Purpose: The risk stratification of pediatric anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) has not been standardized. In this study, new risk factors were included to establish a new risk stratification system for ALCL, and its feasibility in clinical practice was explored. Materials and Methods: On the basis of the non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma Berlin–Frankfurt–Munster 95 (NHL-BFM-95) protocol, patients with minimal disseminated disease (MDD), high-risk tumor site (multiple bone, skin, liver, and lung involvement), and small cell/lymphohistiocytic (SC/LH) pathological subtype were enrolled in risk stratification. Patients were treated with a modified NHL-BFM-95 protocol combined with an anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor or vinblastine (VBL). Results: A total of 136 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 8.8 years. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival of the entire cohort were 77.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.0% to 83.9%) and 92.3% (95% CI, 86.1% to 95.8%), respectively. The 3-year EFS rates of low-risk group (R1), intermediate-risk group (R2), and high-risk group (R3) patients were 100%, 89.5% (95% CI, 76.5% to 95.5%), and 67.9% (95% CI, 55.4% to 77.6%), respectively. The prognosis of patients with MDD (+), stage IV cancer, SC/LH lymphoma, and high-risk sites was poor, and the 3-year EFS rates were 45.3% (95% CI, 68.6% to 19.0%), 65.7% (95% CI, 47.6% to 78.9%), 55.7% (95% CI, 26.2% to 77.5%), and 70.7% (95% CI, 48.6% to 84.6%), respectively. At the end of follow-up, one of the five patients who received maintenance therapy with VBL relapsed, and seven patients receiving anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor maintenance therapy did not experience relapse. Conclusion This study has confirmed the poor prognostic of MDD (+), high-risk site and SC/LH, but patients with SC/LH lymphoma and MDD (+) at diagnosis still need to receive better treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03971305).

Objective:To analyze the relationship among self-efficacy, family support and diabetes self-management behavior in rural patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and to explore the mediating role of self-efficacy between self-management behavior and family support in rural patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods:From June to July 2023, Jingde county in southern Anhui, Jinzhai county in central Anhui, and Mengcheng county in northern Anhui were selected by multistage stratified cluster random sampling method as investigation sites. A total of 258 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were investigated by face-to-face survey. The questionnaire included general situation survey from, the summary of diabetes self-care activities measure, the self-efficacy for diabetes and diabetes family behavior checklist. SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 26.0 softwares were used for descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, common method bias test and mediation analysis.Results:The self-management behavior score of rural patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was(2.15±0.96).The self-efficacy score was(28.50±7.02).The family support score was(29.37±9.45).Self-efficacy and family support were positively correlated with self-management behavior( r=0.390, 0.333, both P<0.01), and family support was positively correlated with self-efficacy( r=0.511, P<0.01). Self-efficacy played a partial mediating role between self-management behavior and family support in rural patients with type 2 diabetes, and the mediating effect accounted for 45.2%(0.147/0.325) of the total effect. Conclusion:Family support not only has direct influence on self-management behavior of rural patients with diabetes mellitus, but also has indirect influence on self-management behavior by improving self-efficacy.

Objective:To analyze the relationship among self-efficacy, family support and diabetes self-management behavior in rural patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and to explore the mediating role of self-efficacy between self-management behavior and family support in rural patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods:From June to July 2023, Jingde county in southern Anhui, Jinzhai county in central Anhui, and Mengcheng county in northern Anhui were selected by multistage stratified cluster random sampling method as investigation sites. A total of 258 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were investigated by face-to-face survey. The questionnaire included general situation survey from, the summary of diabetes self-care activities measure, the self-efficacy for diabetes and diabetes family behavior checklist. SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 26.0 softwares were used for descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, common method bias test and mediation analysis.Results:The self-management behavior score of rural patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was(2.15±0.96).The self-efficacy score was(28.50±7.02).The family support score was(29.37±9.45).Self-efficacy and family support were positively correlated with self-management behavior( r=0.390, 0.333, both P<0.01), and family support was positively correlated with self-efficacy( r=0.511, P<0.01). Self-efficacy played a partial mediating role between self-management behavior and family support in rural patients with type 2 diabetes, and the mediating effect accounted for 45.2%(0.147/0.325) of the total effect. Conclusion:Family support not only has direct influence on self-management behavior of rural patients with diabetes mellitus, but also has indirect influence on self-management behavior by improving self-efficacy.