1.Decision aids for lung cancer screening: a scoping review
Lingjia CUI ; Feng LIU ; Huiying YUE ; Yuting HAO ; Tingyuan HAN ; Yan LIN ; Yanli XIU ; Ying LIN
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing 2025;31(24):3355-3360
Objective:To conduct a scoping review of studies on decision aids for lung cancer screening and provide a reference for the development of such tools in China.Methods:In accordance with the methodology of scoping reviews, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and VIP from inception to November 1, 2024. The included literature was summarized and analyzed.Results:A total of 18 studies were included. The decision aids for lung cancer screening mainly addressed elements such as information support and guidance, analysis of pros and cons related to screening decisions, clarification of values and preferences, and communication support during decision-making. Outcome indicators included cognitive and behavioral aspects, values and preferences, decision outcomes, acceptability and feasibility of the tools. The application effects showed improvements in participants' knowledge about lung cancer screening, screening behaviors, reduced decisional conflict and regret, and increased satisfaction with decision-making. Participants showed a high level of acceptance of these tools.Conclusions:Current research on lung cancer screening decision aids is predominantly conducted in other countries and demonstrates positive effects. In the future, China can draw on these experiences to develop decision aids suitable for the Chinese population, with the aim of reducing decisional conflict and improving decision quality.
2.Decision aids for lung cancer screening: a scoping review
Lingjia CUI ; Feng LIU ; Huiying YUE ; Yuting HAO ; Tingyuan HAN ; Yan LIN ; Yanli XIU ; Ying LIN
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing 2025;31(24):3355-3360
Objective:To conduct a scoping review of studies on decision aids for lung cancer screening and provide a reference for the development of such tools in China.Methods:In accordance with the methodology of scoping reviews, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and VIP from inception to November 1, 2024. The included literature was summarized and analyzed.Results:A total of 18 studies were included. The decision aids for lung cancer screening mainly addressed elements such as information support and guidance, analysis of pros and cons related to screening decisions, clarification of values and preferences, and communication support during decision-making. Outcome indicators included cognitive and behavioral aspects, values and preferences, decision outcomes, acceptability and feasibility of the tools. The application effects showed improvements in participants' knowledge about lung cancer screening, screening behaviors, reduced decisional conflict and regret, and increased satisfaction with decision-making. Participants showed a high level of acceptance of these tools.Conclusions:Current research on lung cancer screening decision aids is predominantly conducted in other countries and demonstrates positive effects. In the future, China can draw on these experiences to develop decision aids suitable for the Chinese population, with the aim of reducing decisional conflict and improving decision quality.
3.Investigation of human brucellosis diagnosis and report quality in medical institutions in key areas of Shanxi province
Lingjia ZENG ; Wenwen YANG ; Ping TIE ; Xinrong LIU ; Xiurong GAO ; Zhenyu LI ; Ping HOU ; Yin ZHI ; Yongfei BAI ; Mengjie GENG ; Qiulan CHEN ; Buyun CUI ; Zhongjie LI ; Liping WANG
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2017;38(11):1480-1483
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of human brucellosis diagnosis and reporting in medical institutions in Shanxi province, and understand the performance of clinical doctors to diagnose human brucellosis according to diagnostic criteria. Methods Field investigation was conducted in 6 medical institutions in the key areas of human brucellosis in Shanxi province. The diagnosis data of the reported brucellosis cases in 2015 were collected and reviewed retrospectively for the evaluation of the diagnosis accuracy with systematic sampling method. The database was established with Excel 2010 and the descriptive analysis and statistical test were conducted with software R 3.3.2. Results The diagnosis consistent rate of the 377 brucellosis cases reviewed was 70.8% (267/377), the diagnosis consistent rates in medical institutions at city-level and country-level were 77.0%(127/165) and 66.0%(140/212) respectively, the differences had significance (χ2=5.4, P=0.02). Among the reviewed cases, the diagnosis consistent rate of laboratory diagnosis and clinical diagnosis were 87.1%(256/294) and 13.3%(11/83) respectively, and the differences had significance (χ2=170.7, P<0.001) . Among the 21 investigated clinical doctors, the numbers of the doctors who correctly diagnosed the suspected cases, probable cases and lab-confirmed cases were only 3, 0 and 8 respectively. All of the clinical doctors knew that it is necessary to report the brucellosis cases within 24 hours after diagnosis. Conclusion The accuracy of human brucellosis diagnosis in key areas of human brucellosis in Shanxi was low, and the performance of the clinical doctors to diagnose human brucellosis according to diagnostic and case classification criteria was unsatisfied.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail