in South Korea. Materials and Methods: Seven 8-month-old beagle dogs underwent premolar extraction followed by placement of implants in the healed mandibular ridges. The following implants were used in this study: six turned-surface titanium implants, six rough-surface titanium implants, and six zirconia implants, following which the implants and surrounding tissues were harvested en bloc for histological analyses. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and new bone area (BA) percentages (%) were calculated and compared between the groups. Statistical analyses were conducted using ANOVA, with the significance level set at p < .05. Results: Histological analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in BIC between the rough-surface titanium and zirconia implants, although the turned-surface titanium implants exhibited significantly lower BIC than the other two groups (p < .05). No significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of BA. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that zirconia implants achieve BIC comparable to that of rough-surface titanium implants, suggestive of their potential clinical application.

Smile design has transitioned from traditional analog methods to modern digital techniques. This case report presents a smile design technique using a digital workflow facilitated by an application on smart devices as a reference. This approach enables real-time chairside modifications, incorporating the patient’s preferences. Furthermore, it improves communication among the patient, clinician, and dental technician, providing an efficient solution for prosthetic rehabilitation.

Smile design has transitioned from traditional analog methods to modern digital techniques. This case report presents a smile design technique using a digital workflow facilitated by an application on smart devices as a reference. This approach enables real-time chairside modifications, incorporating the patient’s preferences. Furthermore, it improves communication among the patient, clinician, and dental technician, providing an efficient solution for prosthetic rehabilitation.

Smile design has transitioned from traditional analog methods to modern digital techniques. This case report presents a smile design technique using a digital workflow facilitated by an application on smart devices as a reference. This approach enables real-time chairside modifications, incorporating the patient’s preferences. Furthermore, it improves communication among the patient, clinician, and dental technician, providing an efficient solution for prosthetic rehabilitation.

Purpose: Endosseous titanium dental implants are widely regarded as the gold standard for replacing missing teeth. Despite the proven osseointegration of titanium implants, particularly those with enhanced surface modifications, concerns remain regarding esthetics, the risk of peri-implantitis, and potential hypersensitivity. Consequently, alternative materials, such as zirconia, have received increasing attention in recent years. This study evaluated the osseointegration parameters of zirconia implants placed in the mandibles of beagle dogs, as a preliminary in vivo evaluation of zirconia dental implants in South Korea. Materials and Methods: Seven 8-month-old beagle dogs underwent premolar extraction followed by placement of implants in the healed mandibular ridges. The following implants were used in this study: six turned-surface titanium implants, six rough-surface titanium implants, and six zirconia implants, following which the implants and surrounding tissues were harvested en bloc for histological analyses. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and new bone area (BA) percentages (%) were calculated and compared between the groups. Statistical analyses were conducted using ANOVA, with the significance level set at p < .05. Results: Histological analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in BIC between the rough-surface titanium and zirconia implants, although the turned-surface titanium implants exhibited significantly lower BIC than the other two groups (p < .05). No significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of BA. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that zirconia implants achieve BIC comparable to that of rough-surface titanium implants, suggestive of their potential clinical application.