1.Predictive value of serum circRNA CDYL and circRNA ACAP2 expression levels for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Xiaoliang GUO ; Yu YUAN ; Junyan LI ; Chang'en DUAN ; ZHEN LIU ; Linglong MENG ; Hui LIU
Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice 2025;29(5):76-81
Objective To investigate the predictive value of serum circular RNA(circRNA)CDYL and circRNA ACAP2 expression levels for major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)in pa-tients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods A total of 98 AMI patients were enrolled into the observation group,and divided into MACE group(n=45)and no-MACE group(n=53)based on whether they experienced MACE.Another 98 healthy individuals who underwent physical ex-amination during the same period were selected as the control group.The expression levels of serum cir-cRNA CDYL and circRNA ACAP2 were compared among groups.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing the occurrence of MACE in AMI patients.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive value of serum circRNA CDYL and circRNA ACAP2 levels for MACE in AMI patients.Results The serum circRNA CDYL level in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group,while the circRNA ACAP2 level was significantly higher(P<0.05).The circRNA CDYL level in the MACE group was significantly lower,and the circRNA ACAP2 level was significantly higher than that in the no-MACE group(P<0.05).Heart rate and circRNA ACAP2 were identified as independent risk factors for MACE in AMI patients,whereas circRNA CDYL served as independent protective factor(P<0.05).The area under the ROC curve(AUC)for predicting MACE in AMI patients using se-rum circRNA CDYL,circRNA ACAP2 and their combination were 0.814,0.821 and 0.921,re-spectively.The sensitivity and specificity of combined prediction using serum circRNA CDYL and circRNA ACAP2 were 91.11%and 79.25%,respectively.The combined prediction efficacy of serum circRNA CDYL and circRNA ACAP2 was superior to their individual prediction(Zcombined-circRNA CDYL=1.975,Zcombined-circRNAACAP2=2.064,P=0.048,0.039).Conclusion Serum circRNA CDYL lev-el is down-regulated and circRNA ACAP2 level is up-regulated in AMI patients,and circRNA ACAP2 is an independent risk factor for MACE,while circRNA CDYL is a independent protective factor.The combined value of circRNA CDYL and circRNA ACAP2 in predicting the occurrence of MACE is higher.
2.Long-term effect of primary combined tissue transplantation on hand reconstruction.
Yongming GUO ; Yunsheng TENG ; Linglong ZHAO ; Zhao ZHANG ; Meng WU
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2002;5(5):271-274
OBJECTIVETo analyze the long-term effect of primary combined tissue transplantation on hand reconstruction.
METHODSThe data of 8 kinds of combined tissue transplantations employed to reconstruct the severely injured hands of 26 patients over the past 2 to 11 years were studied retrospectively. Among them, combined tissue transplantation taking the anterior-lateral femoral flap as the main tissue unit was applied in 21 cases and taking the second toe as the main tissue unit was applied in 5 cases. Blood vessel anastomosis was performed in parallel in 16 cases, series in 6 cases and both in 4 cases.
RESULTSAmong the 60 free tissue units employed on 26 patients, 58 survived completely and the other 2 survived after dressing change because of postoperative partial necrosis. The patients were followed up for 2-11 years postoperatively, with an average of 3.5 years. According to the standard for function of reconstructed hands by Chinese Medical Association, excellent results were obtained in 10 cases, good in 12 cases, fair in 3 cases and bad in 1 case.
CONCLUSIONSPrimary combined tissue transplantation, which may preserve the tissue vitality of injured hands to the maximum and thus facilitate function restoration of the hands, is a promising method in reconstructing severely-injured hands.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Female ; Hand Injuries ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Surgical Flaps ; Treatment Outcome

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail