Objective To explore the differences in stress distribution and stability of the planta pedis in the patients with unilateral and bilateral plantar fasciitis(PF)through plantar stress and center of pressure(COP)analysis.Methods A total of 100 patients with PF visiting in this hospital were enrolled,among them 50 cases were unilateral heel pain(unilateral heel pain group)and 50 cases were bilateral heel pain(bilateral heel pain).Meanwhile,50 healthy subjects were included(healthy group).In the health group and bilateral heel pain groups,the average stress value of both planta pedis surfaces of each subject was taken and named as the J0 group and H2 group,respectively.In the unilateral heel pain group,the plantar stress in 50 healthy feet and 50 affected feet were named as the J1 group and H1 group,respectively.The plantar pedis was divided into 10 regions for analysis and comparison[the first foot toe(T1),T2-5,the first-fifth metatarsal bones(M1-M5),the mid foot(MF),heel medial side(MH),heel lateral side(LH)].The subjects in 3 groups conducted the static and dynamic tests respectively,and the differences in plantar stress distribution and COP parameters among the J1,H1,H2 and J0 groups were compared respectively.Results In the static tests,the maximum pressure of the LH regions in the group J1 was increased when compared with the group J0,the contact area of LH regions in the group H1 was reduced when compared with the group J0,the maximum pressure of the M2 and M3 regions in the H1 group was increased when compared with the group J0,the contact areas of the MH and LH regions in the H2 group were decreased when compared with the group J0,the maximum pressure of the M1 region was increased when compared with the group J0,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).In the dynamic tests,the maximum pressure of the T2-5 regions in the J1 group was increased when compared with the J0 group,the maximum pressure of the M3 region in the group H1 was increased when compared with the group J0,the maximum pressure of the M3 and M4 region in the group H2 was in-creased when compared with the group J0,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The COP 95%confidence ellipse area in the health group was the smallest,followed by the bilateral heel pain group,and finally the unilateral heel pain group,and the differences among 3 groups were statistically signifi-cant(P<0.05),there was also statistically significant difference between pairwise comparisons in 3 groups(P<0.05).Conclusion In the static condition,the pressure of the healthy heel and affected forefoot in the patients with PF is increased;while in the dynamic condition,the pressure of the toes of the healthy foot and forefoot of the affected foot in the patients with PF is also increased.The distribution of plantar stress in the patients with PF has larger difference compared with the healthy population,and the stability is poor.Meas-ures can be taken to improve the abnormal force on the foot,reduce pain and reduce the risk of falling.

Objective To investigate the biomechanical differences in plantar pressure,postural stability,and plantar Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)scores between normal feet and unilateral/bilat-eral pes cavus,reveal their unique neuromechanical compensation mechanisms,and construct a sta-bility early warning model based on the minimum center of pressure(COP)trajectory classification.Methods A total of 70 patients with pes cavus from December 2023 to October 2024 were selected as study subjects,including 33 patients in the unilateral pes cavus group and 37 patients in the bilat-eral pes cavus group.During the same period,32 normal feet were included as normal foot group.A flat-panel plantar pressure testing system was used to collect dynamic plantar pressure data and COP trajectories from three groups at a self-selected walking speed.There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data such as age,gender,and body mass index among the three groups(P＞0.05).One-way analysis of variance and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to compare the differences in maximum pressure,contact area,VAS scores,and the 95％confidence ellipse area of the COP among the three groups in 10 plantar regions.Results Patients with pes cavus exhibited lower peak pressure in the MF region compared to normal feet,while higher peak pressure in the M2,M3,and MH regions.Patients with bilateral pes cavus showed lower peak pressure in the T1 region compared to normal feet,and patients with unilateral pes cavus had lower peak pressure in the LH region compared to the normal group(P＜0.05).The plantar contact area in patients with pes cavus was reduced in the T1,M2,M3,M4,MF,and MH regions compared to normal feet(P＜0.05).The 95％confidence ellipse area of the COP was larger in both the bilateral and uni-lateral pes cavus groups compared to the normal foot group(P＜0.001).Unilateral pes cavus pres-ented a specific lateral COP drift(amplitude of 3 to 4 cm),which is a biomechanical manifestation of compensatory eversion of the unaffected foot.Patients with bilateral pes cavus exhibited a"bimod-al oscillation"trajectory(amplitude of 6 to 8 cm),suggesting possible vestibular-spinal regulatory dysfunction and the poorest postural stability.In the pes cavus group,there was a significant in-crease in pressure in the M2,M3,and MH regions,with peak pressures exceeding 190 kPa in pa-tients with bilateral pes cavus,which was highly correlated with plantar pain and could serve as a pain early warning threshold.Conclusion Unilateral and bilateral pes cavus exhibit significantly different neuromechanical compensation patterns.The classification based on the"lateral drift"and"bimodal oscillation"characteristics of the COP trajectory can serve as a stability early warning indi-cator for assessing fall risk.Decompression interventions targeting the key pressure regions of M2,M3,and MH(such as customized orthotic insoles)are the core strategies for alleviating pain and optimizing dynamic gait stability.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to investigate the early postoperative analgesic effectiveness of using liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: Between January 2024 and July 2024, a total of 80 patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) who met the selection criteria were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the LB group or the "cocktail" group in a 1∶1 ratio using a random number table, with 40 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics, including gender, age, body mass index, operated side, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and knee joint range of motion, showed no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). Both groups received LIA and comprehensive pain management. The surgical duration, incision length, pain-related indicators [resting and activity visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, total dosage of oral morphine, WOMAC scores], knee joint range of motion, first ambulation time after operation, length of hospital stay, and postoperative adverse events. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in surgical duration, incision length, first ambulation time after operation, length of hospital stay, total dosage of oral morphine, and pre-discharge satisfaction with surgery and WOMAC scores ( P>0.05). At 4, 12, and 24 hours after operation, the resting and activity VAS scores in the "cocktail" group were lower than those in the LB group; at 60 and 72 hours postoperatively, the resting VAS scores in the LB group were lower than those in the "cocktail" group, with the activity VAS scores also being lower at 60 hours; all showing significant differences ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups at other time points ( P>0.05). On the second postoperative day, the sleep scores of the LB group were significantly higher than those of the "cocktail" group ( P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in sleep scores on the day of surgery and the first postoperative day ( P>0.05). Additionally, the incidence of complications showed no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). CONCLUSION The use of LB for LIA in UKA can provide prolonged postoperative pain relief; however, it does not demonstrate a significant advantage over the "cocktail" method in terms of short-term analgesic effects or reducing opioid consumption and early functional recovery after UKA. Nevertheless, LB may help reduce postoperative sleep disturbances, making it a recommended option for UKA patients with cardiovascular diseases and insomnia or other mental health issues.
Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Anesthesia, Local/methods* ; Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods* ; Bupivacaine/administration & dosage* ; Liposomes ; Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery* ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control* ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome