Maxillary expansion serves as the principal treatment for maxillary transverse deficiency in clinical practice. Simulating maxillary expansion in animals is the main research approach to assess its mechanism, effect, and stability. Thus, the animal model of maxillary expansion holds great significance in orthodontic research. Rats and rabbits are typically selected for common animal models because the maintenance cost is relatively low; however, their oral anatomy and masticatory behaviors differ significantly from those of humans, and their bone metabolism rates are substantially higher. Consequently, these factors should be carefully considered when extrapolating research findings and applying them to human clinical applications. Miniature pigs and dogs exhibit maxillofacial structures and chewing patterns that closely resemble those of humans; however, their broader application in research is constrained by high maintenance costs and ethical concerns. Rats with small oral space typically require the use of an elastic stainless steel wire expansion appliance, which can be divided into anterior maxillary expansion and posterior maxillary expansion. Rabbits, miniature pigs, and dogs have sufficient oral space and can be fitted with a variety of expansion appliances, including traditional tooth-borne expansion, microimplant-assisted expansion, and new magnetic expansion appliance. Animal models of maxillary expansion are currently used to study the mechanism of mechanically induced bone remodeling in order to provide potential therapeutic targets to promote bone remodeling in clinical orthodontic treatment; different orthodontic devices have been compared and evaluated to verify the correction effect of a new type of orthodontic device and provide experimental evidence for its clinical application; and supplementary methods of maxillary expansion have been screened to explore drug and physical therapy to accelerate the osteogenesis of the palatal suture, so as to shorten the retention time of clinical maxillary expansion and provide patients with more efficient and comfortable treatment. This paper summerized advances in animal models of maxillary expansion and the application effects in order to provide a reference for using an animal model of maxillary expansion.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Humans ; Consensus ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy* ; Neuroendocrine Tumors/therapy*