OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the channel-assisted minimally invasive repair (CAMIR) technique combined with flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfer in the treatment of Achilles tendon sleeve avulsion. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 17 patients with Achilles tendon sleeve avulsion who underwent CAMIR technique combined with FHL transfer between January 2019 and January 2023. The cohort comprised 13 males and 4 females, aged 32 to 65 years (mean, 49.7 years). Etiologies included sports-related injuries in 15 cases and blunt trauma in 2 cases. The interval from injury to surgery ranged from 4 to 368 days (median, 15 days). All patients exhibited calcification at the Achilles tendon insertion site, with 7 cases complicated by Haglund deformity. Postoperative complications were meticulously monitored, and tendon healing was assessed via MRI. Clinical outcome were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, Tegner activity level rating scale, ankle activity score (AAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score, and subjective clinical scoring systems preoperatively and at last follow-up. RESULTS: The operation time was 50-62 minutes (mean, 56 minutes), and the intraoperative blood loss was 5-50 mL (mean, 19.7 mL). All patients were followed up 12-67 months (mean, 38 months). No postoperative complication, such as Achilles tendon re-rupture, incision infection, deep vein thrombosis, heel raise insufficiency, or sural nerve injury, was observed. At last follow-up, MRI examination confirmed satisfactory tendon healing in all cases. Significant improvements were noted in VAS scores, Tegner activity level rating scale, AAS scores, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores, and VISA-A scores compared to preoperative ones ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, the subjective clinical score ranged from 6 to 10 (median, 9). CONCLUSION The CAMIR technique combined with FHL tendon transfer is a good treatment for repair of Achilles tendon sleeve avulsion, with good recovery of ankle function and few complications.
Humans ; Achilles Tendon/diagnostic imaging* ; Middle Aged ; Male ; Female ; Tendon Transfer/methods* ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Adult ; Retrospective Studies ; Aged ; Treatment Outcome ; Tendon Injuries/surgery*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the positional relationship between protective channel and sural nerve while treating acute Achilles tendon rupture with channel assisted minimally invasive repair (CAMIR) technique based on anatomical observations of cadaver specimens. METHODS: Twelve adult cadaveric lower limb specimens (6 left, 6 right) were utilized. A CAMIR device was implanted at a distance of 4 cm from the proximal end of the specimen to the Achilles tendon insertion. The skin was incised along the tendon's medial side, the sural nerve was dissected, and the positional relationship with the protective channel was observed. The distance from the sural nerve-Achilles tendon intersection to the calcaneal insertion, the vertical distance between protective channel and the calcaneal insertion, and the horizontal distance between the sural nerve and protective channel were measured by using vernier caliper. RESULTS: Anatomical examination demonstrated a variable positional relationship between the sural nerve and protective channel, with the sural nerve positioned above (8 specimens) or below (4 specimens) the protective channel. The distance from the sural nerve-Achilles tendon intersection to the calcaneal insertion was (105.67±14.94) mm, the vertical distance between protective channel and the calcaneal insertion was (93.20±9.57) mm, and the horizontal distance between the sural nerve and protective channel was (0.31±0.14) mm. CONCLUSION The use of CAMIR technique for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture can effectively avoid iatrogenic injury to the sural nerve.
Humans ; Achilles Tendon/injuries* ; Sural Nerve/anatomy & histology* ; Cadaver ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Tendon Injuries/surgery* ; Rupture/surgery* ; Adult ; Male ; Calcaneus/injuries* ; Female ; Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods*

OBJECTIVE: To explore the difference in effectiveness between a dynamic rehabilitation protocol and a traditional static rehabilitation protocol after the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture with channel assisted minimally invasive repair (CAMIR) technique through a prospective comparative trial, aiming to provide a reference for clinically selecting a feasible treatment regimen. METHODS: Patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture admitted between June 2021 and June 2022 were included in the study, with 60 patients meeting the selection criteria. They were randomly divided into a dynamic rehabilitation group ( n=30) and a static rehabilitation group ( n=30) using a computer-generated random number method. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, smoking history, injured side, cause of injury, and disease duration between the two groups ( P>0.05). After Achilles tendon anastomosis by using CAMIR technique, the dynamic rehabilitation group implemented early partial weight-bearing training with the assistance of an Achilles heel boot and controlled ankle joint exercises for 6 weeks, while the static rehabilitation group maintained a non-weight-bearing status during this period. Complications in both groups were recorded. At 3 and 6 months after operation, the Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) was used to evaluate the degree of functional limitation of the Achilles tendon in the affected limb, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12 scale) was used to assess the patients' quality of life, including physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. RESULTS: No sural nerve injury occurred during operation in both groups. All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14 months). The dynamic rehabilitation group had significantly higher ATRS scores at 3 and 6 months after operation compared to the static rehabilitation group ( P<0.05). At 3 months after operation, the dynamic rehabilitation group had significantly lower PCS, MCS, and SF-12 total scores compared to the static rehabilitation group ( P<0.05). At 6 months, all quality of life scores in the two groups were similar ( P>0.05). Two cases (6.6%) in the dynamic rehabilitation group and 5 cases (16.7%) in the static rehabilitation group developed complications, with no significant difference in incidence of complications ( P>0.05). CONCLUSION For acute Achilles tendon rupture, the dynamic rehabilitation protocol after Achilles tendon anastomosis by using CAMIR technique can improve early functional recovery and maintains comparable safety and effectiveness compared to static rehabilitation.
Humans ; Achilles Tendon/surgery* ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Rupture/surgery* ; Female ; Male ; Tendon Injuries/rehabilitation* ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Anastomosis, Surgical/methods* ; Recovery of Function ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods*