Objective:To evaluate the effects of different doses of sufentanil on the pupillary dilation reflex (PDR) during induction of general anesthesia.Methods:In this randomized controlled study, 124 patients of either sex, aged 18-64 yr, with a body mass index of 18-30 kg/m 2, of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ or Ⅱ, undergoing surgery with general anesthesia, were divided into 4 groups ( n=31 each) using a random number table method: control group (group C) and different doses of sufentanil groups (S1-S3 groups). Sufentanil 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 μg/kg were intravenously injected in S1-S3 groups, respectively, and the equal volume of normal saline was injected instead in group C. Tetanic stimulation (50 mA, 50 Hz, 5 s) was applied at 5 min after injection of sufentanil. Pupil diameter was measured and the pupillary dilation value and dilation rate were calculated upon entering the operating room while awake, after loss of consciousness, 5 min after intravenous injection of sufentanil, and at maximal pupil diameter after tetanic stimulation. The presence or absence of PDR, PDR latency and PDR duration were also recorded. Results:The pupillary dilation values and dilation rates decreased progressively from group C through groups S1 to S3 ( P<0.05). Compared to group C, the disappearance rate of PDR was significantly increased, and the latency of PDR was prolonged in groups S2 and S3, and the duration of PDR was significantly shortened in groups S1-S3 ( P<0.05). Compared to group S1, the disappearance rate of PDR was significantly increased, and the latency of PDR was prolonged in S2 and S3 groups ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The inhibitory effect of sufentanil on the PDR during induction of general anesthesia is dose-dependent.

Objective:To evaluate the effects of different doses of sufentanil on the pupillary dilation reflex (PDR) during induction of general anesthesia.Methods:In this randomized controlled study, 124 patients of either sex, aged 18-64 yr, with a body mass index of 18-30 kg/m 2, of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ or Ⅱ, undergoing surgery with general anesthesia, were divided into 4 groups ( n=31 each) using a random number table method: control group (group C) and different doses of sufentanil groups (S1-S3 groups). Sufentanil 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 μg/kg were intravenously injected in S1-S3 groups, respectively, and the equal volume of normal saline was injected instead in group C. Tetanic stimulation (50 mA, 50 Hz, 5 s) was applied at 5 min after injection of sufentanil. Pupil diameter was measured and the pupillary dilation value and dilation rate were calculated upon entering the operating room while awake, after loss of consciousness, 5 min after intravenous injection of sufentanil, and at maximal pupil diameter after tetanic stimulation. The presence or absence of PDR, PDR latency and PDR duration were also recorded. Results:The pupillary dilation values and dilation rates decreased progressively from group C through groups S1 to S3 ( P<0.05). Compared to group C, the disappearance rate of PDR was significantly increased, and the latency of PDR was prolonged in groups S2 and S3, and the duration of PDR was significantly shortened in groups S1-S3 ( P<0.05). Compared to group S1, the disappearance rate of PDR was significantly increased, and the latency of PDR was prolonged in S2 and S3 groups ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The inhibitory effect of sufentanil on the PDR during induction of general anesthesia is dose-dependent.

Objective:To evaluate the effect of propofol and remifentanil in different target-controlled infusion(TCI) sequences on hypotension during induction of general anesthesia in hypertensive patients.Methods:A total of 132 patients with hypertension of both sexes, aged 50-75 yr, of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classificationⅡ or Ⅲ, with body mass index of 18-30 kg/m 2, scheduled for elective tracheal intubation under general anesthesia, were divided into 3 groups( n=44 each) using a random number table method: group C, PR group and RP group. In group C, propofol(target effect-site concentration 5 μg/ml) and remifentanil(target effect-site concentration 5 ng/ml) were simultaneously given by TCI. Propofol was given by TCI followed by TCI of remifentanil in PR group. Remifentanil was given by TCI followed by TCI of propofol in RP group. The development of hypotension was observed within 10 min after induction of general anesthesia, and the consumption of propofol, remifentanil and ephedrine, time of loss of consciousness, time of tracheal intubation and adverse reactions during the perioperative period were recorded. Results:Compared with group C, the incidence of hypotension during induction was significantly decreased, the consumption of propofol and ephedrine was decreased, and the BIS value was increased when consciousness disappeared, the time of loss of consciousness and time of tracheal intubation were prolonged, the BIS value was increased at loss of consciousness in PR group, and the consumption of ephedrine was significantly decreased, and the time of loss of consciousness and time of tracheal intubation were prolonged in RP group( P<0.05). Compared with PR group, the consumption of ephedrine was significantly decreased, and the time of loss of consciousness was prolonged in RP group( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of responses to tracheal intubation, injection pain, bucking, inhibition ratio, postoperative delirium, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and intraoperative awareness during induction among the three groups( P>0.05). Conclusions:TCI of remifentanil followed by TCI of propofol can decrease the development of hypotension during induction of general anesthesia in hypertensive patients.