Objective:To compare the efficacy of ultrasound volume navigation (UVN) and that of O-arm navigation in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 29 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral fracture who had been treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation at Department Ⅰ of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery, Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital from January 2022 to June 2023. The patients were assigned into 2 groups according to different navigation methods. In group UVN of 17 cases, there were 14 males and 3 females with a mean age of 50.0 (44.0, 53.5) years, and the pedicle screw fixation was guided by UVN; in group O-arm of 12 cases, there were 10 males and 2 females with an age of (40.6±11.1) years, and the pedicle screw fixation was guided by O-arm navigation. The 2 groups were compared in terms of insertion time per screw, total dose of intraoperative radiation, radiation dose per screw, accuracy of screw placement, rate of facet joint violation, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores for lumbar pain at postoperative 1, 3, and 6 months.Results:There were no statistically significant differences in the preoperative general data between the 2 groups, indicating comparability ( P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the insertion time per screw between group UVN and group O-arm [(13.2±1.3) min versus (14.1±1.3) min] ( P>0.05). The total dose of intraoperative radiation and radiation dose per screw in group UVN [(1.80±0.54) mSv and (0.41±0.10) mSv] were significantly lower than those in group O-arm [(3.52±0.33) mSv and (0.85±0.11) mSv] ( P<0.05). The accuracy of screw placement and rate of facet joint violation in group UVN [94.7% (71/75) and 17.6% (3/17)] were not significantly different from those in group O-arm [92.2% (47/51) and 8.3% (1/12)]] ( P>0.05). The VAS score at postoperative 1 month in group UVN [4.0 (3.5, 5.0) points] was significantly lower than that in group O-arm [5.0 (5.0, 6.0) points] ( P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the VAS pain scores at postoperative 3 and 6 months ( P>0.05). Conclusions:In the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, screw placement guided by UVN is as time-saving, intuitive, and accurate as that guided by O-arm navigation. However, UVN is better than O-arm navigation in radiation avoidance and pain relief.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of ultrasound volume navigation (UVN) and that of O-arm navigation in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 29 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral fracture who had been treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation at Department Ⅰ of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery, Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital from January 2022 to June 2023. The patients were assigned into 2 groups according to different navigation methods. In group UVN of 17 cases, there were 14 males and 3 females with a mean age of 50.0 (44.0, 53.5) years, and the pedicle screw fixation was guided by UVN; in group O-arm of 12 cases, there were 10 males and 2 females with an age of (40.6±11.1) years, and the pedicle screw fixation was guided by O-arm navigation. The 2 groups were compared in terms of insertion time per screw, total dose of intraoperative radiation, radiation dose per screw, accuracy of screw placement, rate of facet joint violation, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores for lumbar pain at postoperative 1, 3, and 6 months.Results:There were no statistically significant differences in the preoperative general data between the 2 groups, indicating comparability ( P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the insertion time per screw between group UVN and group O-arm [(13.2±1.3) min versus (14.1±1.3) min] ( P>0.05). The total dose of intraoperative radiation and radiation dose per screw in group UVN [(1.80±0.54) mSv and (0.41±0.10) mSv] were significantly lower than those in group O-arm [(3.52±0.33) mSv and (0.85±0.11) mSv] ( P<0.05). The accuracy of screw placement and rate of facet joint violation in group UVN [94.7% (71/75) and 17.6% (3/17)] were not significantly different from those in group O-arm [92.2% (47/51) and 8.3% (1/12)]] ( P>0.05). The VAS score at postoperative 1 month in group UVN [4.0 (3.5, 5.0) points] was significantly lower than that in group O-arm [5.0 (5.0, 6.0) points] ( P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the VAS pain scores at postoperative 3 and 6 months ( P>0.05). Conclusions:In the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, screw placement guided by UVN is as time-saving, intuitive, and accurate as that guided by O-arm navigation. However, UVN is better than O-arm navigation in radiation avoidance and pain relief.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of O-arm navigation and ultrasound volume navigation (UVN) in guiding screw placement during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent MIS-TLIF surgery for lumbar disc herniation between June 2022 and June 2023 and met the selection criteria were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to group A (screw placement guided by UVN during MIS-TLIF) or group B (screw placement guided by O-arm navigation during MIS-TLIF), with 30 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in baseline data, including gender, age, body mass index, and surgical segment, between the two groups ( P>0.05). Intraoperative data, including average single screw placement time, total radiation dose, and average single screw effective radiation dose, were recorded and calculated. Postoperatively, X-ray film and CT scans were performed at 10 days to evaluate screw placement accuracy and assess facet joint violation. Pearson correlation and Spearman correlation analyses were used to observe the relationship between the studied parameters (average single screw placement time and screw placement accuracy grading) and BMI. RESULTS: The average single screw placement time in group B was significantly shorter than that in group A, and the total radiation dose of single segment and multi-segment and the average single screw effective radiation dose in group B were significantly higher than those in group A ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total radiation dose between single segment and multiple segments in group B ( P>0.05), while the total radiation dose of multiple segments was significantly higher than that of single segment in group A ( P<0.05). No significant difference was found in the accuracy of screw implantation between the two groups ( P>0.05). In both groups, the grade 1 and grade 2 screws broke through the outer wall of the pedicle, and no screw broke through the inner wall of the pedicle. There was no significant difference in the rate of facet joint violation between the two groups ( P>0.05). In group A, both the average single screw placement time and screw placement accuracy grading were positively correlated with BMI ( r=0.677, P<0.001; r=0.222, P=0.012), while in group B, neither of them was correlated with BMI ( r=0.224, P=0.233; r=0.034, P=0.697). CONCLUSION UVN-guided screw placement in MIS-TLIF surgery demonstrates comparable efficiency, visualization, and accuracy to O-arm navigation, while significantly reducing radiation exposure. However, it may be influenced by factors such as obesity, which poses certain limitations.
Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery* ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Pedicle Screws ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome