Objective To study the consonant articulation performance and speech intelligibility of patients with submucous cleft palate(SMCP)and to provide a reference for clinical speech evaluation and subsequent speech rehabilitation.Methods A total of 333 preoperative SMCP patients aged 4.5 years and older participated in this study.The accuracy,type of error,and error rates were assessed across participant genders and their varying levels of velopharyngeal closure function.Results Among the 333 patients,196 had complete velopharyngeal closure,while 137 had incomplete closure.A total of 145 patients(43.54％)demonstrated normal articulation of all conso-nants,while 188 patients(56.46％)displayed various degrees of articulation disorders.Compensatory articulation behaviors were observed in 66 patients(19.82％).No significant differences in articulation errors were found be-tween male and female patients.The accuracy ranking for consonants was from high to low as follows:nasal sounds,lateral sounds,fricatives,plosives,and affricates.Substitution was the most common error type with an incidence of 35.93％,followed by omission at 34.62％and compensatory errors at 25.51％.The average accuracy rates for plosives,fricatives,affricates,lateral/nasal sounds were 73.27％,78.20％,69.29％,and 93.39％,re-spectively.Substitution was the most common error for plosives and fricatives,while omission was most frequent for affricates.Compensatory errors occurred most often with affricates,and no compensatory errors were found in nasal or lateral sounds.Conclusion Substitution,omission,and compensatory errors are the most common articula-tion errors in SMCP patients,occurring across plosives,fricatives,and affricates.The severity of articulation disor-ders is related to velopharyngeal closure function but is independent of gender.

Objective To study the consonant articulation performance and speech intelligibility of patients with submucous cleft palate(SMCP)and to provide a reference for clinical speech evaluation and subsequent speech rehabilitation.Methods A total of 333 preoperative SMCP patients aged 4.5 years and older participated in this study.The accuracy,type of error,and error rates were assessed across participant genders and their varying levels of velopharyngeal closure function.Results Among the 333 patients,196 had complete velopharyngeal closure,while 137 had incomplete closure.A total of 145 patients(43.54％)demonstrated normal articulation of all conso-nants,while 188 patients(56.46％)displayed various degrees of articulation disorders.Compensatory articulation behaviors were observed in 66 patients(19.82％).No significant differences in articulation errors were found be-tween male and female patients.The accuracy ranking for consonants was from high to low as follows:nasal sounds,lateral sounds,fricatives,plosives,and affricates.Substitution was the most common error type with an incidence of 35.93％,followed by omission at 34.62％and compensatory errors at 25.51％.The average accuracy rates for plosives,fricatives,affricates,lateral/nasal sounds were 73.27％,78.20％,69.29％,and 93.39％,re-spectively.Substitution was the most common error for plosives and fricatives,while omission was most frequent for affricates.Compensatory errors occurred most often with affricates,and no compensatory errors were found in nasal or lateral sounds.Conclusion Substitution,omission,and compensatory errors are the most common articula-tion errors in SMCP patients,occurring across plosives,fricatives,and affricates.The severity of articulation disor-ders is related to velopharyngeal closure function but is independent of gender.

Objective To evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of base dose plan compensation (BDPC) optimization method applied on the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for upper esophageal carcinoma,based on the Eclipse treatment planning system.Methods Nineteen patients were included.For each case initial IMRT plan was generated and further optimized respectively by the two following methods:the BDPC method and hot and cold spot control (HCSC) method.Then the BDPC and HCSC plans were compared concerning planning-target-volume (PTV) coverage,conformity index (CI),and homogeneity index (HI),as well as organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing,planning time,monitor unit (MU) and delivery time.Results Compared with the HCSC plans,the BDPC plans provided superior CI and HI (Z =-3.662,-3.745,P ＜ 0.05),as well as lower D2％ (near-maximum dose) (Z =-3.823,P ＜ 0.05) and comparable D98％ (near-minimum dose) (P ＞ 0.05) for PTV64 (high-risk PTV),and provided superiorCI (Z=-3.340,P＜0.05),lower D95％ and D98％ (Z=-3.582,-2.616,P＜0.05) for PTV54 (low-risk PTV).The BDPC plans also provided slightly lower doses to the spinal cord and lung compared with the HCSC plans (Z =-3.625--3.369,P ＜ 0.05).Moreover,the planning time [(26.05 ±0.88) min] for BDPC plans was less than that of the HCSC plans [(33.73 ± 3.24) min] (Z =-3.823,P ＜0.05).The MU of the BDPC plans (1 019 ± 167) was higher than that of the HCSC plans (1 003 ±159) (Z=-2.616,P＜0.05),while the delivery time [(3.52 ±0.29) min] was more than that of the HCSC plans [(3.50±0.28) min] (Z=-2.548,P＜0.05).Conclusions The BDPC optimization method can significantly improve target dose homogeneity and conformity with effective reduction of the dose to OARs for upper esophageal carcinoma.Moreover,it is simple and can improve the treatment planning efficiency.